Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:14:21.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Uruguay Round North–South Grand Bargain: Implications for future negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Sylvia Ostry
Affiliation:
Research Fellow Munk Center for International Studies, University of Toronto
Daniel L. M. Kennedy
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
James D. Southwick
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

The Uruguay Round Grand Bargain

Prior to the Uruguay Round developing countries negotiated mainly to secure unreciprocated access to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries' markets. Most lacked the expertise and analytical resources for trade policy-making but that really didn't matter much because the focus of negotiations was on border barriers for industrial products, and also because agriculture was largely excluded. The tried and true General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) model of reciprocity worked well as the negotiations were led by the United States and managed by the transatlantic alliance with the European Community. The Cold War contained severe trade friction eruptions and all was well with the world as trade grew faster than output and each fed the other. True, in the 1970s noises offstage about a New International Economic Order could be faintly heard in Geneva but barely in Washington or Brussels. The so-called Third World was largely ignored as a player in the multilateral trading system.

The Uruguay Round was a watershed in the evolution of that system. For the first time, agriculture was at the center of the negotiations and the European effort to block the launch of the negotiations to avoid coming to grips with the Common Agricultural Policy went on for half a decade. This foot-dragging also spawned a new single-interest coalition – the Australian-led Cairns Group, which included Southern countries from Latin America and Asia determined to ensure that liberalization of agricultural trade would not be relegated to the periphery by the Americans and the Europeans as it always had been in the past.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Political Economy of International Trade Law
Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec
, pp. 285 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×