Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:53:42.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Conflict in headquarters–subsidiary relations: a critical literature review and new directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Susanne Blazejewski
Affiliation:
Alanus University of Arts and Social Sciences, Germany
Florian Becker-Ritterspach
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Christoph Dörrenbächer
Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law
Mike Geppert
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this chapter is to provide a critical overview over recent theory-based research on multinational corporations (MNC) conflict. In particular, we seek to understand and explicate the contributions of the various theoretical approaches and perspectives applied in international business (IB) research towards the analysis of conflictual situations and processes in MNC contexts. In modeling conflict in MNC international business, authors draw on diverse theoretical traditions, including psychology, sociology and economics as well as organizational conflict theory. We wish to critically fathom their respective potential for the description and explanation of MNC conflict and, in addition, provide some insights into the theoretical lacunae remaining within the IB conflict research: where and how can we better integrate and extend conflict research in the IB field in order to fully capitalize on the theoretical advancements in conflict research at large? And where do we need to adjust concepts and constructs drawn from related fields to better account for the complex context of MNC conflicts? For reasons expounded upon below, the critical review concentrates on conflicts arising in the MNC headquarters–subsidiary relationship.

Since the MNC as an organization has become an object of study in its own right, it has been characterized as an inherently conflictual arena (Bartlett and Ghoshal 1989; Doz and Prahalad 1991; Gladwin and Walter 1980; Pahl and Roth 1993; Prahalad and Doz 1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation
The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities
, pp. 139 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alper, S., Tjosvold, D. and Law, K. S. 2000. “Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams,” Personnel Psychology 53: 625–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. and Narus, J. A. 1990. “A model of distribution firm and manufacturing firm working partnership,” Journal of Marketing 54: 42–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. and Cole, P. 1996. “Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups” in Jackson, and Ruderman, (eds.) Diversity in Work Teams. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 185–215Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. 1989. “Social identity theory and the organization,” Academy of Management Review 14: 20–39Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. M. 1970. Conflict of Interest. A Theory of Divergent Goals with Application to Politics. Chicago, IL: MarkhamGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. M. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Ayoko, O. B., Härtel, C. E. J. and Callan, V. J. 2002. “Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogenous workgroups: a communication accommodation theory approach,” International Journal of Conflict Management 13: 165–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1962. “Two faces of power,” The American Political Science Review, 56(4): 947–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1969. “Decisions and non-decisions: an analytical framework” in Bell, , Edwards, and Wagner, (eds.) Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. New York: Free Press, pp. 100–9Google Scholar
Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. 2001. “Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict,” The International Journal of Conflict Management 15: 216–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1986. “Tap your subsidiaries for global reach,” Harvard Business Review 64: 87–94Google Scholar
Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2006. “The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: a theoretical framework,” Journal of International Management 12: 358–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2009. “Intra-firm competition in multinational corporations: towards a political framework,” Competition and Change 13: 199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2011. “An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations,” Management International Review (in print)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. 2002. “Multinational corporations, social responsibility and conflict,” Journal of International Affairs 55: 393–410Google Scholar
Binmore, K. G. 1987. “Why game theory ‘doesn't work’ ” in Bennett, (ed.) Analysing Conflict and its Resolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 23–42Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. M. and Hood, N. 1998. “Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies,” Academy of Management Review 23: 773–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. and Lingblad, M. 2005. “Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm,” Organization Science 16: 674–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, I. and Furu, P. 2000. “Determinants of variable pay for top managers of foreign subsidiaries in Finland,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 11: 698–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W. and Li, L. 2004. “Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms,” Journal of International Business Studies 35: 443–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. S. and Gregersen, H. B. 1992. “Serving two masters: managing the dual allegiance of expatriate employees,” Sloan Management Review 33: 61–71Google Scholar
Blalock, H. M. 1989. Power and Conflict: Towards a General Theory. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
Blazejewski, S. 2005. “Transferring value-infused organizational practices in MNCs: a conflict perspective” in Geppert, and Mayer, (eds.) Global, Local and National Practices in Multinational Companies., Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 63–104Google Scholar
Blazejewski, S. 2009. “Actors' interests and local contexts in intrafirm conflict: the 2004 GM and Opel crisis,” Competition & Change 13: 229–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blazejewski, S. 2010. “When truth is the daughter of time: longitudinal case studies in international business research” in Piekkari, and Welch, (eds.) Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research: Towards Greater Pluralism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (in print)Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1996. Co-opetition. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. 1999. “Politics and organizational change: the lived experience,” Human Relations 52: 609–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E. and Taylor, M. S. 1999. “Control in multinational corporations (MNCs): the case of Korean manufacturing subsidiaries,” Journal of Management 25: 541–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, K. 1996. “Game theory and the practice of bargaining,” Group Decision and Negotiation 5: 355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheldelin, S., Druckman, D. and Fast, L. (eds.) 2003. Conflict. 1st ed. London: Continuum
Chen, Y.-R. R. 2004. “Effective public affairs in China: MNC – government bargaining power and corporate strategies for influencing foreign business policy formulation,” Journal of Communication Management 8: 395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. 1997. “Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations, and environment: retrospect and prospect,” Organization Studies 18: 43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E and Geppert, M. 2006. “Socio-political processes in international management in post-socialist contexts: knowledge, learning and transnational institution building,” Journal of International Management 12: 340–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D. and Phillips, N. 2007. Power and Organizations. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J. 1999. “Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change,” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, A. M. 2003. “Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction,” Behavioral and Brain Science 26: 139–53Google Scholar
