Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:17:51.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The International Law Regime for Air Carrier Liability and Surface Damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Brian F. Havel
Affiliation:
DePaul University School of Law
Gabriel S. Sanchez
Affiliation:
DePaul University School of Law
Get access

Summary

A Hybridized Structure

In the first four chapters we discussed the principal components of the public dimension of international aviation law, namely, the Chicago Convention and the bilateral system of cross-border trade in air services. In the previous two chapters we considered other significant issues of public law, including safety and security and evolving regimes to control aircraft carbon emissions and noise pollution. This chapter turns primarily to the private transnational legal rules governing air carrier liability for injury or damages to passengers and cargo on international flights as well as to the fairly rudimentary provisions that international law provides to compensate passengers and shippers for delay. The system of international air carrier liability is an unusual hybrid of public international law and private transnational law: the primary rules are set forth in international treaties (public international law) and in some agreements that are not, strictly speaking, treaties. But all disputes that arise under these various public international law instruments concerning the scope of the rules and liability for damages are adjudicated in the domestic court systems of the contracting States rather than by international judicial bodies. As we will see in the next and final chapter of the book, in modern international aviation law, only the Cape Town Convention (as it relates to ownership interests in aircraft) has a comparable hybridized structure that straddles both the public and private dimensions of international law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, opened for signature Oct. 12, 1929, 137 L.N.T.S. 11, 49 Stat. 3000 (entered into force Feb. 13, 1933) [hereinafter Warsaw Convention]
Pogust, Glenn, Note, The Warsaw Convention – Does it Create a Cause of Action?, 47 Fordham L. Rev.366 (1978).Google Scholar
Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, opened for signature May 28, 1999, 2242 U.N.T.S. 350 (entered into force Nov. 4, 2003) [hereinafter Montreal Convention]
Poole, Robert W., Toward Safer Skies, in Instead of Regulation: Alternatives to Federal Regulation207 (Poole, Robert W. ed., 1982)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ethica Nicomachea 1132a25 (Bywater, L. ed., Oxford Univ. Press (1920))Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A., A Theory of Strict Liability: Toward a Reformation of Tort Law (1980)
Epstein, ’s latest restatement of his views on strict liability, see Toward a General Theory of Tort Law: Strict Liability in Context, J. Tort L., Vol. 3, No. 1 (2010)Google Scholar
Cleveland, Paul A. and Tucker, Thomas L., Privatizing Airline Safety and Security, Ideas on Liberty, Nov. 2002, at 6–9Google Scholar
Degan, V. D., Sources of International Law 489 (1997)
Kaczorowski, Robert J., The Common-Law Background of Nineteenth-Century Tort Law, 51 Ohio St. L. J.1127, 1129–69 (1990)Google Scholar
Kyser, Kevin, Tarnished But Still Valuable: A History and Present State of the Gold Franc, 16 SUM Currents: Int’l Trade L.82, 84–89 (2007)Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Allan I., The Value of the Poincaré Gold Franc in Limitation of Liability Conventions, 5 J. Mar. L. & Com.125, 125–28 (1973)Google Scholar
Protocol to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, opened for signature Sept. 28, 1955, 478 U.N.T.S. 371 (entered into force Aug. 1, 1963) [hereinafter The Hague Protocol]
Speiser, Stuart M. et al., Recovery for Wrongful Death and Injury § 7.1 (3d ed. 1992)
Goldhirsch, Lawrence B., The Warsaw Convention Annotated: A Legal Handbook 152 (2d ed. 2000)
U.S. Dep’t of State, Treaties in Force 350 (2004)
Gardiner, Richard, Revising the Law of Carriage by Air: Mechanisms in Treaties and Contract, 47 I.C.L.Q.278, 281 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Sec’y, Dep’t of Transp. & Fed. Aviation Admin., Code-share Safety Program Guidelines 4 (2006)
Protocol to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, as Amended by the Hague Protocol, opened for signature Mar. 8, 1971, ICAO Doc. 8392 (1971)
