Abbott, D.R., Smith, A.M. and Gallaga, E. 2007. ‘Ballcourts and ceramics: the case for Hohokam marketplaces in the Arizona Desert’, American Antiquity, 72(3): 461–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abercromby, J. 1904. ‘A proposed chronological arrangement of the Drinking Cup or Beaker Class of Fictilia in Britain’, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 45: 323.Google Scholar

Adams, W.Y. 1979. ‘On the argument from ceramics to history: a challenge based on evidence from medieval Nubia’, Current Anthropology, 20: 727–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adan-Bayewitz, D., Karasik, A., Smilansky, U., Asaro, F., Giauque, R.D. and Lavidor, R. 2009. ‘Differentiation of ceramic chemical element composition and vessel morphology at a pottery production center in Roman Galilee’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(11): 2517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitchison, J.A. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data (London: Chapman and Hall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitken, M.J. 1990. Scientific dating methods in archaeology (London: Longmans).Google Scholar

Albinus, P. 1589. Meissniche Chronica (Dresden).Google Scholar

Albrecht, C. 1942. Das Römerlager in Oberaden. Heft II: Die römische und belgische Keramik, Veröffentlichungen aus dem Städt. Mus. für Vor- und Frühgeschichte Dortmund ii.2 (Dortmund).Google Scholar

Allen, J.R.L. 1989. ‘A quantitative technique for assessing the roundness of pottery sherds in water contexts’, Geoarchaeology, 4: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amé, E. 1859. Les carrelages émaillés du Moyen-Age et de la Renaissance (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. 1961. L’alimentation et la cuisine á Rome, Études et Commentaires 38 (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar

Appleby, A., Sheldon, H., Brightwell, A., Demetriou, G., Massey, M. and Peacey, N. 1972. ‘The Horniman Museum Kiln Experiment at Highgate Wood – part 1’, London Archaeologist, 2(1): 12–17.Google Scholar

Appleby, A., Sheldon, H., Brightwell, A., Demetriou, G, Massey, M. and Peacey, N. 1973. ‘The Horniman Museum Kiln Experiment at Highgate Wood – part 2’, London Archaeologist, 2(3): 53–9.Google Scholar

Arnold, D.E. 1978. ‘Ethnography of pottery making in the Valley of Guatemala’ in Wetherington, R.K. (ed.) The ceramics from Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala, Monograph series on Kaminaljuyú (University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press), 327–400.Google Scholar

Arnold, D.E. 1985. Ceramic theory and cultural process, New studies in archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Arnold, D.E. 1991. ‘Ethnoarchaeology and investigations of ceramic production and exchange: can we go beyond cautionary tales?’ in Bishop, R.L. and Lange, F.W. (eds.) The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard (Niwot, Colorado: University of Colorado Press) 321–45.Google Scholar

Arnold, D.E. 1999. ‘Advantages and disadvantages of vertical-half molding technology: implications for production organization’, in Skibo, J.M. and Feinman, G.M. (eds.) Pottery and People: a dynamic interaction (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press) 59–80.Google Scholar

Arnold, D.E. 2000. ‘Does the standardization of ceramic paste really mean specialization’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4): 333–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, J.W. 2002. ‘Pottery use-alteration as an indicator of socioeconomic status: an ethnoarchaeological study of the Gamo of Ethiopia’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 9(4): 331–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, J.W. 2003. ‘Brewing beer: status, wealth and ceramic use alteration among the Gamo of south-western Ethiopia’, World Archaeology, 34(3): 516–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artis, E.T. 1823. The Durobrivae (London).Google Scholar

van As, A.Jacobs, L. and Thissen, L. 2005. ‘Arguments for and against stone cooking in early sixth millennium B.C. southern Romania’, Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies, 21: 103–10.Google Scholar

Attas, M., Fossey, J.M. and Yaffe, L. 1984. ‘Corrections for drill-bit contamination in sampling ancient pottery for Neutron Activation analysis’, Archaeometry 26(1): 104–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baif, L. 1536. Lazari Bayfii annotationes 2 De Vasculis (Paris).Google Scholar

Balfet, H. 1965. ‘Ethnographical observations in North Africa and archeological interpretation’ in Matson, F.R. (ed.) Ceramics and man, Wenner Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 41 (Chicago: Aldine), 161–77.Google Scholar

Balfet, H., Fauvet Berthelot, M.F. and Monzon, S. 1989. Lexique et typologie des poteries: pour la normalisation de la description des poteries (Paris: Presses du CNRS).Google Scholar

Balkansky, A.K., Feinman, G.M. and Nicholas, L.M. 1997. ‘Pottery kilns of ancient Ejutla, Oaxaca, Mexico’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 24(2): 139–60.Google Scholar

Bamps, A. 1884. La céramique americaine au point de vue des éléments constitutifs de la pâte et de sa fabrication, Compte-Rendu de la V Session Congrès des Americanistes (Copenhagen: Imprimerie de Thiele), 274–81.Google Scholar

Barnard, H. and Eerkens, J.W. 2007. Theory and Practice of Archaeological Residue Analysis, British Archaeological Reports International Series 1650 (Oxford: Archaeopress).Google Scholar

Barnett, M.S. 2000. ‘Luminescence dating of pottery from later prehistoric Britain’, Archaeometry, 42(2): 431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barone, G., Mazzoleni, P., Spagnolo, G., and Aquilia, E. 2012. ‘The transport amphorae of Gela: a multidisciplinary study on provenance and technological aspects’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(1): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barraclough, A. 1992. ‘Quaternary sediment analysis: a deductive approach at A-level’, Teaching Geography, 17: 15–18.Google Scholar

van Bastelaar, D.A. 1877. Les couverts, lustres, vernis, enduits, engobes, etc., de nature organique employés en céramique chez les Romains (Anvers).Google Scholar

Bauer, I., Endres, W., Kerkhoff-Hader, B., Koch, R. and Stephan, H.-G. 1986. Leitfaden zur Kermikbeschreigung (Mittelalter-Neuzeit). Terminologie – Typologie – Technologie, Kataloge des Prähistorischen Staatssammlung Beiheft 2 (Munich).Google Scholar

Baumhoff, M.A. and Heizer, R.F. 1959. ‘Some unexploited possibilities in ceramic analysis’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 15: 308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, M.J. 1994. Exploratory Multivariate Statistics in Archaeology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Baxter, M.J. 2003. Statistics in Archaeology (London: Hodder Arnold).Google Scholar

Baxter, M., 2008. ‘Mathematics, statistics and archaeometry: the past 50 years or so’, Archaeometry, 50(6): 968–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, M.J. and Heyworth, M.P. 1989. ‘Principal components analysis of compositional data in archaeology’ in Rahtz, S.P.Q. and Richards, J.D. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989, British Archaeological Reports International Series 548, 227–40.

Beals, R.L., Brainerd, G.W. and Smith, W. 1945. Archaeological studies in northeast Arizona, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Anthropology 44 (Berkeley).Google Scholar

Bech, J.-M. 1988. ‘Correspondence analysis and pottery chronology. A case study from the late Roman Iron Age cemetery Slusegard’ in Madsen, T. (ed.) Multivariate Archaeology, Jutland Archaeological Society 21: 29–35.Google Scholar

de la Beche, Sir H. and Reeks, T. 1855 Catalogue of specimens illustrative of the composition and manufacture of British Pottery and Porcelain from the occupation of Britain by the Romans to the present time (London: Museum of Practical Geology).Google Scholar

Beck, M.E. 2006. ‘Midden ceramic assemblage formation: a case study from Kalinga, Philippines’, American Antiquity, 71(1): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, M.E., Skibo, J.M., Hally, D.J. and Yang, P. 2002. ‘Sample selection for ceramic use-alteration analysis: the effects of abrasion on soot’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckmann, B. 1974. ‘The main types of the first four production periods of Siegburg pottery’ in Evison, V.I., Hodges, H. and Hurst, J.G. (eds.) Medieval Pottery from Excavations (London: John Baker), 183–220.Google Scholar

Bedaux, R. and van der Waals, D. 1987. ‘Aspects of life-span of Dogon pottery’, Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden), 5: 137–53.Google Scholar

de la Bédoyère, G. 1988. Samian ware (Princes Risborough: Shire Publications).Google Scholar

Bedwin, O. and Orton, C.R. 1984. ‘The excavation of the eastern terminal of the Devil's Ditch, West Sussex, 1982’ Sussex Archaeological Collections, 122: 63–74 and fiche.Google Scholar

Beier, T. and Mommsen, H. 1994. ‘Modified Mahalanobis filters for grouping pottery by chemical composition’, Archaeometry, 36(2): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellanger, L., Husi, Ph., and Tommasone, R. 2006. ‘Statistical aspects of pottery quantification for the dating of some archaeological contexts’, Archaeometry, 48(1): 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W.J., Blakeley, J.A., Brinkmann, R. and Vitaliano, C.J. 1989. ‘The provenience postulate: thoughts on the use of physical and chemical data in the study of ceramic materials’ in Blakeley, J.A. and Bennett, W.J. (eds.) Analysis and publication of ceramics, British Archaeological Reports International Series 551 (Oxford: BAR), 31–44.Google Scholar

Benzécri, J.P. 1973. L’analyse des donnés: II. L’analyse des correspondances (Paris: Dunod).Google Scholar

