Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:21:27.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Adnexal tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Ophelia E. Dadzie
Affiliation:
Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Meera Mahalingam
Affiliation:
VA Consolidated Laboratories, New England
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Misago, N., Kimura, T., Toda, S., et al. (2010). A revaluation of trichofolliculoma: the histopathologic and immunohistochemical features. Am J Dermatopathol, 32, 3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogle, M.A., Cohen, P.R., and Tschen, J.A. (2004). Trichofolliculoma with incidental focal acantholytic dyskeratosis. South Med J, 97, 773–5.Google Scholar
Lim, P., and Kossard, S. (2009). Trichofolliculoma with mucinosis. Am J Dermatopathol, 31, 405–6.Google Scholar
Pérez Tato, B., Saez, A.C., and Fernandez, P.R. (2008). Superficial angiomyxoma with trichofolliculoma. Ann Diagn Pathol, 12, 375–7.Google Scholar
Boran, C., Pariak, A.H., and Erkol, H. (2007). Collision tumor of trichofolliculoma and basal cell carcinoma. Australas J Dermatol, 48, 127–9.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (2008). Folliculosebaceous cystic hamartoma or trichofolliculoma? A spectrum of hamartomatous changes inducted by perifollicular stroma in the follicular epithelium. J Cutan Pathol, 35, 843–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, T., and Hartschuh, W. (1998). Folliculo-sebaceous cystic hamartoma is a trichofolliculoma at its very late stage. J Cutan Pathol, 25, 354–64.Google Scholar
Ishii, N., Kawaguchi, H., Takahashi, K., and Nakajima, H. (1992). A case of congenital trichofolliculoma. J Dermatol, 19, 195–6.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Rahbari, H., Mehregan, A., and Pinkus, H. (1977). Trichoadenoma of Nikolowski. J Cutan Pathol, 4, 90–8.Google Scholar
Shimanovich, I., Krahl, D., and Rose, C. (2010). Trichoadenoma of Nikolowski is a distinct neoplasm within the spectrum of follicular tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol, 62, 277–83.Google Scholar
Mehregan, A.H., and Butler, J.D. (1961). A tumor of follicular infundibulum. Report of a case. Arch Dermatol, 83, 924–7.Google Scholar
Mehregan, A.H. (1971). Tumor of follicular infundibulum. Dermatologica, 142, 177–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahalingam, M., Bhawan, J., Finn, R., et al. (2001). Tumor of the follicular infundibulum with sebaceous differentiation. J Cutan Pathol, 8, 314–17.Google Scholar
Abbas, O., and Mahalingam, M. (2009). Tumor of the follicular infundibulum: an epidermal reaction pattern? Am J Dermatopathol, 31, 626–33.Google Scholar
Alomari, A., Subtil, A., Owen, C.E., et al. (2013). Solitary and multiple tumors of follicular infundibulum: a review of 168 cases with emphasis on staining patterns and clinical variants. J Cutan Pathol, 40, 532–7.Google Scholar
Inaloz, H.S., Inaloz, S.S., Unal, B., et al. (2002). Coexistence of tumor of the follicular infundibulum with an unusual trichilemmal tumor. Am J Dermatopathol, 24, 406–8.Google Scholar
Mehregan, A.H., and Brownstein, M.H. (1978). Pilar sheath acanthoma. Arch Dermatol, 114, 1495–7.Google Scholar
Bhawan, J. (1979). Pilar sheath acanthoma. A new benign follicular tumor. J Cutan Pathol, 6, 438–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saida, T., Oohara, K., Hori, Y., et al. (1983). Development of a malignant proliferating trichilemmal cyst in a patient with multiple trichilemmal cysts. Dermatologica, 166, 203–8.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, F., Ito, M., Nakamura, A., et al. (1991). Proliferating trichilemmal cyst with apocrine-acrosyringeal and sebaceous differentiation. J Cutan Pathol, 18, 137–41.Google Scholar
Folpe, A.L., Reisenauer, A.K., Mentzel, T., et al. (2003). Proliferating trichilemmal tumors: clinicopathologic evaluation is a guide to biologic behavior. J Cutan Pathol, 30, 492–8.Google Scholar
Masui, Y., Komine, M., Kadono, T., et al. (2008). Proliferating trichilemmal cystic carcinoma: a case containing differentiated and dedifferentiated parts. J Cutan Pathol, 35 (Suppl 1), 55–8.Google Scholar
Takata, M., Rehman, I., and Rees, J.L. (1998). A trichilemmal carcinoma arising from a proliferating trichilemmal cyst: the loss of the wild-type p53 is a critical event in malignant transformation. Hum Pathol, 29, 193–5.Google Scholar
Sau, P., Graham, J.H., and Helwig, E.B. (1995). Proliferating epithelial cysts. Clinicopathologic analysis of 96 cases. J Cutan Pathol, 22, 394406.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M.H., and Shapiro, L. (1973). Trichilemmoma. Analysis of 40 new cases. Arch Dermatol, 107, 866–9.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M.H. (1980). Trichilemmoma. Benign follicular tumor or viral wart? Am J Dermatopathol, 2, 229–31.Google Scholar
