Book contents
- Personal Networks
- Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences
- Personal Networks
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- I Background
- II Early Foundations
- 1 From Georg Simmel, “On the Significance of Numbers for Social Life: Introduction,” “The Isolated Individual and the Dyad,” “The Triad,” and “The Web of Group Affiliations”
- Georg Simmel’s Contribution to Social Network Research
- 2 From Elihu Katz and Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Personal Influence
- Influencers, Backfire Effects, and the Power of the Periphery
- 3 From J. Clyde Mitchell, “The Concept and Use of Social Networks”
- On J. Clyde Mitchell’s “The Concept and Use of Social Networks”
- 4 From Elizabeth Bott, “Urban Families: Conjugal Roles and Social Networks”
- Commentary on Bott’s “Family and Social Network”
- 5 From Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter, and Kurt Back, Social Pressures in Informal Groups
- Festinger, Schachter, and Back’s Social Pressures in Informal Groups
- 6 From H. Russell Bernard, Peter Killworth, David Kronenfeld, and Lee Sailer, “The Problem of Informant Accuracy”
- Implications of Informant Accuracy Research for Ego Networks
- 7 From Harrison C. White, Identity and Control
- On Parachutes and Lion-Taming
- III Later Foundations
- IV New Perspectives
- Index
- Recent Books in the Series
- References
On J. Clyde Mitchell’s “The Concept and Use of Social Networks”
from II - Early Foundations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2021
Book contents
- Personal Networks
- Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences
- Personal Networks
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- I Background
- II Early Foundations
- 1 From Georg Simmel, “On the Significance of Numbers for Social Life: Introduction,” “The Isolated Individual and the Dyad,” “The Triad,” and “The Web of Group Affiliations”
- Georg Simmel’s Contribution to Social Network Research
- 2 From Elihu Katz and Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Personal Influence
- Influencers, Backfire Effects, and the Power of the Periphery
- 3 From J. Clyde Mitchell, “The Concept and Use of Social Networks”
- On J. Clyde Mitchell’s “The Concept and Use of Social Networks”
- 4 From Elizabeth Bott, “Urban Families: Conjugal Roles and Social Networks”
- Commentary on Bott’s “Family and Social Network”
- 5 From Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter, and Kurt Back, Social Pressures in Informal Groups
- Festinger, Schachter, and Back’s Social Pressures in Informal Groups
- 6 From H. Russell Bernard, Peter Killworth, David Kronenfeld, and Lee Sailer, “The Problem of Informant Accuracy”
- Implications of Informant Accuracy Research for Ego Networks
- 7 From Harrison C. White, Identity and Control
- On Parachutes and Lion-Taming
- III Later Foundations
- IV New Perspectives
- Index
- Recent Books in the Series
- References
Summary
This chapter reflects on J. Clyde Mitchell’s (1969) classic piece “The Concept and Use of Social Networks” in the light of fifty years of development of the field of social network analysis.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Personal NetworksClassic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis, pp. 98 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., and Zaheer, A. 2012. “The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks.” Organization Science 23(2): 434–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1954. “Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish.” Human Relations 7: 39–58.Google Scholar
Boissevain, J. 1973. “An Exploration of Two First Order Zones,” in Network Analysis. Studies in Human Interaction, edited by Boissevain, J. and Mitchell, J. C.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P. 2006. “Identifying Sets of Key Players in a Social Network.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J., and Halgin, D. S. 2014. “Social Network Research: Confusions, Criticisms, and Controversies.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. 2006. “A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality.” Social Networks 28: 466–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Foster, P. C. 2003. “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.” Journal of Management 29(6): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. 2011. “On Network Theory.” Organization Science 22(5): 1168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennecke, J. 2019. “Dissonant Ties in Intraorganizational Networks: Why Individuals Seek Problem-Solving Assistance from Difficult Colleagues.” Academy of Management Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S., and Merluzzi, J. 2016. “Network Oscillation.” Academy of Management Discoveries 2(4): 368–91.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1994. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corona, V. P., and Godart, F. C. 2010. “Network-Domains in Combat and Fashion Organizations.” Organization 17(2): 283–304.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., and Parker, A. 2002. “Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration.” California Management Review 44(2): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. A. 1992. Manufacturing Tales: Sex and Money in Contemporary Legends. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E., and Johnsen, E. C. 1990. “Social Influence and Opinions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15(3–4): 193–206.Google Scholar
Fulghum, R. 1988. All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten. New York: Villard Books.Google Scholar
Furlotti, M., and Soda, G. 2018. “Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances.” Organization Science 29(5): 837–54.Google Scholar
Godart, F. C., and White, H. C. 2010. “Switchings under Uncertainty: The Coming and Becoming of Meanings.” Poetics 38: 567–86.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 6: 1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, P., Ferguson, J. E., Moser, C., Mohr, J., and Borgatti, S. P. 2017. Structure, Content and Meaning of Organizational Networks: Extending Network Thinking. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, F. E. 1966. “Social Participation and Social Structure.” Social Forces 45(2): 199–210.Google Scholar
Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., and Tsujinaka, Y. 1996. Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D., and Hanson, J. R., 1993. “Informal Networks.” Harvard Business Review 71(4): 104–11.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., and Walter, J. 2018. “Is Tie Maintenance Even Necessary?” Academy of Management Discoveries 4: 497–500.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., Walter, J., and Murnighan, J. K. 2011. “Dormant Ties: The Value of Reconnecting.” Organization Science 22(4): 923–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A. C. 1966. “The Significance of Quasi-Groups in the Study of Complex Societies,” in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, edited by M. Blanton. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Methot, J. R., and Rosado-Solomon, E. 2020. “Multiplex Relationships in Organizations,” in Social Networks at Work, edited by D. Brass and S. Borgatti. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mische, A., and White, H. 1998. “Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains.” Social Research 65(3): 695–724.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. “The Concept and Use of Social Networks,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Molina, J. L. 2018. “Egocentric Analysis. Foundations, Methods, and Models.” Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 29(2): 303–6.Google Scholar
Nadler, A. 1991. “Help-Seeking Behavior: Psychological Costs and Instrumental Benefits,” pp. 290–311 in Prosocial Behavior: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by Clark, M. S.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parker, A., Halgin, D. S., and Borgatti, S. P. 2016. “Dynamics of Social Capital: Effects of Performance Feedback on Network Change.” Organization Studies 37(3): 375–97.Google Scholar
Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A., and Borgatti, S. P. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models, vol. 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintane, E., and Carnabuci, G. 2016. “How Do Brokers Broker? Tertius Gaudens, Tertius Iungens, and the Temporality of Structural Holes.” Organization Science 27(6): 1343–60.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glendale, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosnow, R. L., and Fine, G. A. 1976. Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., and Schippers, M. C. 2010. “Network Churn: The Effects of Self-Monitoring Personality on Brokerage Dynamics.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55(4): 639–70.Google Scholar
Smith, E. B., Menon, T., and Thompson, L. 2012. “Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks.” Organization Science 23(1): 67–82.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N., and Beteille, A. 1964. “Networks in Indian Social Structure.” Man 64(212): 165–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B. 1988. “Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance,” in Social Structures: A Network Approach, edited by Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, P. D. 1969. “The Operation of Voluntary Associations and Personal Networks in the Political Processes of Inter-Ethnic Community,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Young, M., and Wilmott, P. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Penguin books.Google Scholar