Abdala, Manuel, and Hill, Alice. 1996. “Argentina: The Sequencing of Privatization and Regulation.” In Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Study of Telecommunications, ed. Levy, Brian and Spiller, Pablo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abdala, Manuel, and Spiller, Pablo. 1999. Instituciones, contratos y regulación en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Temas.Google Scholar

Abeles, Martín, Forcinito, Karina, and Shorr, Martín. 2001. El oligopolio telefónico argentino frente a la liberalización del mercado. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.Google Scholar

Acuña, Carlos. 1994. “Politics and Economics in the Argentina of the Nineties (Or, Why the Future No Longer Is What It Used to Be).” In Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America, ed. Smith, William C., Acuña, Carlos H., and Gamarra, Eduardo. New Brunswick, NJ: North-South Center, Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, Alberto, Mirrlees, James, and Neumann, Manfred J.M.. 1989. “Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies,” Economic Policy 4, no. 8: 57–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Alianza por Mexico. 2000. Plataforma Electoral 2000, PRD, Convergencia, PAS, PT, PSN.Google Scholar

Altamirano, Carlos. 2002. “Ideologías, políticas y debate cívico.” In Los años peronistas (1943–55), ed. Carlos Torre, Juan. Series Nueva Historia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 207–55.Google Scholar

Altomonte, Hugo. 1996. “Energía y desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe: Síntesis del estudio de caso sobre Chile.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, May.

Altomonte, Hugo, and Moguillansky, Graciela. 1999. “La crisis eléctrica en Chile: Del modelo a imitar al principios de los noventa al modelo a evitar en el 2000?” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, June.

Aninat, Cristóbal, Landregan, John, Navia, Patricio, and Vial, Joaquín. 2004. Political Institutions, Policy Making Process and Policy Outcomes in Chile. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Arias, Asunción, and Damonte, Mario Carlos. 1998. “La visión de los grandes usuarios.” In Argentina. El Sector Eléctrico. Buenos Aires: Manrique Zago Ediciones S.R.L.Google Scholar

Arriagada, Genaro. 1988. Pinochet: The Politics of Power. Boston: Unwin.Google Scholar

Arza, Camila. 2002. “La privatización de los servicios públicos y sus impactos distributivos.” In Privatizaciones y Poder Económico, ed. Azpiazu, Daniel. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 91–129.Google Scholar

Aspe, Pedro. 1993. El camino mexicano de la transformación económica. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

,AVANTEL. 2000. “Comparative Revenue of Local Communication Companies.” Internal Document. Mimeo. Mexico City.

Avelino, George, Brown, David, and Hunter, Wendy. 2005. “The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1999,” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 3: 625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azpiazu, Daniel, ed. 2002. Privatizaciones y poder económico. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.

Azpiazu, Daniel. 1999. “Privatizaciones en la Argentina. Regulación tarifaria, mutaciones en los precios relativos, rentas extraordinarias y concentración económica.” Working Paper 7 (April). Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.

Azpiazu, Daniel. 1997. “Elite empresaria en la Argentina.” Working Paper no. 7. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.

Babb, Sarah. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bachelet, Michelle. 2005. “Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet, 2006–2010.” Michelle Bachelet's Electoral Plataform. Centro de Estudios Miguel Enriquez, Archivo Chile. Santiago de Chile, Chile (October 18).

Badaraco, Ernesto. 1998. “La transformación del sector eléctrico argentino. La visión de los generadores.” In Argentina. El Sector Eléctrico. Buenos Aires: Manrique Zago Ediciones S.R.L.Google Scholar

Baena Paz, Guillermina. 2003. “La participación de las bases en el PRI (un estudio del estado de México y un estudio nacional).” In Partido Revolucionario Institucional. Crisis y refundación, ed. Reveles Vázquez, Francisco. Mexico City: Ediciones Gernika, 221–88.Google Scholar

Baker, Andy. 2007. Consuming the Washington Consensus: Mass Responses to the Market in Latin America. Unpublished manuscript.

Baker, Andy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-based Theory of Trade Preferences,” World Politics 55, no. 3 (April): 423–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, Ian. 2002. “When Institutions No Longer Matter: Reform of Telecommunications and Electricity in Germany, France, and Britain,” Journal of Public Policy 22, no. 1: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basañes, C. Federico, Saavedra, Eduardo, and Soto, Raimundo. 2002. “Post-privatization Renegotiation and Disputes in Chile.” In Second-Generation Reforms in Infrastructure Services, ed. Basañes, F. and Willig, R. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 51–88.Google Scholar

Bastos, Carlos M., and Abdala, Manuel A.. 1995. Transformacion del Sector Electrico Argentino. Córdoba, Argentina: Editorial Pugliese Sena S.R.L.Google Scholar

Basualdo, Eduardo, Azpiazu, Daniel, Abeles, Martin, Arza, Camila, Porcinito, Karina, and Schorr, Martin. 2002. “El proceso de privatización en la Argentina: La renegociación con las empresas privatizadas; Revisión contractual y supresión de privilegios y de rentas extraordinarias.” Working Paper. Buenos Aires: Economy and Technology Area, FLACSO-Argentina, April.

Basualdo, Eduardo, Azpiazu, Daniel, Abeles, Martin, Arza, Camila, Porcinito, Karina, and Schorr, Martin. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

,BCN. 2004a. Informe de comisión de Minería y Energía. Cámara Boletín No. 2, 922–08. http://sil.senado.cl/pags/index.html (accessed September 8, 2005).

,BCN. 2004b. Primer informe de comisión de Minería y Energía del Senado. Boletín No. 2, 922–08. http://sil.senado.cl/pags/index.html (accessed September 8, 2005).

,BCN. 2004c. Segundo informe de comisión de Minería y Energía del Senado. Boletín No. 2, 922–08. http://sil.senado.cl/pags/index.html (accessed September 8, 2005).

,BCN. 1999. Historia de la Ley. Compilación de Textos Oficiales del Debate Parlamentario. Ley No. 19,613. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar

,BCN. 1994. Historia de la Ley 19,302. Compilación de Textos Oficiales del Debate Parlamentario. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar

,BCN. 1993. Historia de la Ley 19,496, Vols. 1–4, Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar

,BCN. n.d. Historia de la ley referencial. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. http://websinileg.bcn.cl/websinileg/hley/index.asp (accessed September 10, 2005).Google Scholar

Gary, Becker. 1985. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1985): 371–400.Google Scholar

Benton, Allyson. 2007. “Political Institutions, Hydrocarbons Resources, and Economic Policy Divergence in Latin America.” Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30–September 2.