Berg, I. 2004. ‘The meaning of standardisation: conical cups in the late Bronze Age Aegean’, Antiquity, 78(299): 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, I. 2008. ‘Looking through pots: recent advances in ceramic X-radiography’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(5): 1177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernadini, W. 2000. ‘Kiln firing groups: inter-household economic collaboration and social organization in the northern American Southwest’, American Antiquity, 65(2):365–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berstan, R., Stott, A.W., Minnitt, S., Bronk Ramsey, C. and Hedges, R.E.M. 2008. ‘Direct dating of pottery from its organic residues: new precision using compound-specific carbon isotopes’, Antiquity, 82(317): 702–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddle, M. 1972. ‘Excavations at Winchester, 1970 ninth interim report’, Antiquaries Journal, 52: 93–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddulph, E. 2005. ‘Last orders; choosing pottery for funerals in Roman Essex’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 24(1): 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddulph, E. 2006. ‘What's in a name? Graffiti on funerary pottery’, Britannia, 37: 355–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddulph, E. 2008. ‘Form and function: the experimental use of Roman samian ware cups’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 27(1): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bimson, M. 1956. ‘The techniques of Greek Black and Terra Sigillata Red’, Antiquaries Journal, 36: 200–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bimson, M. 1969. ‘The examination of ceramics by X-ray powder diffraction’, Studies in Conservation, 14: 85–9.Google Scholar

Bimson, M. 1970. ‘The significance of ‘ale-measure’ marks’, Post-medieval Archaeology, 4: 165–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binns, C.F. 1898. The history of the potter (London).Google Scholar

Binns, C.F. and Frazer, A.D. 1929. ‘The Genesis of the Greek Black Glaze’, American Journal of Archaeology, 33: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, S. 1858. History of Ancient Pottery (London).Google Scholar

Bird, D.G. and Turner, D.J. 1974. ‘Reigate: fifteenth century coin hoard’, Surrey Archaeological Collections, 70: 166–7.Google Scholar

Birkhoff, G.D. 1933. Aesthetic measure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R.L., V. Canouts, V., Crown, P.L. and De Atley, S.P. 1990. ‘Sensitivity, precision and accuracy: their roles in ceramic compositional data bases’ American Antiquity, 55(3): 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R.L. and Lange, F.W. (eds.) 1991. The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard (Niwot, Colorado: University of Colorado Press).Google Scholar

Bishop, R.L., Rands, R.L. and Holley, G.R. 1982. ‘Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective’ in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, 5 (New York: Academic Press), 275–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E. and Holland, P.W. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Blackham, M. 2000. ‘Distinguishing bioturbation and trampling using pottery sherd measures, Tell Fendi, Jordan’, Geoarchaeology, 15(5): 469–97.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackman, M.J. and Bishop, R.L. 2007. ‘The Smithsonian-NIST partnership: the application of instrumental neutron activation analysis to archaeology’, Archaeometry, 49(2): 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackman, M.J., Mery, S. and Wright, R.P. 1989. ‘Production and exchange of ceramics on the Oman Peninsula from the perspective of Hili’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 16(1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, H. 1980. ‘Technology, supply or demand?’, Medieval Ceramics, 4: 3–12.Google Scholar

Blake, H. and Davey, P. 1983. Guidelines for the processing and publication of medieval pottery from excavations, Directorate of Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings Occasional Paper 5 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar

Blakely, J.A., 1989. ‘Xeroradiography of historic ceramics: four New England kilns’, Historical Archaeology 23(1): 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanchet, A. 1899. Les ateliers de céramique dans la Gaule-romaine (Paris).Google Scholar

Bloice, B.J. 1971. Note in Dawson, G.J. ‘Montague Close part 2’ London Archaeologist, 1(11): 251.Google Scholar

Bloice, B.J. and Dawson, G.J. 1971. ‘Classification of shapes’ in Bloice, B.J. ‘Norfolk House, Lambeth: excavations at a delftware kiln site’ Post-medieval Archaeology, 5: 99–159 (119–29).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boardman, J. 1975. Athenian red-figure wares: the archaic period, a handbook (London: Thames and Hudson).Google Scholar

Bolling, C. 1994. ‘Analysis of site stratigraphy and formation processes using patterns of pottery sherd dispersion’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 21(1): 15–28.Google Scholar

Bonnamour, L. and Marinval, P. 1985. ‘Céramiques gallo-romaines précoces avec dépôt du millet dans la moyenne vallée de la Saône’, Revue archéologique de l’Est et du Centre-Est, 36: 321–5.Google Scholar

Bong, W.S.K., Matsumura, K., Yokoyama, K. and Nakai, I. 2010. ‘Provenance study of early and middle bronze age pottery from Kaman-Kalehöyük, Turkey, by heavy mineral analysis and geochemical analysis of individual hornblende grains’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(9): 2165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bös, M. 1958. ‘Aufschriften auf rheinischen Trinkgefässen der Römerzeit’, Kölner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühegeschichte, 3: 20–5.Google Scholar

Bradley, R. and Fulford, M.G. 1980. ‘Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, 17: 85–94.Google Scholar

Brainerd, G.W. 1951. ‘The place of ordering in archaeological analysis’, American Antiquity, 16: 301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, M. 1982. ‘Decoration as ritual symbol: a theoretical proposal and an ethnographic study in southern Sudan’ in Hodder, I. (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 80–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brantingham, J.P. and Perrault, C. 2010. ‘Detecting the effects of selection and stochastic forces in archaeological assemblages’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(12): 3211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braudel, F. 1981. The structures of everyday life (London: Collins).Google Scholar

Brears, P. 1989. ‘The continuing tradition’, Medieval Ceramics, 13: 3–8.Google Scholar

Brongniart, M.A. 1844. Traité des Arts Céramiques, ou des Poteries, considérées dans leur histoire, leur pratique et leur théorie (Paris).Google Scholar

Bronitsky, G. 1986. ‘The use of materials science techniques in the study of pottery construction and use’ in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory 9 (New York: Academic Press) 209–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronitsky, G. and Hamer, R. 1986. ‘Experiments in ceramic technology: the effects of various tempering materials on impact and thermal-shock resistance’, American Antiquity, 51: 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, C. and Mainman, A. 1984. ‘Torksey Ware viewed from the North’ in Addyman, P.V. and Black, V.E. (eds.) Archaeological papers from York presented to M.W. Barley (York: York Archaeological Trust), 63–70.Google Scholar

Brorsson, T. 2012. ‘Pottery production in the Novgorod region: local traditions and foreign influences’, in Brisbane, M., Makarov, N. and Nosov, E. (eds.) The Archaeology of Novgorod in its Wider Context: A Study of Centre/Periphery Relations (Oxford: Oxbow Books) 425–434.Google Scholar

Brown, A.E. and Sheldon, H.S. 1969. ‘Early Roman pottery factory in north London’, London Archaeologist, 1(3): 39–44.Google Scholar

Brown, A.E. and Sheldon, H.S. 1974. ‘Highgate Wood: the pottery and its production’, London Archaeologist, 2(9): 222–31.Google Scholar

Brown, D. 1985. ‘Looking at cross-fits’, Medieval Ceramics, 9: 35–42.Google Scholar

Browne, Sir T. 1658. Hydriotaphia. Urne burial (London).Google Scholar

Bryant, G.F. 1970. ‘Two experimental Romano-British Kiln Firings at Barton-on-Humber, Lincolnshire’, Journal of the Scunthorpe Museum Society, 3: 1–16.Google Scholar

Bryant, G.F. 1973. ‘Experimental Romano-British kiln firings’ in Detsicas, A.P. (ed.) Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery, CBA Research Report 10 (London: CBA) 149–60.Google Scholar

Bryant, G.F. 1977. ‘Experimental kiln firings at Barton-on-Humber, S Humberside, 1971’, Medieval Archaeology, 21: 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, G.F. 1978/9. ‘Romano-British experimental kiln firings at Barton-on-Humber, England, 1968–1975’, Acta Prehistorica et Archaeologica, 9/10: 13–22.Google Scholar

Buck, C.E. and Litton, C.D. 1991. ‘A Bayes approach to some archaeological problems’ in Lockyear, K. and Rahtz, S.P.Q. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1990, British Archaeological Reports International Series 565 (Oxford: Tempus Reparatum), 93–9.Google Scholar

Buko, A. 1981. Wczesno-śvedniowieczna ceramika Sandomierska (Warsaw: Polish Academy).Google Scholar

Bulmer, M. 1979. ‘An introduction to Roman samian ware’ Journal of the Chester Archaeological Society, 62: 5–72.Google Scholar

Bunzel, R.L. 1929. The Pueblo Potter (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Burgh, R.F. 1959. ‘Ceramic profiles in the Western Mound at Awotovi, Northeastern Arizona’, American Antiquity, 25: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, D.S. 1937. ‘On standards for texture in pottery’, American Antiquity, 3: 76–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrd, J.E. and Owens, D.D. 1997. ‘A measure for measuring relative abundance of fragmented archaeological ceramics’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 24(3): 315–20.Google Scholar

Cailleux, A. and Taylor, G. 1963. Code expolaire (Paris: Boubé).Google Scholar

Carr, C. 1990. ‘Advances in ceramic radiography and analysis: applications and potential’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 17(1): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, C.B. and Norton, M.G. 2007. Ceramic Materials (New York: Springer).Google Scholar

