Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin. (2015). Schriftliche Anfrage. Elterngeld: Aktueller Stand der Inanspruchnahme, Beanstandungen, Summen und Wartezeiten [press release].Google Scholar

Abramson, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2009). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Adam, C., Hurka, S., & Knill, C. (2017). Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 327–344. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1082262.Google Scholar

Adam, C., Knill, C., & Fernandez-i-Marín, X. (2017). Rule growth and government effectiveness: Why it takes the capacity to learn and coordinate to constrain rule growth. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 241–268. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9265-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, C., Knill, C., Hurka, S., & Steinebach, Y. (2018). Demokratische Politik in der Komplexitätsfalle? Strukturelle Schwierigkeiten eines argumentativen Umgangs mit Populisten. In Mack, W. (ed.), Zwischen Offenheit und Abschottung: Wie die Politik zurück in die Mitte findet: Herder.Google Scholar

Adam, C., & Raschzok, A. (2016). Cannabis policy and the uptake of treatment for cannabis‐related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 36(2), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adsera, A. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amelung, A., Arentz, O., Jänsch, J., & Münstermann, L. (2012). Auswirkungen staatlicher Eingriffe zur Förderung der Gebäudesanierung auf die Akteure des Immobilienmarkts. Discussion Paper 03/2012. Otto-Wolff-Institut.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. M., & Rees, D. I. (2014). The role of dispensaries: The devil is in the details. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 235–240. doi:10.1002/pam.21733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Architektenkammer Baden-Württemberg. (2016). Zehn Punkte zur geplanten Fusion von EnEG/EnEV und EEWärme. Zehn Punkte zur geplanten Fusion von EnEG/EnEV und EEWärmeG. Ergebnis eines Hearings der Architektenkammer Baden-Württemberg und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen – DGNB e.V. In. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ayaß, W. (ed.) (2005). Quellensammlung zur Geschichte der deutschen Sozialpolitik 1867–1914: 2. Abteilung: Von der Kaiserlichen Sozialbotschaft bis zu den Feburarerlassen Wilhelms II (1881–1890): Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WGB).Google Scholar

Babyak, M. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3), 411–421.Google Scholar

Bache, I., & Taylor, A. (2003). The politics of policy resistance: Reconstructing higher education in Kosovo. Journal of Public Policy, 25(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, A., & Hanggartner, D. (2010). When deliberate theory meets empirical political science: Theoretical and methodological challenges in political deliberation. Political Studies, 58, 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, A., & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and measuring deliberation: Towards a new deliberative quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, P., Boisclair, D., & Ferrence, R. (2011). Effects of tobacco taxation and pricing on smoking behavior in high risk populations: a knowledge synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(11), 4118–4139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bardach, E. (1976). Policy termination as a political process. Policy Sciences, 7, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Barnow, B. S. (2000). Exploring the Relationship between Performance Management and Program Impact: A Case Study of the Job Training Partnership Act. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 118–141.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2009). Unemployment, institutions, and reform complementarities: Re-assessing the aggregate evidence for OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Adam, C. (forthcoming). Policy and organizational termination. In Thompson, W. R. (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (2012). Dismantling public policy: Preferences, strategies, and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (2014). A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of policy change: Measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 28–44.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (eds.) (2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, C., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2016). Environmental policy. In Cini, M. & Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, N. (eds.), European Union Politics (Vol. 5, pp. 323–336). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berglund, S., Gange, I., & van Waarden, F. (2006). Mass production of law. Routinization in the transposition of European directives: A Sociological-institutionalist account. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 692–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, P. (1978). The study of macro- and micro-implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 157–184.Google Scholar

Bernauer, D., & Knill, C. (2012). When the dismantling of an ineffective policy becomes increasingly costly: Default strategies, arena shifting and symbolic action in German waste policy. In Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pederson, C., & Héritier, A. (eds.), Dismantling Public Policies: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects (pp. 155–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, E., Bunch, J., Canner, N., & Lee, M. (2016). Beyond the Holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 8.Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. (2015). Enhancing joined-up government and outcome-based performance management through system dynamics modelling to deal with wicked problems: The case of societal ageing. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(4), 502–505. doi:10.1002/sres.2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianculli, A., Jenne, N., & Jordana, J. (2012). From dismantling by default to arena shifting? Child benefits policy in Spain. In Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (eds.), Dismantling Public Policies: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects (pp. 105–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, R. D., & Knight, T. (2013). Compliance with corporate policy: An economic approach. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blichner, L. C., & Molander, A. (2008). Mapping juridification. European Law Journal, 14(1), 36–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blonz, J. A., Vajjhala, S. P., & Safirova, E. (2008). Growing complexities: A cross-sector review of U.S. bio-fuels policies and their interactions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar

BMFSFJ, B. f. F., Senioren, Frauen, und Jugend. (2012). Bestandsaufnahme der familienbezogenen Leistungen und Maßnahmen des Staates im Jahr 2012. Retrieved from www.bmfsfj.de/blob/108340/4066c3b967d5db0f9fc11ee1946fc713/bestandsaufnahme-familienbezogene-leistungen-2012-data.pdf.Google Scholar

BMFSFJ, B. f. F., Senioren, Frauen, und Jugend. (2015). Fünfter Bericht zur Evaluation des Kinderförderungsgesetzes. Retrieved from www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/service/publikationen/fuenfter-bericht-zur-evaluation-des-kinderfoerderungsgesetzes–kifoeg-bericht-2015-/86370?view=DEFAULT.Google Scholar

BMFSFJ, B. f. F., Senioren, Frauen, und Jugend. (2016). Richtlinien zum BEEG. Retrieved from www.elterngeld.net/pdf/Richtlinien.pdf.Google Scholar

BMU. (2013). Water Framework Directive. Implementation of WFD programmes of measures – interim results 2012. Berlin: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bonin, H., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2015). Übertragung der Studie von Frey/Osborne (2013) auf Deutschland. Mannheim: ZEW.Google Scholar

Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics & Society, 38(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börzel, T. A., Hofman, T., & Panke, D. (2011). Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 1–18.Google Scholar

Bovaird, T. (2014). Attributing outcomes to social policy interventions – ‘Gold Standard’ or ‘Fool’s Gold’ in public policy and management? Social Policy & Administration, 48(1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00869.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, D., Beckfield, J., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic globalization and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975–2001. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 921–948. doi:10.1177/000312240507000603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2005). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82. doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremische Bürgerschaft. (2016). Sitzungsprotokoll. Fragestunde. 17. Sitzung am Dienstag, dem 23. August 2016. [Press release]. Retrieved from www.bremische-buergerschaft.de/dokumente/wp19/stadt/protokoll/P19S0017.pdf.Google Scholar

Bruno, G., Choudhry, M., Marelli, E., & Signorelli, M. (2017). The short and long-run impacts of financial crises on youth unemployment in the OECD. Applied Economics, 49(34), 3372–3394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bujard, M. (2011). Geburtenrückgang und Familienpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bujard, M. (2015). Consequences of enduring low fertility – A German case study. Demographic projections and implications for different policy fields. Comparative Population Studies, 40(2), 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundesrat. (2013). Beschluss des Bundesrates. Zweite Verordnung zur Änderung der Energieeinsparverordnung.Google Scholar

Carley, S. (2009). State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3071–3081. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castles, F. G. (2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209–227. doi:10.1177/09589287030133001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaloupka, F., & Wechsler, H. (1997). Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults. Journal of Health Economics, 16(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy. Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R. (2003). A policy mix for environmentally sustainable development-learning from the Dutch experience. NZJ Envtl. L., 7, 29.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. R., Harris, M., & Höpfl, H. (2013). Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crozier, M. (2010). The bureaucratic phenomenon. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Dachis, B., Duranton, G., & Turner, M. (2012). The effects of land transfer taxes on real estate markets: Evidence from a natural experiment in Toronto. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, P. (2012). The state of evidence-based policy evaluation and its role in policy formation. National Institute Economic Review, 219(1), R41–R52. doi:10.1177/002795011221900105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jong, M. (2009). Rose’s “10 Steps”: Why process, messiness, history and culture are not vague and banal. Policy & Politics, 37(1), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Mesquita, E. B., & Stephenson, M. C. (2007). Regulatory quality under imperfect oversight. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. (2009a). Green tape and public employee rule abidance: Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 901–910. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02039.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. (2009b). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del Rio, P., & Howlett, M. P. (2013). Beyond the “Tinbergen Rule” in policy design: Matching tools and goals in policy portfolios. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1(1), 12–37.Google Scholar

