Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:24:57.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

The Politics of Representation in the Global Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Peter A. Hall
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wade Jacoby
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Jonah Levy
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Sophie Meunier
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Peter A. Hall
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wade Jacoby
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Jonah Levy
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Sophie Meunier
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

This is a book about how processes of political representation work, whom they represent, and how they develop over time. We think of these as processes in which interests are formed, given a voice within organizations and polities, and influence the decisions of governments. As such, these processes are at the heart of how democracies are organized and governed. As Suzanne Berger has observed, “political representation involves both the organizations that link citizens to government and the political ideas and programs that structure how the world works.” Few processes are more important to the operation of democracy. Democratic governance is a system in which choices are made and compromises forged among competing interests, and the quality of a democracy is determined, in large measure, by how well the views of the people are represented by its governing institutions.

Appropriately, therefore, the study of representation has always been central to political science. How best to accomplish it has been a core question for theorists of democracy since the eighteenth-century debates of Edmund Burke and the authors of The Federalist Papers up to those that join contemporary analysts, such as Robert Dahl (1972), Bernard Manin (1977), and Pierre Rosanvallon (2011). This has never been an easy question to resolve because even the most democratic governments are imperfect mirrors for the views of the people (Pitkin 1984). Of more concern to us, however, are debates among empirical analysts of politics about how existing processes of representation work. How are interests formed? How do they acquire influence, and how are conflicts among them resolved?

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Representation in the Global Age
Identification, Mobilization, and Adjudication
, pp. 1 - 26
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, Rawi. 2001. National Purpose in the World Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. States and Markets in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne. 1972. Peasants Against Politics: Rural Organization in Britanny, 1911–1967. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne, ed. 1981. Organizing Interests in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, Suzanne. 2005. How We Compete. New York: Doubleday Business.Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne and Dore, Ronald, eds. 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1998. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik. 2003. Race Politics in Britain and France. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 1997. “Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy.” Comparative Politics 29(2): 229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry, Drutman, Lee, Schlozman, Kay, and Verba, Sidney. 2007. “Corporate Lobbying Activity in American Politics.” APSA Paper.
Campbell, John. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2012. Contructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper. 2003. Creating Cooperation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1972. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, Lomax Cook, Fay, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2004. “Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
De Figueiredo, John and Kim, James. 2004. “When Do Firms Hire Lobbyists? The Organization of Lobbying at the Federal Communications Commission.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13: 883–900.CrossRef
Dobbin, Frank. 1997. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Drezner, Daniel. 2007. All Politics Is Global. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Ana Maria. 2008. “Preemptive Modernization and the Politics of Sectoral Defense: Adjustment to Globalization in the Portuguese Pharmacy Sector.” Comparative Politics 40(3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition: A Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 2004. “Can Human Rights Accommodate Women's Rights? Towards an Embodied Account of Social Norms, Social Meaning, and Cultural Change.” Contemporary Political Theory 3: 275–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1948. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, R. Kenneth and Seldon, Barry. 2002. “What Corporations Really Want from Government: The Public Provision of Private Goods.” In Cigler, Allan and Loomis, Burdett, eds. Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press: 205–24.Google Scholar
Goyer, Michel. 2003. “Corporate Governance, Employees and the Focus on Core Competencies in France and Germany.” In Milhaupt, Curtis J., ed. Global Markets, Domestic Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press: 183–213.Google Scholar
Guttman, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2009. “Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective.” In Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, Power. New York: Cambridge University Press: 204–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1996. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David. 2009. “The Political Theory of the Firm.” In Coen, David, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 173–90.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko. 2004. Imagined Economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen. 1992. Health Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions, Parties and the Politics of Class: Why Some Democracies Distribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos, eds. 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, Richard and Mair, Peter. 2009. “The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement.” Perspectives on Politics 7: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry. 2007. Preferences and Situations. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Milner, Helen, eds. 1996. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk, Pablo Luna, Juan, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1982. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. “The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization.” In Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert, eds. The Politics of Social Protest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 167–98.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1935. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe, eds. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Peggy and Merry, Sally. 2009. “Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women's Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States.” Global Networks 9(4): 441–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jonah, Cole, Alistair, and Le Galès, Patrick. 2008. “From Chirac to Sarkozy: A New France?” In Levy, Jonah, Cole, Alistair, and Le Galès, Patrick, eds. Developments in French Politics 4. London: Palgrave-Macmillan: 1–21.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar and Snower, Denis. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Unemployment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Peter. 2009. “Representative versus Responsible Government.” Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Working Paper, 09/8.
Manin, Bernard. 1977. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. 2000. Stuck in Neutral: Business and the Politics of Human Capital Investment Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo and Thelen, Kathleen. 2007. “The State and Coordinated Capitalism: Contributions of the Public Sector to Social Solidarity in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 60(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John, and Zald, Mayer, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
McAdam, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney. 2004. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen. 1999. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie. 2012. “Globalization, the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe, and the 2012 French Presidential Election.” Working paper.
Neustadt, Richard. 1960. Presidential Power. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
OECD. 1994. The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus and Wiesenthal, Helmut. 1980. “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form.” Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Mitchell, Bloom, Stephen, and Lindstrom, Nicole, eds. 2008. Transnational Actors in Central and East European Transitions. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRef
Pitkin, Hannah. 1984. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1978. “Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict.” In Crouch, Colin and Pizzorno, Alessandro, eds. The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe. London: Macmillan: 277–98.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 1998. “It Was Like a Fever.…Narrative and Identity in Social Protest.” Social Problems 45(2): 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polletta, Francesca and Jasper, James. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 1995. “From Comparative Public Policy to Political Economy: Putting Political Institutions in Their Place and Taking Interests Seriously.” Comparative Political Studies 28(1): 117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas and Swenson, Peter. 1996. “Labor Markets, Production Strategies, and Wage Bargaining Institutions: The Swedish Employer Offensive in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 29: 223–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel, Habyarimana, James, Humphries, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy. 2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?American Political Science Review 101(4): 709–25.Google Scholar
Richter, Alexander, Samphantharak, Krislert, and Timmons, Jeffrey. 2009. “Lobbying and Taxes.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ronsanvallon, Pierre. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven and Mark Hansen, John. 2004. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles. 1982. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, Jan 2000. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn and Keck, Margaret. 2006. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2002. Capitalists Against Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swindler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51(2): 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1971. “Interpretation and the Science of Man.” The Review of Metaphysics 25(1): 3–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, Rosemary C.R. 2012. “The Politics of Securing Borders and the Identities of Disease.” Sociology of Health and Illness.
Taylor, Verta and Whittier, Nancy. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities.” In Morris, Aldon and Mueller, Carol, eds. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press: 104–29.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. How Institutions Evolve. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen and Kume, Ikuo. 1999. “The Effects of Globalization on Labor Revisited: Lessons from Germany and Japan.” Politics and Society 27: 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 2003. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry and Marshall, J.W.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; Or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized As Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31(3): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woll, Cornelia. 2008. Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×