Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:03:15.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 29 - Applied trauma oral topics

from Section 7 - The trauma oral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
, pp. 660 - 684
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ly, TV, Coetzee, JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: Primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;88:514–20.Google Scholar
Kuo, RS, Tejwani, NC, Digiovanni, CW, Holt, SK, Benirschke, SK, Hansen, ST, Sangeorzan outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82A:1609–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knirk, JL, Jupiter, JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:647–59.Google Scholar

References

Griffin, D, Parsons, N, Shaw, E, et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g4483.Google Scholar
Stein, RE. Radiological aspects of the tarsometatarsal joints. Foot Ankle. 1983;3:286–9.Google Scholar
Ly, TV, Coetzee, JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: Primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;88:514–20.Google Scholar
Henning, JA, Jones, CB, Sietsema, DL, Bohay, DR, Anderson JG. Open reduction internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries: A prospective randomised study. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:913–22.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S; Bolt, B, McBryde, A. Comparison of standard screw fixation versus suture button fixation in Lisfranc ligament injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:892–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panchbhavi, VK. Screw fixation compared with suture-button fixation of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1143.Google Scholar
Mulier, T, Reynders, P, Dereymaeker, G, Broos, P. Severe Lisfrancs injuries: Primary Arthrodesis or ORIF? Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:902–5.Google Scholar
Duncan, CP, Haddad, FS. The Unified Classification System (UCS): Improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 2014;96B:713–16.Google Scholar
Beighton, PH, Horan, F. Orthopedic aspects of the Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969;51:444–53.Google Scholar
Allman, FL Jr. Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49A:774–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, EV. Fractures of the clavicle. In Rockwood, CA Jr, Green, DP, Bucholz, RW (eds). Fractures in Adults, Third Edition. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 1991, pp. 928–90.Google Scholar
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomised clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:110.Google Scholar
Potter, JM, Jones, C, Wild, LM, Schemitsch, EH, McKee, MD. Does delay matter? The restoration of objectively measured shoulder strength and patient-oriented outcome after immediate fixation versus delayed reconstruction of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:514–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, PP, Gross, DF, Gerber, C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:143–50.Google Scholar
Holstein, A Lewis, GB. Fractures of the humerus with radial-nerve paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:1382–4.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, M, Hardy, D, Delince, P. Stability assessment of distal radius fractures. Injury. 1989;20:208–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesbitt, KS, Failla, JM, Les, C. Assessment of instability factors in adult distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:1128–38.Google Scholar
Pensy, RA, Brunton, LM, Parks, BG, Higgins, JP, Chhabra, AB.Single-incision extensile volar approach to the distal radius and concurrent carpal tunnel release: Cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:217–22.Google Scholar
Haus, BM, Jupiter, JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults: Reexamined as evidence-based and outcomes medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2984–91.Google Scholar
McAnany, S, Parsons, BO. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A critical analysis review. JBJS Revs. 2014;2:e5.Google Scholar
McLaurin, TM. Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are we operating on too many? Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2003;62:2432.Google Scholar
Court-Brown, CM, Cattermole, H, McQueen, MM. Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:504–8.Google Scholar
Hertel, R, Hempfing, A, Stiehler, M, Leunig, L. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:427–33.Google Scholar
Boyd, H, Anderson, L. A method of reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43:1041–3.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×