Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T06:51:32.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Third-Party Policymakers and the Limits of the Influence of Indicators

from Part IV - Skeptical Voices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

By
Melissa M. Lee  and
Aila M. Matanock
Edited by
Judith G. Kelley  and
Beth A. Simmons
Judith G. Kelley
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Do Global Performance Indicators (GPIs) influence the application of material power? While existing research has shown that GPIs can provoke reform through social mechanisms, material power is an important tool for influencing states resistant to social pressure. We investigate whether GPIs shape third-party policymakers’ decisions to employ material power in the fight against corruption, an important component of the good governance agenda. We theorize that GPIs influence policymakers by acting as focal points that provide information and establish standards of behavior. We test this argument for a highly visible GPI: Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index. We find that while this GPI garners significant media attention, it does not influence policymakers’ decisions to punish corruption offenders by withdrawing or altering foreign aid. Our results raise important scope conditions on the power of GPIs and suggest that their ability to alter state behavior through third-party material mechanisms may be limited.

Keywords

indicatorsrankingsratingsmetricsforeign aidcorruptionpowerTransparency Internationalstate fragilityshamingCorruption Perceptions Index
Type
Chapter
Information
The Power of Global Performance Indicators , pp. 341 - 374
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Dollar, David. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1):33–63.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Weder, Beatrice. 2002. Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review 92 (4):1126–37.Google Scholar
Baccini, Leonardo, and Urpelainen, Johannes. 2012. Strategic Side Payments: Preferential Trading Agreements, Economic Reform, and Foreign Aid. The Journal of Politics 74 (4):932–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2017. Aid Allocation and Targeted Development in an Increasingly Connected World. International Organization 71 (4):735–66.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2018. Targeted Development: Industrialized Country Strategy in a Globalizing World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett, and Leblang, David. 2015. Migration and Foreign Aid. International Organization 69 (3):627–57.Google Scholar
Berthélemy, Jean-Claude. 2006. Bilateral Donors Interest vs. Recipients Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics 10 (2):179–94.Google Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. this volume. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Indicators. In The Power of Global Performance Indicators, edited by Kelley, Judith and Simmons, Beth A. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boutton, Andrew, and Carter, David B.. 2014. Fair-Weather Allies? Terrorism and the Allocation of US Foreign Aid. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (7):1144–73.Google Scholar
Broome, André, and Quirk, Joel. 2015. Governing the World at a Distance: The Practice of Global Benchmarking. Review of International Studies 41 (5):819–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, André, Homolar, Alexandra, and Kranke, Matthias. 2018. Bad Science: International Organizations and the Indirect Power of Global Benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations 24 (3): 514–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Corruption Is Bad: Normative Dimensions of the Anti-Corruption Movement. Working Paper no. 2002/5, Australian National University. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/40136/3/02-5.pdf.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2015. Corruption Rankings: Constructing and Contesting the Global Anti-Corruption Agenda. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 60–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2017. The Politics of Rating Freedom: Ideological Affinity, Private Authority, and the Freedom in the World Ratings. Perspectives on Politics 15 (3):711–31.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2012. Beyond Supply and Demand: A Political-Economic Conceptual Model. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 29–51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callen, Michael, Gulzar, Saad, Hasanain, Ali, and Khan, Yasir. 2016. The Political Economy of Public Sector Absence: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan. NBER Working Paper. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22340.pdf.Google Scholar
Charron, Nicholas. 2011. Exploring the Impact of Foreign Aid on Corruption: Has the “Anti-Corruption Movement” Been Effective? The Developing Economies 49 (1):66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Pasquarello, Thomas E.. 1985. Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of U.S. Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries. American Journal of Political Science 29 (3):539–63.Google Scholar
Claessens, Stijn, Cassimon, Danny, and Van Campenhout, Bjorn. 2009. Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria. World Bank Economic Review 23 (2):185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clist, Paul. 2011. 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Whither Selectivity? World Development 39 (10):1724–34.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Snyder, Jack. 2015. Conclusion - Rating the Ratings Craze: From ConsumerChoice to Public Policy Outcomes. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 178–93. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, eds. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quanatification and Rankings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review 46 (1):71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H.R. 2012. International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives? International Interactions 38 (5):597–621.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2013. Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation. International Studies Quarterly 57 (4):698–712.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2016. Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness. International Organization 70 (1):65–102.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2004. Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa. International Organization 58 (2):409–23.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Sauder, Michael. 2012. The Dynamism of Indicators. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Qunatification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 86–109. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2010. The Strategic Substitution of United States Foreign Aid. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (2):107–31.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2011. Self-Enforcing Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4):1661–708.Google Scholar
Fisher, Angelina. 2012. From Diagnosing Under-immunization to Evaluating Health Care Systems: Immunization Coverage Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 217–46. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K., and Kilby, Christopher. 2010. Changing Aid Regimes? US Foreign Aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics 91 (2):185–97.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2014. Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended Consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15 (2–3):118–31.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur A. 2001. Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa. International Organization 55 (1):123–48.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62:689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Hans Krause, and Porter, Tony. 2012. What Do Numbers Do in Transnational Governance? International Political Sociology 6 (4):409–26.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen S., and Wong, Wendy H.. 2013. When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3):651–72.Google Scholar