Umwelthilfe, Deutsche. (2015). Regelungs- und Vollzugsdefizite der Energieeinsparverordnung (EnEV) bei der Durchsetzung des Energieausweises als Lenkungsinstrument [Press release]. Retrieved from www.duh.de/fileadmin/media/duhdownloads/Hintergrund_Regelungs_Vollzugsdefizite_270415_01.pdf.Google Scholar

Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Lisa Paus, Dr. Harald Terpe, Dr. Thomas Gambke, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN Weiterentwicklung der Tabaksteuer als Präventionsinstrument. Deutscher Bundestag: 18. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 18/1065.Google Scholar

Devaney, T. (April 18, 2017). Trump’s ‘one in, two out’ regulatory policy backed by 14 states. The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/329297-trumps-1-in-2-out-policy-backed-by-14-states.Google Scholar

Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (eds.) (2016). Authoritarianism goes global: The challenge to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dias, J. J., & Maynard-Moody, S. W. (2007). For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Die Welt. (May 3, 2016). Merkel: Müssen AfD mit Argumenten und “ohne Schaum vorm Mund” begegnen. Retrieved from www.welt.de/newsticker/news1/article154994290/Merkel-Muessen-AfD-mit-Argumenten-und-ohne-Schaum-vorm-Mund-begegnen.html.Google Scholar

DKFZ. (2014). Tobacco prevention in Germany: What works? Heidelberg: German Cancer Research Center.Google Scholar

Doll, S. (2016). Bremer warten auf Elterngeld. Weser Kurier.Google Scholar

Dolowitz, D. P. (2003). A policy-maker’s guide to policy transfer. The Political Quarterly, 74(1), 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review, 3(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S., & Braithwaite, V. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology, 21, 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duell, N., Thurau, L., & Vetter, T. (2016). Long-term unemployment in the EU: Trends and policies. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead – Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dye, J. (February 24, 2017). Trump signs order creating task forces to weed out ‘excessive regulation’. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/ad9dbb0b-d9dd-3fc6-86a3-e727b7d36a5f?mhq5j=e5.Google Scholar

Eladis, P., Hill, M., & Howlett, M. (2005). Designing government: From instruments to governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elmore, R. F. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 185–228.Google ScholarPubMed

Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1994). Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeston: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Euractiv. (2012). Tajani backs away from 2025 fuel efficiency fight. Retrieved from www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/car-industry-boss-calls-2025-co2-standards-news-511735.Google Scholar

Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkner, G., Hartlapp, M., & Treib, O. (2007). Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only “sometimes-true theories”. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe: EU harmonisation and soft law in the member states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farnsworth, K., & Irving, Z. (2012). Varieties of crisis, varieties of austerity: Social policy in challenging times. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favero, N., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2016). Goals, trust, participation, and feedback: Linking internal management with performance outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 327–343. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Featherstone, K., & Papadimitriou, D. (2008). The limits of europeanization: Reform capacity and policy conflict in Greece. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2017). The hidden faces of crisis. Displacement effects and policy punctuations during economic crises. Paper presented at the conference Policy-Making in Hard Times: Deregulation, Dismantling and Compensation, Barcelona.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S. C. (2017). The politics of investing in families: Comparing family policy expansion in Japan and South Korea. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society (24), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischer, G. (February 14, 2017). Viele Mütter bekommen weniger Mütterrente. Sächsische Zeitung Online.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2010). In defense of politics. The Political Quarterly, 81(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florida, R., & Kenney, M. (1992). Restructuring in place: Japanese investment, production organization, and the geography of steel. Economic Geography, 68(2), 146–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rundschau, Frankfurter. (January 24, 2015). Gabriel diskutiert mit Pegida. Retrieved from www.fr.de/politik/spezials/pegida/spd-pegida-gabriel-diskutiert-mit-pegida-a-514519.Google Scholar

Frantz, J. E. (1997). The high cost of policy termination. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(2), 2097–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, W. A. (2018). Anti-pluralism: The populist threat to liberal democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gelles, D. (2015). At Zappos, pushing shoes and vision. New York Times.Google Scholar

German Energy Agency. (2017). Energy-efficient building and refurbishment the right way. Retrieved from www.dena.de/en/topics-projects/energy-efficiency/buildings/consulting-and-planning/german-energy-saving-ordinance-enev-standards-and-laws/.Google Scholar