Rohwedder, A., Keminer, O., Hendricks, C., et al. (1997). Detection of HPV DNA in trichilemmomas by polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol, 51, 119–25.Google Scholar
Hidayat, A.A., and Font, R.L. (1980). Tricholemmoma of eyelid and eyebrow. A clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Arch Ophthalmol, 98, 844–84.Google Scholar
Hunt, S.J., Kilzer, B., and Santa Cruz, D.J. (1990). Desmoplastic trichilemmoma: histopathologic variant resembling invasive carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol, 17, 4552.Google Scholar
Illueca, C., Monteagudo, C., Revert, A., et al. (1998). Diagnostic value of CD34 immunostaining in desmoplastic trichilemmoma. J Cutan Pathol, 25, 435–9.Google Scholar
Ung, T., Tan, J.H., and Mudhar, H. (2012). Three patients with desmoplastic tricholemmoma with an incidental histopathologic surprise impacting on management. Br J Ophthalmol, 96,461–2.Google Scholar
Dalton, S.R., and LeBoit, P.E. (2008). Squamous cell carcinoma with clear cells: how often is there evidence of tricholemmal differentiation? Am J Dermatopathol, 30, 333–9.Google Scholar
Headington, J.T. (1992). Tricholemmal carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol, 19, 83–4.Google Scholar
Kaddu, S., Soyer, H.P., Hodl, S., et al. (1996). Morphologic stages of pilomatricoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 18, 33–8.Google Scholar
Chan, E.F., Gat, U., McNiff, J.M., et al. (1999). A common human skin tumor is caused by activating mutations in beta-catenin. Nat Genet, 21, 410–13.Google Scholar
Kaddu, S., Soyer, H.P., Wolf, I.H., et al. (1997). Proliferating pilomatricoma. A histopathologic simulator of matrical carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol, 24, 228–34.Google Scholar
de la Torre, J.P., Saiz, A., and García-Arpa, M. (2006). Pilomatricomal horn: a new superficial variant of pilomatricoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 426–8.Google Scholar
Sassmannshausen, J., and Chaffins, M. (2001). Pilomatrix carcinoma: a report of a case arising from a previously excised pilomatrixoma and a review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol, 44, 358–61.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J.L., Allan, A., Trapp, K.M., et al. (2014). Pilomatrix carcinoma: 13 new cases and review of the literature with emphasis on predictors of metastasis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 71, 3843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, J.A., Healy, K., Slominski, A., et al. (1999). Melanocytic matricoma: a report of two cases of a new entity. Am J Dermatopathol, 21, 344–9.Google Scholar
Ye, J., Nappi, O., Swanson, P.E., et al. (2004). Proliferating pilar tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 76 cases with a proposal for definition of benign and malignant variants. Am J Clin Pathol, 122, 566–74.Google Scholar
Oh, D.H., Lane, A.T., Turk, A.E., et al. (1997). A young boy with a large hemifacial plaque with histopathologic features of trichoepithelioma. J Am Acad Dermatol, 37, 881–3.Google Scholar
Tatnall, F.M., and Jones, E.W. (1986). Giant solitary trichoepitheliomas located in the perianal area: a report of three cases. Br J Dermatol, 115, 91–9.Google Scholar
Grossmann, P., Vanecek, T., Steiner, P., et al. (2013). Novel and recurrent germline and somatic mutations in a cohort of 67 patients from 48 families with Brooke-Spiegler syndrome including the phenotypic variant of multiple familial trichoepitheliomas and correlation with the histopathologic findings in 379 biopsy specimens. Am J Dermatopathol, 35, 3444.Google Scholar
Melly, L., Lawton, G., and Rajan, N. (2012). Basal cell carcinoma arising in association with trichoepithelioma in a case of Brooke-Spiegler syndrome with a novel genetic mutation in CYLD. J Cutan Pathol, 39, 977–8.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M.H., and Shapiro, L. (1977). Desmoplastic trichoepithelioma. Cancer, 40, 2979–86.Google Scholar
McFaddin, C., Sirohi, D., Castro-Echeverry, E., et al. (2015). Desmoplastic trichoepithelioma with pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia: a report of three cases. J Cutan Pathol, 42, 102–7.Google Scholar
Tse, J.Y., Nguyen, A.T., Le, L.P., et al. (2013). Microcystic adnexal carcinoma versus desmoplastic trichoepithelioma: a comparative study. Am J Dermatopathol, 35, 50–5.Google Scholar
Jedrych, J., Leffell, D., and McNiff, J.M. (2012). Desmoplastic trichoepithelioma with perineural involvement: a series of seven cases. J Cutan Pathol, 39, 317–23.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M.H., and Starink, T.M. (1987). Desmoplastic trichoepithelioma and intradermal nevus: a combined malformation. J Am Acad Dermatol, 17, 489–92.Google Scholar