Bernstein, Juan Sebastián. 1999. “Racionamiento Eléctrico: Causas y Posibles Soluciones.” Puntos de Referencia 209 (May): 1–11.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Juan Sebastián. 1995. “Establecimiento de una política energética basada en el funcionamiento de los mercados competitivos y en la participación privada.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

,Bicameral Commission for the Reform of the State and the Following of Privatization. Proceedings of Special Meeting in July 25, 2000, Congress of the Nation of Argentina, Buenos Aires.

Biglaiser, Glen, and Brown, David. 2003. “The Determinants of Privatization in Latin America,” Political Research Quarterly 56, no. 1 (March): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Birdsall, Nancy, and Nellis, John. 2002. “Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization.” Working Paper no. 6. Center for Global Development, May.

Bitran, Eduardo. 1998. “Regulación, privatización y competencia: Lecciones de la experiencia chilena.” In Qué hay de nuevo en las regulaciones? Telecomunicaciones, electricidad y agua en América Latina, ed. Barrionuevo, Arthur and Lahera, Eugenio. Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 31–60.Google Scholar

Bitran, Eduardo, and Sáez, Raúl. 1994. “Privatization and Regulation in Chile.” In The Chilean Economy: Policy Lessons and Challenges, ed. Bosworth, Barry, Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Labán, Raul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 329–78.Google Scholar

Bitran, Eduardo, and Serra, Pablo. 1998. “Regulation of Privatized Utilities: The Chilean Experience,” World Development 26, no. 6: 945–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitran, Eduardo, and Serra, Pablo. 1994. “Regulatory Issues in the Privatization of Public Utilities: The Chilean Experience,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitran, Eduardo, Estache, Antonio, Guash, José Luis, and Serra, Pablo. 1999. “Privatizing and Regulating Chile's Utilities, 1974–2000: Successes, Failures, and Outstanding Challenges.” In Chile: Recent Policy Lessons and Emerging Challenges, ed. Perry, Guillermo and Leipziger, Danny M.. Washington, DC: World Bank, 327–92.Google Scholar

Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, Carles. 2000. “Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in OECD Countries, 1964–1993,” World Politics 53: 38–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnet, Céline, Dubois, Pierre, Martimort, David, and Straub, Stéphane. 2006. Empirical evidence on satisfaction with privatization in Latin America: Welfare Effects and Beliefs. Mimeo. Toulouse: IDEI.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher J.W.. 2001. “Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science,” American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 4 (October): 972–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boylan, Delia M. 2001. Defusing Democracy: Central Bank Autonomy and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briceño, Arturo. n.d. Case Study: Fixed-mobile Interconnection in Mexico. http://www.itu.int/osg/sec/spu/ni/fmi/case_studies/ (accessed March 30, 2009).

Brooks, Sarah. 2008. Social Protection and the Market: The Transformation of Social Security Institutions in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brune, Nancy, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2000. “The Diffusion of Privatization in the Developing World.” Paper presented at the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 31–September 3.

Buira, Ariel. 2003. “An Analysis of IMF Conditionality.” G-24 Discussion Paper Series 22.

Bull, Benedicte. 2005. Aid, Power, and Privatization: The Politics of Telecommunications Reform in Central America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Burgess, Katrina. 2004. Parties and Unions in the New Global Economy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

,CAF. 2006. “Argentina. Análisis del Sector Eléctrico,” Corporación Andina de Fomento. Informes Sectoriales de Infraestructura 4, no. 1 (February).

Callaghy, Thomas. 1997. “Globalization and Marginalization: Debt and the International Underclass,” special issue, The Global Economy, Current History 96, no. 613: 392–6.Google Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2005. “A New Law of Argentine Politics.” In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, ed. Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, Maria VictoriaUniversity Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 207–26Google Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 4 (October): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cámara, Diputados. 1999. Informe de la Comisión de Minería y Energía sobre la investigación de los hechos que han motivado el racionamiento de energía eléctrica en el país. Valparaíso, Chile: Cámara de Diputados.Google Scholar

Camp, Roderic Ai. 2003. Politics in Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,CANIETI. 2000. “Propuesta del sector de telecomunicaciones para la nueva administracion del gobierno federal.” Mexico City, January 18. Paper presented to the Joint Congressional Commission on Telecommunications Reform.

Canitrot, Adolfo. 1981. “Teoría y práctica del liberalismo. Política antiinflacionaria y apertura económica en la Argentina, 1976-1981,” Desarrollo Económico 21, no. 82 (July–September): 131–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canton, Darío, and Jorrat, Jorge R.. 2001. “Economic Evaluations, Partisanship, and Social Bases of Presidential Voting in Argentina, 1995 and 1999,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14, no. 4 (August): 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John. 2002. “Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, BenitoCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carreón, Rodríguez, Víctor, David G., Jiménez, Armando and Rosellón, Juan. 2007. “The Mexican Electricity Sector: Economic, Legal, and Political Issues.” In The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform, ed. Victor, David G. and Heller, Thomas C.. New York: Cambridge University Press: 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrera, Jorge, Checchi, Daniele, and Florio, Massimo. 2005. “Privatization Discontent and Its Determinants: Evidence from Latin America.” Mimeo. University of Milan (March).

Casar, Maria Amparo. 1998. “Oscillating Relations: President and Congress in Argentina.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, BenitoCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 114–44.Google Scholar

Castelar Pinheiro, Armando, and Schneider, Ben Ross. 1994. “The Fiscal Impact of Privatization in Latin America,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34 (Summer): 9–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Catterberg, Edgardo. 1989. Los argentinos frente a la política: Cultura política y opinión pública en la transición argentina a la democracia. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar

Celani, Marcelo. 2000. “Determinantes de la inversión en telecomunicaciones en Argentina.” In La Argentina de los noventa, ed. Heymann, Daniel and Kosacoff, Bernardo. Buenos Aires: CEPAL-Eudeba, 9–56Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel A. 1994. Democracy within Reason. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel A., and Silva, Patricio. 1998. The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. Amsterdam: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). Studies in Public Opinion: Surveys from 1993 to 1999. http://www.cepchile.cl/enc_main.html (accessed October 1, 2005).

,Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1992. El ladrillo: Bases de la política económica del gobierno militar chileno. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.Google Scholar

,CEPAL. 2007. Anuario estadistico de America Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar

Chong, Alberto. 2005. “Privatization in Latin America.” Mimeo. Inter-American Development Bank.

Chong, Alberto, and López-de-Silanes, Florencio. 2005. Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality. Washington, DC: Stanford University Press and the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,CIDE. 2000a. Encuesta de Privatización del Sector Eléctrico. Presidencia de la Nación. National Survey. February 1 (PRV10200).

,CIDE. 2000b. Encuesta de la Declaracion de Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Privatización del Sector Eléctrico. Presidencia de la Nación. National Survey. August 15 (PRV10899).

,CIDE. 2008. National Home Surveys of the Office of the President of Mexico (1989–2000) and BGC Ulises Beltrán y Asociados (2001–2). National Sample.

,CIDE/Presidencia de la Republica, 1989–2000, public opinión survey database.

