Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:53:45.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 99 - Common pitfalls in pediatric fractures: ones not to miss

from Section 8 - Pediatrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Martin L. Gunn
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

There are numerous pitfalls in pediatric musculoskeletal trauma, in large part due to the progressive ossification of the maturing skeleton. Three fractures unique to pediatric imaging will be discussed here: supracondylar humeral, toddler’s type 1, and the classic metaphyseal lesion.

Supracondylar fractures are the most common pediatric elbow fractures, comprising 50–70% of such injuries [1]. These fractures are shown to greatest advantage on the lateral view, usually showing posterior angulation of the distal fragment. These are covered in detail in Case 96.

Non-displaced or hairline spiral fracture of the tibial diaphysis is referred to as toddler’s type 1 fracture, the most common subtype (Figure 99.1) [2]. Impaction or buckle fracture of the proximal tibial diaphysis, or toddler’s type 2, is a recently described but less common variant [3]. Hairline fractures may be extremely difficult or impossible to identify on standard orthogonal views. Overlying soft tissue swelling may be variably present. If suspicious for this injury, one should perform an additional oblique projection of the lower leg to optimize detection. Toddler’s fractures may manifest either as sharp oblique lucent or sclerotic lines, depending on both acuity and projection [2]. If clinical suspicion remains high and three-view tibia/fibula radiographs are negative, a scintigraphic bone scan may be performed (Figure 99.2). These exams feature a wide field of view, do not require anesthesia, and are less expensive than MRI. Bone scans may also identify tarsal fractures, particularly the cuboid and calcaneus, which may mimic tibial injuries in toddlers [4].

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Emergency Radiology
Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 360 - 365
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alburger, PD, Weidner, PL, Randal, RB.Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:16–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swischuk, LE, John, SD, Tschoepe, EJ.Upper tibial hyperextension fractures in infants: another occult toddler’s fracture. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:6–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, LP, Connolly, SA.Skeletal scintigraphy in the multimodality assessment of young children with acute skeletal symptoms. Clin Nucl Med. 2003;28(9):746–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boal, DK.Metaphyseal fractures. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(7):538–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinman, PK.Problems in the diagnosis of metaphyseal fractures. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(Suppl 3):S388–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, PK, Marks, SC, Blackbourne, B.The metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: a radiologic-histopathologic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(5):895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halsey, MF, Finzel, KC, Carrion, WV, et al. Toddler’s fracture: presumptive diagnosis and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(2):152–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, DM, Doria, AS, Paul, BS.Clinical-radiological features of fractures of premature infants: a review. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:366–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinman, PK, Belanger, PL, Karellas, A, et al. Normal metaphyseal radiologic variants not to be confused with findings of infant abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(4):781–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, PK, Sarwar, ZU, Newton, AW, et al. Metaphyseal fragmentation with physiologic bowing: a finding not to be confused with the classic metaphyseal lesion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1266–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×