Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T04:08:43.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Advocate

Policing and the Lessons of Focused Deterrence

from Part V - Pulling Levers (Focused Deterrence) Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

David Weisburd
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

Pity the poor soul who, more than twenty years ago, would have predicted that hard-core street cops would be sitting down with serious violent offenders, telling them politely to cease and desist, asking them what they and their families need, and going to extreme lengths to keep them safe and out of jail. Exactly that has in fact become standard practice with police officers nationally; beyond that, and not coincidentally, that standard practice is increasingly understood to work very well indeed. The “focused deterrence” strategies piloted in Boston in the mid-1990s and implemented since then in a range of other jurisdictions are racking up impressive results in preventing violent crime and have become essentially mainstream. What was once seen as at best innovative – but more often to be fringe bordering on the bizarre, as in the face-to-face meetings between authorities and offenders that the Boston strategy invented – is now standard practice and routine not just for special interventions but as a philosophy of policing: it is, one hears police chiefs say, “what we do.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
, pp. 205 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abt, T., & Winship, C. (2016). What Works in Reducing Community Violence: A Meta-Review and Field Study for the Northern Triangle. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Beck, C. (2016, February 11). Charlie Beck: The real Ferguson effect in L.A. Los Angeles Times. www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0211-beck-ferguson-effect-lapd-20160211-story.html.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2002). Problem-Oriented Policing and Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2008). Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 332343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. A., Apel, R., & Welsh, B. C. (2013). The spillover effects of focused deterrence on gang violence. Evaluation Review, 37(3–4), 314342.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. V. (2014). Deterring gang-involved gun violence: Measuring the impact of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire on street gang behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 113139.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., & Tita, G. (2002). New approaches to the strategic prevention of gang and group-involved violence. In Huff, C. R. (ed.), Gangs in America, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E., & Piehl, A. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 195225.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., McDevitt, J., & Pierce, G. (2005). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 8.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Piehl, A., & Kennedy, D. M. (1999). Youth homicide in Boston: An assessment of supplementary homicide report data. Homicide Studies, 3, 277299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. A., Pierce, G. L., McDevitt, J., Bond, B. J., & Cronin, S. (2008). The strategic prevention of gun violence among gang-involved offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25(1), 132162.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D., (2012). The Effects of “Pulling Levers” Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime. Oslo, Norway: Campbell Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology and Public Policy, 17(1). doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12353.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165184.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., Brunson, R., & McGarrell, E. (2010). Problem-oriented policing and open-air drug markets: Examining the Rockford pulling levers strategy. Crime and Delinquency. doi: 10.1177/0011128709345955.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., & Engel, R.S. (2015). Most challenging of contexts: Assessing the impact of focused deterrence on serious violence in New Orleans. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(3).Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., Hunt, E., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. (2012). The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: An evaluation of the High Point Drug Market Intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 167200.Google Scholar
Clear, T. R. (2009). Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Communities Worse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, E. (2003). Lessons in Preventing Homicide. Project Safe Neighborhoods Report. Lansing: School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
De Blasio, B. (2013). Stop-and-frisk can only work after real police reform. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/13/stop-and-frisk-new-york-bill-de-blasio.Google Scholar
Densley, J., & Squier Jones, D. (2016). Pulling levers on gang violence in London and St. Paul. In Maxson, C. L., & Esbensen, F-A., (eds.), Gang Transitions and Transformations in an International Context (pp. 291305). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist. (2017). Murder rates in 50 American cities. Economist.com. www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/02/daily-chart-3.Google Scholar
Engel, R. S., Corsaro, N., & Tillyer, M. S. (2010). Evaluation of the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Policing Institute.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Fagan, J., & Kiss, A. (2007). An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479), doi: 10.1198/016214506000001040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (2002). On further developing problem-oriented policing: The most critical need, the major impediments, and a proposal. In Knutsson, J. (ed.), Mainstreaming Problem-Oriented Policing. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Green, B., Horel, T., & Papachristos, A. V. (2017). Modeling contagion through social networks to explain and predict gunshot violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(3), 326333. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, B., Rosenfeld, R., & Levin, A. (2017). Opting out of treatment: Self- selection bias in a randomized controlled study of a focused deterrence notification meeting. Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017–9309-z.Google Scholar
Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing Drug Involved Probationers with Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. Los Angeles: NCJRS.Google Scholar