,CIDE/Presidencia de la Republica. 1995. Encuesta de Privatizacion Roll Económico. Presidencia de la Nacional. National Survey. August 29 (code REC30895.PRG).

Clark, William. 2003. Capitalism, Not Globalism. Capital Mobility, Central Bank Independence and the Political Control of the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleary, Matthew. 2006. “Explaining the Left's Resurgence,” Journal of Democracy 17, no. 4: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifton, Judith. 2000. The Politics of Telecommunications in Mexico. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,CMIC. 2002. “Comision de Infraestructura: Sector Electrico.” Mexico City. Paper presented to the Congressional Commission on Electricity Reform.

Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth Berins. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

,Comisión Nacional de Energía (CNE). 1999. Crisis eléctrica. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Nacional de Energía.Google Scholar

,Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 1993. “Un gobierno para los nuevos tiempos: Bases programáticas del segundo gobierno de la Concertacion.” Santiago de Chile.

,Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 1989. “Programa de Gobierno.” Santiago de Chile: Documentos La Época.

Conniff, Michael L. 1999. Introduction to Populism in Latin America, ed. Conniff, Michael L.. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Maria Lorena. 2007. The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 1997. “A Classification of Latin American Political Parties.” Working Paper no. 244. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, November.

Corrales, Javier. 2002. Presidents without Parties: The Politics of Economic Reform in Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, D.R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 34, no. 2: 187–220.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Matthew D.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 21–63.Google Scholar

,CPT. 2002. “Ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones: Propuesta de reforma.” Conferencia Parlamentaria de Telecomunicaciones, August 22.

Crisp, Brian, and Johnson, Gregg. 2003. “Mandates, Power, and Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (January): 128–42.Google Scholar

Cukierman, Alex, and Tommasi, Mariano. 1998. “When Does It Take a Nixon to Go to China?” American Economic Review 88, no. 1 (March): 180–97.Google Scholar

Curzio, Leonardo. 1994. La oferta electoral de los partidos politicos. Mexico City: Triana Editores.Google Scholar

Garza Talavera, Rafael. 2003. “Del nacionalismo al liberalismo: la transformación ideológica del Partido de la Revolución.” In Partido de la Revolución Institucional: crisis y refundación, ed. Reveles Vázquez, Francisco. Mexico City: Editorial Gernika, 315–45.Google Scholar

Devlin, Robert, and Cominetti, Rosella. 1994. “La crisis de la empresa pública, las privatizaciones y la equidad social.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar

Díaz, Carlos, Galetovic, Alexander, and Soto, Raimundo. 2000. “La crisis eléctrica 1998–1999: Causas, consecuencias, y lecciones,” Estudios Públicos 80 (Spring): 149–92.Google Scholar

Di Maggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (April): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domínguez, Jorge I. 1996. “Ideas and Leaders in Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s.” In Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Domínguez, Jorge, and McCann, James. 1996. Democratizing Mexico. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Dornbush, Rudiger, and Edwards, Sebastian. 1991. “The Macroeconomics of Populism.” In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. Dornbush, R. and Edwards, S.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eicheengreen, Barry, and Fishlow, Albert. 1998. “Contending with Capital Flows: What Is Different about the 1990s.” In Capital Flows and Financial Crises, ed. Kahler, Miles. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1–22.Google Scholar

Eising, Rainer. 2002. “Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization,” International Organization 56, no. 1: 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, ed. Hedstrom, Peter and Swedberg, RichardCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escolar, Marcelo, and Calvo, Ernesto. 2002. Transferencia electoral y reestructuración partidaria en la elección federal Argentina 2001: Categoría diputados nacionales. Buenos Aires: UNDP Political Reform Program report.Google Scholar

Esping-Anderson, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2009. “Models of Economic Liberalization: Regime, Power and Compensation in Spain, Argentina, Chile, and the Iberian-American Region,” Manuscript. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.

Fazio, Hugo. 1997. Mapa actual de la extrema riqueza en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Lom.Google Scholar

Fernández-Arias, Eduardo, and Hausmann, Ricardo. 2000. “Is FDI a Safer Form of Financing?” RES Working Papers 4201, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

,FIEL. 1999. La regulación de la competencia y de los servicios públicos. Buenos Aires: Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas.Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald, and Galetovic, Alexander. 2003. “Regulatory Governance and Chile's 1998–1999 Electricity Shortage,” Policy Reform 6, no. 2 (June): 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Ronald, and Serra, Pablo. 2003. “Efecto de la privatización de servicios públicos en Chile: Casos sanitario, electricidad y telecomunicaciones.” Mimeo. Universidad de Chile (June).

Fishlow, Albert. 1994. “Latin America and the United States in a Changing World Economy.” In Latin America in a New World, ed. Lowenthal, Abraham and Treverton, Gregory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 65–78.Google Scholar

Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fontaine Aldunate, Arturo. 1988. Los Economistas y el Presidente Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Zig-Zag.Google Scholar

Foster, Vivien. 2004. “Toward a Social Policy for Argentina's Infrastructure Sectors: Evaluating the Past and Exploring the Future,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3422 (October).

Foweraker, Joe, Landman, Todd, and Harvey, Neil. 2003. Governing Latin America. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Fox, Vicente. 2005. Quinto informe de gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar

Franzese, Robert. 2002a. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes,” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 369–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franzese, Robert. 2002b. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frei, Eduardo. 1999a. Discurso sobre la crisis eléctrica, 26 Abril de 1999. http://www.fundacionfrei.cl/nuevo/efr/discursos.html (accessed September 20, 2005).

Frei, Eduardo. 1999b. Mensaje presidencial 21 de Mayo 1999. http://www.camara.cl/hist/archivo/discurs/presi99.pdf (accessed September 21, 2005).

,Frente para la Victoria. 2003. “Declaracion de Principios.” Nestor Kirchner's Electoral Plataform. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

,Frente para la Lealtad. 2003. “10 Propuestas para salir de la crisis.” Carlos Menem's Electoral Plataform. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Frieden, Jeffrey. 1992. Debt, Development, and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 2006. “Partisan Politics in Transition Economies.” Mimeo. Columbus: Ohio State University.

Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics 54: 308–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galetovic, Alexander. 2003. “Integración vertical en el sector eléctrico: Una guía para el usuario,” Estudios Públicos 91 (Winter): 199–232.Google Scholar

Galetovic, Alexander. 2002. “Transmisión y la ‘ley corta.’ ” Puntos de Referencia, 265. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos, December.Google Scholar

Gargarella, Roberto. 2008. “The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies: The Cases of Argentina, Chile and Colombia.” In The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, ed. Gargarella, Roberto, Gloppen, Siri, Kinander, Morten, and Wilson, Bruce. Manuscript.Google Scholar

Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1991. “The Political Opposition and the Party System under the Military Regime.” In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, ed. Drake, Paul and Jaksic, Ivan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 211–50.Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerchunoff, Pablo, Greco, Esteban, and Bondorevsky, Diego. 2003. “Comienzos diversos, distintas trayectorias y final abierto: Más de una década de privatizaciones en Argentina, 1990–2002.” Working Paper 34, Public Management Series. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL (April).