Coleman, P. T. 2006. “Power and conflict” in Deutsch, , Coleman, and Marcus, (eds.) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 120–43Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1975. Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. 1993. “What does conflict theory predict about America's future? 1993 presidential address,” Sociological Perspectives 36: 289–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, L. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. 1981. Actors and Systems. Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1963. Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1968. Essays in the Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dalton, M. and Chrobot-Mason, D. 2007. “A theoretical exploration of manager and employee social identity, cultural values and identity conflict management,” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 7: 169–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danskin, P., Dibrell, C. and Kedia, B. L. 2005. “The evolving role of cooperation among multinational corporations and indigenous organizations in transition economies: a migration away from confrontation,” Journal of World Business 40: 223–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1980. “Fifty years of conflict” in Festinger, (ed.) Restropections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–72Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1982. “Conflict resolution: theory and practice,” Political Psychology 4: 431–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, P. F. 2006. “Just a phase? Integrating conflict dynamics over time,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 23: 199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. K. and Skeath, S. 1999. Games of Strategy. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. 2007. “Inside the transnational social space: cross-border management and owner relationships at a German-subsidiary in Hungary,” Journal of East European Management Studies 13: 318–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Gammelgaard, J. 2006. “Subsidiary role development: the effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market, and value-added scope of foreign owned subsidiaries,” Journal of International Management 12: 266–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2006. “Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this Special Issue,” Journal of International Management 12: 251–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009. “A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France,” European Management Journal 27: 100–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1981. “Headquarters influence and strategic control in MNCs,” Sloan Management Review 23: 15–29Google Scholar
Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1984. “Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies 15: 55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1991. “Managing DMNCs: a search for a new paradigm,” Strategic Management Journal 12: 145–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doz, Y. L., Bartlett, C. A. and Prahalad, C. K. 1981. “Global competitive pressures and host country demands, managing tensions in MNCs,” California Management Review 23: 63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C. 1994. “Organizational images and member identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 293–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C. and Laubach, M. 2002. “Structural identity theory and the dynamics of cross-cultural work groups” in Gannon, and Newman, (eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 256–82Google Scholar
Easton, G. and Araujo, L. 1992. “Non-economic exchange in industrial networks” in Axelsson, and Easton, (eds.) Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality. London: Routledge, pp. 62–84Google Scholar
Edwards, P. K. and Bélanger, J. 2009. “The MNC as a contested terrain” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 193–216Google Scholar
Edwards, T. and Kuruvilla, S. 2005. “International HRM: national business systems, organisational politics and the international division of labour in global value chains,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 16: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, T., Coller, X., Ortiz, L., Rees, C. and Wortmann, M. 2006. “How important are national industrial relations systems in shaping restructuring in MNCs?,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 12: 69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, T., Colling, T. and Ferner, A. 2007. “The transfer of employment practices in multinational companies: towards an integrated conceptual approach,” Human Resource Management Journal 17: 201–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Agency theory: an assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review 14: 57–74Google Scholar
Ferner, A. 2000. “The underpinnings of ‘bureaucratic’ control systems: HRM in European multinationals,” Journal of Management Studies 37: 521–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferner, A. and Edwards, P. 1995. “Power and diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 37: 229–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferner, A, Almond, P., Colling, T. and Edwards, T. 2005. “Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: between micro-politics and macro-institutions,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 43: 703–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Edited by Gordon, C.. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1982. “The subject and power” in Dreyfus, and Rabinow, (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 208–26Google Scholar
Frenkel, M. 2008. “The multinational corporation as a third space: rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha,” Academy of Management Review 33: 924–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, P. J. 1987. “Power, politics and influence” in Jablin, (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 503–48Google Scholar
Gaski, J. F. 1984. “The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution,” Journal of Marketing 48: 9–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, M. and Clark, E. 2003. “Knowledge and learning in transnational ventures: an actor-centred approach,” Management Decision 41: 433–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, M. and Williams, C. 2006. “Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a sociopolitical framework,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 17: 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. 1996. “Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory,” Academy of Management Review 21: 13–47Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Structuration Theory. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gladwin, T. N. and Walter, I. 1980. Multinationals under Fire: Lessons in the Management of Conflict. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Glasl, F. 2010. Konfliktmanagement. 9th edn. Bern: HauptGoogle Scholar
Gong, Y. 2003. “Toward a dynamic process model of staffing composition and subsidiary outcomes in multinational corporations,” Journal of Management 29: 259–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. L. 1985. “The influence of culture on the process of business negotiations: an exploratory study,” Journal of International Business Studies 16: 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. K. and Cao, Q. 2005. “Parent-subsidiary conflict within multinational enterprises” Working Paper presented at Academy of Management Conference 2005: Honolulu, HI.
