Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:52:16.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Public-Private Institutions as Social and Knowledge Bridges

Reconfiguring the Political Boundaries for Economic Upgrading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Gerald A. McDermott
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Peter A. Hall
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wade Jacoby
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Jonah Levy
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Sophie Meunier
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

How can developing countries upgrade their industries to compete in the world? Scholars of development and international business have increasingly argued that the attendant ability of local firms to upgrade – combine existing resources in new ways to create new higher value products – depends in large part on their access to a variety of knowledge resources (Moran and Ghoshal 1999; Song 2002; Giuliani, Pietrobelli, and Rabellotti 2005). However, it is less clear what types of institutional infrastructure facilitate such access.

A growing current in the innovation literature argues that access to knowledge depends often on whether firms are embedded in rich interfirm networks, which enable them to build collaborative relationships, gain resources, learn, and coordinate experiments (Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr, 1996; McEvily and Marcus 2005). However, scholars also note how the stickiness of past firm practices, social structures, and institutions are slow to change and can constrain one's access to new knowledge resources (Uzzi 1996). This enabling and constraining nature of embeddedness resonates strongly in emerging market countries (Spicer, McDermott, and Kogut 2000), and especially Latin America, where societies are often noted for their weak institutions and social capital (Levitsky and Murillo 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Representation in the Global Age
Identification, Mobilization, and Adjudication
, pp. 100 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allub, Leopoldo. 1996. “Globalizacion y Modernizacion Agroindustrial en la Provincia de San Juan, Argentina.” Estudios Sociologicos 14 (41): 473–92.Google Scholar
Augustin, Borsani. 2001. “Los Diferimientos Impositivos Agropecuarios en la Provincia de San Juan.” Apuntes Agroeconomicos 2(3).Google Scholar
Azpiazu, Diego and Basualdo, Eduardo. 2003. Industria vitivinicola. Estudios Sectorials: Estudio 1.EG.33.6. Buenos Aires: CEPAL.
Berger, Suzanne. 1972. Peasants against Politics: Rural Organization in Brittany, 1911–1967. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne. 2000. “Globalization and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne. 2005. How We Compete. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Steve P., Everett, Martin G., and Freeman, Lin C.. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Dan. 2007. Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cetrangolo, Hugo, Fernandez, Sandra, Quagliano, Javier, Zelenay, Vera, Muratore, Natalia, and Lettier, Francisco. 2002. El negocio de los vinos en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: FAUBA.
Consejo, Empresario Mendocino. 1999. “Impacto Economico de los Regimenes de Promocion de las Provincias San Juan, San Luis, La Rioja y Catamarca.” CEM.
Fleming, Lee. 2001. “Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search.” Management Science 47(1): 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, Elisa and Martin, Bell. 2005. “The Micro-Determinants of Meso-Level Learning and Innovation: Evidence From a Chilean Wine Cluster.” Research Policy 34(1): 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, Elise, Pietrobelli, Carlo, and Rabellotti, Roberto. 2005. “Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Lessons From Latin American Clusters.” World Development 33(4): 549–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobierno de, San Juan. 2004. Proyecto de Fortalecimiento Institucional Para el Desarrollo Rural: Provincia de San Juan.
Granovetter, Mark. 2002. “A Theoretical Agenda for Economic Sociology.” In Guillen, Mauro, Collins, Randall, England, Paula, and Meyer, Marshall, eds. The New Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Knoke, David. 2001. Changing Organizations: Business Networks in the New Political Economy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, Victoria. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard. 1995. Remaking the Italian Economy: Local Politics and Industrial Change in Contemporary Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Gerald A. 2007. “The Politics of Institutional Renovation and Economic Upgrading: Recombining the Vines that Bind in Argentina.” Politics & Society 35(1): 103–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Gerald A., Corredoira, Rafael, and Kruse, Greg. 2009. “Public-Private Institutions as Catalysts of Upgrading in Emerging Markets.” Academy of Management Journal 52(6): 1270–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvily, Bill and Marcus, Alfred. 2005. “Embedded Ties and the Acquisition of Competitive Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 26(11): 1033–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvily, Bill and Zaheer, Aks. 1999. “Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 20(12): 1133–56.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvily, Bill and Zaheer, Aks. 2004. “Architects of Trust: The Role of Network Facilitators in Geographical Clusters.” In Kramer, Roderick and Cook, Karen S., eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Moran, Peter and Ghoshal, Sumantra. 1999. “Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development.” Academy of Management Review 24(3): 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. “Coping with Tragedies of the Commons.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, Jason and Powell, Walter W.. 2004. “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community.” Organization Science 15(1): 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Ansell, Christopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1259–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladino, Marcelo and Jauregui, Juan M.. 2001. La Transformacion del sector Vitivinicola Argentino. Argentina: IAE, Universidad Austral.Google Scholar
Perez-Aleman, Paola 2005. “Cluster Formation, Institutions and Learning: The Emergence of Clusters and Development in Chile.” Industrial and Corporate Change 14(4): 651–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter, Koput, Kenneth, and Smith-Doerr, Laurel. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, Keith and Milward, H. Brinton. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert, Leonardi, Robert, and Nanetti, Raffaella. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Peter and Ingram, Paul. 2002. “Vertical Linkages, Knowledge Transfer and Export Performance: The Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry, 1987–1999.” Working paper.
Rofman, Alejandro B. 1999. Desarrollo Regional y Exclusión Social: Transformaciones y Crisis en la Argentina Contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Ana Maria and Vila, Hernan. 2003. “Structural Changes and Strategies of the Argentinean Wine Chain Actors.” In Gatti, Silvia, Giraud-Heraud, Eric, and Mili, Samir, eds. Wine in the Old World: New Risks and Opportunities. Milano: Franco-Angeli: 215–28.Google Scholar
Safford, Sean. 2009. Why the Garden Club Couldn't Save Youngstown. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Hubert, ed. 2004. Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading. Northampton: Edward Elger Publishing.CrossRef
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Jaeyong. 2002. “Firm Capabilities and Technology Ladders: Sequential Foreign Direct Investments of Japanese Electronic Firms in East Asia.” Strategic Management Journal 23(3): 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, Andrew, McDermott, Gerald, Kogut, Bruce. 2000. “Entrepreneurship and Privatization in Central Europe.” Academy of Management Review 25(3): 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, David and Vedres, Balacs. 2006. “Social Times of Network Spaces: Network Sequences and Foreign Investment in Hungary.” American Journal of Sociology 111(5): 1367–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61(4) 674–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Ezra and Sgourev, Stoyan. 2006. “Peer Capitalism: Parallel Relationships in the U.S. Economy.” American Journal of Sociology 111(5): 1327–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×