Gerston, L. N. (2010). Public policy making: Process and principles. Abingdon: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Geva-May, I. (2004). Riding the wave of opportunity: Termination in public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., & Feitelson, E. (2013). From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennerster, R. (2012). The power of evidence: Improving the effectiveness of government by investing in more rigorous evaluation. National Institute Economic Review, 219(1), R4–R14. doi:10.1177/002795011221900102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goggin, M. (1986). The “too few cases/too many variables” problem in implementation research. Political Research Quarterly, 39(2), 328–347.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Grabosky, P. N. (1995). Counterproductive regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green-Pedersen, C., Christiansen, F. J., Euchner, E.-M., Jensen, C., & Turnpenny, J. (2012). Dismantling by default? The indexation of social benefits in four Countries. In Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (eds.), Dismantling Public Policies: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects (pp. 129–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregg, M. (2008). Field epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, J. (2001). Tobacco at the crossroads: The past and future of smoking regulation in the United States. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy, 21(1), 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1991). Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 109–131.Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socioeconomic Review, 7(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halligan, J., Buick, F., & Flynn, O. (2011). Experiments with joined-up, horizontal and whole- of- government in Anglophone countries. In Massey, A. (ed.), International Handbook on Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elger.Google Scholar

Hamel, G. (2014). Bureaucracy must die. Harvard Business Review, 8.Google Scholar

Harlass, A. (2010). Jeder 5. Rentenbescheid in Sachsen falsch! Bild.de. Retrieved from www.bild.de/regional/dresden/jeder-fuenfte-ist-falsch-10986084.bild.html.Google Scholar

Haverland, M., Steunenberg, B., & van Waarden, F. (2011). Sectors at different speeds: Analysing transposition deficits in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Head, B. W. (2015). Toward more “Evidence-informed” policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. doi:10.1111/puar.12475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes-based performance management in the Public Sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennicke, P. (2004). Scenarios for a robust policy mix: The final report of the German study commission on sustainable energy supply. Energy Policy, 32(15), 1673–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrekson, M. (1990). The Peacock and Wiseman displacement effect. European Journal of Political Economy, 6(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertle, M., Duscha, M., Jahn, D., Münster, D., Bliss, U., Lambrecht, K., & Jungmann, U. (2006). Evaluation und Begleitung der Umsetzung der Energieeinsparverordnung 2002 in Baden-Württemberg. Heidelberg: Ifeu-Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. (2008). The judicialization of politics. In Caldeira, G. A., Kelemen, R. D., & Whittington, K. E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (pp. 119–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C.-H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HM Treasury. (2003). The Magenta book: Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10521/.Google Scholar

Holzinger, K. (2001a). Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den internationalen Beziehungen: Anmerkungen zu einigen irreführenden Dichotomien. Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 8(2), 243–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzinger, K. (2001b). Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42(3), 414–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hou, Y., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Substitution and supplementation between co‐functional policy instruments: Evidence from state budget stabilization practices. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 914–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33–46.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., & Del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C, 33(5), 1233–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2002). The policy effects of internationalization: A subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4(3), 31–50.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Pearl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs. packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1993). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Hupe, P. (2014). What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hupe, P., & Saetren, H. (2014). The sustainable future of implementation research: On the development of the field and its paradoxes. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ILOSTAT. (2017). Employment. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/ilosta.Google Scholar

Immergut, E. M. (1992). Health politics interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. S., & Schulze, I. (eds.) (2007). The handbook of West European pension politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2011). Effectiveness of tax and price policies for Tobacco control. World Health Organization: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar

Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52, 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, R. (2018). Wenn selbst wir das nicht mehr kapieren, kann das kein Recht sein. In Bartsch, M. & Hipp, D. (eds.), Der Spiegel (06/2018).Google Scholar

Jahn, D. (1998). Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD countries. Policy Sciences, 31(2), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jahn, D. (2016). The politics of environmental performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. L. F., & Mortensen, P. B. (2015). How politics shapes the growth of rules. Governance, 28(4), 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. L. F., & Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Rules and the doctrine of performance management. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, C., Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2014). Giving less by doing more? Dynamics of social policy expansion and dismantling in 18 OECD Countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 528–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, C. B. (2007). Implementing Europe. A question of oversight. European Union Politics, 8(4), 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2013). Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaeding, M. (2008). Lost in translation or full steam ahead. European Union Politics, 9, 115–143. doi:10.1177/1465116507085959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, H. (2014). Hinweise zur öffentlichen Anhörung des Rechtsausschusses des Deutschen Bundestags zur Umsetzung der Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zur Sukzessivadoption durch Lebenspartner/innen am 5. Mai 2014. Rechtsausschuss des Deutschen – BundestagsDeutsches Institut für Jugendhilfe und Familienrecht e.V.Google Scholar

