Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:22:29.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Power in cooperation and competition: Understanding the positive and negative faces of power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

In the office in which I work there are five people of whom I am afraid. Each of these five people is afraid of four people (excluding overlaps), for a total of twenty and each of these twenty people is afraid of six people, making a total of one hundred and twenty people who are feared by at least one person. Each of these one hundred and twenty people is afraid of the other one hundred and nineteen, and all of these one hundred and forty-five people are afraid of the twelve men at the top who helped found and build the company and now own and direct it.

Joseph Heller, Something Happened.

The men who make power make an indispensable contribution to the Nation's greatness, but the men who question power make a contribution just as indispensable, especially when questioning is disinterested, for they determine whether we use power or power uses us.

John F. Kennedy, October 26, 1963

Our task is not to learn where to place power; it is how to develop power […] Genuine power can only be grown, it will slip from every arbitrary hand that grasps it; for genuine power is not coercive control, but co-active control. Coercive power is the curse of the universe; co-active power, the enrichment and advancement of every human soul.

Mary Parker-Follett (1924)

Power has traditionally been considered a destructive force in organizations, corrupting those with power and demoralizing those without it (Ashforth 1997; Kipnis 1976; Rudolph and Peluchette 1993).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. (1978) Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. (1996) Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. (1997) Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, L. (1974) From instinct to identity: The development of personality, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Burke, W. (1986) Leadership as empowering others. In Srivastva, S. (Ed.), Executive power (pp. 51–77), San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Christopher, R., Probst, T. M., Martocchio, J. J., Drasgow, F., and Lawler, J. J. (2000) Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 643–658.Google Scholar
Coleman, P. (2006) Power and conflict. In Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., and Marcus, E. C. (Eds.),The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, 2nd edn (pp. 120–143), San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. N. (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, C. M. and Johnson, J. L. (1997) Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1993) The new economics for industry, government, education, Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973) The resolution of conflict, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 709–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Follett, M. P. (1924) Creative experience, New York, N.Y.: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P.. and Raven, B. H. (1959) The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. and Zander, A. F. (Eds.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167), Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1993) Cultural constraints in management theories. The Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81–94.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., and Hogan, J. (1994) What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2005) New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychological Monographs, 131, 285–358.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1989) Cooperation and competition: Theory and research, Edina, Minn.: Interaction Books.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., and Skon, L. (1981) Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1983) The change masters, New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1979) Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 65–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanter, R. M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation, New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kipnis, D. (1976) The power-holders, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., and Wilkinson, I. (1980) Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. and Rosen, B. (1999) Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.Google Scholar
Kouzes, J. M. and Posner, B. Z. (1987) The leadership challenge, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. J. and Yoon, J. (1993) Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. J., and Yoon, J. (1995) Structural power and emotional processes in negotiation: A social exchange approach. In Kramer, R. M. and Messick, D. M. (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process (pp. 143–165), Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., and Bies, R. J. (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. (1997) Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In Earley, P. C. and Erez, M. (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 640–675), San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1970) The two faces of power. Journal of Affairs, 24, 29–47.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1975) Power: The inner experience, New York, N.Y.: Irvington.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations, Boston, Mass.: Pittman.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Moore, W. L. (1980) Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, M., Pike, R., and Tjosvold, D. (2001) Budget participation, goal interdependence and controversy: A study of a Chinese public utility. Management Accounting Research, 12, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1985) Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raven, B. H. (1993) The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rind, B and Kipnis, D. (1999) Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, H. R. and Peluchette, J. V. (1993) The power gap: Is sharing or accumulating power the answer?Journal of Applied Business Research, 9, 12–20.Google Scholar
Scholl, W. (1999) Restrictive control and information pathologies in organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (1997) Unequal relationships in high and low power distance societies: A comparative study of tutor-student role relations in Britain and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., and Nason, S. W. (1997) A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23, 679–704.Google Scholar
Stanne, M. B., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1999) Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibaut, J. W. and Kelley, H. H. (1959) The social psychology of groups, New York, N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1981) Unequal power relationships within a cooperative or competitive context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1985a) Effects of attribution and social context on superiors' influence and interaction with low performing subordinates. Personnel Psychology, 38, 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1985b) Power and social context in superior–subordinate interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1989) Interdependence and power between managers and employees: A study of the leader relationship. Journal of Management, 15, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1995) Effects of power to reward and punish in cooperative and competitive contexts. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 723–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Andrews, I. R., and Struthers, J. (1991) Power and interdependence in work groups: Views of managers and employees. Group and Organization Studies, 16, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Leung, K., and Johnson, D. W. (2006) Cooperative and competitive conflict in China. In Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., and Marcus, E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (pp. 671–692), San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Coleman, P. T., and Sun, H. (2003) Effects of organizational values on leaders' use of information power to affect performance in China. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., and Law, K. S. (1998) Empowerment in the leader relationship in Hong Kong: Interdependence and controversy. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 624–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1981) Effect of partner's effort and ability on liking for partner after failure on a cooperative task. The Journal of Psychology, 109, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. and Sun, H. (2001) Effects of influence tactics and social contexts: An experiment on relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, R. (1987) Managing conflict: Interpersonal dialogue and third-party roles, 2nd edn, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Welbourne, T. M. and Trevor, C. O. (2000) The role of departmental and position power in job evaluation. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 761–771.Google Scholar
West, M. A. (2002) Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 51, 355–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G., Kim, H., and Chavez, C. (1999) Task importance, feasibility, and agent influence behavior as determinants of target commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. and Tracey, J. B. (1992) Consequences of influence attempts used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×