Gereffi, Gary, and Evans, Peter. 1981. “Transnational Corporations, Dependent Development and State Policies in the Semiperiphery: A Comparison of Brazil and Mexico,” Latin American Research Review 16, no. 3: 31–64.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gervasoni, Carlos. 1998. “Del Distribucionismo al neoliberalismo: Los cambios en la Coalición Electoral Peronista durante el gobierno de Menem.” Paper presented at the 1998 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September 24–6.

Gibson, Edward. 1997. “The Populist Road to Market Reforms: Policy and Electoral Coalitions in Argentina and Mexico,” World Politics 49 (April): 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, Edward, and Calvo, Ernesto. 2000. “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina,” Studies in Comparative International Development 35, no. 3 (Fall): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gil Hubert, Johanna. 2000. “La Interconexión en el sector de las telecomunicaciones en México a partir de la privatización de Telmex: Un análisis teórico y empírico.” BA thesis, Economics Department, ITAM, Mexico City.

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2004. “Institutional Change in Regulatory Policies: Regulation through Independent Agencies and the Three New Institutionalisms.” In The Politics of Regulation: Examining Regulatory Institutions and Instruments in the Age of Governance, ed. Jordana, Jacint and Levi-Faur, David. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 67–89.Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2002. “Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis,” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 6: 873–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomez-Ibanez, Jose. 2003. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts and Distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Greif, Avner, and Laitin, David D.. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 4 (November): 633–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe,” Comparative Political Studies 36: 1123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guerrero, Isabel, Lopez-Calva, Luis Felipe, and Walton, Michael. 2006. “The Inequality Trap and Its Links to Low Growth in Mexico.” Mimeo.

Haas, Peter. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization 46, no. 1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hachette, Dominique, and Luders, Rulf. 1993. Privatization in Chile. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1992. “Economic Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, ed. Haggard, Stephen and Kaufman, Robert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 319–50.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephen, and Maxfield, Sylvia. 1996. “The Political Economy of Financial Internationalization in the Developing World.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, ed. Keohane, Robert and Milner, Helen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haggard, Stephen, and McCubbins, Matthew D., 2001. “Introduction: Political Institutions and the Determinants of Public Policy.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Matthew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephen, and Noble, Gregory. 2001. “Power Politics: Elections and Electricity Regulation in Taiwan.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Matthew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256–90.Google Scholar

Hagopian, Frances. 2005. “Conclusions: Government Performance, Political Representation, and Public Perceptions of Contemporary Democracy in Latin America.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter A. 1989. “Conclusion: The Politics of Keynesian Ideas.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, ed. Hall, Peter A.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 361–91Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, John, and Pages, Carmen. 2000. “The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets,” Economia, the Journal of the Latin American Economic Association 1 (Fall): 109–54.Google Scholar

Heller, William B., and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2001. “Political Institutions and Economic Development: The Case of Electric Utility Regulation in Argentina and Chile.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Matthew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229–55Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions,” World Politics 50 (January): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen. 2004. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Henisz, Witold J. 2002. “The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment,” Industrial and Corporate Change 11, no. 2: 355–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henisz, Witold J., and Zelner, Bennet A.. 2005. “Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures and Change in Emerging Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments,” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3: 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henisz, Witold J., and Zelner, Bennet A.. 2003. “Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments,” William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003–589, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School.Google Scholar

Henisz, Witold J., Zelner, Bennet A., and Guillen, Mauro F.. 2005. “The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999,” American Sociological Review 70: 871–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hernández, Cesar. 2007. La reforma cautiva. Inversión, trabajo y empresa en el sector eléctrico mexicano. Mexico City: CIDAC.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71, no. 4: 1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillman, Amy J., Keim, Gerald D., and Schuler, Douglas. 2004. “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management 30, no. 6: 837–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirshman, Albert. 1968. “The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (February): 2–32.Google Scholar

Hirshman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hite, Katherine. 2000. When the Romance Ended: Leaders of the Chilean Left, 1968–1998. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Holburn, Guy, and Spiller, Pablo. 2002. “Interest Group Representation in Administrative Institutions: The Impact of Consumer Advocate and Elected Commissioners on Regulatory Policy in the United States.” Unpublished manuscript.

Huber, Evelyne, Mustillo, Thomas, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. “Politics and Social Spending in Latin America,” The Journal of Politics 70, no. 2 (April): 420–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2006. “Politics, Delegation and Bureaucracy.” In The Oxford Handbook for Political Economy, ed. Weingast, Barry and Wittman, Donald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256–73.Google Scholar

Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulsink, Willem. 1999. Privatization and Liberalization in European Telecommunications: Comparing Britain, the Netherlands, and France. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Carlos. 2000a. El régimen de Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Carlos. 2000b. “Technocrats and Politicians in an Authoritarian Regime: The ‘Odeplan Boys’ and the ‘Gremialists’ in Pinochet's Chile,” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (May): 461–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,IADB. 2005. The Politics of Policies. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America 2006 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.Google Scholar

,IADB. 2001. Competitiveness: The Business of Growth. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America 2001 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

,IERAL. 1999. “Las regulaciones en la Argentina.” Working Paper 22, IERAL.

Inostroza, Gabriel. 1995. “Control del estado y gestión empresarial en el sector eléctrico de Chile.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, February.

,Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Población de 15 años y más por situación en la fuerza de trabajo y tasa de desocupación. Total país, ambos sexos. Series 1986–2004. http://www.ine.cl/03-empleo/9999.htm (accessed October 1, 2005).

,Inter-American Development Bank. 2001. Competitiveness: The Business of Growth. Washington, DC: IPES, Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World Politics 50 (July): 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, Scott. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Gregg, and Crisp, Brian. 2003. “Mandates, Power, and Politics,” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (January): 128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgarner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Mark. 1997. “Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Shuggart, Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 259–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones-Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1 (February): 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones-Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2001. “Prelude to the Resource Curse: Explaining Oil and Gas Development Strategies in the Soviet Successor States and Beyond,” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 4 (May): 367–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordana, Jacint, and Levi-Faur, David. 2005. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (March): 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, Robert. 2008. “The Political Left, the Export Boom, and the Populist Temptation.” Mimeo. New York.