Carver, M.O.H. 1985. ‘Theory and practice in urban pottery seriation’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 12(5): 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castillo Tejero, N. and Litvak, J. 1968. Un sistema de estudio para formas de csaijas, Technologia 2 (Mexico: Departmento de Prehistória, Instituto Nacional de Antropologio e Historia).Google Scholar

Catling, H.W., Blin-Stoyle, A.E. and Richards, E.E. 1961. ‘Spectrographic analysis of Mycenean and Minoan pottery’, Archaeometry, 4: 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Catling, H.W., Blin-Stoyle, A.E. and Richards, E.E. 1963. ‘Correlations between composition and provenance of Mycenean and Minoan pottery’, Annual Report of the British School at Athens, 58: 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Caumont, M. 1850. Quelques produits céramiques du moyen-age (Caen).Google Scholar

Celoria, F.S.C. and Kelly, J.H. 1973. A post-medieval pottery site with a kiln base found off Albion Square, Hanley, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, England SJ 885474, Archaeological Society Report 4 (Stoke-on-Trent: City of Stoke-on-Trent Museum).Google Scholar

Chase, P.G. 1985 ‘Whole vessels and sherds: an experimental investigation of their quantitative relationship’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 12: 213–8.Google Scholar

Childe, V.G. 1929. The Danube in Prehistory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Church, A.H. 1870. Catalogue of the specimens of the old English pottery in the collection of A.H. Church (Cirencester).Google Scholar

Ciolek-Torillo, R. 1984. ‘An alternative model of room function from Grasshopper Pueblo, Arizona’ in Hietala, H.J. (ed.) Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 127–53.Google Scholar

Clark, R.J.H. and Curri, L. 1998. ‘The identification by Raman microscopy and X-ray diffraction of iron-oxide pigments and of the red pigments found on Italian pottery fragments’, Journal of Molecular Structure, 440: 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochet, Abbé 1860. Archéologie céramique et sépulchrale; ou l'art de classer les sépultures anciennes à l'aide de la céramique (Paris).Google Scholar

Cockle, H. 1981. ‘Roman manufacture in Roman Egypt. A new papyrus’, Journal of Roman Studies, 71: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman-Smith, R. 1971. ‘Experiments in ancient bonfire-fired pottery’, Ceramic Review, 12: 6–7.Google Scholar

Colls, D., Étienne, R., Leuement, R., Liou, B. and Mayet, F. 1977. L’Épave Port Vendres II et le commerce de la Bétique a l’époque de Claude, Archaeonautica 1 (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar

Colt Hoare, R. 1812. The ancient history of south Wiltshire (London: Miller).Google Scholar

Colton, H.S. 1939. ‘Primitive pottery firing methods’, Museum notes, Museum of Northern Arizona 11(10): 63–6.Google Scholar

Colton, H.S. 1953. Potsherds. An introduction to the study of prehistoric southwestern ceramics and their use in historic reconstruction, Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 23 (Flagstaff, Arizona).Google Scholar

Colton, H.S. and Hargraves, L.L. 1937. Handbook of north Arizona pottery wares, Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 11 (Flagstaff, Arizona).Google Scholar

Combe, C. and Jackson, J. 1787. ‘Account of the discoveries in digging a sewer in Lombard-street and Birchin-lane, 1786’, Archaeologia, 8: 116–32.Google Scholar

Conolly, J. and Lake, M. 2006. Geographical information systems in archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conyers, J. 1675. Sloane MSS 958, f.105, f.108ff (London: British Museum).Google Scholar

Conyers, J. 1677. Sloane MSS 958, f.106–7 (London: British Museum).Google Scholar

Cornwall, I.W. and Hodges, H.W.M. 1964. ‘Thin sections of British Neolithic pottery: Windmill Hill – a test site’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology of London University, 4: 29–33.Google Scholar

Costin, C.L. 1991. ‘Craft specialization: issues defining, documenting and explaining the organization of production’, Archaeological Method and Theory, 3: 1–56.Google Scholar

Costin, C.L. 2000. ‘The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4): 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costin, C.L. and Hagstrum, M.B. 1995. ‘Standardization, labor investment, skill, and the organization of ceramic production in late Prehispanic Highland Peru’, American Antiquity, 60(4): 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courty, M.A. and Roux, V. 1995. ‘Identification of wheel throwing on the basis of ceramic surface features and microfabrics’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22(1): 17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowgill, G.L. 1970. ‘Some sampling and reliability problems in archaeology’, Archéologie et Calculateurs: Problèmes Semiologiques et Mathématiques (CNRS: Paris) 161–75.Google Scholar

Cowgill, G.L. 1972. ‘Models, methods and techniques for seriation’ in Clarke, D.L. (ed.) Models in archaeology (London: Methuen) 381–424.Google Scholar

Crown, P.L. 2007. ‘Life histories of pots and potters: situating the individual in archaeology’, American Antiquity, 72(4): 677–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crummy, P. and Terry, R. 1979. ‘Seriation problems in urban archaeology’ in Millett, M. (ed.) Pottery and the archaeologist, Institute of Archaeology Occasional Publications, 4: 49–60.Google Scholar

Crusoe, D.L. 1971. ‘The missing half: The analysis of ceramic fabric’, Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin, 13: 108–114.Google Scholar

Cuomo di Caprio, N. 1971–2. ‘Proposta di classificazione della fornaci per cermica e laterizi nell'area italiana’ Sibrium, 11: 373–464.Google Scholar

Cushing, F.H. 1886. A Study of Pueblo Pottery as illustrative of Zuni Culture Growth, Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, 4 (Washington D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology).Google Scholar

Darvill, T. and Timby, J. 1982. ‘Textural analysis: a review of limitations and possibilities’, in Freestone, I.C., Johns, C. and Potter, T. (eds.) Current research in ceramics: Thin-section studies, British Museum Occasional Paper 32 (London: British Museum) 73–87.Google Scholar

Davey, P. and Hodges, R. 1983. ‘Ceramics and trade: a critique of the archaeological evidence’ in Davey, P. and Hodges, R. (eds.) Ceramics and trade. The production and distribution of later medieval pottery in north-west Europe, (Sheffield: Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Sheffield) 1–14.Google Scholar

David, E. 1959. French Country Cooking (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar

David, N. and Hennig, H. 1972. The ethnography of pottery: a Fulani study seen in archaeological perspective, Addison-Wesley Modular Publications 21 (Reading Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar

Davies, N. 1971. Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century; part 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Dawson, D. and Kent, O. 1985. ‘Kiln superstructures – the Bickley experiment’, Bulletin of the Experimental Firing Group, 3: 70–9.Google Scholar

Day, P.M., Kiriatzi, E., Tsolakidou, A. and Kilikoglou, V. 1999. ‘Group therapy in Crete: a comparison between analyses by NAA and thin section petrography of Early Minoan pottery’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(8): 1025–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeBoer, W.R. and Lathrap, D.W. 1979. ‘The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics’ in Kramer, C. (ed.) Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology (New York: Columbia University Press) 102–138.Google Scholar

Degryse, P., Poblome, J., Donners, K., Deckers, K. and Waelkens, M. 2003. ‘Geoarchaeological investigations of the “potters’ quarter” at Sagalassos, southwest Turkey’, Geoarchaeology 18(2): 255–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVore, I. 1968. ‘Comments’ in Binford, L.R. and Binford, S.R. (eds.) New Perspectives in Archaeology (New York: Aldine) 346–9.Google Scholar

Déchelette, J. 1904. Les vases céramiques ornés de la Gaule romaine (Paris: A. Picard).Google Scholar

Dempsey, P. and Baumhoff, M. 1963. ‘The statistical use of artefact distributions to establish chronological sequences’, American Antiquity, 28: 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desbat, A. 1989. ‘Aperçu et réflexions sur les techniques traditionelles des céramiques à partir d'exemples marocains’ in Rivet, L. (ed.) Actes du Congres de Lezoux 4–7 Mai 1989 (Marseille: Societe Francaise d’Étude de la Céramique Antique en Gaule) 143–152.Google Scholar

Doran, J.E. 1971. ‘Computer analysis of data from the La Tène cemetery at Münsingen-Rain’ in Hodson, F.R., Kendall, D.G. and Tăutu, P. (eds.) Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) 422–31.Google Scholar

Doran, J.E. and Hodson, F.R. 1975. Mathematics and computers in Archaeology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Dornbusch, J.B. 1873. Die Kunstgilde der Töpfer in der abteilichen Stadt Siegburg (Köln).Google Scholar

Douglas, F.H. and Raynolds, F.R. 1941. ‘Pottery design terminology – final report on questionnaires’, Clearing House for Southwestern Museums Newsletter 35 (Denver).Google Scholar

Dragendorff, H. 1895. ‘Terra sigillata’, Bonner Jahrbücher 96: 18–155.Google Scholar

Draper, J. 1975. Dated post-medieval pottery in Northampton Museum (Northampton: Northampton Museum and Art Gallery).Google Scholar

Drier, R.W. 1939. ‘A new method of sherd classification’, American Antiquity, 5: 31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drury, P.J. 1981. ‘The production of brick and tile in medieval England’ in Crossley, D.W. (ed.) Medieval Industry, Council for British Archaeology Research Report 40 (London: Council for British Archaeology) 126–42.Google Scholar