Hjertholm, Peter, and White, Howard. 2000. Survey of Foreign Aid: History, Trends, and Allocation. Working Paper, University of Copenhagen and University of Sussex. http://www.economics.ku.dk/research/publications/wp/2000/0004.pdf.Google Scholar
Holley, Peter. 2015. Afghan President Calls for a “Holy War” Against His Country’s Greatest Enemy- Corruption. The Washington Post, September 1.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan, and Weaver, Catherine. this volume. A Race to the Top?: The Aid Transparency Index and the Normative Power of Global Performance Indicators. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Hough, Dan. 2017. Analyzing Corruption. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K., Croco, Sarah E., and Appel, Benjamin J.. 2011. Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945. American Political Science Review 105 (2):415–36.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2017. The Role of the Fund in Governance Issues - Review of the Guidance Note - Preliminary Considerations. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan M., and Malesky, Edmund J.. 2018. Nonstate Actors and Compliance with International Agreements: An Empirical Analysis of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. International Organization 72 (1):33–69.Google Scholar
Jolly, David. 2011. New Zealand Has World’s Cleanest Government, Survey Finds. New York Times, November 30.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence their Reputation and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. this volume. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. Chapter 1 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. this volume. International Assessments and Education Policy: Evidence from an Elite Survey.Google Scholar
Koliev, Faraj, Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. this volume. Reporting Matters: Performance Assessment and Compliance in the ILO. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krain, Matthew. 2012. J’accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides? International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Andrew E. 2016. Railing Against Graft, a Georgian Leads Call for a Cleanup in Ukraine. New York Times, February 3.Google Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik. 2006. The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4):861–88.Google Scholar
Lynn, Michael, Flynn, Sean Masaki, and Helion, Chelsea. 2013. Do Consumers Prefer Round Prices? Evidence from Pay-What-You-Want Decisions and Self-Pumped Gasoline Purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology 35:96–102.Google Scholar
Masaki, Takaaki, and Parks, Bradley C.. 2019. When Do Performance Assessments Influence Policy Behavior? Micro-evidence from the 2014 Reform Efforts Survey. The Review of International Organizations. [forthcoming]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, Krueger, Eric L., and Poe, Steven C.. 1998. Testing Models of US Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War. The Journal of Politics 60 (1):63–85.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin, and Kingsbury, Benedict, eds. 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. this volume. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2003. The Determinants of Aid Allocation by Regional Multilateral Development Nanks and United Nations Agencies. International Studies Quarterly 47 (1):101–22.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Richard A., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Rewards for Ratification: Payoffs for Participating in the International Human Rights Regime? International Studies Quarterly 59:197–208.Google Scholar
Nienaber, Michael. 2014. The Most and Least Corrupt Countries in the World. Reuters, December 2.Google Scholar
Pope, Devin, and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. Round Numbers as Goals: Evidence From Baseball, SAT Takers, and the Lab. Psychological Science 22:71–9.Google Scholar
Pratto, Felicia, and John, Oliver P.. 1991. Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (3):380–91.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. 2018. Regulatory Indicators in the European Union and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Performance Assessment, Organizational Processes, and Learning. Public Policy and Administration. [forthcoming, online first]Google Scholar
Roberts, Jordan, and Fernando Tellez, Roberts. this volume. Freedom House’s Scarlet Letter: Assessment Power through Transnational Pressure.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology 7:532–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard, Merry, Sally Engle, Park, Sung-Joon, and Mugler, Johanna, eds. 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Gray, Mark M.. 2003. International Integration and National Corruption. International Organization 57 (4):761–800.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Wolfram, and Scorse, Jason. 2017. Does Being a “Top 10” Worst Polluter Affect Environmental Releases? Evidence from the U.S. Toxic Release Inventory. Working Paper, Columbia University, NBER, and Monterey Institute of International Studies. https://cenrep.ncsu.edu/cenrep/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SchlenkerScorse.pdf.Google Scholar
Schueth, Sam. 2015. Winning the Ranking Game: The Republic of Georgia, USAID, and the Doing Business Project. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 151–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Sande Lie, Jon Harald. 2015. The Limits of Global Authority: World Bank Benchmarks in Ethiopia and Malawi. Review of International Studies 41 (5):993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2009. The Bark Is the Bite: International Organizations and Blacklisting. Review of International Political Economy 16 (4):573–96.Google Scholar
Shore, Cris, and Wright, Susan. 2015. Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order. Social Anthropology 23 (1):22–8.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Timothy. 2005. The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sonnemans, Joep. 2006. Price Clustering and Natural Resistance Points in the Dutch Stock Market: A Natural Experiment. European Economic Review 50:1937–50.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, Lisa McIntosh, and Henry, Laura A.. 2017. Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil. Forests 8 (11):445.Google Scholar
The Associated Press. 2014. China, Turkey, Angola Slip in Global Graft Index. The Associated Press, December 3.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2014. Transparency International: A More Combative Approach? The Economist, October 16.Google Scholar
Tierney, Michael J., Nielson, Daniel L., Hawkins, Darren G., Roberts, J. Timmons, Findley, Michael G., Powers, Ryan M., Parks, Bradley, Wilson, Sven E., and Hicks, Robert L.. 2011. More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData. World Development 39 (11):1891–906.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2016. Research - CPI - Overview. http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongying, and Rosenau, James N.. 2001. Transparency International and Corruption as an Issue of Global Governance. Global Governance 7 (25):25–49.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winbourne, Svetlana, and Spector, Bertram I.. 2014. Analysis of USAID Anticorruption Programming Worldwide (2007–2013). Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development and Management Systems International.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S. 2010. Choosing to Target: What Types of Countries Get Different Types of World Bank Projects. World Politics 62 (3):422–58.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S., and Martinez, Gina. 2015. The Role of Governance in Determining Foreign Aid Flow Composition. World Development 66:516–31.Google Scholar
Yip, Martin. 2013. Can Hong Kong Stay Corruption-Free Under China? BBC News, July 11.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×