Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T21:38:07.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Political Theory, International Theory, and the Political Theory of International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

David Boucher
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Andrew Vincent
Affiliation:
University of Wales College of Cardiff
Get access

Summary

Theories of international relations, in both their behaviouralist and anti-behaviouralist forms – that dominated the sub-discipline for sixty years or so – self-consciously rejected political theory in an attempt to establish their own intellectual credentials. Although subject to similar pressures, international theory rejected the option taken by political theory of defining itself in terms of its illustrious past, and missed the opportunity of firmly anchoring itself on sound philosophical foundations. Paradoxically, the ‘English School’, represented by Wight and Bull, far from strengthening the intellectual heritage, undermined it: they failed to employ discriminating criteria to differentiate genuinely philosophical contributions from the merely polemical. The emphasis upon taxonomy averted the gaze from the quality of argument. However, political theory and international relations theory become genuinely united in focusing upon the issue of identity, that is, the answers to the question ‘Who am I?’ The consequent politics of recognition, inclusion and exclusion bring into focus not only the politics of the nation, state and cosmopolitanism, but also of gender, race, religion and ethnicity. All these forms of identity are answers to the question ‘Who am I?’, and all are integral to a multidimensional approach to the political theory of international relations. I conclude by suggesting that much of the newly generated normative political theory of international relations, from whatever intellectual perspective, is directly addressing the key question long ago identified by T. H. Green, and that is the ethical status of one's community and how to extend it to become more and more inclusive of a wider range of people we are prepared to regard as our neighbours.

Type
Chapter
Information
Political Theory
Tradition and Diversity
, pp. 193 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×