Dudd, S.H., Evershed, R.P. and Gibson, A.M. 1999. ‘Evidence for varying patterns of exploitation of animal products in different prehistoric pottery traditions based on lipids preserved in surface and absorbed residues’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(12): 1473–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, A.I. 1996. ‘Ceramic micro-seriation: types or attributes?’, American Archaeology, 61(1): 89–101.Google Scholar

Duhamel, P. 1973. ‘Les fours céramiques gallo-romains’, in Duval, P.-M. (ed.) Recherches d'archéologie celtique et gallo-romaine, Hautes études du Monde gréco-romaine 5 (Paris-Geneva: Centre de recherches de l'histoire et de philologie de la IVème section de l’École Pratique des Hautes Études, III) 141–54.Google Scholar

Duistermatt, K. 2007. ‘Not fit for firing: unfired vessel fragments from Late Bronze Age Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria, and their value for the study of pottery technology’, Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies, 23: 21–40.Google Scholar

Dunnell, R.C. 1970. ‘Seriation method and its evaluation’, American Antiquity, 35: 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunnell, R.C. 1990. ‘Artefact size and lateral displacement under tillage: comments on the Odell and Cowan experiment’, American Antiquity, 55(3): 592–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunnell, R.C. and Simek, J.F. 1995. ‘Artifact size and plowzone processes’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 22(3): 305–19.Google Scholar

Dyer, C. 1982. ‘The social and economic changes of the later Middle Ages and the pottery of the period’, Medieval Ceramics, 6: 33–42.Google Scholar

Edwards, B.J.N. 1974. ‘A pottery drawing aid’, Antiquity, 48: 230–2.Google Scholar

Edwards, I. and Jacobs, L. 1986. ‘Experiments with stone pottery wheel bearings – notes on the use of rotation in the production of ancient pottery’, Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden), 4: 49–55.Google Scholar

Eerkens, J.W. and Bettinger, R.L. 2001. ‘Techniques for assessing standardization in artefact assemblages: can we scale material variability?’, American Antiquity, 66(3): 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egloff, B.J. 1973. ‘A method for counting ceramic rim sherds’, American Antiquity, 38(3) 351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellison, S.L.R., Barwick, V.J. and Duguid Farrant, T.J., 2009. Practical statistics for the analytical scientist – a bench guide, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry).Google Scholar

Emeleus, V.M. 1960. ‘Neutron activation analysis of Samian ware sherds’, Archaeometry, 3: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English Heritage, 1991. Management of Archaeological Projects II (London: English Heritage).Google Scholar

Ericson, J.E. and Stickel, E.G. 1973. ‘A proposed classification system for ceramics’, World Archaeology, 4: 357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. and Meggers, B.J. 1962. ‘Use of organic temper for Carbon 14 dating in lowland South America’, American Antiquity, 28: 243–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. and Millett, M. 1992. ‘Residuality revisited’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 11(2): 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everitt, B.S., Landau, S. and Leese, M. 2001. Cluster Analysis, 4th edn. (London: Arnold).Google Scholar

Evershed, R.P. 1999. ‘Lipids as carriers of anthropogenic signals from prehistory’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 354: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evershed, R.P. 2008. ‘Organic residue analysis in archaeology: the archaeological biomarker revolution’, Archaeometry, 50(6): 895–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falbe, C.T. 1843. Vases antiques du Pérou (Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Farrar, R.A.H., 1973. ‘The techniques and sources of Romano-British black-burnished ware’ in Detsicas, A.P. (ed.) Current research in Romano-British coarse pottery, Council for British Archaeology Research Report 10: 67–103.

Faure-Boucharlat, E. 1990. A la fortune du pot; la cuisine et la table à Lyon et à Vienne Xe-XIXe siècles d'après les fouilles archéologiques (Lyon: Musée de la Civilisation Gallo-Romaine).Google Scholar

Feathers, J.K. 2006. ‘Explaining shell-tempered pottery in prehistoric Eastern North America’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(2): 89–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feathers, J.K. and Rhode, D. 1998. ‘Luminescence dating of protohistoric pottery from the Great Basin’, Geoarchaeology, 13(3): 287–308.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinman, G.M. 1999. ‘Rethinking our Assumptions: Economic Specialization at the Household Scale in Ancient Ejutla, Oaxaca, Mexico’, in Skibo, J.M. and Feinman, G.M. (eds.) Pottery and People: a dynamic interaction (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press) 81–98.Google Scholar

Felicissimo, M.P., Peixoto, J.L., Bittencourt, C., Tomasi, R., Houssiau, L., Pireaux, J.J., and Rodrigues-Filho, U.P. 2010. ‘SEM, EPR and ToF-SIMS analyses applied to unravel the technology employed for pottery-making by pre-colonial Indian tribes from Pantanal, Brazil’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(9): 2179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, S.J. 1979. Thermoluminescence techniques in archaeology (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Fleming, S.J. and Swann, C.P. 1992. ‘Recent applications of PIXE spectrometry in archaeology 2. Characterization of Chinese pottery exported to the Islamic world’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 64: 528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, M. and Lock, G.R. 1991. Digging numbers: elementary statistics for archaeologists, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 31 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fontana, V. 1998. ‘Procedures to analyse intra-site pottery distribution, applied to the Neolithic site of Fimon, Molino Casarotto (Italy), Housesite No. 3’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(11) 1067–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, J.A. 1954. ‘The type concept revisited’, American Anthropologist, 56: 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, J.A. 1962. A quantitative method for deriving cultural chronology, Pan American Union Technical Manual 1 (Washington).Google Scholar

Ford, J.A. and Quimby, G.I. 1945. The Tchefuncte Culture, an Early Occupation of the Lower Mississippi Valley, Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 2 (Menasha, Wisconsin).Google Scholar

Formenti, F., Hesnard, A. and Tchernia, A. 1978. ‘Une amphore Lamboglia 2 contenant du vin dans l’épave de la Madrague de Giens’, Archaeonautica, 2: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, B. 1963. The local port book of Southampton 1435–36 (Southampton: Southampton University Press).Google Scholar

Foster, G.M. 1959. ‘The potter's wheel: an analysis of idea and artefact in invention’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 15: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, G.M. 1960. ‘Life-expectancy of utilitarian pottery in Tzintzuntzan, Michoacan, Mexico’, American Antiquity, 25: 606–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franchet, L. 1911. Céramique primitive: introduction à l’étude de la technologie (Paris: Geuthner).Google Scholar

Frankel, D. and Webb, J.M. 2001. ‘Population, households and ceramic consumption in a prehistoric Cypriot village’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 28(1–2): 115–29.Google Scholar

Franken, H.J. 1993/94. ‘Notes on the typology of pot handles and grips’, Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden), 11: 47–53.Google Scholar

Franken, H.J. and Kalsbeek, A.J. 1969. Excavations at Tell Deir ‘Alla Alla 1 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Franken, H.J. and Kalsbeek, A.J. 1984. ‘Iron Age pottery from Haren (Northern Brabant, The Netherlands)’, Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden), 2: 17–26.Google Scholar

Freestone, I.C. 1982. ‘Applications and potential of electron probe micro analysis in technological and provenance investigations of ancient ceramics’, Archaeometry, 24(2): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freestone, I.C. 1999. ‘The science of early English porcelain’, British Ceramic Proceedings, 60: 11–17.Google Scholar

Freestone, I. and Gaimster, D. (eds.) 1997. Pottery in the Making: World Ceramic Traditions (London: British Museum Press).Google Scholar

Freestone, I.C., Meeks, N.D. and Middleton, A.P. 1985. ‘Retention of phosphate in buried ceramics: an electron microprobe approach’, Archaeometry, 27(2): 161–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freestone, I.C. and Tite, M.S. 1997. ‘The technology of German stoneware glazes’, in Gaimster, D.R.M. (ed.) German Stoneware 1200–1900 (London: British Museum Publications): 354–8.Google Scholar

Fulford, M.G. 1975. New Forest Roman Pottery, British Archaeological Reports British Series, 17 (Oxford: BAR).Google Scholar

Fulford, M.G. and Hodder, I. 1974. ‘A regression analysis of some later Romano-British pottery: a case study’, Oxoniensia, 39: 26–33.Google Scholar

Fulford, M.G. and Huddleston, K. 1991. The current state of Romano-British pottery studies, English Heritage Occasional Papers, 1(London: English Heritage).Google Scholar

Fulford, M.G. and Peacock, D.P.S. (eds.) 1984. The Avenue du President Habib Bourguiba, Salammbo: The Pottery and other ceramic objects from the site, Excavations at Carthage: The British Mission, I, 2.Google Scholar

Fulford, M.G. and Timby, J. 2001. ‘Timing devices, fermentation vessels, ‘ritual’ piercing? A consideration of deliberately ‘holed’ pots from Silchester and elsewhere’, Britannia, 32: 293–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fülle, G. 1997. ‘The internal organisation of the Arretine terra sigillata industry: problems of evidence and interpretation’, Journal of Roman Studies, 87: 111–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaffney, C., Gaffney, V. and Tingle, M. 1985. ‘Settlement, economy and behaviour? Micro-regional land use models and the interpretation of surface artefact patterns’, in Haselgrove, C., Millett, M. and Smith, I. (eds.) Archaeology from the ploughsoil (Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield), 95–107.Google Scholar

