Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:02:37.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Radiological identification of residual and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Hero K. Hussain
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Isaac R. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Minimally invasive techniques, including thermal ablation and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have evolved substantially over the past decade. Although surgical techniques remain the best curative option for HCC, many patients are poor surgical candidates due to severe hepatic dysfunction, comorbid conditions, or extent of tumor burden. Minimally invasive therapies are being used more frequently as an alternative primary treatment option, with either a palliative or curative intent. Critical to the management of such patients is the posttreatment imaging that is tasked with detecting residual disease and facilitating early detection of recurrent disease. This chapter discusses the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearances of patients who have undergone minimally invasive therapy for HCC, including ablation and TACE, with an emphasis on the normal posttreatment appearance and features of residual and recurrent disease. Although both CT and MRI are used for the assessment of residual and recurrent disease, the practice in our hospital is to use MRI for postprocedural follow-up.

Background

The prompt identification of residual or recurrent disease may facilitate additional successful intervention at an early stage. Additionally, posttreatment imaging may also reveal postprocedural complications such as hepatic abscess, localized biliary ductal dilation, or biloma. Traditionally, the efficacy of treatment for cancer has been measured by criteria proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), which use the morphological changes in a lesion's size as a marker of treatment success or failure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sironi, S, Livraghi, T, Meloni, F, Cobelli, F, Ferrero, C, and Del Maschio, A. Small hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous RF ablation: MR imaging follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999 Nov; 173(5): 1225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, YH. A strategy for early detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following initial remission by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Intervirology 2005; 48(1): 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guan, YS, Sun, L, Zhou, XP, Li, X, and Zheng, XH. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with interventional procedures: CT and MRI follow-up. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(24): 3543–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, AB, Hoogstraten, B, Staquet, M, and Winkler, A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47(1): 207–14.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dromain, C, Baere, T, Elias, D, et al. Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up. Radiology 2002; 223(1): 255–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takayasu, K, Arii, S, Matsuo, N, et al. Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(3): 699–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lencioni, R, Della, Pina C, and Bartolozzi, C. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation in the therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30(4): 401–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SK, Lim, HK, Kim, YH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation: Spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics 2003; 23(1): 107–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solbiati, L, Ierace, T, Goldberg, SN, et al. Percutaneous US-guided radio-frequency tissue ablation of liver metastases: Treatment and follow-up in 16 patients. Radiology 1997; 202(1): 195–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goshima, S, Kanematsu, M, Kondo, H, et al. Evaluating local hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: Is diffusion-weighted MRI reliable as an indicator?J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27(4): 834–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamel, IR, Bluemke, DA, Ramsey, D, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in estimating tumor necrosis after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181(3): 708–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llovet, JM and Bruix, J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 2003; 37(2): 429–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takayasu, K, Moriyama, N, Muramatsu, Y, et al. Hepatic arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparison of CT scans and resected specimens. Radiology 1984; 150(3): 661–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, HS, Jeong, YY, Kang, HK, Kim, JK, and Park, JG. Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(4): W341–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, BI, Kim, HC, Han, JK, et al. Therapeutic effect of transcatheter oily chemoembolization therapy for encapsulated nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: CT and pathologic findings. Radiology 1992; 182(3): 709–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SH, Lee, WJ, Lim, HK, and Lim, JH. Prediction of viable tumor in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: Usefulness of attenuation value measurement at quadruple-phase helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31(2): 198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckwalter, KA, Ellis, JH, Baker, , Borello, JA, and Glazer, GM. Pitfall in MR imaging of lymphadenopathy after lymphangiography. Radiology 1986; 161: 831–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubota, K, Hisa, N, Nishikawa, T, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: Comparison of Lipiodol-CT, power Doppler sonography, and dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26(2): 184–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willatt, JM, Hussain, HK, Adusumilli, S, and Marrero, JA. MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: Challenges and controversies. Radiology 2008; 247: 311–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×