Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T02:27:07.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The ecology of vertebrate pests and integrated pest management (IPM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Marcos Kogan
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Paul Jepson
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Across the world, vertebrates cause considerable annual damage to agriculture, property, human health and safety, and natural resources. Although some species of all vertebrate groups have been implicated in damage, the species most often involved in serious amounts of damage are birds and mammals. Agroecosystems have provided many new opportunities for vertebrates to exploit, resulting in their becoming serious “pests” with humans taking various steps to protect their agricultural resources. This conflict has intensified as the human population has increased, efforts to get more production out of traditional croplands have intensified, and marginal lands have been placed into crop production. Additionally, as the human population has increased, people have moved into lands occupied by wildlife, resulting in more human–wildlife encounters and conflicts.

Worldwide, the kind of damage caused by wildlife is most often related to the life history strategy of the species, although the actual species and crop involved varies greatly from region to region. In most cases, the conflict arises when wildlife are trying to acquire adequate food resources (i.e. meet nutritional needs) and forage on resources important to, and “reserved” by, humans. Examples can be identified from almost any region of the world for (1) carnivore predation on livestock, highly valued game animals, and endangered wildlife; (2) grain losses to flocking, seed-feeding avian species; (3) grassland rodents and lagomorphs consuming seeds and green foliage that would otherwise be available to livestock; (4) herding ungulates trampling and consuming crops and seedlings planted for reforestation; (5) aquaculture losses to fish-eating birds; and (6) disease transmission from wildlife to humans or their livestock (Conover, 2002; Dolbeer et al., 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderton, D. (1996). Rodents of the World. London: Blandford Books.Google Scholar
Batzli, G. O. (1992). Dynamics of small mammal populations: a review. In McCullough, D. and Barrett, R. (eds.), Wildlife 2001: Populations. New York: Elsevier Applied Science. pp. 831–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. R., Singleton, G. R., Norton, G. A. and Thompson, D. (2001). Mouser (Version 1.0): a decision tool for management. Proceedings of the Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference, 12, 199–201.Google Scholar
Buckle, A. P. and Smith, R. H. (1994). Rodent Pests and Their Control. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Conover, M. (2002). Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflicts. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. M. (2001). Rodent Control. Cleveland, OH: GIE Media.Google Scholar
Dolbeer, R. A., Holler, N. R. and Hawthorne, D. W. (1994). Identification and control of wildlife damage. In Bookout, T. A. (ed.), Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society. pp. 474–506.Google Scholar
Engeman, R. M. and Witmer, G. W. (2000 a). IPM strategies: indexing difficult to monitor populations of pest species. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 19, 183–9.Google Scholar
Engeman, R. M. and Witmer, G. W. (2000 b). Integrated management tactics for predicting and alleviating pocket gopher damage to conifer reforestation plantings. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 5, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagerstone, K. A., Coffey, M. A., Curtis, P. D.et al. (2002). Wildlife Fertility Control. Technical Review 02–2. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Howard, W. E., Marsh, R. E. and Corbett, C. W. (1985). Raptor perches: their influence on crop protection. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 173, 191–2.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E. (1991). Grazing and pocket gopher abundance in a California annual grassland. Southwestern Naturalist, 36, 117–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hygnstrom, S. E., Timm, R. M. and Larson, G. E. (1994). Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. B. (2001). Current rodenticide strategies. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 48, 127–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. J. (1996). Population cycles revisited. Journal of Mammalogy, 77, 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. R. (1998). Mammal repellents: options and considerations for development. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 18, 325–9.Google Scholar
Naiman, R. J., Johnston, C. A. and Kelley, J. C. (1988). Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience, 38, 753–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pech, R. P. (2000). Biological control of vertebrate pests. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 19, 206–11.Google Scholar
Pelton, M. R., Fribourg, H. A., Laundre, J. W. and Reynolds, T. W. (1991). Preliminary assessment of small wild mammal populations in tall fescue habitats. Tennessee Farm and Home Science, 160, 68–71.Google Scholar
Pipas, M. J. and Witmer, G. W. (1999). Evaluation of physical barriers to protect ponderosa pine seedlings from pocket gophers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 14, 164–8.Google Scholar
Ramsey, D. S. L. and Wilson, J. C. (2000). Towards ecologically based baiting strategies for rodents in agricultural systems. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 45, 183–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, G. R., Hinds, L. A., Herwig, H. and Zhang, Z. (eds.) (1999). Ecologically-Based Management of Rodent Pests. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Singleton, G. R., Sudarmaji, and Suriapermana, S. (1998). An experimental field study to evaluate a trap-barrier system and fumigation for controlling the rice rat in rice crops in West Java. Crop Protection, 17, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, T. P., Crump, D. R. and Sullivan, D. S. (1988). Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores IV: northern pocket gophers. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14, 379–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, T. P. and Klenner, W. (1993). Influences of diversionary food on red squirrel populations and damage to crop trees in young lodgepole pine forest. Ecological Applications, 3, 708–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, T. P., Sullivan, D. S., Hogue, E. J., Lautenschlager, R. A. and Wagner, R. G. (1998). Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to vegetation management in orchard agroecosystems: compensatory responses in abundance and biomass. Crop Protection, 17, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. and Emden, H. F. (2000). Integrated pest management in practice: pathways towards successful application. Crop Protection, 19, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmer, G. W., Bucknall, J. L., Fritts, T. H. and Moreno, D. G. (1996). Predator management to protect endangered avian species. Trans. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 61, 102–8.Google Scholar
Witmer, G. W., Campbell, , E. W. III and Boyd, F. (1998). Rat management for endangered species protection in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 18, 281–6.Google Scholar
Witmer, G. W., Fall, M. W. and Fiedler, L. A. (1995). Rodent control, research, and technology transfer. In Bissonette, J. and Krausman, P. (eds.), Integrating People and Wildlife for a Sustainable Future. Proceedings of the First International Wildlife Management Congress. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society. pp. 693–7.Google Scholar
Witmer, G. W. and VerCauteren, K. C. (2001). Understanding vole problems in direct seeding – strategies for management. In Veseth, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Northwest Direct Seed Cropping Systems Conference. Northwest Direct Seed Conference, Spokane. pp. 104–10.Google Scholar
Witmer, G. W., VerCauteren, K. C., Manci, K. M. and Dees, D. M. (2000). Urban-suburban prairie dog management: opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 19, 439–44.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×