Gardin, J.-C. 1958: Four codes for the description of artefacts: an essay in archaeological technique and theory’, American Anthropologist, 60: 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardin, J.C. 1985. Code pour l'analyse des formes de poteries (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar

Garnier, E. 1880. Histoire de la céramique (Tours).Google Scholar

Garrison, E. 2003. Techniques in Archaeological Geology (Natural Science in Archaeology) (London: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, E.W. 1951. ‘Archaeological excavations in Fiji’, Anthropological Records, 13: 189–288.Google Scholar

Gifford, J.C. 1960. ‘The type-variety method of ceramic classification as an indicator of cultural phenomena’, American Antiquity, 25: 341–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilboa, A., Karasik, A., Sharon, L. and Smilansky, U. 2004. ‘Towards computerised typology and classification of ceramics’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(6): 681–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillam, J.P. 1957. ‘Types of Roman coarse pottery in northern Britain’, Archaeologia Aeliana, 35: 180–251.Google Scholar

Gillin, J. 1938. ‘A method of notation for the description and comparison of southwestern pottery sherds by formula’, American Antiquity, 4: 22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gladwin, N. 1937. ‘Petrography of Snaketown pottery’ in Gladwin, H.S. (ed.) Excavations at Snaketown, Medallion Papers, Gila Pueblo, Arizona 25.Google Scholar

Glanzman, W.D. 1983. ‘Xeroradiographic examination of pottery manufacturing techniques: A test case from the Baq'ah valley, Jordan’, MASCA Journal, 2(6): 163–9.Google Scholar

Glascock, M.D. 1992. ‘Characterization of archaeological ceramics at MURR by neutron activation analysis and multivariate statistics’ in Neff, H. (ed.) Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7 (Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press), 11–26.Google Scholar

Gliozzo, E., Kirkman, I.W., Pantos, E. and Memmi Turbani, I. 2004. ‘Black gloss pottery: production sites and technology in northern Etruria, Part II: gloss technology’, Archaeometry, 46(2): 227–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, A.E. 1975. ‘Homo Faber: the pot and the potter at Taranach’, Bulletin of American Schools of Oriental Research, 219: 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glover, I.C. 1972. Excavations in Timor (Canberra: Australian National University).Google Scholar

Glover, I.C. 1990. ‘Ban Don Ta Phet 1984–85’, in Glover, I.C. and Glover, E. (eds.) Southeast Asian Archaeology 1986, British Archaeological Reports International Series, 561 (Oxford: BAR), 139–183.Google Scholar

Going, C.J. 1987. The Mansio and other sites in south-eastern sector of Caesaromagus: the Roman pottery, Council for British Archaeology Research Report 62 (London: Council for British Archaeology).Google Scholar

Goldmann, K. 1972. ‘Zwei Methoden chronologischer Grüppierung’, Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica, 3: 1–34.Google Scholar

Goodman, D., Nishimura, Y., Uno, T. and Yamamoto, T. 1994. ‘A ground radar survey of medieval kiln sites in Suzu City, western Japan’, Archaeometry, 36(2): 317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goody, J.C. 1982. Cooking, cuisine and culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 1993. ‘Bonfire of the enquiries. Pottery firing temperatures in archaeology. What for?’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 19(3): 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goulder, J. 2010. ‘Administrators’ bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl’, Antiquity, 84(324): 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, C.M. 1980. ‘Roman pottery’, in Jones, D.M. (ed.) Excavations at Billingsgate Buildings Triangle, Lower Thames Street, 1974, London and Middlesex Archaeological Society Special Paper 4 (London: LAMAS) 39–80.Google Scholar

Greenacre, M.J. 2007. Correspondence Analysis in Practice (Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, J.P. and Johnson, B. 1978. ‘An experimental tile kiln at Norton Priory, Cheshire’, Medieval Ceramics, 2: 31–42.Google Scholar

Greene, K.T. 1979. The pre-Flavian fine wares, Report on the excavations at Usk 1965–1976 (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).Google Scholar

Greenwell, W. 1877. British Barrows (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Gregg, M.W., Banning, E.B., Gibbs, K. and Slater, G.F. 2009. ‘Subsistence practices and pottery use in Neolithic Jordan: molecular and isotopic evidence’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(4): 936–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregg, M.W. and Slater, G.F. 2010. ‘A new method for extraction, isolation and transesterification of free fatty acids from archaeological pottery’, Archaeometry, 52(5): 833–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J.B. 1950–54. Prehistoric pottery of the eastern United States (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology).Google Scholar

Griffiths, D. 1978. ‘Use-marks on historic ceramics: a preliminary study’, Historical Archaeology, 12: 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, N., Jenner, A. and Wilson, C. 1990. Drawing archaeological finds (London: Archetype Publications).Google Scholar

Grignon, 1774. Fouilles d'une ville romaine sur la montagne du Châtelet (Paris).Google Scholar

Grimshaw, R.W. 1980. The chemistry and physic of clays and allied ceramic materials (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar

Grivaux de la Vincelle, C.M. 1807. Antiquités gauloises et romaines recueillies dans les jardins du Palais du Sénat (Paris).Google Scholar

Groevius, and Gronovius, 1694. Thesaurus antiquitatum (Traj. ad Rhenum).Google Scholar

Gruner, D. 1973. Die Berber-Keramik, Studien zur Kulterkunde, 33 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner).Google Scholar

Guiseppi, M.S. 1937. ‘Medieval pottery in Kingston upon Thames’, Surrey Archaeological Collections, 45: 151–2.Google Scholar

Günther, A. 1901. ‘Augusteisches Graberfeld bei Coblenz-Neuerdorf’ Bonner Jahrbucher, 107: 73–94.Google Scholar

Guthe, C.E. 1925. Pueblo Pottery making, a study at the village of San Ildefonso, Papers of the Phillips Academy Southwestern Expedition 2 (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Guthe, C.E. 1927. A Method of Ceramic Description, Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, 8: 23–9.

Gutierrez, A., 2003. ‘A shipwreck cargo of Sevillian pottery from the Studland Bay wreck, Dorset, UK’, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 32(1): 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagstrum, M.B. 1985. ‘Measuring prehistoric ceramic craft specialization: a test case in the American Southwest’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 12(1): 65–75.Google Scholar

Hagstrum, M.B. and Hildebrand, J.A. 1990. ‘The two-curve method for reconstructing ceramic morphology’, American Antiquity, 55(2): 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, N.S. and Laflin, S. 1984. ‘A computer aided design technique for pottery profiles’ in Laflin, S. (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1984 (Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham) 178–88.Google Scholar

Hally, D.J. 1983. ‘Use alteration of pottery vessel surfaces: an important source of evidence in the identification of vessel function’, North American Archaeologist, 4: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, S. 1977. ‘The Iron Age pottery’ in Bell, M.G. (ed.) ‘Excavations at Bishopstone’ Sussex Archaeological Collections, 115: 83–118.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Sir W. 1766–67. Etruscan, Greek and Roman vases from the cabinet of Sir W. Hamilton (Naples).Google Scholar

Hamon, E. and Hesnard, A. 1977. ‘Problèmes de documentation et de description relatifs à un corpus d'amphores romaines’, in Méthodes classiques et méthodes formelles dans l’étude des amphores, Collection de l’École Française de Rome 32 (Rome), 17–33.Google Scholar

Hampe, R. and Winter, A. 1962. Bei Töpfern und Töpferinnen in Kreta Messenien und Zypern (Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum).Google Scholar

Hampe, R. and Winter, A. 1965. Bei Töfern und Zieglern in Süditalien Sizilien und Greichenland (Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum).Google Scholar

Harbottle, G. 1982. ‘Provenience studies using neutron activation analysis: The role of standardization’, in Olin, J.S. and Franklin, A.D. (eds.) Archaeological ceramics (Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press), 67–77.Google Scholar

Harbottle, G. and Holmes, L. 2007. ‘The history of the Brookhaven National Laboratory project in archaeological chemistry, and applying nuclear methods to the fine arts’, Archaeometry, 49(2): 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy-Smith, A. 1974. ‘Post-medieval pot shapes: a quantitative analysis’, Science and Archaeology, 11: 4–15.Google Scholar

Hargraves, L.L. and Smith, W. 1936. ‘A method for determining the texture of pottery’, American Antiquity, 2: 32–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harry, K.G. 2005. ‘Ceramic specialization and agricultural marginality: do ethnographic models explain the development of specialized pottery production in the prehistoric American Southwest?’, American Antiquity, 70(2): 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harry, K. and Frink, L. 2009. ‘The Arctic cooking pot: why was it adopted?’, American Anthropologist, 111(3): 330–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, F.A. and Adams, S.J. 1983. ‘The chemical analysis of Romano-British pottery from the Alice Holt Forest, Hampshire, by means of inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry’, Archaeometry, 25(2): 179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, B. and Dickinson, B. 2008–11. Names on Terra Sigillata, vols 1–7 (London: Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar

Hartley, K. and Tomber, R. 2006. ‘A mortarium bibliography for Roman Britain’, Journal of Roman Pottery Studies, 13.Google Scholar