Karimi, F. (2016). Dallas sniper attack: 5 officers killed, suspect identified. CNN.com. www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/us/philando-castile-alton-sterling protests/index.html.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (1990). Fighting the drug trade in Link Valley. Case C16-90–935.0. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449484.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (1998). Pulling levers: Getting deterrence right. National Institute of Justice Journal, July, 28.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2002a). A tale of one city: Reflections on the Boston gun project. In Katzmann, G. (ed.), Securing Our Children’s Future: New Approaches to Juvenile Justice and Youth Violence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2002b). Controlling Domestic Violence Offenders. Report submitted to the Hewlett-Family Violence Prevention Fund. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2003). Reconsidering deterrence. Final report submitted to the US National Institute of Justice. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2008). Deterrence and Crime Prevention: Reconsidering the Prospect of Sanction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2009). Drugs, race and common ground: Reflections of the High Point Intervention. National Institute of Justice Journal, 262, 1217.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Don’t Shoot: One Man, a Street Fellowship, and the End of Violence in Inner-City America. USA: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M., & Braga, A. A. (1998). Homicide in Minneapolis: Research for problem solving. Homicide Studies, 2, 263290.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., & Kleiman, M. (2017). Beyond deterrence: Strategies of focus and fairness. In Tilley, N., & Sidebottom, A. (eds.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., & Piehl, A. (1997). The (un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In Weisburd, D., & McEwen, J. T. (eds.), Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Kilmer, B., Nicosia, N., Heaton, P., & Midgette, G. (2013). Insights from South Dakota 24/7 sobriety project. American Journal of Public Health, 103(1), 3743.Google Scholar
Kleiman, M. (2009). When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landrieu, M. (2014). New Orleans’ top priority: Cut its murder rate. CNN Money. http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/09/news/economy/new-orleans-landrieu/index.html.Google Scholar
Lee, T. (2015). America’s incarceration problem hits bipartisan sweet spot. MSNBC.com. www.msnbc.com/msnbc/incarceration-bipartisan-sweet-spot.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2012). Legitimacy in Policing. Oslo, Norway: Campbell Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E., & Chermak, S. (2003). Strategic approaches to reducing firearms violence: Final report on the Indianapolis Violence Reduction Partnership. Final report submitted to the U.S. National Institute of Justice. East Lansing: School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E., Chermak, S., Wilson, J., & Corsaro, N. (2006). Reducing homicide through a “lever-pulling” strategy. Justice Quarterly, 23, 214229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarrell, E., Corsaro, N., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). The drug market intervention approach to overt drug markets. VARSTVOSLOVJE, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 12(4), 397407.Google Scholar
Meares, T. L. (2009). The legitimacy of police among young African-American men. Marquette Law Review, 92(4), 651666.Google Scholar
Mentel, Z. (2012). Racial Reconciliation, Truth-Telling, and Police Legitimacy. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Mueller, B., & Baker, A. (2017). Police officer is “murdered for her uniform” in the Bronx. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2017/07/05/nyregion/nypd-bronx-police-shooting.html.Google Scholar
National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice. (2017). 2017 Interim Status Report. Trustandjustice.org. https://trustandjustice.org/pilot-sites.Google Scholar
National Network for Safe Communities. (2018). International Initiatives. Nnscommunities.org. https://nnscommunities.org/our-work/strategy/international-initiatives.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2014). The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Committee on Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration. Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (eds.), Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2014). Strengthening the Relationship Between Law Enforcement and Communities of Color: Developing an Agenda for Action. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223272.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V., Braga, A. A., & Hureau, D. (2012). Social networks and the risk of gunshot injury. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 89(6), 9921003.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V., & Kirk, D. S. (2015). Changing the street dynamic: Evaluating Chicago’s group violence reduction strategy. Criminology and Public Policy, 14(3), 134.Google Scholar
PICO National Network and Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. (2016). Healing Communities in Crisis: Lifesaving Solutions to the Urban Gun Violence Epidemic. http://smartgunlaws.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Healing-Communities-in- Crisis-4–3.pdf.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, R. (2016). Documenting and Explaining the 2015 Homicide Rise: Research Directions. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Sechrist, S., Weil, J., & Shelton, T. (2016). Executive Summary of the Evaluation of the Offender Focused Domestic Violence Initiative (OFDIV) in High Point, NC & Replication in Lexington, NC. Greensboro: University of North Carolina, Greensboro and the North Carolina Network for Safe Communities.Google Scholar
Sierra-Arevalo, M., Charette, Y., & Papachristos, A. V. (2017). Evaluating the effect of project longevity on group-involved shootings and homicides in New Haven, Connecticut. Crime and Delinquency, 63(4), 446467. doi:10.1177/0011128716635197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tita, G., Riley, K. J., Ridgeway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A., & Greenwood, P. (2003). Reducing Gun Violence: Results From an Intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Travis, J., Kennedy, D., Roman, C., Beckman, K., Solomon, A., & Turner, E. (2003). An Analysis of Homicide Incident Reviews in the District of Columbia. Unpublished report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
University of Cincinnati Policing Institute. (2009). Implementation of the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV): Year 2 Report. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Policing Institute.Google Scholar
Vasquez, E.A., Wenborne, L., Peers, M., Alleyne, E., & Ellis, K. (2015). Any of them will do: In-group identification, out-group entitativity, and gang membership as predictors of group-based retribution. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 242252. doi:10.1002/ab.21581.Google Scholar
Wakeling, S. (2003). Ending Gang Homicide: Deterrence Can Work. Perspectives on Violence Prevention, vol. 1. Sacramento: California Attorney General’s Office and the California Health and Human Services Agency.Google Scholar
Wallace, D., Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2015). Desistance and legitimacy: The impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33(7), 12371264.Google Scholar
Warner, B., Pacholke, D., & Kujath, C. (2014). Operation Place Safety: First Year in Review. Washington Department of Corrections. www.nnscommunities.org/uploads/Operation_Place_Safety_First_Year_Report_2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 4265.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Farrington, D., & Gill, C. (eds.). (2016. What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: Lessons from Systematic Reviews. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, D. J., Currie, D., Linden, W., & Donnelly, P. (2014). Addressing gang-related violence in Glasgow: A preliminary pragmatic quasi-experimental evaluation of the community initiative to reduce violence (CIRV). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(6), 686691.Google Scholar
Williams, T., & Oppel, R. (2017). Police chiefs say Trump’s law enforcement priorities are out of step. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2017/02/12/us/police-chiefs-trump-law-enforcement-priorities.html.Google Scholar
Wong, J., Gravel, J., Bouchard, M., Morselli, C., & Descormiers, K. (2012). Effectiveness of Street Gang Control Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Studies. Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×