Mankiewicz, Rene H., The 1971 Protocol of Guatemala City to Further Amend the 1929 Warsaw Convention, 38 J. Air L. & Com.519 (1972)Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund, Factsheet, Special Drawing Rights (Aug. 24, 2012),
Abeyratne, Ruwantissa, Regulatory Management of the Warsaw System of Air Carrier Liability, 3 J. Air Transport Mgmt.37–45 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havel, Brian F. & Sanchez, Gabriel S., The Emerging Lex Aviatica, 42 Geo J. Int’l L.639, 658–59 (2011)Google Scholar
Baden, Naneen K., The Japanese Initiative on the Warsaw Convention, 61 J. Air L. & Com.437, 453–55 (1996)Google Scholar
Schmid, E. and Giemulla, R., Council Regulation (EC) No. 2027/97 on Air Carrier Liability in the Event of Accidents and its Implications for Air Carriers, 23 Air & Space L.98 (1998)Google Scholar
Diederiks-Verschoor, I. H. Ph., An Introduction to Air Law 163–64 (8th ed. 2006)
IATA Economics Briefing, The Economic Benefits Generated by Alliances and Joint Ventures (2012),
MacLaggan, Corrie, U.S. Charges JetBlue Pilot for Midair Meltdown, Reuters, Mar. 29, 2012,
Abeyratne, Ruwantissa I. R., Mental Distress in Aviation Claims – Emergent Trends, 65 J. Air L. & Com.225 (2000)Google Scholar
Easton, John F., Trock, Jennifer, & Radford, Kent, Post-Traumatic “Lésion Corporelle”: A Continuum of Bodily Injury Under the Warsaw Convention, 68 J. Air L. & Com.665, 673–90 (2003)Google Scholar
Andrews, Christian & Nase, Vernon, Psychiatric Injury in Aviation Accidents Under the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions: The Interface Between Medicine and Law, 76 J. Air L. & Com.3, 33 (2011)Google Scholar
Cunningham, McKay, The Montreal Convention: Can Passengers Finally Recover for Mental Injuries?, 41 Vand. J. Transnat’l L.1043, 1073 (2008)Google Scholar
Feyissa, Hailegabriel G., Ethiopian Law of International Carriage by Air: An Overview, 5 Mizan L. Rev. No. 2, 215, 234, n.114 (2011)Google Scholar
Andemariam, Senai W., Does the Montreal Convention of 1999 Require that a Notice be Given to Passengers? What is the Validity of Notice of a Choice of Forum Clause Under Montreal 1999?, 71 J. Air L. & Com.251, 270 (2006)Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A., Tort Law (1999)
Müller-Rostin, Wolf, The Montreal Convention of 1999: Uncertainties and Inconsistencies, The Aviation Q. 218, 223 (2000)Google Scholar
De Leon, Pablo Mendes & Eyskens, Werner, The Montreal Convention: Analysis of Some Aspects of the Attempted Modernization and Consolidation of the Warsaw System, 66 J. Air. L. & Com.1155, 1178–79 (2001)Google Scholar
Litigating the Aviation Tort Case: From Pre-Trial to Closing Argument 31 (Harakas, Andrew J. ed., 3rd ed. 2008)
Ginsburg, Justice’s Tseng opinion, in a footnote, cited the following non-U.S. cases in support: Gal v. Northern Mountain Helicopters Inc., Dkt. No. 3491834918, 1998 B.C.T.C. LEXIS 1351, *15–*16 (Jul. 22, 1998)
Mendelsohn, Allan I. & Lieux, Renee, The Warsaw Convention Article 28, the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, and the Foreign Plaintiff, 68 J. Air L. & Com.75 (2003)Google Scholar
Lang, Christian G. & Dreifuss, Prager, Forum Non Conveniens in Continental Europe (unpublished paper, Aug. 2, 2009, )
Mendelsohn, Allan I., Recent Developments in the Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine, 52 Fed. Law. 45, 46 (2005)Google Scholar
Diederiks-Verschoor, I. H. Ph., An Introduction to Air Law 342–43 (de Leon, Pablo Mendes, ed., 9th rev. ed. 2012)
Prassl, Jeremias, The European Union and the Montreal Convention: A New Analytical Framework, 12 Issues Aviation L. & Pol’y381, 402–06 (2013)Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, Graeme B., A New Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms, 149 U. Penn. L.R.469 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to Damage Caused by Aircraft to Third Parties on the Surface, opened for signature May 29, 1933, 192 L.N.T.S. 291 (entered into force Feb. 13, 1942)
Protocol Supplementary to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to Third Parties on the Surface, opened for signature Sept. 29, 1938, ICAO Doc. 107-CD
Convention on Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to Third Parties on the Surface, opened for signature Oct. 7, 1952, 310 U.N.T.S. 182 (entered into force Feb. 4, 1958) [hereinafter Rome Convention]
Gates, Sean & LeLoudas, George, From Rome to Montreal in 57 Years: Worth the Wait?, 22 No. 3 Air & Space Law. 1 (2009)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×