Kaufman, C. (2016). Republican Trump says 70 percent of federal regulations ‘can go’. New York: Reuters.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, W., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2016). Do rules breed rules? Vertical rule-making cascades at the supranational, national, and organizational Level. International Public Management Journal, 1–26. doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1143420.Google Scholar

Kay, A. (2007). Tense layering and synthetic policy paradigms: The politics of health insurance in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemmerling, A., & Bruttel, O. (2006). New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state. West European Politics, 29(1), 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, A. (1975). Overload: Problems of governing in the 1970s. Political Studies, 23(2–3), 284–296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knill, C., Adam, C., & Hurka, S. (eds.) (2015). On the road to permissiveness? Change and convergence of moral regulation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knill, C., Heichel, S., & Arndt, D. (2012). Really a front-runner, really a straggler? Of environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union and beyond – A quantitative policy perspective. Energy Policy, 48, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knill, C., & Hille, P. (2006). “It’s the bureaucracy, stupid”: The implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003. European Union Politics, 7, 531–552.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2000a). On deficient implementation and deficient theories: The need for an institutional perspective in implementation research. In Knill, C. & Lenschow, A. (eds.), Implementing EU Environmental Policy: New Directions and Old Problems (pp. 9–38). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (eds.) (2000b). Implementing EU environmental policy: New directions and old problems. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2018). Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in the talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU environmental policy. Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12542.Google Scholar

Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Public policy: A new introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2015). Einführung in die Policy-Analyse. Opladen: Barbara Budrich/UTB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, T., & Mäder, L. (2013). The strategic nature of compliance: An empirical evaluation of law implementation in the central monitoring system of the European Union. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korte, S., & Jörgens, H. (2012). Active dismantling under high institutional constraints? Explaining the Bush administration’s attempts to weaken US air pollution control policy. In Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (eds.), Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects (pp. 81–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruppe, T., & Lang, J. (2015). Arbeitsmarkteffekte von Umschulungen im Bereich der Altenpflege. Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., & Mouff, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Lecuyer, O., & Bibas, R. (2012). Combining climate and energy policies: Synergies or antagonisms? Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2017). Can citizens be framed? How information more than emphasis changes opinions. Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar

Legrenzi, G. (2004). The displacement effect in the growth of governments. Public Choice, 120(1), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenaerts, K. (2006). The unity of European law and the overload of the ECJ – the system of preliminary ruling revisited. In Pernice, I., Stöbener, P., J. Kokot, Stöbener, P., & Kokot, J. (eds.), The Future of the European Judicial System in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 211–239). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, D. (2014). The welfare state: A regulatory perspective. Public Administration, 92(3), 599–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die: What history reveals about our future. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Liang, L., Chaloupka, F., Nichter, M., & Clayton, R. (2003). Prices, policies and youth smoking, May 2001. Addiction, 98(Supplement 1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linder, S. H., & Peters, G. B. (1984). From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Lundin, M. (2007). When does cooperation improve public policy implementation? The Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. (1994). Designing bureaucratic accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems, 57(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacMahon, B., & Trichopoulos, D. (1996). Epidemiology: Principles and methods. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (eds.) (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996). Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 9(3), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, M. L. (1978). Judicial overload: The reasons and the remedies. Buffalo Law Review, 28, 111–141.Google Scholar

Mastenbroek, E. (2005). EU Compliance: Still a “black hole”? Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 1103–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.Google Scholar