Haselgrove, C. 1985. ‘Inference from ploughsoil’ in Haselgrove, C., Millett, M. and Smith, I.Archaeology from the ploughsoil (Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield) 7–30.Google Scholar

Haselgrove, C., Millett, M. and Smith, I. 1985. Archaeology from the ploughsoil (Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield).Google Scholar

Haslam, J. 1975. ‘The excavation of a 17th-century pottery site at Cove, E. Hampshire’, Post-Medieval Archaeology, 9: 164–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauptmann, A., Pingel, V. (eds.) 2008. Archäometrie – Methoden und Anwendungsbeispiele naturwissenschaftlicher Verfahren in der Archäologie (Archaeometry: Methods and Case Studies of the Application of Scientific Methods in Archaeology), (Stuttgart: Schweizerbart).Google Scholar

Hayes, J.W. 1972. Late Roman pottery (London: The British School at Rome).Google Scholar

von Hefner, J. 1862. Die römische Töpferei in Westendorf (München).Google Scholar

von Hefner, J. and Wolf, J.W. 1850. Die Burg Tannenburg (Frankfurt-am-Main).Google Scholar

Hegmon, M. 2000. ‘Advances in ceramic ethnoarchaeology’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(3): 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hein, A., Georgopoulou, V., Nodarau, E. and Kilikoglou, V. 2008. ‘Koan amphorae from Halasarna – investigations in a Hellenistic amphora production centre’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(4): 1049–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hein, A. and Kilikoglou, V. 2012. ‘CeraDAT – prototype of a web-based relational database for archaeological ceramics’, Archaeometry, 54(2): 230–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hein, A., Tsolakidou, A., Iliopoulos, I., Mommsen, H., Buxeda i Garrigós, J., Montana, G. and Kilikoglou, V. 2002. ‘Standardisation of elemental analytical techniques applied to provenance studies of archaeological ceramics: an inter laboratory calibration study’, Analyst 127: 542–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henderson, J. 2000. The Science and Archaeology of Materials: an investigation of inorganic materials (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Hendrickson, E.M. and McDonald, M.A. 1983. ‘Ceramic form and function: an ethnographic search and archaeological explanation’, American Anthropologist, 85: 630–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennicker, J.M. 1796. Two letters on the origin of Norman tiles (London).Google Scholar

Hermet, F. 1934. La Graufesenque (Paris: Librairie Ernest Leroux).Google Scholar

Heron, C., Evershed, R.P. and Goad, L.J. 1992. ‘Effects of migration of soil lipids on organic residues associated with buried potsherds’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 18(6): 641–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heron, C. and Evershed, R.P. 1993. ‘The analysis of organic residues and the study of pottery use’, Archaeological Method and Theory, 5: 247–84.Google Scholar

Heron, C. and Pollard, A.M. 1987. ‘The analysis of natural resinous materials from Roman amphorae’ in Slater, E.A. and Tate, J.O. (eds.) Science and archaeology, Glasgow, 1987, British Archaeological Reports British Series 196 (Oxford: BAR) 429–47.Google Scholar

Hilgers, W. 1969. Lateinische Gefässnamen, Beihefte Bonner Jahrbucher 31 (Düsseldorf).Google Scholar

Hill, H.E. 1984. ‘Chemical analysis of pottery residues’, Bulletin of the Experimental Firing Group, 2: 86–9.Google Scholar

Hill, J.N. 1970. Broken K Pueblo: prehistoric social organization in the American South-west, University of Arizona Anthropological Papers, 18 (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar

Hill, M.O. 1974. ‘Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method’, Applied Statistics, 23(3): 340–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, D.A. 1977. ‘“Rudely made earthen vessels” of the twelfth to fifteenth centuries AD’, in Peacock, D.P.S (ed.) Pottery and early commerce (London: Academic Press), 221–38.Google Scholar

Hinton, M.P. 1980. ‘Medieval pottery from a kiln site at Kingston upon Thames’, London Archaeologist, 3(14): 377–83.Google Scholar

Hirth, F. 1888. Ancient porcelain: a study in Chinese medieval industry and trade (London).Google Scholar

Hoard, R.J., O’Brien, M.J., Khorasgamy, M.G. and Gopalaratnam, V.S. 1995. ‘A materials-science approach to understanding limestone-tempered pottery from the Midwestern United States’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22(6): 823–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, R.L. 1903. British Museum Catalogue of English Pottery (London: British Museum).Google Scholar

Hodder, I. 1979. ‘Pottery distribution: service and tribal areas’ in Millett, M. (ed.) Pottery and the archaeologist, Institute of Archaeology Occasional Publications, 4 (London: Institute of Archaeology), 7–24.Google Scholar

Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hodder, I. and Orton, C.R. 1976. Spatial analysis in archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hodges, H.W.M. 1962. ‘Thin sections of prehistoric pottery: an empirical study’, Bulletin of the University of London Institute of Archaeology, 3: 58–68.Google Scholar

Holladay, J.S. 1976. ‘A technical aid to pottery drawing’, Antiquity, 50: 223–9.Google Scholar

Holmes, W.H. 1886. ‘Pottery of the ancient pueblos, Fourth report of the Bureau of Ethnology (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), 257–360.Google Scholar

Howard, H. and Morris, E. (eds.) 1980. Production and distribution: a ceramic viewpoint, British Archaeological Reports International Series 120 (Oxford: BAR), 323–46.Google Scholar

Hughes, M.J. 2008. ‘Inductively coupled plasma analysis of tin-glazed tiles and vessels produced at several centres in London,’ in Tyler, K., Betts, I. and Stephenson, R.London's delftware industry MOLAS Monograph 40 (London: Museum of London and English Heritage) 120–31.Google Scholar

Hughes, M.J. 2009. ‘ICP-AES analysis of ceramic building material’, in Paul Drury, Hill Hall – a singular house devised by a Tudor intellectual, ch.5 Environmental and scientific studies. (London: The Society of Antiquaries of London), 366–79.Google Scholar

Hughes, M.J., Cowell, M.R. and Craddock, P.T. 1976. ‘Atomic absorption techniques in archaeology’, Archaeometry, 18(1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, M. and Gaimster, D. 1999. ‘Neutron activation analyses of maiolica from London, Norwich, the Low Countries and Italy’, in Gaimster, D. (ed.) Maiolica in the North. The archaeology of tin-glazed earthenware in north-west Europe c. 1500–1600, British Museum Occasional Paper 122 (London: British Museum): 57–89.Google Scholar

Hulthén, B. 1974. ‘On documentation of pottery’, Acta Archaeologica Lundensia (Lund).Google Scholar

Hume, I.N. 1977. Early English Delftware from London and Virginia, Colonial Williamsburg Occasional Papers in Archaeology, 2.

Huntley, D.J., Godfrey-Smith, D.I. and Thewalt, M.L.W. 1985. ‘Optical dating of sediments’, Nature, 313: 105–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurst, J.G. 1977. ‘Annotations on Anglo-Saxon pottery’, Medieval Ceramics, 1: 75–8.Google Scholar

Hurst, J.G. 1982. ‘Gerald Dunning and his contribution to medieval archaeology’, Medieval Ceramics, 6: 3–20.Google Scholar

Ihm, P. 1981. ‘The Gaussian model in chronological seriation’, Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Union for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences Vol. Z, Commission IV (Mexico) 108–24.Google Scholar

Irving, A. 2011. A Research Framework for Post-Roman Ceramic Studies in Britain, Medieval Pottery Research Group Occasional Paper no. 6 (London: Medieval Pottery Research Group).Google Scholar

Ixer, R., Lunt, S. and Sillar, B. 2013. ‘The use of andesite temper in Inca and pre-Inca pottery from the region of Cuzco, Peru’, in Martinón-Torres, M. and Hunt, A. (eds.) 10th meeting of the European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (to be published by QScience.com).

Jacobs, L. 1983. ‘Notes about the relationship between filler and clay, and filler and shrinkage’, Newsletter. Department of Pottery Technology (University of Leiden), 1: 6–12.Google Scholar

Jacobs, M. and Peremans, P. 1976. ‘De Studie van Archeologica op Schilderijen’, Handelingen der Maatschappij voor Geschiedenis en Oudheidkunde te Gent, new series, 30: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jallot, L. 1990. ‘Conservation et distribution du matérial céramique: de l’éspace domestique à l’éspace social’ in Colomer, A., Colourou, J. and Gutherz, X. (eds.) Documents d’Archéologie Française 24 (Boussargues, Argelliers, Hérault) 171–98.Google Scholar

Jamieson, A., and Warfe, A. 2005. ‘Experimental archaeology and prehistoric technology: neolithic pottery production in the Dakhlen Oasis, south central Eqypt’, Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies, 21: 87–102.Google Scholar

Jeffra, C. 2008. ‘Hair and potters: an experimental look at temper’, World Archaeology, 40(1): 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, J.H.B. 1908. ‘The chemical examination of some substances from the Red Hills of Essex’, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London, new series, 22: 182–6.Google Scholar

Jewitt, L. 1878. Ceramic Art of Great Britain (London).Google Scholar

Johns, C. 1971. Arretine and samian pottery (London: British Museum).Google Scholar

Johnston-Feller, R., 2001. Color Science in the Examination of Museum Objects: Nondestructive Procedures, (Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute).Google Scholar

Jones, R.E. 1986. Greek and Cypriot pottery: a review of scientific studies, Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper, 1 (Athens: British School at Athens).Google Scholar

Jope, E.M. 1956. ‘Ceramics: medieval’, in Singer, C., Holmyard, E.J., Hall, A.R. and Williams, T.I. (eds.) A History of Technology, 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press) 284–310.Google Scholar

Joukowsky, M. 1980. A complete manual of field archaeology (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar

Joyner, L. (ed.) 2000. ‘Production and distribution of pottery in the eastern Mediterranean: applications of ceramic petrography’, Internet Archaeology, 9 Special section (7 papers) ().

