Book contents
- The Prevention and Management of Violence
- The Prevention and Management of Violence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Section 1 General Aspects of Management
- Section 2 Medical and Psychological Intervention
- Section 3 Violence in Different Settings
- Section 4 Management in Other Groups
- Introduction to Section 4
- Chapter 13 Working With Violence in Children: A Developmental and Relational Perspective
- Chapter 14 Management of Violence in Older Adults
- Chapter 15 Management of Violence in People With Intellectual Disability
- Chapter 16 The Relationship Between Violence and Mental Health Inequality in the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Communities
- Section 5 Violence and Society
- Section 6 Engagement and Understanding
- Index
- References
Chapter 15 - Management of Violence in People With Intellectual Disability
from Section 4 - Management in Other Groups
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 May 2023
Book contents
- The Prevention and Management of Violence
- The Prevention and Management of Violence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Section 1 General Aspects of Management
- Section 2 Medical and Psychological Intervention
- Section 3 Violence in Different Settings
- Section 4 Management in Other Groups
- Introduction to Section 4
- Chapter 13 Working With Violence in Children: A Developmental and Relational Perspective
- Chapter 14 Management of Violence in Older Adults
- Chapter 15 Management of Violence in People With Intellectual Disability
- Chapter 16 The Relationship Between Violence and Mental Health Inequality in the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Communities
- Section 5 Violence and Society
- Section 6 Engagement and Understanding
- Index
- References
Summary
Violent behaviour displayed by individuals with intellectual disability (ID) is one of the biggest challenges to services. It can cause serious consequences to the health and well-being of the individual and those involved in their care, including exclusion from services or social groups. There is a greater risk of violence in the ID population and aetiological causes include biological and psychosocial factors and developmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD. Key management strategies involve a review of these factors, robust risk assessments and collaborative working utilising a multidisciplinary approach. Psychological and behavioural support interventions offered should be person-centred and tailored according to their needs. The goal is to assess and modify psychological, environmental or social factors and improve challenging behaviour. Pharmacological treatment can be helpful where underlying physical or mental health illnesses contribute to aggression. In those without obvious causes of violent behaviour, psychotropic medication can be also used to attenuate risks; however, current evidence base is limited and medication options should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Prevention and Management of ViolenceGuidance for Mental Healthcare Professionals, pp. 248 - 259Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Jenkins, R., Rose, J. and Lovell, C. Psychological well-being of staff working with people who have challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1997; 41:502–11.Google Scholar
Male, D. B. and May, D. S. Burnout and workload in teachers of children with severe learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 1997; 25:117–21.Google Scholar
Borthwick-Duffy, S. A. Prevalence of destructive behaviors: A study of aggression, self-injury, and property destruction. In Thompson, T. and Gray, B. D. (eds.) Destructive Behavior in Developmental Disabilities: Diagnoses and Treatment. California: SAGE Publishing; 1994, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A. et al. The prevalence of challenging behaviors: A total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22:77–93.Google Scholar
Crocker, A. G., Mercier, C., Lachapelle, Y. et al. Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2006; 50:652–61.Google Scholar
McClintock, K., Hall, S. and Oliver, C. Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2003; 47:405–16.Google Scholar
Bhaumik, S., Nadkarni, S. S., Biswas, A. B. and Watson, J. M. Service innovations: Risk assessment in learning disability. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29:28–31.Google Scholar
Larkin, P., Jahoda, A. and MacMahon, K. The social information processing model as a framework for explaining frequent aggression in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: A systemic review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2013; 26(5):447–65.Google Scholar
Crocker, A. G., Prokić, A., Morin, D. and Reyes, A. Intellectual disability and co-occurring mental health and physical disorders in aggressive behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2014; 58(11):1032–44.Google Scholar
Creaby, M., Warner, M., Jamil, N. and Jawad, S. Ictal aggression in severely mentally handicapped people. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 1993; 10:12–15.Google Scholar
Tenneij, N. H. and Koot, H. M. Incidence, types and characteristics of aggressive behaviour in treatment facilities for adults with mild intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2008; 52:114–24.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J., Lipscombe, J. and Santer, M. Menstrual problems experienced by women with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2006; 19:364–73.Google Scholar
Powis, L. and Oliver, C. The prevalence of aggression in genetic syndromes: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014; 35(5):1051–71.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. and Baines, B. Health inequalities and people with learning disabilities in the UK. Tizard Learning Disability Review 2011; 16(1):42–8.Google Scholar
Matson, J. L. and Adams, H. L. Characteristics of aggression among persons with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2014; 8(11):1578–84.Google Scholar
Davies, L. E. and Oliver, C. Self-injury, aggression and destruction in children with severe intellectual disability: Incidence, persistence and novel, predictive behavioural risk markers. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2016; 49–50:291–301.Google Scholar
Mazurek, M O, Kanne, S M & Wodka, E L. Physical aggression in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2013; 7(3):455–65.Google Scholar
Visser, E M, Berger, H J C, Prins, J B, et al. Shifting impairment and aggression in intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014; 35(9):2137–47.Google Scholar
Crocker, J., Major, B. and Steele, C. Social stigma. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. and Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1998, pp. 504–533.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Major, B. and Crocker, J. Stigma: Introduction and overview. In Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R. and Hull, J. G. (eds.) The Social Psychology of Stigma. New York: Guilford Press; 2000, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Strand, M., Benzein, E. and Saveman, B. I. Violence in the care of adult persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2004; 13:506–14.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. I. and Moffatt, C. Aggressive behaviour: Definition, assessment, treatment. International Review of Psychiatry 1990; 2:91–100.Google Scholar
Healthcare Commission. Final report: National Audit of Violence (2003–2005). London: Healthcare Commission, 2005. [online]. www.wales.nhs.uk/documents/FinalReport-violence.pdf [Accessed 27.4.2022].Google Scholar
Deb, S. and Roberts, K. The evidence base for the management of imminent violence in Intellectual Disability services. Occasional Paper OP57. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2005.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: Prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges: NICE Guideline (NG11). 2015.Google Scholar
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E. and Cromier, C. A. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.Google Scholar
Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S. and Wintrup, A. The HCR-20: The Assessment of Dangerousness and Risk. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University and British Colombia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission; 1995.Google Scholar
Quinsey, V. L., Book, A. and Skilling, T. A. A. Follow-up of deinstitutionalized men with intellectual disabilities and histories of antisocial behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2004; 17:243–53.Google Scholar
Prout, T. H. and Strohmer, D. C. Emotional Problem Scale. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1991.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. R., Hogue, T. E., Taylor, J. L. et al. Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: A comparison across three levels of security. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2008; 52:90–111.Google Scholar
Mansell Report 2007. Department of Health: Services for people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour or mental health needs (project report). https://research.kent.ac.uk/tizard/wp-content/uploads/sites/2302/2019/01/dh2007mansellreport.pdf.Google Scholar
Totsika, V., Toogood, S., Hastings, R. P. and McCarthy, J. The effect of active support interactive training on the daily lives of adults with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2010; 23(2):112–21.Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L. et al. Toward a technology of ‘nonaversive’ behavior support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1990; 15:125–32.Google Scholar
Nicoll, M., Beail, N. and Saxon, D. Cognitive behavioural treatment for anger in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2013; 26(1):47–62.Google Scholar
Willner, P., Rose, J., Jahoda, A. et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management interventions delivered by supervised lay therapises to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technology Assessment 2013; 17(21):1–173.Google Scholar
Brown, J. F., Hamilton-Mason, J., Maramaldi, P. and Barnhill, L. J. Exploring perspectives of individuals with intellectual disabilities and histories of challenging behaviours about family relationships: An emergent topic in a grounded theory focus group study. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2016; 9(3):1–24.Google Scholar
Brylewski, J. and Duggan, L. Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with learning disability. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004; (3):CD000377.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P., Oliver-Africano, P., Romeo, R. et al. Neuroleptics in the treatment of aggressive challenging behaviour for people with intellectual disabilities: A randomised controlled trial (NACHBID). Health Technology Assessment 2009; 13:1–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. M., Barnes, T. R. E. and Young, A. H. The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry 13th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.Google Scholar
Sheehan, R. and Hassiotis, A. Reduction or discontinuation of antipsychotics for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4(3):238–56.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2016). Psychotropic drug prescribing for people with intellectual disability, mental health problems and/or behaviours that challenge: practice guidelines. Faculty report FR/ID/09. 2016.Google Scholar
NHS England (2016). Stopping over medication of people with a learning disabilty, autism or both (STOMP). www.england.nhs.uk/learning-disabilities/improving-health/stomp/ [Accessed 27.4.2022].Google Scholar
Deb, S., Nancarrow, T., Limbu, B. and Sheehan, R. UK psychiatrists’ experience of withdrawal of antipsychotics prescribed for challenging behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities and/or autism. BJPsych Open 2020; 6(5): e112.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Position statement. PS05/21. Stopping the overmedication of people with intellectual disability, autism or both (STOMP) and supporting treatment and appropriate medication in paediatrics (STAMP). [online] 2021. www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/position-statements/position-statement-ps0521-stomp-stamp.pdf?sfvrsn=684d09b3_6 [Accessed 27.4.2022].Google Scholar
Emerson, E. and Bains, S. Health inequalities and people with intellectual disability in the UK 2010. Improving Health and Lives: Intellectual Disability Observatory. 2010.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists. The evidence base for the management of imminent violence in Intellectual Disability settings. Occasional Paper OP57. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. 2005.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Violence and aggression: Short-term management in mental health, health and community settings: NICE Guideline (NG10). 2015.Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission (2020). Out of sight – who cares? A review of restraint, seclusion and segregation for autistic people, and people with a learning disability and/or mental health condition. www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20201218_rssreview_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Health, UK. The Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983. London: The Stationery Office. 2015.Google Scholar
Tsakanikos, E., Costello, H., Holt, G., Sturmey, P. and Bouras, N. Behaviour management problems as predictors of psychotropic medication and use of psychiatric services in adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2007; 37(6):1080–5.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S. E., Srivorakiat, L., Wink, L. K., Pedapati, E. V. and Erickson, C. A. Aggression in autism spectrum disorder: Presentation and treatment options. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016; 12:1525–38.Google Scholar
Howes, O. D., Rogdaki, M., Findon, J. L. et al. Autism spectrum disorder: Consensus guidelines on assessment, treatment and research from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2018; 32(1):3–29.Google Scholar
NHS England. Building the Right Support: A National Plan to Develop Community Services and Close Inpatient Facilities for People with a Learning Disability and/or Autism who Display Behaviour that Challenges, including those with a Mental Health Condition. NHS England, 2015.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. L., McKinnon, I., Thorpe, I. and Gillmer, B. T. The impact of transforming care on the care and safety of patients with intellectual disabilities and forensic needs. BJPsych Bulletin 2017; 41:205–8.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Decision making and mental capacity: NICE Guideline (NG108). 2017.Google Scholar
Public Health England. Deaths of people identified as having learning disabilities with COVID-19 in England in the spring of 2020. November 2020.Google Scholar
Courtenay, K. and Perera, B. COVID-19 and people with intellectual disability: Impacts of a pandemic. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 2020; 14:1–6Google Scholar
Tyrer, P., Tarabi, S. A., Bassett, P. et al. Nidotherapy compared with enhanced care programme approach training for adults with aggressive challenging behaviour and intellectual disability (NIDABID): Cluster-randomised controlled trial. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2017, 61:521–31.Google Scholar