Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:14:31.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 29 - Uterine Rupture/Dehiscence

from Section 8 - Uteroplacental Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2018

Raymond W. Redline
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Theonia K. Boyd
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Drucilla J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 115(6):1279–95.Google Scholar
Landon, MB, et al., Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med, 2004. 351(25):2581–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usta, IM, et al., Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007. 86(2):172–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahiya, P, et al., Placenta Accreta Causing Uterine Rupture in Second Trimester of Pregnancy after in vitro Fertilization: A Case Report. J Reprod Infertil, 2012. 13(1):61–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Hornemann, A, et al., Spontaneous uterine rupture at the 21st week of gestation caused by placenta percreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011. 284(4):875–8.Google Scholar
Gyamfi-Bannerman, C, et al., Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol, 2012. 120(6):1332–7.Google Scholar
Dow, M, et al., Third-trimester uterine rupture without previous cesarean: a case series and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol, 2009. 26(10):739–44.Google Scholar
Porreco, RP, et al., The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 200(3):269 e14.Google Scholar
Kieser, KE, Baskett, TF, A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol, 2002. 100(4):749–53.Google Scholar
Chibber, R, et al., Uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome–how safe is it? A 25-year study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2010. 23(5):421–4.Google Scholar
Gibbins, KJ, et al., Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015. 213(3):382 e16.Google Scholar
Al-Zirqi, I, et al., Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG, 2016. 123(5):780–7.Google Scholar
Ofir, K, et al., Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 189(4):1042–6.Google Scholar
Thisted, DL, Mortensen, LH, Krebs, L, Uterine rupture without previous caesarean delivery: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015. 195:151–5.Google Scholar
Berhe, Y, Wall, LL, Uterine rupture in resource-poor countries. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2014. 69(11):695707.Google Scholar
Pepin, M, et al., Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(10):673–80.Google Scholar
Chauhan, SP, et al., Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 189(2):408–17.Google Scholar
Barger, MK, et al., Maternal and newborn outcomes following uterine rupture among women without versus those with a prior cesarean. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013. 26(2):183–7.Google Scholar
Wen, SW, et al., Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991–2001. CMAJ, 2005. 173(7):759–64.Google Scholar
Kaczmarczyk, M, et al., Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG, 2007. 114(10):1208–14.Google Scholar
Thaddeus, S, Maine, D, Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med, 1994. 38(8):1091–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×