May, P. J. (1991). Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics. Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), 187–206. doi:10.1017/S0143814X0000619X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayne, J. (2007). Challenges and lessons in implementing results-based management. Evaluation, 13(1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayntz, R. (1978). Intergovernmental implementation of environmental policy. In Hand, K. & Scharpf, F. W. (eds.), Interorganizational Policy-Making: Limits of Coordination and Central Control (pp. 202–214). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Mayntz, R. (1980). Implementation politischer Programme. Empirische Forschungsberichte. Königstein/Ts.: Verlag Anton Hein Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Mayntz, R. (1983). Implementation politischer Programme II – Ansätze zur Theoriebildung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Effective policy implementation. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBeath, B., & Meezan, W. (2010). Governance in motion: Service provision and child welfare outcomes in a performance-based, managed care contracting environment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(supplement 1), i101–i123. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConnell, A. (2010). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCree, W. H. J. (1981). Bureaucratuc justice: An early warning. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129(4), 777–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrol versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meseguer, C. (2006). Learning and economic Policy Choices. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 156–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meseguer Yebra, C. (2009). Learning, policy making, and market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mettler, S. (2016). The Policyscape and the challenges of contemporary politics to policy maintenance. Perspectives on Politics, 14(2), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelsen, C. (2014). Die Mietpreisbremse: Kunstfehler mit Langzeitfolgen. DIW Wochenbericht Nr. 14/2014. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar

Milkman, K. L., Mazza, M. C., Shu, L. L., Tsay, C.-J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Policy bundling to overcome loss aversion: A method for improving legislative outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ministerium für Umwelt Klima und Energiewirtschaft Baden-Württemberg. (2015). Erneuerbare Energie in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: Ministerium für Umwelt, Klima und Energiewirtschaft.Google Scholar

Möhring, K. (2012). The fixed effects approach as alternative to multilevel models for cross-national analyses. GK SOCLIFE Working Paper Series, 1–15.Google Scholar

Montpetit, E. (2016). In defence of pluralism: Policy disagreement and its media coverage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, C. Z. (1999). The politics of morality policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 675–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, C. Z. (2001). The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Morris, D. Z. (February 25, 2017). Steve Bannon says Trump’s cabinet picks are Intended to “deconstruct” regulation and agencies. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/02/25/bannon-trump-cabinet-cpac/.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nationaler Normenkontrollrat. (2016). 10 Jahre NKR – gute Bilanz bei Bürokratieabbau und Folgekostenbegrenzung – alarmierender Rückstand bei E-Government. Retrieved from www.normenkontrollrat.bund.de/Webs/NKR/Content/DE/Publikationen/Jahresberichte/2016–09-21-nkr-jahresbericht-2016.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.Google Scholar

Nationaler Normenkontrollrat. (2017). Bürokratieabbau. Bessere Rechtsetzung. Digitalisierung: Erfolge ausbauen – Rückstand aufholen.Google Scholar

Neshkova, M., & Kostadinova, T. (2012). The effectiveness of administrative reform in new democracies. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, W. R. (1996). Political communication infrastructure. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (1999). Selective policy implementation in rural China. Comparative Politics, 31(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Loughlin, J., Gervais, A., Dugas, E., & Meshefedjian, G. (2009). Milestones in the process of cessation among novice adolescent smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 99(3), 499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oberfield, Z. (2010). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD. (2011). Towards green growth: A summary for policy makers. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Offe, C. (1972). Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates: Aufsätze zur politischen Soziologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Pacula, R. L., Powell, D., Heaton, P., & Sevigny, E. L. (2015). Assessing the effects of medical marijuana laws on marijuana use: The devil is in the details. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(1), 7–31. doi:10.1002/pam.21804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Page, E. (2000). Future governance and the literature on policy transfer and lesson frawing. Prepared for the ESRC Future Governance Programme Workshop on Policy Transfer (January 28, 2000, Britannia House, London).Google Scholar

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2001). Realistic evaluation bloodlines. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peacock, A. T., & Wiseman, J. (1961). The growth of public expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Philibert, C. (2011). Interactions of policies for renewable energy and climate. Working paper.Google Scholar

Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P., & Hacker, J. S. (2016). American amnesia: How the war on government led us to forget what made America prosper. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Piotrowski, S. J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2002). Nonmission-based values in results-oriented public management: The case of freedom of information. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. New public Mmanagement, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Polzin, F., Migendt, M., Täube, F., & von Paschen, F. (2015). Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—A panel data study across OECD countries. Energy Policy, 80, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland, Or, Why it’s amazing federal programs work at all; this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy – How media choice Iicreases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Puddington, A., & Roylance, T. (2017). The dual threat of populists and autocrats. Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., & Sidnery, M. S. (eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 89–108). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Radin, B. A. (2000). The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Radin, B. A. (2009). What can we expect from performance measurement activities? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(3), 505–512. doi:10.1002/pam.20445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasch, U. (September 18, 2014). Mit Mütterrente weniger Geld als vorher. RP Online.Google Scholar

