Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T11:38:37.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Evidence and research design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Jeff D. Colgan
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Propose theories which can be criticized … but do not give up your theories too easily – not, at any rate, before you have critically examined your criticism.

– Karl Popper

Chapter 2 set out a theory of how oil and revolutionary governments generate international conflict. I now seek to test the theory against the empirical evidence. My strategy is to subject the hypothesized relationships to multiple tests using different kinds of evidence and methods. Subsequent chapters carry out the various tests.

This type of research design, using multiple empirical methods to test a theory, has produced some of the best research in political science. The key benefit of using both quantitative and qualitative methods is that the strengths of each method tend to compensate for the weaknesses of the other. For instance, the statistical analysis complements the qualitative case studies by revealing the relative importance of multiple variables, something that is nearly impossible to do convincingly using a small number of cases. The rigor of statistical methods also serves to guard against unintentional selection bias that can crop up relatively easily in case studies. The qualitative analyses, on the other hand, are much better at revealing the political processes and causal mechanisms that link the explanatory variables to the state’s propensity for international conflict. Historical case studies also allow us to examine the evidence of whether and how decision-makers considered alternative options and “off-the-equilibrium-path” outcomes, other than the ones they actually chose. Overall, a multi-method approach provides a parallax for theory-testing that is difficult to achieve using a single methodology. As Beth Simmons points out, “to choose one method to the exclusion of the other is like closing one eye and trying to make judgments about distance: it is easy to lose perspective.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Petro-Aggression
When Oil Causes War
, pp. 41 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×