Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T00:51:48.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Weed ecology, habitat management, and IPM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Marcos Kogan
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Paul Jepson
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Pests are organisms that interfere with the goals of humans. Plants that interfere with human activities are typically referred to as weeds. Such plants are unique as a category of pest as they are ecologically producers, in contrast with organisms in all other pest categories, which are consumers. Weeds are thus in a different ecological position from all other categories of pests, resulting in differences in control tactics, and making weeds and their management likely to interact with all other categories of pests.

Weeds, like all plants, are not mobile. Therefore weeds cannot “search”, in the sense of moving to a new location, for resources that they need. Lack of mobility also means that weeds cannot move to escape from organisms that would feed on them. These two differences between weeds and organisms in all animal pest categories mean that the approaches to weed management, and their response to such management, are often quite different from those for animal pests.

Most animal pests and aerial pathogens are not equally devastating every year. Their population dynamics lead to outbreak years when losses can be very high, and other years when populations remain low and losses are small. Weeds, on the other hand, like most other soil-borne pests, typically occur in damaging numbers every year once a site is infested, necessitating control action every year in order to achieve the crop yields desired by humans.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, R. J. and Kremer, R. J. (1997). Principles in Weed Science. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Nicholls, C. I. (1999). Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and insect pest management in agricultural systems. In Collins, W. W., and Qualset, C. O. (eds.), Biodiversity in Agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. P. (1996). Weed Science: Principles and Applications, 3rd edn. Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minn: West Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Andow, D. A. (1990). Control of arthropods using crop diversity. In Pimentel, D. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 257–85.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. (2002). Ladys' thumb interference and seed production in cotton. Weed Science, 50, 326–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, B. A. and Tisdell, C. A. (1986). Economic threshold/critical density models in weed control. Proc. EWRS Symp. 1986Economic Weed Control, 261–8.Google Scholar
Baker, H. G. (1965). Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L. (eds.), The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York: Academic Press Inc. pp. 147–72.Google Scholar
Ballare, C. L., Sanchez, R. A., Scopel, A. L. and Ghersa, C. M. (1988). Morphological responses of Datura ferox L. seedlings to the presence of neighbours. Their relationships with canopy microclimate. Oecologia, 76, 288–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballare, C. L., Scopel, A. L. and Sanchez, R. A. (1990). Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science, 247, 329–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, P. (ed.). (1998). Conservation Biological Control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. (1998). Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berti, A., Dunan, C., Sattin, M., Zanin, G. and Westra, P. (1996). A new approach to determine when to control weeds. Weed Science, 44, 496–503.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. (1990). Time of emergence and seed production of longspine sandbur (Cenchurus longispinus) and puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris). Weed Science, 38, 16–21.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. (1992). Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. (2002). Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Science, 50, 273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntin, G. D. and Pedigo, L. P. (1986). Enhancement of annual weed populations in alfalfa after stubble defoliation by variegated cutworm Lepidoptera: Noctuidae. Journal of Economic Entomology, 79, 1507–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdon, J. J. and Leather, S. R. (eds.). (1990). Pests, Pathogens, and Plant Communities. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Johnson, G. A. and Sparrow, D. H. (1997). The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution. Weed Science, 45, 364–73.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Webster, T. M., Herms, C. P. and Regnier, E. E. (1999). Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. In Buhler, D. D. (ed.), Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York: Food Products Press, The Haworth Press Inc. pp. 239–67.Google Scholar
Cavers, P. B. and Benoit, D. L. (1989). Seed banks in arable land. In Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. and Simpson, R. L. (ed.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc. pp. 309–28.Google Scholar
Champion, G. T., Grundy, A. C., Jones, N. E., Marshall, E. J. P. and Froud-Williams, R. J. (eds.). (1998). Weed Seedbanks: Determination, Dynamics and Manipulation. Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK: Association of Applied Biologists.Google Scholar
Chiverton, P. A. (1999). The benefits of unsprayed cereal crop margins to grey partridges Perdix perdix and pheasants Phasianus colchicus in Sweden. Wildlife Biology, 5, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, K. (2003). Parasites lost. Nature, 421, 585–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coble, H. D. and Mortensen, D. A. (1992). The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technology, 6, 191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. W. and Qualset, C. O. (ed.). (1999). Biodiversity in Agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. (1987). Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Protection Quarterly, 2, 13–20.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Croft, A. M. (2000). Weed populations and pathogens. Weed Research, 40, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. (1995). Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cussans, G. W., Cousens, R. D. and Wilson, B. J. (1986). Thresholds for weed control – the concepts and their interpretation. In Economic Weed Control. European Weed Research Society. pp. 253–60.Google Scholar