Kaufman, Robert R., and Nelson, Joan M.. 2004. Crucial Needs, Weak Incentives: Social Sector Reform, Democratization, and Globalization in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Robert R., and Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2001. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973–97,” World Politics 53 (July): 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Keohena, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Kingstone, Peter. 2003. “Privatizing Telebrás: Brazilian Political Institutions and Policy Performance,” Comparative Politics 36, no. 1 (October): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Hebert. 2001. “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Pierson, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klesner, Joseph. 2004. “The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social Attitudinal and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox's Victory.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 91–122Google Scholar

Kogut, Bruce, and Macpherson, J. Muir. 2004. “The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Epistemic Communities, Palace Wars, and Diffusion.” Mimeo.

Kuhlmann, Federico, Wohlers de Almeida, Marcio, Abeles, Martin, Forcinito, Karina, and Schorr, Martín. 2000. “Privatization and Deregulation: Latin American Style.” Paper presented at the 11th ITS European Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, September 9–11.

Kurtz, Marcus. 2004. “The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy: Lessons from Latin America,” World Politics 56 (January): 261–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtz, Marcus. 1999. “Chile's Neo-Liberal Revolution: Incremental Decisions and Structural Transformation, 1973–89,” Journal of Latin American Studies 31, pt. 2 (May): 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagos, Ricardo. 1999. “Iniciar el siglo XXI con mas democracia y mas derechos,” Ricardo Lagos's Electoral Plataform Bases Programáticas. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. Santiago de Chile. Chile (June 23).

,La Época. Programa de Gobierno. 1989. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar

,Latintrack 2000. Public Opinion Tracking. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

,Latinobarómetro. 2005. Informe Latinobarómetro, 1995–2005: Diez años de opinión pública. http://www.latinobarometro.org (accessed July 15, 2008).

,Latinobarómetro. 2003. Informe de prensa: resumen. http://www.latinobarometro.org/Upload/Informe-Resumen%20Latinobarómetro%202003.zip (accessed July 15, 2008).

,Latinobarómetro. 1998. 1998 Latinobarometer survey of Latin America data purchased at http://www.latinobarometro.org/(accessed July 20, 2008).

,Latinobarómetro. 1995. 1995 Latinobarometer survey of Latin America data purchased at http://www.latinobarometro.org/(accessed July 20, 2008).

Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Introduction to Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawson, Chappell. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Legisa, Juan. 2002. “Settlement of Disputes in the Power Sector in Argentina.” In Second-Generation Reforms in Infrastructure Services, ed. Basañes, F. and Willig, R. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 133–45.Google Scholar

Legisa, Juan. 1999. “Second Generation Issues in the Reform of Public Services,” Mimeo, Interamerican Development Bank (October).

León, Samuel. 1990. “Del partido de partidos al partido de sectores.” In El Partido en el poder. IEPES: Mexico City.Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, David. 2004. “On the ‘Net Impact’ of Europeanization: The EU's Telecoms and Electricity Regimes between the Global and the National,” Comparative Political Studies 37, no. 1 (February): 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi-Faur, David. 2003. “The Politics of Liberalization: Privatization and Regulation-for-Competition in Europe's and Latin America's Telecoms and Electricity Industries,” European Journal of Political Research 42: 705–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi-Faur, David. 1999. “The Governance of Competition: The Interplay of Technology, Economics, and Politics in European Union Electricity and Telecom Regimes,” Journal of Public Policy 19, no. 2: 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi-Faur, David, and Jordana, Jacint. 2005. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (March): 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, Michael, and Forrence, Jennifer. 1990. “Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a Synthesis,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, Steve. 2003. Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2009. “The Causes and Implications of Variation in Institutional Strength,” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2003. “Argentina Weathers the Storm,” Journal of Democracy 14, no. 4 (October): 152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Brian, and Spiller, Pablo. 1996. Introduction to Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Study of Telecommunications, ed. Levy, Brian and Spiller, Pablo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littlechild, Stephen C., and Skerk, Carlos J.. 2004. “Regulation of Transmission Expansion in Argentina.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 464. November.

,Libertad y Desarrollo. 1993a. “Comentarios al Proyecto de Ley sobre los Derechos del Consumidor.” Reseña Legislativa 155 (August). Santiago de Chile.

,Libertad y Desarrollo. 1993b. “Telecomunicaciones: Hacia una Mayor Competencia,” Temas Públicos 147 (June). Santiago de Chile.

Llanos, Mariana. 2002. Privatization and Democracy in Argentina: An Analysis of President-Congress Relations. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, Milton, and Hammill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing,” American Political Science Review 80, no. 2 (June): 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lopreite, Débora Cecilia. 2001. “Ciudadanos o consumidores: Los dilemas institucionales del Defensor del Pueblo de la Nación Argentina.” MA thesis, Public Administration, School of Economics, University of Buenos Aires, May.

Lora, Eduardo. 2001. “ Structural Reforms in Latin America: What Has Been Reformed and How to Measure It.” Working Paper 446. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, December.

Lora, Eduardo, and Olivera, Mauricio. 2005. “The Electoral Consequences of the Washington Consensus,” Economia (Spring): 1–45.Google Scholar

Lustig, Nora. 1992. “Equity and Growth in Mexico.” In Towards a New Development Strategy for Latin America, ed. Teitel, Simon. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 219–58.Google Scholar

Madrid, Raul. 2003. Retiring the State: The Politics of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz, and Poire, Alejandro. 2004. “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chapel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 293–319.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz, Diaz Cayeros, Alberto, and Estevez, Federico. 2007. “Clientelism and portfolio diversification: a model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Electoral Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2003. “Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America,” American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 1 (July): 50–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. “Introduction: Party Sytems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–34.Google Scholar

Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: The State of the Debate.” In Navigating Public Opinion, ed. Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I.. New York: Oxford University Press, 17–32.Google Scholar

Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Margheritis, Ana. 2002. “Policy Innovation and Leaders' Perceptions: Building a Reformist Consensus in Argentina,” Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 881–914.Google Scholar

Margheritis, Ana. 1999. Ajuste y reforma en Argentina, 1989–1995. Buenos Aires: Nuevohacer.Google Scholar

Mariscal, Judith. 2002. Unfinished Business: Telecommunications Reform in Mexico. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Mariscal, Judith, and Rivera, Eugenio. 2005. “New Trends in the Latin American Telecommunications Market: Telefonica and Telmex,” Telecommunications Policy 29: 757–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinez Gallardo, Cecilia. Forthcoming. “Cabinets and the Policy-Making Process.” In Political Institutions, Actors and Arenas in Latin American, ed. Scartascini, Carlos, Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano.

McAdam, Adam, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked,” American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3, no. 2 (Fall): 243–77.Google Scholar

McGillivray, Fiona. 2003. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, James. 1997. Peronism without Perón. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Megginson, William L., and Netter, Jeffrey M.. 2001. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies in Privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (June): 321–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meller, Patricio. 1996. Un siglo de economía política chilena (1890–1990). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar

Melo, José Ricardo. 1993. “La liberalización y la privatización de las telecomunicaciones.” Manuscript, University of Chile.Google Scholar

Melo, José Ricardo and Serra, Pablo. 1998. “Competencia y regulación en telecomunicaciones: la experiencia chilena,” Perspectivas 2, no. 1: 215–47. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar

Menem, Carlos, and Dromi, Roberto. 1997. Reforma del estado. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciudad Argentina.Google Scholar

Meseguer Yebra, Covadonga, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2005. “What Is New in the Study of Policy Diffusion? A Critical Review.” Mimeo. Mexico City.

Meseguer Yebra, Covadonga. 2002. Bayesian Learning about Policies. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones.Google Scholar

,MIDEPLAN (Ministry of Planning and Cooperation). 1998. Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional 1998 (CASEN), Cuadros Vivienda. http://www.mideplan.cl/casen3/vivienda/cuadros1998.html (accessed September 18, 2005).

Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

,Ministerio Secretaria General de Gobierno (MSGG). 1999. Informe encuestas flash crisis eléctrica. Santiago de Chile: Secretaria de Comunicación y Cultura, MSGG, May.

Moe, Terry. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, ed. Williamson, Oliver E.. New York: Oxford University Press, 116–53.Google Scholar

Moguillansky, Graciela. 1999. La inversión en Chile: El fin de un ciclo en expansión?Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar

Molano, Walter. 1997. The Logic of Privatization: The Case of Telecommunications in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Mora y Araujo, Manuel. 1980a. “Las bases estructurales del peronismo.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Mora y Araujo, Manuel and Llorente, Ignacio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 397–440.Google Scholar

Mora y Araujo, Manuel. 1980b. “Introducción: La sociología electoral y la comprensión del peronismo.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Mora y Araujo, Manuel and Llorente, Ignacio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 11–54.Google Scholar

Moreira, Carlos, and Narbondo, Pedro. 1998. “La reforma de las empresas públicas (1992–1994): Actores, diagnósticos y objetivos.” Working Paper no. 11. Department of Political Science, Universidad de la República, Montevideo.Google Scholar

Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Gerardo. 2004. “Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers,” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (May 2004): 437–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2005. “Partisanship Amidst Convergence: Labor Market Reforms in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 37, no. 4 (July 2005): 441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2002. “Political Bias in Policy Convergence. Privatization Choices in Latin America,” World Politics 54, no. 4 (July): 462–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Schrank, Andrew. 2005. “With a Little Help from My Friends: External and Domestic Allies and Labor Rights in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 8 (October): 971–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Schrank, Andrew. Forthcoming. “Labor Unions in the Policy making Process in Latin America.” In Actors in Latin American Policy making, ed. Stein, Ernesto and Mariano Tommasi. Washington, DC: Interamerican Development Bank.

Murillo, María Victoria, and Gallardo, Cecilia Martínez. 2007. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities,” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (January): 120–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, María Victoria, and Foulon, Carmen. 2006. “Crisis and Policymaking in Latin America: The Case of Chile's 1998–99 Electricity Crisis,” World Development 34, no. 9 (September): 1580–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, María Victoria, and Finchelstein, Diego. 2004. “Privatización y Poder de Mercado: el caso de la generación de energía eléctrica en Argentina. Nota de investigación,” Desarrollo Económico 44, no. 173 (April–June): 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murillo, Maria Victoria, Oliveros, Virginia, and Vaishnav, Milan. Forthcoming. “Voting for the Left or Governing on the Left?” In Latin American Left Turn, ed. Steven Levitsky and Kenneth Roberts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mustapic, Ana María. 2002. “Oscillating Relations: President and Congress in Argentina.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Navia, Patricio. 2004. Las grandes alamedas: El Chile post Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Tercera-Mondadori.Google Scholar

,NERA (National Economic Research Associates). 1998. “Analysis of the Reform of the Argentine Power Sector: Final Report.” New York, January.

Noll, Roger. 1999. “Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries.” Working Paper 99–10, AEI – Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, November.

Noll, Roger. 1989. “Economic Perspective on the Politics of Regulation.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2, ed. Schmalensee, Richard and Willig, Robert D.. London: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1253–87.Google Scholar

Noll, Roger, and Owen, Bruce. 1983. The Political Economy of Deregulation: Interest Groups in the Regulatory Process. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Obinger, Herbert, and Zohnhofer, John. 2005. “Selling Off the ‘Family Silver’: The Politics of Privatization in the OECD, 1990–2000.” Center for European Studies Working Paper no. 121. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

,Observatorio de Servicios Públicos (OPSM -Enrique Zuleta Puceiro). 2002. Monitor de Tendencias Económicas y Sociales. Opinión Pública, Servicios y Mercados (July).

,Observatorio de Servicios Públicos (OPSM -Enrique Zuleta Puceiro). 2003. Monitor de Tendencias Económicas y Sociales. Opinión Pública, Servicios y Mercados (September).

Ochoa Camposeco, Victor, and Orozco, Jesus. 2002. “Iniciativa de Ley Federal para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones,” April. Congreso de la Union. Mexico City.

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy?” Journal of Democracy 5 (January): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,OECD. 2000. Reforma regulatory en México. Vol. 1. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

O'Neil, Shannon. 2007. “The Rise of the Regulatory State: Post-Privatization Politics in Latin America.” Paper presented at Latin American Studies Association International Congress XXVII, Montréal, Canada.

Orenstein, Michael. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Post Communist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orozco, Jesús and ,Víctor Manuel Ochoa Camposeco. 2002. “Propuesta de Reforma a la ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones.” Comisión de Telecomunicaciones. Cámara de Diputados. Mexico City, Mexico.

Ostiguy, Pierre. 1998. Peronism and Anti-Peronism: Class-Cultural Cleavages and Political Identity in Argentina. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Oxhorn, Philip, and Ducatenzeiler, Graciela. 1998. What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Palermo, Vicente and Novaro, Marcos. 1996. Política y poder en el gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma Ensayo.Google Scholar

Palermo, Vicente, and Torre, Juan Carlos. 1992. “A la sombra de la hiperinflación. La política de reformas estructurales en Argentina.” CEPAL, Buenos Aires, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

,PAN. 2003. “Legislative Program 2003.” Mexico City, IFE.

,PAN. 1997. Plataforma Legislativa 1997–2000, January 13.

,Parametría. 2002. National Home Surveys. Electricity Reform. Parametria SA de CV, Mexico City, Mexico (June 15–13).

Pastor, Manuel, and Wise, Carol. 1997. “State Policy, Distribution, and Neoliberal Reform in Mexico,” Journal of Latin American Studies 29, no. 2 (May): 419–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Smulovitz, Catalina, eds. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of the Law: Social Accountabity in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRef

Petracci, Mónica. 1998. “La calidad de los servicios públicos privatizados—luz, agua, gas y teléfono: Evaluada por el ciudadano-usuario.” Dirección Nacional de Estudios y Documentación, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública (INAP). Buenos Aires.

Petrazzini, Alfa, Ben. 1995. The Political Economy of Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries: Privatization and Liberalization in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Piñera, José. 1990. La revolución laboral en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Zig-Zag.Google Scholar

Piñeira, Sebastián. 2005. “Compromiso de Gobierno de Sebastián Piñeira. Primeros 120 días.” Sebastián Piñeira's Electoral Plataform. Santiago de Chile, Chile.

Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2008. “Crisis in the Eye of the Beholder: Economic Crisis and Partisan Politics in Latin American and East European International Monetary Fund Programs,” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 9 (September): 1179–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Post, Alison. 2007. “Bargaining for the Long-Term in Volatile Economies: The Regulation of Water and Sanitation Concessions in Latin America.” Paper presented for the Latin American Studies Association Meeting, Montreal, September 5–8.

,PRD. 2003. “Party for a Democratic Revolution: Legislative Program, 2003–2006.” Mexico City, IFE.

,PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2003. “Unidad y Congruencia: Plataforma Electoral 2003.” PRI National Political Committee, Mexico City. January 13, IFE.

,PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2002. “Analisis y presentación de criterios para la discusión de reformas del sector eléctrico nacional.” Aprobado por unanimidad en la comisión permanente del consejo político nacional del PRI.

,PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2000. Federal Electoral Program, 2000–2006. Mexico City.Google Scholar

,Proyecto de Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA). 1994–2005. Manuel Alcántara, Director. Salamanca, Spain: Universidad de Salamanca.

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehren, Alfredo. 2000. “Clientelismo político, corrupción y reforma del estado en Chile.” Working Paper no. 305. Centro de Estudios Publicos, Santiago de Chile.

Remmer, Karen. 2003. “Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin America.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America, ed. Wise, Carol and Roett, Riordan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 31–55.Google Scholar

Remmer, Karen. 2002. “The Politics of Economic Policy and Performance in Latin America,” Journal of Public Policy 22, no. 1: 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remmer, Karen. 1998. “The Politics of Neoliberal Economic Reform in South America, 1980–94,” Studies in Comparative International Development 33 (Summer): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reveles Vázquez, Francisco. 2003. “La lucha entre fracciones priistas en la selección de candidatos presidenciales.” In Partido Revolucionario Institucional: Crisis y refundación, ed. Reveles Vázquez, Francisco. Mexico City: Ediciones Gernika, 79–152.Google Scholar

Reyes Heroles, Federico. 2000. Hacia la Presidencia en el 2000. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Economica.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Sybil. 2006. Social Movements and Free-Market Capitalism in Latin America. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Rios Figueroa, Julio. 2007. “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994–2002,” Latin American Politics and Society 49, no. 1 (Spring): 31–57.Google Scholar

Rivera, Eugenio. 2000. “Competencia y regulación de los servicios de utilidad pública en Chile: una perspectiva institucional.” In El estado y el sector privado: Construyendo una nueva economía en los años 90, ed. Muñoz Gomá, Oscar. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen-FLACSO, 155–98.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth. 2008. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility during Latin America's Transition to Economic Liberalism.” Mimeo. Ithaca, NY.

Roberts, Kenneth. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era,” Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106, no. 5 (October): 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, no. 1 (March): 9–41.Google Scholar

Rogozinski, Jacques. 1997. La privatización en México: Razones e impactos. Mexico City: Trillas.Google Scholar

Rojas Bolaños, Manuel, and Sojo, Carlos. 1995. El malestar con la política: Partidos y elites en Costa Rica. San José: FLACSO.Google Scholar

Romero, Carlos. 1999. “Regulaciones e inversiones en el sector electric.” Texto de Discusión 5, Centro de Estudios Económicos de la Regulación. UADE, Buenos Aires, Argentina (June).

Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 7 (September): 824–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi de Oliveira, Andre. 2003. “The Future of Privatization and Regulation in Brazil.” Paper presented at the conference Progress and Challenges of Rendering Infrastructure in Latin America, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Peru, October 2.

Rozas, Patricio. 1999. “La crisis eléctrica en Chile: Antecedentes para una evaluación de la institucionalidad reguladora.” Serie Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura No. 5. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Rufin, Carlos. 2003. The Political Economy of Institutional Change in the Electricity Supply Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Rufin, Carlos. 2002. “Political Economy of the Brazilian Electricity Sector.” Report presented to the Inter-American Development Bank. http://faculty.babson.edu/crufin/ (accessed June 8, 2005).

Rufin, Carlos, and Rangan, U. Srinivasa. 2004. Institutional Change in the Electricity Industry: Initial Evidence. Unpublished manuscript. Babson College, January.Google Scholar

Rufin, Carlos, and Romero, Evanán. 2005. “Evaluating the Sustainability of Privatization and Regulatory Reform: Brazil in Comparative Perspective.” Paper presented at the Brazil in Interdisciplinary Perspective conference, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, April 29–30.

Saavedra, Eduardo. 2005. Marco Regulatorio de los Servicios Basicos en Chile. IDEAS. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ila/ilades/inv167.html (accessed September 28, 2006).Google Scholar

Sábato, Jorge. 1971. Segba, cogestión y Banco Mundial. Buenos Aires: Juárez.Google Scholar

Saiegh, Sebastian. 2006. “Patterns of Successful Statutory Policy Making around the World.” Mimeo. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Salinas, Carlos. 1994. Sexto informe de gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar

Schamis, Hector. 2002. Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schamis, Hector. 1999. “Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America,” World Politics 51: 236–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schamis, Hector. 1991. “Reconceptualizing Latin American Authoritarianism in the 1970s: From Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism to Neoconservatism,” Comparative Politics 23, no. 2 (January): 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schenone, Osvaldo. 1991. “Public Sector Behavior in Argentina.” In The Public Sector and the Latin American Crisis, ed. Larraín, Felipe and Selowsky, Marcelo. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth, 20–56.Google Scholar

Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, Ben Ross. 1998. “The Material Bases of Technocracy: Investor Confidence and Neoliberalism in Latin America.” In The Politics of Expertise in Latin America, ed. Centeno, Miguel and Silva, Patricio. London: St. Martin, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, Volker, Fink, Simon, and Tenbücken, Marc. 2005. “Buying Out the State: A Comparative Perspective on the Privatization of Infrastructures,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 6: 704–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Secretary of Communications and Transportation (SCT). 2000. El sector comunicaciones y transporte, 1994–2000. Mexico City: SCT.Google Scholar

Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2007. The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serra, Pablo. 2002. “Regulación del sector eléctrico chileno,” Perspectivas 6, no. 1: 11–44.Google Scholar

Shoetters, Marcelo Alberto. 1999. “ Preocupa la posible cartelización de la generación en el MEM? ” Mimeo. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. and Haggard, Stephen. 2001. “Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Matthew D.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 21–63.Google Scholar

Siavelis, Peter. 2002. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, BenitoCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Sigmund, Paul. 1990. “Chile: Privatization, Reprivatization, Hyperprivatization.” In The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, ed. Suleiman, Ezra N. and Waterbury, JohnBoulder, CO: Westview Press, 87–113.Google Scholar

Silva, Eduardo. 1996. The State and Capital in Chile. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Silva, Patricio. 1991. “Technocrats and Politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks,” Journal of Latin American Studies 23 (May): 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Beth. 1999. “The Internationalization of Capital.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John. New York: Cambridge University Press, 36–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Beth, and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy,” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1 (February): 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Peter. 1980. “Las elecciones de 1946 y las inferencias ecológicas.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Mora y Araujo, Manuel and Llorente, Ignacio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 165–89.Google Scholar

Spiller, Pablo, and Martorell, Luis Viana. 1996. “How Should It Be Done? Electricity Regulation in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Chile.” In International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation, ed. Gilbert, Richard J. and Kahn, Edward P.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stallings, Barbara. 1992. “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, ed. Haggard, Stephen and Kaufman, Robert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 41–88.Google Scholar

Stallings, Barbara. 1990. “The Role of Foreign Capital in Economic Development.” In Manufacturing Miracles: The Path of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, ed. Gereffi, Gary and Wyman, Donald L.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 54–87.Google Scholar

Stallings, Barbara and Perez, Wilson. 2000. Crecimiento, Empleo y Equidad: el impacto de las reformas económicas en América Latina. Mexico City: CEPAL/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal on Economic and Management Science 2: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina,” American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (August): 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturzenegger, Federico. 1990. “Description of a Populist Experience: Argentina, 1973–1976.” In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. Dornbush, Rudisher and Edwards, Sebastian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 77–120.Google Scholar

,Subsecretaria de Economia. 2004. “Indicadores de regulacion: Servicios de utilidad publica.” Ministerio de Economia, Santiago de Chile. http://www.economia.cl/ aws00/Estatico/repositorio/Y/j/R/YjRiNWM0ZTZmNTMwZDQ1MjRiNj Y0NWM0MWZhNTFmMjg4YWRlN2ZmOA==.pdf (accessed October 1, 2005).Google Scholar

Székely, Gabriel, and Palacio, Jaime Del. 1995. Teléfonos de México: una empresa privada. Mexico City: Grupo Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar

Tabja, Rodrigo. 1996. “Organización industrial, legislación y tarificación en las telecomunicaciones de Chile. Un intento de Síntesis.” Mimeo. Santiago de Chile.

Taylor, Shelley. 1982. “The Availability Bias in Social Perception and Interaction.” In Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Telecomunicaciones y Negocios. 1999. no. 42, year 9.

,Telecomunicaciones y Negocios. 1997. “Las Pymes hacen numerous,” no. 32, year 7.

Teichman, Judith. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

,Telmex. 2002. “Propuesta de Telmex a la CPT.” Mexico City. Mimeo.

Thatcher, Mark. 2002a. “Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation,” West European Politics 25, no. 1 (January): 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thatcher, Mark. 2002b. “Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe,” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 6: 954–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thatcher, Mark. 1999. The Politics of Telecommunications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen. 2004 How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (June): 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torre, Juan Carlos. 1998. El proceso político de las reformas económicas en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar

Torre, Leonardo. 2000. “Tarifas y penetración telefónica en México: Demanda insuficiente o poder de monopolio?” Working Paper 18. Centro de Análisis y Difusión Económica (CADE), Monterrey (November).Google Scholar

,Trends in Telecommunications Reforms. 1998. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union.

Tsebelis, George. 2003. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ugalde, Luis Carlos. 2000. The Mexican Congress: Old Player, New Power. Washington, DC: CSIS.Google Scholar

,UNDP. 2004. Democracy in Latin America: Towards a Citizens' Democracy. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar

Urbiztondo, Santiago. 2000. “El problema de los cortes de electricidad y posibles soluciones regulatorias.” Mimeo. FIEL, March.

Urbiztondo, Santiago, Artana, Daniel, and Navajas, Fernando. 1998. “La autonomía de los nuevos entes reguladores argentinos,” Desarrollo Económico 38 (Autumn): 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valenzuela, Arturo. 1991. “The Military in Power: The Consolidation of One-Man Rule.” In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, ed. Drake, Paul and Jaksic, Ivan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press: 97–132.Google Scholar

Vergara, Pilar. 1981. “Las Transformaciones de las Funciones Económicas del Estado en Chile Bajo el Gobierno Militar,” Colección Estudios CIEPLAN 5: 117–54.Google Scholar

Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Victor, David, and Heller, Thomas. 2007. Introduction to the Political Economy of Power Sector Reform, ed. Victori, D. and Heller, T.. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vispo, Adolfo. 1999. Los entes de regulación. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Norma.Google Scholar

Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reforms in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vreeland, James. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry. 1981. “Regulation, Reregulation, and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships,” Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 148–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Shuggart, Matthew S.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2008. “The Latin American Left: Destroyer or Savior of the Market Model?” Mimeo. Austin, TX.

Weyland, Kurt. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform,” World Politics 2: 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2004. “Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform: An Introduction.” In Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform, ed. Weyland, KurtBaltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1–34.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2002a. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 2002b. “Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism for the Study of Latin American Politics,” Studies in Comparative International Development 37, no. 1 (Spring): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1999. “Economic Policy in Chile's New Democracy,” Journal of Interamerican. Studies and World Affairs 41, no. 3: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies 31, no. 5 (October): 539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamsom, John. 1994. The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Wilson, Bruce. 1999. “Leftist Parties, Neoliberal Policies, and Reelection Strategies: The Case of the PLN in Costa Rica,” Comparative Political Studies 32, no. 6: 752–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, James Q. 1980. “The Politics of Regulation.” In The Politics of Regulation, ed. Wilson, James Q.. New York: Basic Books, 357–447.Google Scholar

Winograd, Carlos. 2002. “Infraestructura y Servicios Públicos. Crisis Económica y Agenda Regulatoria.” Mimeo. París: DELTA-Ecole Normale Superieure (September 11).

Wise, Carol. 2003. “Mexico's Democratic Transition: The Search for New Reform Coalitions.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America, ed. Wise, Carol and Roett, Riordan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 159–98.Google Scholar

,World Bank. 2005. “Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Recent Development and Key Changes.” Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

,World Bank. 1991. “The Evolution, Situation, and Prospects of the Electric Power Sector in the LAC Countries.” Washington, DC: World Bank and OLADE, August.Google Scholar

Yashar, Deborah. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zedillo, Ernesto. 2000. Sexto Informe de Gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.Google Scholar