Julien, S. 1856. Histoire de la fabrication de la porcelaine chinoise (Paris).Google Scholar

Kahl, W.A. and Ramminger, B. 2012. ‘Non-destructive fabric analysis of prehistoric pottery using high-resolution X-ray microtomography: a pilot study on the late Mesolithic to Neolithic site Hamburg-Boberg’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(7): 2206–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karasik, A. and Smilansky, U. 2008. ‘3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(5): 1148–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karasik, A. and Smilansky, U. 2011. ‘Computerized morphological classification of ceramics’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(10): 2644–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keay, S. and Williams, D. 2005. Roman Amphorae: a digital resource [data-set]. York: Archaeology Data Service [distributor] ( ).Google Scholar

Keighley, J. 1973 ‘Some problems in the quantitative interpretation of ceramic data’, in Renfrew, C. (ed.) The explanation of culture change (London: Duckworth) 131–6.Google Scholar

Kempe, A.J. 1832. ‘An account of various Roman antiquities discovered on the site of the Church of Saint Michael, Crooked Lane, and Eastcheap in forming the northern approaches of the new London Bridge’, Archaeologia, 24: 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, D.G. 1971. ‘Seriation from abundance matrices’, in Hodson, F.R., Kendall, D.G. and Tăutu, P. (eds.) Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) 215–52.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G.C. and Knopff, L. 1960. ‘Dating by thermoluminescence’, Archaeology, 13: 147–8.Google Scholar

Kenrick, P. 1993. ‘Italian terra sigillata: a sophisticated Roman industry’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 12(2): 235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, P.F. 1977. Optical mineralogy (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar

Kidder, A.V. 1924. An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology, Papers of the Phillips Academy Southwestern Expedition 1 (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Kidder, A.V. 1931. The Pottery of Pecos, Papers of the Phillips Academy Southwestern Expedition 5 (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Kidder, M.A. and Kidder, A.V. 1917. ‘Notes on the Pottery of Pecos’, American Anthropologist, new series, 19: 325–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kikiloglou, V. and Vekinis, G. 2002. ‘Failure prediction and function determination of archaeological pottery by Finite Element Analysis’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(11): 1317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kildyushevskii, V. 2006. ‘Pskov pottery in the 12th to 16th centuries’ in Orton, C.R. (ed.) The Pottery from Medieval Novgorod and its Region (London: UCL Press) 79–115.Google Scholar

Kingery, W.D. 1982. ‘Plausible inferences from ceramic artifacts’, in Olin, J.S. and Franklin, A.D. (eds.) Archaeological ceramics (Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press) 37–45.Google Scholar

Kingery, W.D. 1991. ‘Attic pottery gloss technology’, Archaeometry, 40(2): 261–79.Google Scholar

Kingery, W.D. 1996. ‘A role for materials science’, and ‘Materials science and material culture’ in Kingery, W.D. (ed.) Learning from Things: Method and Theory of Material Culture Studies, (Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press) 175–80 and 181–204.Google Scholar

Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K. and Uhlmann, D.R. 1976. Introduction to ceramics. 2nd edn. (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar

Kingery, W.D. and Vandiver, P. 1986. Ceramic Masterpieces (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar

Knappett, C., Pirrie, D., Power, M.R., Nikolakopoulou, I., Hilditch, J., and Rollinson, G.K. 2011. ‘Mineralogical analysis and provenancing of ancient ceramics using automated SEM-EDS analysis (QEMSCAN®): a pilot study on LB1 pottery from Akrotiri, Thera’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2): 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, C. 1841. London. 1 (London).Google Scholar

Knorr, K. 1906. Die verzierten Terra sigillata von Cannstatt (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Kramer, C. 1985. ‘Ceramic ethnoarchaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 14: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauskopf, K.B. and Bird, D.K. 1995. Introduction to Geochemistry 3rd edn. (London: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar

Krieger, A.D. 1944. ‘The typological concept’, American Antiquity, 9: 271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeber, A.L. 1916. ‘Zuñi Potsherds’, Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 18(1): 1–37.Google Scholar

Kunow, J., Giesler, J., Gechter, M., Gaitzsch, W., Follmann-Schulz, A.B. and von Brandt, D. 1986. Vorschläge zur systematischen Beschreibung von Keramik, Führer des Rheinischen Landesmuseums Bonn, 124 (Köln: Rheinisches Landesmuseum Bonn/Rheinland Verlag).Google Scholar

Kvamme, K.L., Stark, M.T. and Longacre, W.A. 1996. ‘Alternative procedures for assessing standardization in ceramic assemblages’, American Antiquity, 61(1): 116–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laneri, N. 2011. The life-history of the potter's wheel in the Ancient Near East’, in Scarcella, S. (ed.) Archaeological Ceramics: a review of current research, BAR International Series 2193 (Oxford: Archaeopress) 64–72.Google Scholar

Lasfargues, J. and Picon, M. 1982. ‘Die chemischen Untersuchungen’, in von Schnurbein, S. (ed.) Die unverziete Terra Sigillata aus Haltern, Bonenaltertümer Westfalens, 19 (Münster) 6–21.Google Scholar

Laubenheimer, F. 1990. Le temps des amphores en Gaule. Vins, huiles et sauces, Collection des Hesperides (Paris: Editions Errance).Google Scholar

Lauchert, . 1845. Die römische Tongefässe und Legionsziegel der archäologische Sammlung zu Rottweil (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Laxton, R.R. 1976. ‘A measure of pre-Q-ness with applications to archaeology’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 3(1): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laxton, R.R. 1987. ‘Some mathematical problems in seriation with applications’, in Ruggles, C.L.N. and Rahtz, S.P.Q.Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, British Archaeological Reports International Series, 393 (Oxford: BAR) 39–44.Google Scholar

Laxton, R.R. and Restorick, J. 1989. ‘Seriation by similarity and consistency’, in Rahtz, S.P.Q. and Richards, J.D. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, British Archaeological Reports International Series, 548 (Oxford: BAR) 229–40.

Le Grand d’Aussy, P.J.B. 1782. Histoire de la vie privée des Français (Paris).Google Scholar

Le Patourel, H.E.J. 1968. ‘Documentary evidence and the medieval pottery industrial industry’, Medieval Archaeology, 12: 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Patourel, H.E.J. 1983. ‘Documentary evidence for the pottery trade in north-west Europe’, in Davey, P. and Hodges, R. (eds.) Ceramics and trade. The production and distribution of later medieval pottery in north-west Europe (Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield) 27–35.Google Scholar

Leach, B. 1940. A potter's book (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar

Leese, M.N. and Main, P.L. 1983. ‘An approach to the assessment of artefact dimension as descriptors of shape’, in Haigh, J.G.B. (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1983 (Bradford: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford) 171–80.Google Scholar

van der Leeuw, S.E. 1976. Studies in the technology of ancient pottery (Amsterdam: unpublished dissertation).Google Scholar

van der Leeuw, S.E. 1977. ‘Towards a study of the economics of pottery making’ in van Beek, B.L., Brandt, R.W. and Groenman-van Waateringe, W. (eds.) Ex Horreo (Amsterdam: Institute of Pre- and Proto-History, University of Amsterdam) 68–76.Google Scholar

van der Leeuw, S.E. 1984. ‘Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle’, in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds.) The many dimensions of pottery: Ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Cingula, 7 (Amsterdam: Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, University of Amsterdam) 707–92.Google Scholar

van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds.) 1984. The many dimensions of pottery: Ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Cingula, 7 (Amsterdam: Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Lemoine, C. and Picon, M. 1982. ‘La fixation du phosphore par les céramiques lors de leur enfouissement et ses incidences analytiques’, Revue d’Archéometrie, 6: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemoine, C., Walker, S. and Picon, M. 1982. ‘Archaeological, geochemical, and statistical methods in ceramic provenance studies’ in Olin, J.S. and Franklin, A.D. (eds.) Archaeological ceramics (Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press) 57–64.Google Scholar

Lewarch, D.E. and O’Brien, M.J. 1981. ‘The expanding role of surface assemblages in archaeological research’, in Schiffer, M.B.Advances in archaeological method and theory, 4 (New York: Academic Press) 297–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, P.H. and Goodson, K.J. 1991. ‘Images, databases and edge detection for archaeological object drawings’, in Lockyear, K. and Rahtz, S.P.Q. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1990, British Archaeological Reports International Series 565 (Oxford: BAR) 149–53.Google Scholar

Liddell, D. 1932. ‘Report on the Excavation at Hembury Fort, third season, 1932’, Proceedings of the Devon Archaeological Exploration Society, 1: 162–83.Google Scholar

Liming, G., Hongjie, L. and Wilcock, J.D. 1989. ‘The analysis of ancient Chinese pottery and porcelain shapes’, in Rahtz, S.P.Q. and Richards, J.D. (eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989, British Archaeological Reports International Series, 548 (Oxford: BAR) 363–74.Google Scholar

Linné, S. 1925. The Technique of South American Ceramics, Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Sämhälles Handlingar, Fifth Series, series A, band 1, no. 3.

