Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:14:19.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 23 - Elective Cesarean Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

By
Sarah Armstrong
Edited by
Tauqeer Husain ,
Roshan Fernando  and
Scott Segal
Tauqeer Husain
Affiliation:
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Affiliation:
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
 , pp. 120 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Ventura, SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62(3):1–20.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Clinical guideline 132: Caesarean section, 2015. Available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132 (accessed July 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Provan, D, Stasi, R, Newland, AC, et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010; 115(2):168–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, JN, Woolf, SH, Raskob, GE, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 1996; 88(1):3–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuen, TST, Kua, JSW, Tan, IKS. Spinal haematoma following epidural anaesthesia in a patient with eclampsia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54(4):350–54.Google Scholar
Mendelson, CL. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946; 52:191–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Preoperative Assessment and Patient Preparation: The Role of the Anaesthetist. London: AAGBI; 2011.Google Scholar
Paranjothy, S, Griffiths, JD, Broughton, HK, et al. Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (2):CD004943.Google Scholar
Gyte, GMI, Dou, L, Vazquez, JC. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (11):CD008726.Google Scholar
Hawkins, JL, Koonin, LM, Palmer, SK, Gibbs, CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979–1990. Anesthesiology 1997; 86(2):277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, JG, Khan, MM. Anaesthesia for caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002. Anaesthesia 2003; 58(11):1114–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, ET, Cohen, SE, Macario, A, Desai, JB, Ratner, EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg 1995; 80(4):709–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Broadbent, CR, Maxwell, WB, Ferrie, R, et al. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 2000; 55(11):1122–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sia, AT, Tan, KH, Sng, BL, et al. Use of hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (5):CD005143.Google Scholar
Ithnin, F, Lim, Y, Sia, AT, Ocampo, CE. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102(2):577–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horstman, DJ, Riley, ET, Carvalho, B. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(1):240–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, Y-Y, Zhou, J, Ren, X-H, Lin, X-M. Comparison of spinal block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using combined spinal epidural technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2012; 2012:187132.Google ScholarPubMed
McClure, JH, Cooper, GM, Clutton-Brock, TH, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–8: A review. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107(2):127–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, R, Thorburn, J. Acute pharyngolaryngeal oedema in a pre-eclamptic parturient with systemic lupus erythematosus and a recent renal transplant. Int J Obstet Anesth 1993; 2(1):53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushambi, MC, Kinsella, SM, Popat, M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015; 70(11):1286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munnur, U, de Boisblanc, B, Suresh, MS. Airway problems in pregnancy. Crit Care Med 2005; 33(Suppl 10):S259–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Errando, CL, Sigl, JC, Robles, M, et al. Awareness with recall during general anaesthesia: a prospective observational evaluation of 4001 patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101(2):178–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paech, MJ, Scott, KL, Clavisi, O, Chua, S, McDonnell, N, ANZCA Trials Group. A prospective study of awareness and recall associated with general anaesthesia for cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17(4):298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandit, JJ, Andrade, J, Bogod, DG, et al. Fifth National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(4):549–59.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, G, Hultstrand, C, Jakobsson, J, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1997; 85(6):1288–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shende, D, Cooper, GM, Bowden, MI. The influence of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of subarachnoid block for caesarean section. Anaesthesia 1998; 53(7):706–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belzarena, SD. Clinical effects of intrathecally administered fentanyl in patients undergoing cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1992; 74(5):653–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, JB, Jeppesen, IS, Jørgensen, H, Wetterslev, J, Møiniche, S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 1999; 91(6):1919–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallworth, SP, Fernando, R, Bell, R, Parry, MG, Lim, GH. Comparison of intrathecal and epidural diamorphine for elective caesarean section using a combined spinal-epidural technique. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82(2):228–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skilton, RW, Kinsella, SM, Smith, A, Thomas, TA. Dose response study of subarachnoid diamorphine for analgesia after elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 1999; 8(4):231–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stacey, R, Jones, R, Kar, G, Poon, A. High-dose intrathecal diamorphine for analgesia after caesarean section. Anaesthesia 2001; 56(1):54–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, CO, Naulty, JS, Bader, AM, et al. Perioperative analgesia with subarachnoid fentanyl-bupivacaine for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 1989; 71(4):535–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, B, Riley, E, Cohen, SE, et al. Single-dose, sustained-release epidural morphine in the management of postoperative pain after elective cesarean delivery: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg 2005; 100(4):1150–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdallah, FW, Halpern, SH, Margarido, CB. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109(5):679–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamigboye, AA, Hofmeyr, GJ. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3):CD006954.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, JC, Carr, DB, Chalmers, TC, et al. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5(3):182–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudcova, J, McNicol, ED, Quah, CS, Lau, J, Carr, DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4):CD003348.Google Scholar
Willmann, S, Edginton, AN, Coboeken, K, Ahr, G, Lippert, J. Risk to the breast-fed neonate from codeine treatment to the mother: a quantitative mechanistic modeling study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 86(6):634–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koren, G, Cairns, J, Chitayat, D, Gaedigk, A, Leeder, SJ. Pharmacogenetics of morphine poisoning in a breastfed neonate of a codeine-prescribed mother. Lancet 2006; 368(9536):704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niranjan, N, Bolton, T, Berry, C. Enhanced recovery after surgery-current trends in perioperative care. Update in Anaesthesia 2010; 26(1):18–23.Google Scholar
Wrench, IJ, Allison, A, Galimberti, A, Radley, S, Wilson, MJ. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth 2015; 24(2):124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluri, S, Wrench, IJ. Enhanced recovery from obstetric surgery: a UK survey of practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23(2):157–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×