Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:14:00.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Treatment of Patent Assertion Entities under Korean Antitrust Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2017

D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ko, Haksoo 2014. Facilitating Negotiation for Licensing Standard-Essential Patents in the Shadow of Injunctive Relief Possibilities, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 22: 209–21.Google Scholar
Ko, Haksoo and Seo, Jeong 2015. Treatment of Patent Assertion Entities under Korean Antitrust Law, Journal of Korean Law 15 (1): 91115.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Bruce H., Ginsburg, Douglas H., Wong-Ervin, Koren W., and Wright, Joshua D. 2015. Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the Korea Fair Trade Commission’s Revised Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights. George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 15–35; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 15–45.Google Scholar
KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) 2009. Press Release, “Qualcomm’s Abuse of Market Dominance.”Google Scholar
Lu, Jiaqing “Jack” 2012. The Economics and Controversies of Non-practicing Entities (NPEs): How NPEs and Defensive Patent Aggregators Will Change the License Market, Les Nouvelles March: 55–68.Google Scholar
OECD 2014. Development in Law Enforcements Related to the Adoption of System Monitoring Anticompetitive Behaviors in the Pharmaceutical Sector. DAF/COMP/WD(2014)58.Google Scholar
Risch, Michael 2012. Patent Troll Myths, Seton Hall Law Review 42: 457–99.Google Scholar
Schwartz, David L. and Kesan, Jay P. 2014. Analyzing the Role of Non-Practicing Entities in the Patent System, Cornell Law Review 99: 425–56.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×