Sellheyer, K., Nelson, P., Kutzner, H. et al. (2013). The immunohistochemical differential diagnosis of microcystic adnexal carcinoma, desmoplastic trichoepithelioma and morpheaform basal cell carcinoma using BerEP4 and stem cell markers. J Cutan Pathol, 40, 363–70.Google Scholar
Sau, P., Lupton, G.P., Graham, , and J.H. (1992). Trichogerminoma. Report of 14 cases. J Cutan Pathol, 19, 357–65.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K., Prince, C., Kato, I., et al. (1989). Rippled-pattern trichomatricoma. J Cutan Pathol, 16, 1930.Google Scholar
Altman, D.A., Mikhail, G.R., Johnson, T.M., et al. (1995). Trichoblastic fibroma. A series of 10 cases with report of a new plaque variant. Arch Dermatol, 131, 198201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazakov, D.V., Mentzel, T., Erlandson, R.A., et al. (2006). Clear cell trichoblastoma. A clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study of two cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 197201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanitakis, J., Brutzkus, A., Butnaru, A.C., et al. (2002). Melanotrichoblastoma. Immunohistochemical study of a variant of pigmented trichoblastoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 24, 498501.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cascajo, C., Borghi, S., Rey-Lopez, A., et al. (1996). Cutaneous lymphadenoma. A peculiar variant of nodular trichoblastoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 18, 186–91.Google Scholar
Schulz, T., Proske, S., Hartschuh, W., et al. (2005). High-grade trichoblastic carcinoma arising in trichoblastoma: a rare adnexal neoplasm often showing metastatic spread. Am J Dermatopathol, 27, 916.Google Scholar
Shan, S.J., and Guo, Y. (2014). Panfolliculoma and histopathologic variants: a study of 19 cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 36, 965–71.Google Scholar
Idriss, M.H., Khalil, A., Long, W., et al. (2013). Epidermal panfolliculoma: an adnexal proliferation with advanced follicular differentiation confined to the epidermis. J Cutan Pathol, 40, 409–12.Google Scholar
Kacerovska, D., Michal, M., and Kazakov, D.V. (2012). Panfolliculoma with sebaceous differentiation – a case report. Am J Dermatopathol, 34, e90–3.Google Scholar
Harris, A., Faulkner-Jones, B., and Zimarowski, M.J. (2011). Epidermal panfolliculoma: A report of 2 cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 33, e710.Google Scholar
Hoang, M.P., and Levenson, B.M. (2006). Cystic panfolliculoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 130, 389–92.Google Scholar
Somach, S., and Morgan, M. (2001). Benign keratosis with a spectrum of follicular differentiation: a case series and investigation of a potential role of human papilloma virus. J Cutan Pathol, 28, 156–9.Google Scholar
Birt, A.R., Hogg, G.R., and Dubé, W.J. (1977). Hereditary multiple fibrofolliculomas with trichodiscomas and acrochordons. Arch Dermatol, 113, 1674–7.Google Scholar
Sangueza, O.P., and Requena, L. (1994). Neurofollicular hamartoma. A new histogenetic interpretation. Am J Dermatopathol, 16, 150–4.Google Scholar
Schulz, T., and Hartschuh, W. (1998). Folliculo-sebaceous cystic hamartoma is a trichofolliculoma at its very late stage. J Cutan Pathol, 25, 354–64.Google Scholar
Schulz, T., and Hartschuh, W. (1999). Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome and Hornstein–Knickenberg syndrome are the same. Different sectioning technique as the cause of different histology. J Cutan Pathol, 26, 5561.Google Scholar
Schulz, T., Ebschner, U., and Hartschuh, W. (2001). Localized Birt–Hogg–Dube syndrome with prominent perivascular fibromas. Am J Dermatopathol, 23, 149–53.Google Scholar
Kutzner, H., Requena, L., Rütten, A., et al. (2006). Spindle cell predominant trichodiscoma: a fibrofolliculoma/trichodiscoma variant considered formerly to be a neurofollicular hamartoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 17 cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 18.Google Scholar
Lazar, A.J.F., Lyle, S., and Calonje, E. (2007). Sebaceous neoplasia and Torre–Muir syndrome. Curr Diagn Pathol, 13, 301–19.Google Scholar
Cabral, E.S., Auerbach, A., Killian, J.K., et al. (2006). Distinction of benign sebaceous proliferations from sebaceous carcinomas by immunohistochemistry. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 465–71.Google Scholar
Troy, J.L., and Ackerman, A.B. (1984). Sebaceoma. A distinctive benign neoplasm of adnexal epithelium differentiating toward sebaceous cells. Am J Dermatopathol, 6, 713.Google Scholar
Misago, N., Mihara, I., Ansai, S., et al. (2002). Sebaceoma and related neoplasms with sebaceous differentiation: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 24, 294304.Google Scholar
Fan, Y.S., Carr, R.A., Sanders, D.S., et al. (2007). Characteristic Ber-EP4 and EMA expression in sebaceoma is immunohistochemically distinct from basal cell carcinoma. Histopathology, 51, 80–6.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Kutzner, H., Rutten, A., et al. (2005). Carcinoid-like pattern in sebaceous neoplasms: another distinctive, previously unrecognized pattern in extraocular sebaceous carcinoma and sebaceoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 27, 195203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misago, N., and Narisawa, Y. (2001). Rippled-pattern sebaceoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 23, 437–43.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K, Prince, C, Kato, I, et al. (1989). Rippled-pattern trichomatricoma. Histopathological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of an immature hair matrix tumor. J Cutan Pathol, 16, 1930.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T.A., Maia-Cohen, S., Hessel, A.B., et al. (1998). Sebaceous neoplasm with reticulated and cribriform features: a rare variant of sebaceoma. J Cutan Pathol, 25, 233–5.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Calonje, E., Rütten, A., et al. (2007). Cutaneous sebaceous neoplasms with a focal glandular pattern (seboapocrine lesions): a clinicopathologic study of three cases. Am J Dermatopathol, 29, 359–64.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Spagnolo, D.V., Kacerovska, D., et al. (2010). Unusual patterns of cutaneous sebaceous neoplasms. Diagn Histopathol, 16, 425–31.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Kutzner, H., Rütten, A., et al (2005). Carcinoid-like pattern in sebaceous neoplasms: another distinctive, previously unrecognized pattern in extraocular sebaceous carcinoma and sebaceoma. Am J Dermatopathol, 27, 195203.Google Scholar
Ponti, G., and Ponz de Leon, M. (2005). Muir-Torre syndrome. Lancet Oncol, 6, 980–7.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R.A., and Torre, D,P. (1995). The Muir-Torre syndrome: A 25 year retrospect. J Am Acad Dermatol, 33, 90104.Google Scholar
Curry, M.L., Eng, W., Lund, K., et al. (2004). Muir-Torre syndrome: role of the dermatopathologist in diagnosis. Am J Dermatopathol, 26, 217–21.Google Scholar
Chhibber, V., Dresser, K., and Mahalingam, M. (2008). MSH-6-extending the reliability of immunohistochemistry as a screening tool in patients with Muir-Torre syndrome. Mod Pathol, 21, 159–64.Google Scholar
Abbas, O., and Mahalingam, M. (2009). Cutaneous sebaceous neoplasms as markers of Muir-Torre syndrome: a diagnostic algorithm. J Cutan Pathol, 36, 613–19.Google Scholar
Freidman, K.J., Boudreau, S., and Farmer, E.R. (1987). Superficial epithelioma with sebaceous differentiation. J Cutan Pathol, 14, 193–7.Google Scholar
Fukai, Y., Sowa, J., and Ishii, M. (2006). Reticulated acanthoma with sebaceous differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 158–61.Google Scholar
Leboeuf, N.R., and Mahalingam, M. (2007). Acanthomatous superficial sebaceous hamartoma? A study of six cases with clarification of the nomenclature. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 865–70.Google Scholar
Requena, L., Roó, E., and Sánchez-Yus, E. (1992). Plate-like sebaceous hyperplasia overlying dermatofibroma. J Cutan Pathol, 19, 253–5.Google Scholar
Steffen, C. (1993). Mantleoma. A benign neoplasm with mantle differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol, 15, 306–10.Google Scholar
Ackerman, A.B., and Böer, A. (2008). Histopathologic Diagnosis of Adnexal Epithelial Neoplasms. New York, NY: Ardor Scribendi.Google Scholar
Ackerman, A.B., Nussen-Lee, S., and Aldrene Tan, M.L. (2009). Histopathologic Diagnosis of Neoplasms with Sebaceous Differentiation. New York, NY: Ardor Scribendi.Google Scholar
Leshin, B., and White, W.L. (1990). Folliculocentric basaloid proliferation. The buldge (der Wulst) revisited. Arch Dermatol, 126, 900–6.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, O., Doi, Y., and Hamada, T., et al. (2002). An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of syringocystadenoma papilliferum. Br J Dermatol, 147, 936–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazakov, D.V., Requena, L., Kutzner, H., et al. (2010). Morphologic diversity of syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum based on a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 32, 340–7.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Spagnolo, D.V., Kacerovska, D., et al. (2011). Lesions of anogenital mammary-like glands: an update. Adv Anat Pathol, 18, 128.Google Scholar
Parks, A., Branch, K.D., Metcalf, J., et al. (2012). Hidradenoma papilliferum with mixed histopathologic features of syringocystadenoma papilliferum and anogenital mammary-like glands: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 34, 104–9.Google Scholar
Fernández-Aceñero, M.J., Aramendi Sánchez, T., Villanueva Sánchez, M.C., et al. (2003). Ectopic hidradenoma papilliferum: a case report and literature review. Am J Dermatopathol, 25, 176–8.Google Scholar
Vazmitel, M., Spagnolo, D.V., Nemcova, J., et al. (2008). Hidradenoma papilliferum with a ductal carcinoma in situ component: case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 30, 392–4.Google Scholar
Rosen, P.P., and Caicco, J.A. (1986). Florid papillomatosis of the nipple. A study of 51 patients, including nine with mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 10, 87101.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M.H., Phelps, R.G., and Magnin, P.H. (1985). Papillary adenoma of the nipple: analysis of fifteen new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol, 12, 707–15.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Parez, E., and Cestoni-Parducci, R. (1985). Nodular hidradenoma and hidradenocarcinoma. A 10-year review. J Am Acad Dermatol, 12, 1520.Google Scholar
Stefanato, C.M., Ferrara, G., Chaudhry, I.H., et al. (2012). Clear cell nodular hidradenoma involving the lymphatic system: a tumor of uncertain malignant potential or a novel example of “metastasizing” benign tumor? Am J Surg Pathol, 36, 1835–40.Google Scholar
Nazarian, R.M., Kapur, P., Rakheja, D., et al. (2009). Atypical and malignant hidradenomas: a histopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol, 22, 600–10.Google Scholar
Mambo, N.C. (1984). The significance of atypical nuclear changes in benign eccrine acrospiromas: a clinical and pathologic study of 18 cases. J Cutan Pathol, 11, 3544.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Ivan, D., Kutzner, H., et al. (2009). Cutaneous hidradenocarcinoma: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biologic study of 14 cases, including Her2/neu gene expression/amplification, TP53 gene mutation analysis, and t(11;19) translocation. Am J Dermatopathol, 31, 236–47.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Belousova, I.E., Bisceglia, M., et al. (2007). Apocrine mixed tumor of the skin (“mixed tumor of the folliculosebaceous-apocrine complex”). Spectrum of differentiations and metaplastic changes in the epithelial, myoepithelial, and stromal components based on a histopathologic study of 244 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol, 57, 467–83.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Bisceglia, M., Spagnolo, D.V., et al. (2007). Apocrine mixed tumors of the skin with architectural and/or cytologic atypia: a retrospective clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 31, 1094–102.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Kacerovska, D., Hantschke, M., et al. (2011). Cutaneous mixed tumor, eccrine variant: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 50 cases, with emphasis on unusual histopathologic features. Am J Dermatopathol, 33, 557–68.Google Scholar
Mentzel, T., Requena, L., Kaddu, S., et al. (2003). Cutaneous myoepithelial neoplasms: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases suggesting a continuous spectrum ranging from benign mixed tumor of the skin to cutaneous myoepithelioma and myoepithelial carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol, 30, 294302.Google Scholar
Hornick, J.L., and Fletcher, C.D.M. (2004). Cutaneous myoepithelioma: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 14 cases. Human Pathol, 35, 1424.Google Scholar
Tanahashi, J., Kashima, K., Daa, T., et al. (2007). A case of cutaneous myoepithelial carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 648–53.Google Scholar
Clarke, L.E., and Seykora, J.T. (2007). Primary cutaneous adenomyoepithelioma. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 654–7.Google Scholar
Guarner, J., Cohen, C., and DeRose, P.B. (1989). Histogenesis of extramammary and mammary Paget cells. An immunohistochemical study. Am J Dermatopathol, 11, 313–18.Google Scholar
Marucci, G., Betts, C.M., and Golough, R. (2002). Toker cells are probably precursors of Paget cell carcinoma: a morphologic and ultrastructural description. Virchows Arch, 441, 1117–23.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, E.J., and Brown, H.M. (2002). Vulvar Paget disease of urothelial origin: a report of three cases and a proposed classification of vulvar Paget disease. Human Pathol, 33, 549–54.Google Scholar
Willman, J.H., Golitz, L.E., and Fitzpatrick, J.E. (2005). Vulvar clear cells of Toker. Precursors of extramammary Paget's disease. Am J Dermatopathol, 27, 185–8.Google Scholar
De La Garza Bravo, M. M., Curry, J.L., Torres-Cabala, C.A., et al. (2014). Pigmented extramammary Paget disease of the thigh mimicking a melanocytic tumor: report of a case and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol, 41, 529–35.Google Scholar
Liegl, B., Leibl, S., Gogg-Kamerer, M., et al. (2007). Mammary and extramammary Paget's disease: an immunohistochemical study of 83 cases. Histopathology, 50, 439–47.Google Scholar
Cohen, C., Guarner, J., and DeRose, P.B. (1993). Mammary Paget's disease and associated carcinoma. An immunohistochemical study. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 117, 291–4.Google Scholar
Goldblum, J.R., and Hart, W.R. (1997). Vulvar Paget's disease: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 19 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 21, 1178–87.Google Scholar
Goldblum, J.R., and Hart, W.R. (1998). Perianal Paget's disease. A histopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases with and without associated rectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 22, 170–9.Google Scholar
Ferringer, T., Rogers, H.C., and Metcalf, J.S. (2005). Merkel cell carcinoma in situ. J Cutan Pathol, 32, 162–5.Google Scholar
Kuo, T.T., Chan, H.L., and Hsueh, S. (1987). Clear cell papulosis of the skin. A new entity with histogenetic implications for cutaneous Paget's disease. Am J Surg Pathol, 11, 827–34.Google Scholar
Boer-Auer, A., August, C., Falk, T.M., et al. (2011). Benign mucinous metaplasia of the genital mucosa: histomorphologic and immunohistochemical features and criteria for differentiation from extramammary Paget disease. Br J Dermatol, 165, 1263–72.Google Scholar
Robson, A., Lazar, A.J.F., Ben Nagi, J., et al. (2008). Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma. A clinico-pathologic analysis of 24 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 32, 682–90.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Flores, A. (2012). Immunohistochemical and morphologic evaluation of primary cutaneous apocrine carcinomas and cutaneous metastases from ductal breast carcinoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 53, 879–92.Google Scholar
Wick, M.R., Ockner, D.M., Mills, S.E., et al. (1998). Homologous carcinomas of the breasts, skin, and salivary glands. A histopathologic and immunohistochemical comparison of ductal mammary carcinoma, ductal sweat gland carcinoma, and salivary duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol, 109, 7584.Google Scholar
Rütten, A., Kutzner, H., Mentzel, T., et al. (2009). Primary cutaneous cribriform apocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 26 cases of an under-recognized cutaneous adnexal neoplasm. J Am Acad Dermatol, 61, 644–51.Google Scholar
Hattori, N., Imakado, S., Kikuchi, K. et al (1997). Papillary tubular adenoma with marked tubular vacuolization. J Dermatol, 24, 770–80.Google Scholar
Blasini, W., Hu, S., Gugic, D., et al. (2007). Papillary eccrine adenoma in association with cutaneous horn. Am J Clin Dermatol, 8, 179–82.Google Scholar
Falck, V.G., and Jordaan, H.F. (1986). Papillary eccrine adenoma. A tubulopapillary hidradenoma with eccrine differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol, 8, 6472.Google Scholar
Rulon, D.B., and Helwig, E.B. (1977). Papillary eccrine adenoma. Arch Dermatol, 113, 596–8.Google Scholar
Fox, S.B., and Cotton, D.W. (1992). Tubular apocrine adenoma and papillary eccrine adenoma. Entities or unity? Am J Dermatopathol, 14, 149–54.Google Scholar
Tellechea, O., Reis, J.P., Marques, C., et al. (1995). Tubular apocrine adenoma with eccrine and apocrine immunophenotypes or papillary tubular adenoma? Am J Dermatopathol, 17, 499505.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, A., Sugiura, M., Piris, A., et al. (2007). Apocrine cystadenoma and apocrine hidrocystoma: examination of 21 cases with emphasis on nomenclature according to proliferative features. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 912–17.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Bisceglia, M., Calonje, E., et al. (2007). Tubular adenoma and syringocystadenoma papilliferum: a reappraisal of their relationship. An interobserver study of a series, by a panel of dermatopathologists. Am J Dermatopathol, 29, 256–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishiko, A., Shimizu, H., Inamoto, N., et al. (1993). Is tubular apocrine adenoma a distinct clinical entity? Am J Dermatopathol, 15, 482–7.Google Scholar
Landry, M., and Winkelmann, R.K. (1972). An unusual tubular apocrine adenoma. Arch Dermatol, 105, 869–79.Google Scholar
Kao, G.F., Helwig, E.B., and Graham, J.H. (1987). Aggressive digital papillary adenoma and adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 57 patients, with histochemical, immunopathological, and ultrastructural observations. J Cutan Pathol, 14, 129–46.Google Scholar
Duke, W.H., Sherrod, T.T., and Lupton, G.P. (2000). Aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (aggressive digital papillary adenoma and adenocarcinoma revisited). Am J Surg Pathol, 24, 775–84.Google Scholar
Suchak, R., Wang, W.L., Prieto, V.G., et al. (2012). Cutaneous digital papillary adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 31 cases of a rare neoplasm with new observations. Am J Surg Pathol, 36, 1883–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meybehm, M., and Fischer, H.P. (1997). Spiradenoma and dermal cylindroma: comparative immunohistochemical analysis and histogenetic considerations. Am J Dermatopathol, 9, 154–61.Google Scholar