Rasler, K. A., & Thompson, W. R. (1985). War making and state making: Governmental expenditures, tax revenues, and global wars. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, J. (1994). Doing less by doing more: British government 1979–1993. West European Politics, 17(3), 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The revolutionary management system that abolishes hierarchy. London: Portfolio Penguin.Google Scholar

Robichau, R. W., & Lynn, L. E. J. (2009). The implementation of public policy: Still the missing link. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, H., Dörre, K., & Lessenich, S. (2017). Appropriation, activation and acceleration: The escalatory logics of capitalist modernity and the crises of dynamic stabilization. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. (2015). Le bon gouvernement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Rose, R. (1979). Ungovernability: Is there fire behind the smoke? Political Studies, 27(3), 351–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1979.tb01209.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Ross, H., & Chaloupka, F. (2003). The effect of cigarette pricing on youth smoking. Health Economics, 12(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar

Ruhl, K. J. (1994). Verordnete Unterordnung. Berufstätige Frauen zwischen Wirtschaftswachstum und konservativer Ideologie in der Nachkriegszeit (1945–1963). Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up: Approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of Ppolicy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (eds.) (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 189–220). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sanger, M. B. (2013). Does measuring performance lead to better performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(1), 185–203. doi:10.1002/pam.21657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, F. W. (2003). Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability. MPIfG Working Paper, 3(1).Google Scholar

Scheiner, E. (2006). Democracy without competition in Japan: Opposition failure in a one-party dominant state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schickler, E. (2001). Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the US Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. (1982). Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik unter bürgerlichen und sozialdemo¬kratischen Regierungen. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, M. G., Ostheim, T., Siegel, N. A., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2007). Der Wohlfahrtsstaat: Eine Einführung in den historischen und internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz, M. (1998). Limits to bureaucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 845–876. doi:10.2307/2393618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuster, T. (2013). Mindestlohn: Beschäftigungsrisiken höher als behauptet. IW Policy Paper 19. Köln: Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft.Google Scholar

Scruggs, L. (2003). Sustaining abundance: Environmental performance in industrial democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scruggs, L. (2007). Welfare state generosity across space and time. In Clasen, J. & Siegel, N. A. (eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change: The “Dependent Variable Problem” in Comparative Analysis (pp. 133–165). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Shapiro, M., & Sweet, A. S. (2002). On law, politics, and judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skovgaard, J. (2014). EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics, 23, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, D. C. (2009). What can we expect from performance management activities that we cannot expect from performance measurement? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(3), 512–514. doi:10.1002/pam.20446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Specht, F. (July 12, 2017). Andrea Nahles platzt der Kragen. Handelsblatt. Retrieved from www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/mindestlohn-andrea-nahles-platzt-der-kragen/20050986.html.Google Scholar

Spermann, A. (2015). How to fight long-term unemployment – lessons from Germany. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statistisches Bundesamt. (2017). Die Kinderlosigkeit in Deutschland ist nicht weiter gestiegen.Google Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberations: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinebach, Y. (2018). Making environmental policies work: A cross-national analysis of clean air policy effectiveness and Its Determinants. München: Dissertation.Google Scholar

Steinebach, Y., & Knill, C. (2017a). Social policy in hard times: Crisis-coping strategies in Europe from 1976 to 2013. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(14), 1164–1174. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1317802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinebach, Y., & Knill, C. (2017b). Still an entrepreneur? The changing role of the European Commission in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 429–446. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1149207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinebach, Y., Knill, C., & Jordana, J. (2017). Austerity or welfare state transformation? Examining the impact of economic crises on social regulation in Europe. Regulation & Governance, early view.Google Scholar

Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). Deliberative politics in action: A cross-national study of parliamentary debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinmeier, F.-W. (November 5, 2016). Eine tödliche Gefahr für unsere Gesellschaft. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Google Scholar

Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (eds.) (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sweet, A. S. (1999). Judicialization and the construction of governance. Comparative Political Studies, 32(2), 147–184. doi:10.1177/0010414099032002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szent-Ivanyi, T. (2010). Rente falsch berechnet. Frankfurter Rundschau. Retrieved from www.fr.de/politik/aufsichtsbehoerde-rente-falsch-berechnet-a-997599.Google Scholar

Tatalovich, R., Smith, A., & Bobic, M. P. (1994). Moral Conflict and the Policy Process. Policy Currents, 4(4), 3–6.Google Scholar

Teodosiu, C., Barjoveanu, G., & Teleman, D. (2003). Sustainable water resources management. First river basin management and the EC water framework directive. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 2(4), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2013). Focus on health reform – Summary of the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http://files.kff.org/attachment/fact-sheet-summary-of-the-affordable-care-act.Google Scholar

Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. (ed.) (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomann, E. (2015). Customizing Europe: Transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1368–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomann, E., & Sager, F. (2017). Moving beyond legal compliance: Innovative approaches to EU multi-level implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(9), 1253–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. C. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Loon, N., M. (2016). From red tape to which performance results? Exploring the relationship between red tape and various dimensions of performance in healtcare work units. Public Administration, 95(1), 60–77. doi:10.1111/padm.12294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Witteloostuijn, A., & de Jong, G. (2007). The evolution of higher education rules: Evidence for an ecology of law. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Witteloostuijn, A., & de Jong, G. (2008). Changing national rules: Theory and evidence from the netherlands (1960–2004). Public Administration, 86(2), 499–522. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00732.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Witteloostuijn, A., & de Jong, G. (2010). Ecology of national rule birth: A longitudinal study of Dutch higher education law, 1960–2004. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vedung, E. (2015). Autonomy and street-level bureaucrats’ coping strategies. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 28643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband. (2017). Energieeffizienz bei Gebäuden verbaucherfreundlich Umsetzen. Stellungnahme des Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverbands zum Entwurf der Europäischen Kommission zur Änderung der Richtlinie über die Gesamteffizienz von Gebäuden 2016/0381 (COD), [Press release]. Retrieved from www.vzbv.de/sites/default/files/downloads/2017/02/24/17_02_23_vzbv_stellungnahme _richtlinie_energieeffizienz_gebaeude_neu.pdf.Google Scholar

Vis, B., Van Kersbergen, K., & Hylands, T. (2011). To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state? Social Policy & Administration, 45, 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in the global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, S. K. (1996). Freer markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vogelpohl, T., Ohlhorst, D., Bechberger, M., & Hirschl, B. (2017). German renewable energy policy: Independent pioneering versus creeping Europeanization? In Solorio, I. & Jörgerns, H. (eds.), The EU Renewable Energy Policy: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 45–64). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Völker, J. (2014). Analyse und Bewertung der Instrumente zur Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie sowie Verknüpfung zu den institutionellen Rahmenbedingungen—Wasserfachliche Aspekte. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen.Google Scholar

Voulvoulis, N., Arpon, K. D., & Giakoumis, T. (2017). The EU water framework directive: From great expectations to problems with implementation. Science of the Total Environment, 575(1), 358–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wagner, A. (1892). Grundlegung der politischen Ökonomie. Vol. 1. CF Winter.Google Scholar

Warren, M. E., Mansbridge, J., Bächtiger, A., Cameron, M. A., Chambers, S., Ferejohn, J., … Williams, M. (2016). Deliberative negotiation. In J. Mansbridge & C. J. Martin (eds.), Political Negotiation (pp. 141–196). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Studienausgabe (Vol. 5. Auflage). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Wells, P. (2007). New labour and evidence-based policy making: 1997–2007. People, Place & Policy Online, 1(1), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, W. (2005). Administrative rulemaking: An old and emerging literature. Public Administration Review, 65(6), 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wigger, B. U. (2011). Zur schrittweisen Erhöhung der Tabaksteuer. Wirtschaftsdienst, 91(1), 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, S. C. (2012). Implementation perspectives: Status and reconsideration. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 265–278).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, S. C., & Nielsen, V. L. (2008). Implementering af politik [Implementation of public policy]. Aarhus: Academica.Google Scholar

Wison, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, G. (December 19, 2015). Den Populisten die Stirn bieten. Retrieved from www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2015–12/parteien-populismus-usa-frankreich-wahlen-gefahr.Google Scholar

Wren, A. (ed.) (2013). The political economy of the service transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar