Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:22:15.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Recalibrating Risks of Nuclear Power

Reactions to Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima

from Part III - Case Studies on Nuclear Accidents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2017

Edward J. Balleisen
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Lori S. Bennear
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Kimberly D. Krawiec
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Wiener
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Policy Shock
Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises
, pp. 243 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behr, P. (2009) “Three Mile Island Still Haunts U.S. Nuclear Industry.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/03/27/27greenwire-three-mile-island-still-haunts-us-reactor-indu-10327.html?pagewanted=all.Google Scholar
Epstein, W. (2011). “A Probabilistic Risk Assessment Practitioner Looks at the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami” A Ninokata Laboratory white paper, Tokyo Institute of Technology, April 2011.Google Scholar
Epstein, W. (2014). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (2011). Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Atlanta, GA: INPO,Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2012). Key World Energy Statistics. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2013). Annual Report. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J. (1981). “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk.” Risk Analysis, 1(1): 1127.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. G. (1979). Report of the President’s Commission on the Three Mile Island Accident: the Need for Change, Washington, DC: The Commission.Google Scholar
LaPorte, T. R. (1996). “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 4(2): 6071.Google Scholar
Office of Chancellor Merkel (2011). “Germany’s Energy Transition” Report of the Ethics Commission for a Safe Energy Supply, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Paté-Cornell, M. E. (2009). “Probabilistic Risk Assessment” in The Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Cochran, J. J. (Editor-in-Chief), New York, NY: Wiley Pub.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, J. V. (1996). Hostages of each other: the transformation of nuclear safety since Three Mile Island, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, W. (2013). “Valuing Safety Even When the Markets Do Not Notice” in Energy and Security, 2nd edition, Goldwyn, D. L. and Kalicki, J. (eds.), Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 107–20.Google Scholar
New York Times (December 26, 2011). “Japan Panel Cites Failures in Tsunami,” Op-ed by Tabushi, Hiroko. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/world/asia/report-condemns-japans-response-to-nuclear-accident.html.Google Scholar
New York Times (March 9, 2012). “Fukushima Could Have Been Prevented,” Op-ed by Acton, James M.. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/10/opinion/fukushima-could-have-been-prevented.html.Google Scholar
Nimmo, D. D. and Combs, J. E. (1989). Nightly Horrors: Crisis Coverage by Television Nightly News. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. (March 30, 1979). “Pa. Reactor Mishap Called Worst in U.S. History; Accident Clouds Future Of Nuclear Power in U.S.; Future of Nuclear Power Is CloudedWashington Post.: A1.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience 185 (4175): 1124–31.Google Scholar
UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2008). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiations. United Nations, Geneva Switzerland.Google Scholar
UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2012). Interim Findings of Fukushima-Daiichi Assessment Presented at the Annual Meeting of UNSCEAR. United Nations Information Service, Geneva Switzerland.Google Scholar
USNRC, Rasmussen, Norman C. et al. (1975). Reactor Safety Study: An assessment of accidental risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-75/014 (Wash-1400). Washington DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
USNRC (1979). Annual Report (NUREG-0690).Google Scholar
USNRC (2011). “Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident,” Washington DC. www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1118/ML111861807.pdf.Google Scholar
USNRC (2013a). “Backgrounder on the Chernobyl Accident,” www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/chernobyl-bg.html.Google Scholar
USNRC (2013b). “Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident” (NUREG-0558). www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html.Google Scholar
USNRC (2013c). “What Are the Lessons Learned from Fukushima.” www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/priorities.html.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2006). Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes, Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum, Bennett, B., Repacholi, M. and Carr, Z. (eds.), Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×