Grossmann, P., Vanecek, T., Steiner, P., et al. (2013). Novel and recurrent germline and somatic mutations in a cohort of 67 patients from 48 families with Brooke-Spiegler syndrome including the phenotypic variant of multiple familial trichoepitheliomas and correlation with the histopathologic findings in 379 biopsy specimens. Am J Dermatopathol, 35, 3444.Google Scholar
Sellheyer, K. (2014). Spiradenoma and cylindroma originate from the hair follicle bulge and not from the eccrine sweat gland: an immunohistochemical study with CD200 and other stem cell markers. J Cutan Pathol, doi: 10.1111/cup.12406.Google Scholar
Mambo, N.C. (1983). Eccrine spiradenoma: clinical and pathologic study of 49 tumors. J Cutan Pathol, 10, 312–20.Google Scholar
Sellheyer, K. (2014). Spiradenoma and cylindroma originate from the hair follicle bulge and not from the eccrine sweat gland: an immunohistochemical study with CD200 and other stem cell markers. J Cutan Pathol, doi: 10.1111/cup.12406.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Zelger, J.A., Vanecek, T. et al. (2009). Morphologic diversity of malignant neoplasms arising in preexisting spiradenoma, cylindroma, and spiradenocylindroma based on the study of 24 cases, sporadic or occurring in the setting of Brooke-Spielger syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol, 33, 705–19.Google Scholar
Chandler, W.M., and Bosenberg, M.W. (2009). Autoimmune acrosyringitis with ductal cysts: reclassification of case of eruptive syringoma. J Cutan Pathol, 36, 1312–15.Google Scholar
Wallace, J.S., Bond, J.S., Seidel, G.D., et al. (2014). An important mimicker: plaque-type syringoma mistakenly diagnosed as microcystic adnexal carcinoma. Dermatol Surg, 40, 810–12.Google Scholar
Missall, T.A., Burkemper, N.M., Jensen, S.L., et al. (2009). Immunohistochemical differentiation of four benign eccrine tumors. J Cutan Pathol, 36, 190–6.Google Scholar
Harvell, J.D., Kerschmann, R.L., LeBoit, P.E. (1996). Eccrine or apocrine poroma? Six poromas with divergent adnexal differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol, 18, 19.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Kutzner, H., Spagnolo, D.V., et al. (2008). Sebaceous differentiation in poroid neoplasms: report of 11 cases, including a case of metaplastic carcinoma associated with apocrine poroma (sarcomatoid apocrine porocarcinoma). Am J Dermatopathol, 30, 21–6.Google Scholar
Battistella, M., Langbein, L., Peltre, B., et al. (2010). From hidroacanthoma simplex to poroid hidradenoma: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemic study of poroid neoplasms and reappraisal of their histogenesis. Am J Dermatopathol, 32, 459–68.Google Scholar
Langbein, L., Cribier, B., Schirmacher, P., et al. (2008). New concepts on the histogenesis of eccrine neoplasia from keratin expression in the normal eccrine gland, syringoma and poroma. Br J Dermatol, 159, 633–45.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, J.F., and Googe, P.B. (1996). Mucinous differentiation in adnexal sweat gland tumors. J Cutan Pathol, 3, 259–63.Google Scholar
Robson, A., Greene, J., Ansari, N., et al. (2001). Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 25, 710–20.Google Scholar
Shaw, M., McKee, P.H., Lowe, D. et al. (1982). Malignant eccrine poroma: a study of twenty-seven cases. Br J Dermatol, 107, 675–80.Google Scholar
Goh, S.G., Dayrit, J.F., and Calonje, E. (2007). Sarcomatoid eccrine porocarcinoma: report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 5560.Google Scholar
Mahomed, F., Blok, J., and Grayson, W. (2008). The squamous variant of eccrine porocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 21 cases. J Clin Pathol, 61, 361–5.Google Scholar
Goldstein, D.J., Barr, R.J., and Santa Cruz, D.J. (1982). Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: A distinct clinicopathologic entity. Cancer, 50, 566–72.Google Scholar
Lipper, S., and Peiper, S.C. (1979). Sweat gland carcinoma with syringomatous features: a microscopic and ultrastructural study. Cancer, 44, 157–63.Google Scholar
Mehregan, A.H., Hashimoto, K., and Rahbari, H. (1983) Eccrine adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol, 119, 104–14.Google Scholar
Cooper, P.H., Mills, S.E., Leonard, D.D., et al. (1985). Sclerosing sweat duct (syringomatous) carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 9, 422–33.Google Scholar
Fernández-Figueras, M.T., Montero, M.A., Admella, J., et al. (2006). High (nuclear) grade adnexal carcinoma with microcystic adnexal carcinoma-like structural features. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 346–51.Google Scholar