Daehler, C. C. and Carino, D. A. (2000). Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions, 2, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, J. (1999). Soil weed seed banks and weed management. In Buhler, D. D. (ed.), Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York: Food Products Press, The Haworth Press Inc. pp. 139–66.Google Scholar
Fenner, M. (2000). Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 2nd edn. Wallingford, UK; New York: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghersa, C. M. and Roush, M. L. (1993). Searching for solutions to weed problems. Bioscience, 43, 104–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K. (1990). Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Science, 38, 113–18.Google Scholar
Hauptli, H. and Jain, S. K. (1978). Biosystematics and agronomic potential of some weedy and cultivated Amaranths. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 52, 177–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heitefuss, R., Gerowitt, B. and Wahmoff, W. (1987). Development and implementation of weed economic thresholds in the F. R. Germany. In British Crop Protection Conference – Weeds. pp. 1025–33.Google Scholar
Higley, L. G. and Pedigo, L. P. (ed.). (1996). Economic Thresholds for Integrated Pest Management. Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V. and Herberger, J. P. (1977). The Worlds Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HA: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (1990). The problem of weed patchiness. Weed Research, 30, 223–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inderjit, D. K. M. M. and Foy, C. L. (1999). Principles and Practices in Plant Ecology. Allelochemical Interactions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. and Medd, R. W. (2000). Economic thresholds and the case for longer term approaches to population management of weeds. Weed Technology, 14, 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, G., Hermer, R. and Moss, S. R. (2000). A century of vegetation change at Broadbalk wilderness. English Nature, 34, 41–7.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Acker, R. C. and Lindquist, J. L. (2002). Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Science, 50, 773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, R. K., Singh, H. P. and Batish, D. (2001). Allelopathy in Agroecosystems. New York: Food Products Press.Google Scholar
Kranz, J. (1990). Tansley review no. 28. Fungal diseases in multispecies plant communities. New Phytologist, 116, 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropff, M. J. and Laar, H. H. (eds.). (1993). Modelling Crop–Weed Interactions. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Kwon, T. J., Young, D. L., Young, F. L. and Boerboom, C. M. (1995). Palweed–wheat: a bioeconomic decision model for postemergence weed management in winter wheat Triticum aestivum. Weed Science, 43, 595–603.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. G. (1884). In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread. The Agricultural Gazette, 23, 427–8.Google Scholar
Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L. and Staver, C. P. (2001). Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, J. L. (2001). Performance of INTERCOM for predicting corn–velvetleaf interference across north–central United States. Weed Science, 49, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, L. A. P., Wallinga, J. and Kropff, M. J. (1995). Crop–weed interactions: quantification and prediction. In Glen, D. M., Greaves, M. P. and Anderson, H. M. (eds.), Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems. London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Louda, S. M. (1989). Predation in the dynamics of seed regeneration. In Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., Simpson, R. L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc. pp. 25–51.Google Scholar
Maillet, J. and Lopez–Garcia, C. (2000). What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural weed? The case of invasive American species in France. Weed Research, 40, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. E. and Power, A. G. (2003). Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature, 421, 625–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortensen, D. A., Bastiaans, L. and Sattin, M. (2000). The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook. Weed Research, 40, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, A. M., Putwain, P. D. and McMahon, D. J. (1978). A theoretical approach to the prediction of weed population sizes. In Proc. 14th Brit. Crop Prot. Conf. – Weeds., Vol. 14. pp. 467–74.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. (1992 a). Case history for weed competition/population ecology: Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technology, 6, 220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. (1992 b). Predicting seed rain in barnyardgrass Echinochloa crus-galli. In IX Colloquium on Weed Biology and Ecology. Dijon, France: European Weed Research Society. pp. 377–86.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. (1996 a). Water use efficiency as a method for predicting water use by weeds. Weed Technology, 10, 153–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. (1996 b). Weed population dynamics: seed production. In Proceedings, 2nd International Weed Control Congress. pp. 15–20. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. (1999). Ecological implications of using thresholds for weed management. In Buhler, D. D. (ed.), Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York: Food Products Press, The Haworth Press Inc. pp. 31–58.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F., Caswell-Chen, E. P. and Kogan, M. (2003). Concepts in Integrated Pest Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F., Elmore, C. L., Rejmanek, M. and Akey, W. C. (2001 a). Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. Crop growth and yield. Weed Science, 49, 61–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F., Elmore, C. L., Rejmanek, M. and Akey, W. C. (2001 b). Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II. Barnyardgrass growth and seed production. Weed Science, 49, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. and Kogan, M. (2000). Interactions between weeds, arthropod pests, and their natural enemies in managed ecosystems. Weed Science, 48, 94–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T. (1996). Weed economic thresholds: useful agronomic tool or pipe dream?Phytoprotection, 77, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pester, T. A., Burnside, O. C. and Orf, J. H. (1999). Increasing crop competitiveness to weeds through crop breeding. Journal of Crop Production, 2, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A. and Halloy, S. R. (1999). A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, C. H. and Bugg, R. L. (1998). Enhancing Biological Control: Habitat Management to Promote Natural Enemies of Agricultural Pests. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R. and Morrison, D. (2000). Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience, 50, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. (2002). Food webs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L., Lawton, J. H. and Cohen, J. E. (1991). Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature, 350, 669–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A. and Winemiller, K. O. (1996). Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Anderson, R. L. (1984). Effect of soybean (Glycine max). interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Science, 32, 638–45.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J. and Ghersa, C. (1997). Weed Ecology: Implications for Management, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. (2000). Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology, 25, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, K. A. and Black, J. R. (1991). SOYHERB – A computer program for soybean herbicide decision making. Agronomy Journal, 83, 921–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, E. L. (1995). Biological Control of Weeds and Plant Diseases: Advances in Applied Allelopathy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. (1999). Applied Weed Science, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. and Charlesworth, D. (2001). Introduction to Plant Population Biology, 4th edn. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Saxena, M. C., Abuirmaileh, B. E., Althahabi, S. A. and Haddad, N. I. (1996). Estimation of critical period of weed control. Weed Science, 44, 273–83.Google Scholar
Steinmaus, S. J. and Norris, R. F. (2002). Growth analysis and canopy architecture of velvetleaf grown under light conditions representative of irrigated Mediterranean–type agroecosystems. Weed Science, 50, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, O. A. (1932). The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. American Journal of Botany, 19, 784–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, O. A. (1957). Weights of seeds and numbers per plant. Weeds, 5, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. (1996). Weed science beyond the weeds – the role of integrated weed management, IWM, in agroecosystem health. Weed Science, 44, 437–45.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Weaver, S. E., Cowan, P. et al. (1999). Weed thresholds: theory and applicability. In Buhler, D. D. (ed.), Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York: Food Products Press, The Haworth Press Inc. pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., Lish, J. M., Callihan, R. H. and Bechinski, E. J. (1991). Integrated weed management – a component of pest management. Weed Technology, 5, 648–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K., Band, S. R. and Hodgson, J. G. (1993). Seed size and shape predict persistence in the soil. Functional Ecology, 7, 236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresh, J. M. (ed.). (1981). Pests, Pathogens and Vegetation. London, UK: Pitman Books.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. C., Duvick, D. N., Brush, S. B.et al. (1999). ‘Benefits of Biodiversity,’ Task Force Report no. 133. Ames, Iowa: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., McKenzie, V. J. and Kuris, A. M. (2003). Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature, 421, 628–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United States Congress and Office of Technology Assessment. (1993). Harmful Non-indigenous Species in the United States. Washington, DC: US Printing Office.
Groenendael, J. M. (1988). Patchy distribution of weeds and some implications for modeling population dynamics: a short literature review. Weed Research, 28, 437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangessel, M. J. (1996). Successes of integrated weed management – a symposium. Weed Science, 44, 408–408.Google Scholar
Wallinga, J. and Oijen, M. (1997). Level of threshold weed density does not affect the long–term frequency of weed control. Crop Protection, 16, 273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Kropff, M. J. and Groeneveld, R. M. W. (1992). Use of ecophysiological models for crop–weed interference: the critical period of weed interference. Weed Science, 40, 302–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, L. A. (1996). Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agronomy Journal, 88, 860–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A. D. and Coble, H. D. (1997). Validation of HERB for use in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technology, 11, 573–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, G. G., Modena, S. A. and Coble, H. D. (1991). HERB: decision model for postemergence weed control in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 83, 413–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. (1980). Weed–crop Competition: A Review, International Plant Protection Center. Corvallis, OR: Orgeon State University.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. (1988). The concept and application of the critical weed-free period. In Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M. (eds.), Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc. pp. 145–55.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×