Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:19:38.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Contingency, Coherence, and Conceptualism: Reflections on the Encounter between ‘Critique’ and ‘the Philosophy of the Criminal Law’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

R. A. Duff
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access

Summary

Aristotle himself has said, speaking of the laws of his own country, that jurisprudence or the knowledge of those laws is the principal and most perfect branch of ethics.

William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–9), Volume 1, p. 27

Human life and philosophical explanations of it move in different planes till the explanation has become so complete as not to interfere with the thing to be explained. When they coincide, they cannot affect each other.

James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England (1883), Volume II, p. 84

[T]he degree of systematization of a discipline is the prime index of the state of knowledge of its subject matter.

Jerome Hall, General Principles of Criminal Law (1960), p. 12

Each of these contrasting reflections expresses a different view of legal theory. In this chapter, I consider the relationship between two particular approaches to criminal law theory: ‘critique’ and ‘the philosophy of criminal law.’ Whilst the title of my chapter presupposes an opposition between the two, it is in fact one of my main purposes to question that opposition. It is, of course, an opposition which bears some real relationship with the positions held by protagonists in the debate canvassed by Antony Duff in his introduction to this collection. In recent years, a number of British and American writers working within a ‘critical’ tradition have questioned the basis of ‘philosophical’ theories of criminal law which emphasise and seek to elaborate upon its ‘principled’ nature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy and the Criminal Law
Principle and Critique
, pp. 9 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×