Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:59:52.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.4 - Intraspecific competition in the cestode Hymenolepis diminuta, in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

C. R. Kennedy
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
J. M. Behnke
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
D. W. Halton
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
J. M. Behnke
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
I. Marshall
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Get access

Summary

Aims and objectives

This exercise is designed to demonstrate:

  1. The effect of parasite population density on adult cestode size.

  2. The effect of parasite population density on parasite fecundity.

  3. The relationship between parasite size and fecundity.

Introduction

It has been known for a long time that there is a relationship between the number of parasites of a species in a host (infra-population density) and parasite size and fecundity. The relationship originally referred to as a crowding effect is most easily observed in parasites such as cestodes, in which growth is relatively indeterminate and adult size maybe large. This effect can be detected in other groups of parasites such as nematodes and acanthocephalans, but these are often smaller in size and growth is more determinate.

The crowding effect has been studied most intensively in cestodes, and whilst there is a measure of agreement on its manifestation, and its population consequences, there is less agreement on its causation. One school of thought believes it is an example of intra-specific competition, probably for carbohydrate resources, which become increasingly scarce as infra-population density increases. Another school believes that it is a result of a host immune response, which increases in intensity and effectiveness as infra-population density increases. A third school believes that it is caused by secretions from the parasites that suppress growth. Whatever the cause, there is no doubt that it is potentially a very effective regulator and stabiliser of parasite population density, since the effect on fecundity is density-dependent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×