Freeman, R.G., and Winkelmann, R.K. (1969). Basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation (eccrine epithelioma). Arch Dermatol, 100, 234–42.Google Scholar
McKee, P.H., Fletcher, C.D., and Rasbridge, S.A. (1990). The enigmatic eccrine epithelioma (eccrine syringomatous carcinoma). Am J Dermatopathol, 12, 552–61.Google Scholar
Kohda, M., Manabe, T., Ueki, H. (1990). Squamous islands in eccrine neoplasms. Am J Dermatopathol, 12, 344–9.Google Scholar
Wong, T.Y., Suster, S., and Mihm, M.C. (1997). Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma. Histopathology, 30, 288–93.Google Scholar
Herrero, J., Monteagudo, C., Jorda, E., et al. (1998). Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma. Histopathology, 32, 478–80.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.J., Kim, A.R., and Yu, D.S. (2005). Mohs micrographic surgery for squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma. Dermatol Surg, 31, 1462–4.Google Scholar
Chhibber, V., Lyle, S., and Mahalingam, M. (2007). Ductal eccrine carcinoma with squamous differentiation: apropos a case. J Cutan Pathol, 34, 503–7.Google Scholar
Kavand, S., and Cassarino, D.S. (2009). “Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma”: an unusual low-grade case with follicular differentiation. Are these tumors squamoid variants of microcystic adnexal carcinoma? Am J Dermatopathol, 31, 849–52.Google Scholar
Terushkin, E., Leffell, D.J., Futoryan, T., et al. (2010). Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 32, 287–92.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, J., Kakoti, L.M., and Nagaraj, R. (2014). Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma: A diagnostic challenge. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol, 1, 90–3.Google Scholar
Cassarino, D.S., Derienzo, D.P., and Barr, R.J. (2006). Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive clinicopathologic classification – part two. J Cutan Pathol, 33, 261–79.Google Scholar
Boggio, R. (1975). Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the scalp. Arch Dermatol, 111, 793–4.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, R., Chaudhry, I.H., Ramdial, P., et al. (2013) Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 27 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 37, 1603–11.Google Scholar
Seab, J.A., and Graham, J.H. (1987). Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol, 17, 113–18.Google Scholar
Naylor, B.A., Sarkar, P., Perlis, C.S., et al. (2008). Pimary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol, 58, 636–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Suster, S., LeBoit, P.E., et al. (2005). Mucinous carcinoma of the skin, primary, and secondary: a clinicopathologic study of 63 cases with emphasis on the morphologic spectrum of primary cutaneous forms: homologies with mucinous lesions in the breast. Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 764–82.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H.S., Salama, M.E., Chitale, D., et al. (2004). Primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma: presence of myoepithelial cells as a clue to the cutaneous origin. Am J Dermatopathol, 26, 353–8.Google Scholar
Dhaliwalm, C.A., Torgersen, A., Ross, J.J., et al. (2013). Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma: report of two cases of an under-recognized malignant neoplasm and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 35, 117–24.Google Scholar
Zembowicz, A., Garcia, C.F., Tannous, Z.S., et al. (2005). Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma: twelve new cases suggest that it is a precursor of some invasive mucinous carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1330–9.Google Scholar
Flieder, A., Koerner, F.C., Pilch, B.Z., et al (1997). Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma: a cutaneous neoplasm analogous to solid papillary carcinoma of breast. Am J Surg Pathol, 21, 1501–6.Google Scholar
Maluf, H.M., and Koerner, F.C. (1995). Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast. A form of intraductal carcinoma with endocrine differentiation frequently associated with mucinous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 19, 1237–44.Google Scholar
Tanboon, J., Uiprasertkul, M., and Luemsamran, P. (2013). Signet-ring cell/histiocytoid carcinoma of the eyelid: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 35, e15.Google Scholar
Iwaya, M., Uehara, T., Yoshizawa, A., et al. (2012). A case of primary signet-ring cell/histiocytoid carcinoma of the eyelid: immunohistochemical comparison with the normal sweat gland and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 34, e139–45.Google Scholar
Requena, L., Prieto, V.G., Requena, C., et al. (2011). Primary signet-ring cell/histiocytoid carcinoma of the eyelid: a clinicopathologic study of 5 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol, 35, 378–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×