Hardy, C. 1996. “Understanding power: bringing about strategic change,” British Journal of Management 7: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A. and Boeker, W. 1998. “Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: evidence from investment banking,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J. F. 1991. “Control in multinational firms: the role of price and hierarchy,” Management International Review 31: 71–96Google Scholar
Huber, G. P. and Ven, A. H. 1995. Longitudinal Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Jameson, J. 1999. “Toward a comprehensive model for the assessment and management of intraorganizational conflict: developing the framework,” International Journal of Conflict Management 10: 268–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. 1995. “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 256–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. and Neale, M. A. 1999. “Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 741–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1976. “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. and Khanna, T. 2006. “Bringing history (back) into international business,” Journal of International Business Studies 37: 453–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, A., Labianca, G. and Caligiuri, P. M. 2002. “Getting along long distance: understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis,” Journal of World Business 37: 277–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, P.-J. 1998. Strategisches Konfliktmanagement in Organisationen. Eine spieltheoretische Einführung. 1st edn. Wiesbaden: GablerGoogle Scholar
Karnoe, P. and Nygaard, C. 1999. “Bringing social action and situated rationality back in,” International Studies of Management & Organisation 29: 78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, L. and Rössing, S. 2005. “Managing conflicts of interests between headquarters and their subsidiaries regarding technology transfer to emerging markets – a framework,” Journal of World Business 40: 235–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, E. 1999. “Comparing varieties of agency theory in economics, political science, and sociology: an illustration from state policy implementation,” Sociological Theory 17: 146–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostova, T. 1999. “Transnational transfer of strategic organisational practices: a contextual perspective,” Academy of Management Review 24: 308–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2002. “Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects,” Academy of Management Journal 45: 215–33Google Scholar
Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. T. 2008. “Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions,” Academy of Management Review 33: 994–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2001. “The making of a global firm: local pathways to multinational enterprise” in Morgan, , Kristensen, and Whitley, (eds.) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, pp. 172–95Google Scholar
Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. 1967. “Differentiation and integration,” Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London and New York: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 1986. Power: A Radical View. New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path dependency in historical sociology,” Theory and Society 29: 507–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailath, G. J. and Samuelson, L.. 2006. Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R. H. and Perrault, W. D. 1976. “Organizational role conflict: its antecedents and Consequences,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 17: 19–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, R. and Mir, A. 2009. “From the Colony to the corporation: studying knowledge transfer across international boundaries,” Group and Organization Management 34: 90–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, R. and Sharpe, D. R. 2004. “Transferring managerial practices within multinationals: control, resistance and empowerment,” Academy of Management Proceedings 2004: E1–E6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, R. and Sharpe, D. R. 2009. “The multinational firm as an instrument of exploitation and domination” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 247–65Google Scholar
Mohr, A. T. and Puck, J. F. 2007. “Inter-sender role conflicts, general manager satisfaction and joint venture performance in Indian-German joint ventures,” European Management Journal, 25(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. 2003. “International business and multinationals: a critical management approach.” Paper read at Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management Conference 2003: Seattle, WA
Morgan, G. and Kristensen, P. H. 2006. “The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism,” Human Relations 59: 1467–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R., and Pedersen, T. 2007 “Agency theory and resource dependence theory: complementary explanations for subsidiary power in multinational corporations.” SMG Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School, http://uk.cbs.dk/content/download/60978/ 840515/file/SMG%20WP%202007_5.pdf (last accessed October 13, 2010)
Murninghan, J. K. 1994. “Game theory and organizational behaviorResearch in Organizational Behavior 16: 83–125Google Scholar
Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. 1994. “Differentiated fit and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters–subsidiary relations,” Strategic Management Journal 15: 491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, S. 2000. “Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?,” Strategic Management Journal 21: 525–483.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. 1991. “Strategic responses to institutional processes,” Strategic Management Review 16: 145–79Google Scholar
Pahl, J. M. and Roth, K. 1993. “Managing the headquarters–foreign subsidiary relationship: the roles of strategy, conflict, and integration,” The International Journal of Conflict Management 4: 139–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhe, A. 1993. “Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation,” Academy of Management Journal 36: 794–829Google Scholar
Pearson d'Estrée, T. 2003. “Dynamics” in Cheldelin, , Druckman, and Fast, (eds.) Conflict. London: Continuum, pp. 68–87Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2000. “Controlling the foreign agent: how governments deal with multinationals in a transition economy,” Management International Review 40: 141–65Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. and Cameron, K. S. 2001. “Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research,” Academy of Management Journal 44: 697–713Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Pondy, L. R. 1967. “Organizational conflict: concepts and models,” Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 296–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. 1975. “The strategic process in a multinational corporation.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Business Administration, Harvard University
Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. 1987. The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Rahim, M. A. 1983. “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict,” Academy of Management Journal 26: 368–76Google ScholarPubMed
Reade, C. 2001. “Dual identification in multinational corporations: local managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 12: 405–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössing, S. M. 2005. Technology Transfer to China. Frankfurt am Main: European Management PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Roth, K. and Nigh, D. 1992. “The effectiveness of headquarters–subsidiary relationships: the role of coordination, control, and conflict,” Journal of Business Research 25: 277–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, K. and O'Donnell, S. 1996. “Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: an agency theory perspective,” Academy of Management Journal 39: 687–703Google Scholar
Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G. and Kim, S. H. 1994. “Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Sanders, W. G. and Carpenter, M. A. 1998. “Internationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure,” Academy of Management Journal 41: 158–78Google Scholar
Scharf, F. W. 2006. Interaktionsformen. Akteurszentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für SozialwissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, T. 2007. “Event and process: an exercise in analytical ethnography,” Human Studies 30: 167–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1958. “The strategy of conflict: prospectus for a reorientation of game theory,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2: 203–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Schepers, D. H. 2006. “The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations,” Business & Society 45: 282–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, S. and Daniel, A. 2007. “Are subsidiary roles a matter of perception? A review of the literature and avenues for future research.” Working Paper No. 30, ESCP-EAP European School of Management, Berlin
Schütz, A. 1972. Collected Papers. Volume 1. Edited by Natanson, M. A. and Breda, H. L.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. P. 2005. “Agency theory,” Annual Review of Sociology 31: 263–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, B. H. 1992. “Conflict research as schizophrenia: the many faces of organizational conflict,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 325–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. 2004. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Stern, L. W. and Gorman, R. H. 1969. “Conflict in distribution channels: an exploration” in Stern, (ed.) Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 156–175Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. 1986. “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior” in Worchel, and Austin, (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Burnham Inc Pub, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Tasoluk, B., Yaprak, A. and Calantone, R. J. 2006. “Conflict and collaboration in headquarters–subsidiary relationships. An agency-theory perspective on product rollouts in an emerging market,” International Journal of Conflict Management 17: 332–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. 1976. “Conflict and conflict management” in Dunnette, (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, pp. 889–935Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W. 1992. “Conflict and conflict management: reflections and update,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 265–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. 1999. “Bridging east and west to develop new products and trust: interdependence and interaction between a Hong Kong parent and north American subsidiary,” International Journal of Innovation Management 3: 233–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. 2007. “From homogenization to pluralism: international management research in the Academy and beyond,” Academy of Management Journal 50: 1353–64Google Scholar
Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. L. and Brett, J. M. 2004. “Can we talk. And should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams,” Academy of Management Review 29: 578–92Google Scholar
Vora, D. T. and T. Kostova 2007. “A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28: 327–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, D., Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2007. “Roles of subsidiary managers in multinational corporations: the effect of dual organizational identification,” Management International Review 47: 595–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, R. E. and Dutton, J. M. 1969. “The management of international conflict: a model and review,” Administrative Science Quarterly 14: 73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westney, D. E. 1993. “Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation” in Ghoshal, and Westney, (eds.) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 53–76Google Scholar
Whiteman, G. 2009. “All my relations: understanding perceptions of justice and conflict between companies and indigenous peoples,” Organization Studies 30: 101–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. 1992. “Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency,” Journal of Management Studies, 29(6): 693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zietsma, C. and Winn, M. I. 2008. “Building chains and directing flows: strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts,” Business & Society 47: 68–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×