Lippi, M.M., Gonelli, T. and Pallechi, P. 2011. ‘Rice chaff in ceramics from the archaeological site of Sumhuram (Dhofar, Southern Oman)’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(6): 1173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litzel, G. 1749. Beschriebung der Römischen Todten Töpfe (Speyer).Google Scholar

Lobert, H.W. 1984. ‘Types of potter's wheel and the spread of the spindle-wheel in Germany’ in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds.) The many dimensions of pottery: Ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Cingula, 7 (Amsterdam: Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, University of Amsterdam) 203–30.Google Scholar

Loeschcke, S. 1909. ‘Keramische Funde in Haltern’, Mitteilungen der Altertums-Kommision für Westfalen, 5: 103–322.Google Scholar

Lockyear, K. 2012. ‘Applying bootstrapped correspondence analysis to archaeological data’, Journal of Archaeological Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar

London, G. 1981. ‘Dung-tempered clay’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8(2): 189–95.Google Scholar

London, G.A., Shuster, R. and Jacobs, L. 2007. ‘Ceramic technology of selected Hellenistic and Iron Age pottery based on re-firing experiments’, Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies, 23: 77–88.Google Scholar

London Museum. 1940. London Museum Medieval Catalogue (London: London Museum).Google Scholar

Loney, H.L. 2000. ‘Society and technological control: a critical review of models of technological change in ceramic studies’, American Antiquity, 65(4): 646–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loney, H.L. 2001. ‘Pots and evolution: response to Neff and Schiffer et al’, American Antiquity, 66(4): 738–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longacre, W.A. 1985. ‘Pottery use-life among the Kalinga, Northern Luzon, the Philippines’, in Nelson, B.A. (ed.) Decoding prehistoric ceramics (Carbondale: S. Illinois University Press) 334–46.Google Scholar

Longacre, W.A. 1999. ‘Standardization and specialization: what's the link?’, in Skibo, J.M. and Feinman, G.M. (eds.) Pottery and People: a dynamic interaction (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press) 44–58.Google Scholar

López Varela, S.P., van Gijn, A. and Jacobs, L. 2002. ‘De-mystifying pottery production in the Maya Lowlands: detection of traces of use-wear on pottery sherds through microscopic analysis and experimental replication’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(10): 1133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loughton, M.E. 2009. ‘Getting smashed: the deposition of amphorae and the drinking of wine in Gaul during the Late Iron Age’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 28(1): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucke, A. 1988. ‘Brennversuche in Sinne experimenteller Archäologie’, in Vossen, E.R. (ed.) Töpfereiforschung zwischen Archäologie und Entwicklungspolitik, Töpferei- und Keramikforschung, 1 (Bonn: Rudolf Habelt) 128–41.Google Scholar

Ludowici, W. 1904. Stempel-Namen römischer Töpfer von meinen Ausgrabungen im Rheinzabern (Munich).Google Scholar

Lyne, M.A.B. and Jefferies, R.S. 1979. The Alice Holt/Farnham Roman pottery industry Council for British Archaeology Research Report, 30 (London: Council for British Archaeology).Google Scholar

MacKenzie, W.S. and Adams, A.E. 1994. A Colour Atlas of Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section (London: Manson Publishing).Google Scholar

Madsen, T. 1988. ‘Multivariate statistics and archaeology’, in Madsen (ed.) Multivariate archaeology, Jutland Archaeological Society publications, 21: 7–27.Google Scholar

Maggetti, M. 1982. ‘Phase analysis and its significance for technology and origin’ in Olin, J.S. and Franklin, A.D. (eds.) Archaeological Ceramics (Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press) 121–31.Google Scholar

Main, P.L. 1981. A method for the computer storage and comparison of the outline shapes of archaeological artefacts, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (London: Council for National Academic Awards).Google Scholar

Main, P.L. 1982. ‘SHU – an interactive graphics program for the storage, retrieval and analysis of artefact shapes’, in Graham, I. and Webb, E. (eds.) Computer applications in Archaeology 1981 (London Institute of Archaeology) 75–82.Google Scholar

Main, P.L. 1986. ‘Accessing outline shape information efficiently within a large database’, in Laflin, S. (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1986 (Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham) 73–82.Google Scholar

Maniatis, Y., Jones, R.E., Whitbread, I.K., Kostikas, A., Simopoulos, A., Karakalos, C. and William, C.K. 1984. ‘Punic amphoras found at Corinth, Greece: an investigation of their origin and technology’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 11(2): 205–22.Google Scholar

Maniatis, Y. and Tite, M.S. 1981. ‘Technological examination of Neolithic-Bronze Age pottery from Central and Southeast Europe and from the Near East’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 8: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manly, B.F.J. 2005. Multivariate Statistical methods: a primer, 3rd Edn. (London: Chapman and Hall).Google Scholar

Marby, J., Skibo, J.M., Schiffer, M.B. and Kvamme, K. 1988. ‘Use of a falling-weight tester for assessing ceramic impact strength’, American Antiquity, 53(4): 829–39.Google Scholar

March, B. 1934. Standards of Pottery Descriptions, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Occasional Contribution, 3.Google Scholar

Marie, I. and Qasrawi, H. 2005. ‘Virtual assembly of pottery fragments using moiré surface profile measurements’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 32(10): 1527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marquardt, W.H. 1978. ‘Advances in Archaeological Seriation’, in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.) Advances in archaeological method and theory, 1 (New York: Academic Press) 257–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, G. 1978. ‘Early second century fine wares in the London area’, in Arthur, P. and Marsh, G. (eds.) Early Fine wares in Roman Britain, British Archaeological Reports British Series, 57 (Oxford: BAR) 119–223.Google Scholar

Marsh, G.D. and Tyers, P.A. 1978. ‘The Roman pottery from Southwark’, in Bird, J., Graham, A.H., Sheldon, H.L. and Townend, P. (eds.) Southwark excavations 1972–1974 (London: Southwark and Lambeth Archaeological Excavation Committee) 533–86.Google Scholar

Mathew, A.J., Woods, A.J. and Oliver, C. 1991. ‘Spots before your eyes: new comparison charts for visual percentage estimation in archaeological material’, in Middleton, A.P. and Freestone, I.C. (eds.) Recent developments in ceramic petrology, British Museum Occasional Paper, 81 (London: British Museum) 211–63.Google Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1951. ‘Ceramic technology as an aid to cultural interpretation – techniques and problems’, in Griffin, J.B. (ed.) Essays in Archaeological Method, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Papers, 8: 102–16.Google Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1952. ‘The contribution of technical ceramic studies to American archaeology’, Prehistoric Pottery of the Eastern United States, 2 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology) 1–7.Google Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1965. Ceramics and man, Wenner Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 41 (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1966. ‘Some aspects of ceramic technology’, in Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E.S.Science in Archaeology, (London: Thames and Hudson) 592–602.Google Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1981. ‘Archaeological ceramics and the physical sciences: problem definition and results’, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8(4): 448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matson, F.R. 1984. ‘Ceramics and Man reconsidered with some thoughts for the future’, in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C.The many dimensions of pottery: Ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Cingula, 7 (Amsterdam: Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, University of Amsterdam) 25–49.Google Scholar

Mayes, P. 1961. ‘The firing of a pottery kiln of a Romano-British type at Boston, Lincs’, Archaeometry, 4: 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayes, P. 1962. ‘The firing of a second pottery kiln of Romano-British type at Boston, Lincs’, Archaeometry, 5: 80–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, M. and Brooks, C. 1988. Medieval pottery in Britain: AD 900–1600 (Leicester: Leicester University Press).Google Scholar

McMorris, M.R. 1990. ‘The median procedure for n-trees as a maximum likelihood method’, Journal of Classification, 7: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNutt, C.H. 1973. ‘On the methodological validity of frequency seriation’, American Antiquity, 38: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Mellen, J. 1679. Historia urnae sepulchralis sarmaticae (Jena).Google Scholar

Méry, S., Anderson, P., Inizan, M.-L., Lechevallier, M. and Pelegrin, J. 2007. ‘A pottery workshop with flint blades knapped with copper at Nausharo (Indus civilisation, ca. 2500 BC)’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(7): 1091–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, F.S. 1957. Handbook of Ornament (New York: Dover).Google Scholar

Middleton, A.P. 1985. ‘Examination of ash from the experimental firing group pottery bonfire held at Leicester in July 1984 and comparison with some archaeological ashes’, Bulletin of the Experimental Firing Group, 3: 19–24.Google Scholar

Middleton, A.P. 1997. ‘Ceramics’ in Lang, J. and Middleton, A.P. (eds.) Radiography of Cultural Material (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann), 60–81.Google Scholar

Middleton, A.P., Freestone, I.C. and Leese, M.N. 1985. ‘Textural analysis of ceramic thin sections: evaluation of grain sampling procedures’, Archaeometry, 27(1): 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, D. 1985. Artefacts as categories: A study of ceramic variability in Central India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Miller, J.N. and Miller, J.C. 2010. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 6th edn. (Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.).Google Scholar