Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:31:09.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scenario Section 1 - Obstetric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Edited by
Kirsty MacLennan  and
Catherine Robinson
Kirsty MacLennan
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Catherine Robinson
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation , pp. 57 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Bhalla, R., Wuntakal, R., Odejinmi, F. and Khan, R. U. (2009). Acute inversion of the uterus. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coad, S. L., Dahlgren, L. S. and Hutcheon, J. A. (2017). Risks and consequences of puerperal uterine inversion in the United States, 2004 through 2013. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(3), 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haeri, S., Rais, S. and Monks, B. (2015). Intrauterine tamponade balloon use in the treatment of uterine inversion. BMJ Case Reports, 2015. pii:brc2014206705. doi: 1136/bcr-2014-206705. PubMed PMID:25564634;PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4289782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ida, A., Ito, K., Kubota, Y., Nosaka, M., Kato, H. and Tsuji, Y. (2015). Successful reduction of acute puerperal uterine inversion with the use of a Bakri postpartum balloon. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2015, 424891. doi: 10.1155/2015/424891. Epub 2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leal, R. F., Luz, R. M., de Almeida, J. P., Duarte, V. and Matos, I. (2014). Total and acute uterine inversion after delivery: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 8, 347. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogueh, O. and Ayida, G. (1997). Acute uterine inversion: a new technique of hydrostatic replacement. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 104, 951–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson-Brown, S. and Howell, C. (2014). Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma (MOET), third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, R. and Sujatha, Y. (2006). Acute postpartum uterine inversion with haemorrhagic shock: laparoscopic reduction: a new method of management? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 1100–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vivanti, A. J., Furet, E. and Nizard, J. (2017). Successful use of a Bakri Tamponade balloon in the treatment of puerperal uterine inversion during caesarean section. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 46(1), 101–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteveen, T., van Stralen, G., Zwart, J. and van Roosmalen, J. (2013). Puerperal uterine inversion in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavica 92(3), 34–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bibliography

Athukorala, C., Middleton, P. and Ca, C. (2009). Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia (Review ). The Cochrane Library, 4, 24. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005543.pub2/pdf.Google Scholar
Boulvain, M., Senat, M. V., Perrotin, F., et al. (2015). Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 385(9987), 2600–2605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulvain, M., Irion, O., Dowswell, T. and Thornton, J. G. (2016). Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD000938. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27208913 (accessed December 28, 2016).Google ScholarPubMed
Cluver, C. A. and Hofmeyr, G. J. (2014). Posterior axilla sling traction for shoulder dystocia: case review and a new method of shoulder rotation with the sling. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(6), 784.e1–784.e7. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, J., Draycott, T. J., Montague, I., Winter, C. and Fox, R. (2012). Green-top Guideline Number 42 Shoulder Dystocia. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Dajani, N. K. and Magann, E. F. (2014). Complications of shoulder dystocia. Seminars in Perinatology, 38(4), 201–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gherman, R. B., Goodwin, T. M., Souter, I., Neumann, K., Ouzounian, J. G. and Paul, R. H. (1997). The McRoberts’ maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176(3), 656–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. (2010). Shoulder dystocia. In Luesley, D. and Baker, P. (Eds.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (pp. 419–423). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Broche, D. E., Riethmuller, D., Vidal, C., et al. (2005). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of a disreputable presentation: the non frank breech. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 34, 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, C., O'Herlihy, C. and Murphy, J. F. (2014). Umbilical cord prolapse – changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 121, 1705–1709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D. J. and MacKenzie, I. Z. (1995). The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 102, 826–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2008). Induction of Labour. NICE Clinical Guideline 70. Manchester: NICE.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2014). Umbilical Cord Prolapse. RCOG Greentop Guideline No. 50. London: RCOG.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Brennand, J. E., Millins, P., Yentis, S. and Hinshaw, H. K. S., on behalf of the Joint Standing Committee of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2010). Good Practice No. 11: Classification of Urgency of Caesarean Section – A Continuum of Risk. London: The Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Chandraharan, E. and Arulkumaran, S. (2007). Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph(CTG) traces. Best Practice Research Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(4), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffey, F., Tsuchiya, K., Timmons, S., Baxendale, B., Adolphs, S. and Atkins, S. (2016). Simulated patients versus manikins in acute-care scenarios. Clinical Teacher, 13, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kither, H. and Monaghan, S. (2016). Intrauterine fetal resuscitation. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 17(7), 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
le Riche, H. and Hall, D. (2005). Non-elective caesarean section: how long do we take to deliver? Journal of Tropical Paediatrics, 51, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, D. N., Yentis, S. M., Kinsella, S. M., et al. (2000). Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification system. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93, 346–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, S. E., Ogrinc, G. and Steadman, W. (2007). Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nageotte, M. P. and Vander Wal, B. (2012). Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics – can it be done? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2011). Caesarean Section. NICE Clinical Guideline 132. Manchester: NICE.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2014). Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Clinical Guideline CG190. Manchester: NICE. Last updated: February 2017.Google Scholar
Ryding, E. L., Wijma, K. and Wijma, B. (2000). Emergency cesarean section: 25 women's experiences. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siassakos, D., Hasafa, Z., Sibanda, T., et al. (2009a). Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siassakos, D., Clark, J., Sibanda, T., et al. (2009b). A simple tool to measure patient perception of operative birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 1755–1761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuffnell, D. J., Wilkinson, K. and Beresford, N. (2001). Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section – are current standards achievable? Observational case series. British Medical Journal, 322, 1330–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, M. H., Kamania, J. and Dennis, A. T. (2018). Immediate birth – an analysis of women and their babies undergoing time critical birth in a tertiary referral obstetric hospital. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 33, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×