Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T14:39:14.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Corporate profitability as a determinant of restrictive monetary policy: estimates for the postwar United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Thomas Mayer
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access

Summary

Current debates over international coordination of macroeconomic policy pose interesting conundrums for our understanding of domestic monetary policy. For a number of years the United States has been exerting pressure on Japan and West Germany to pursue an easier monetary policy, and particularly in the case of the West Germans the United States has been unsuccessful. German officials cite fear of inflation as their rationale for a restrictive policy. Yet, last year, consumer prices fell in West Germany, casting suspicion on either the sincerity or wisdom of the German government's stance.

An alternative explanation, now recognized by economists and other observers, is that macroeconomic expansion is thought by the German government to be incompatible with maintenance of corporate profitability in West Germany (Llewellyn 1983). The German case suggests the need to rethink traditional approaches to understanding macroeconomic policy in general and monetary policy in particular.

This chapter attempts such a rethinking. Using the case of the United States, we investigate the hypothesis that the Federal Reserve's monetary policy is motivated by a concern for corporate profitability. We reinterpret the standard evidence on the determinants of monetary policy in light of this hypothesis. The results are consistent with the view that the Federal Reserve is acting so as to maximize the (weighted) profitability of finanical and nonfinancial corporations. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the Fed independently attempts to promote labor's interests.

Theories of monetary policy

It is well established that the Federal Reserve responds to inflation and the growth of output by leaning against the wind. Reaction-function studies such as that of McNees (1986) support this proposition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×