Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:18:33.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Standards Performance Continuum: A Performance-Based Measure of the Standards for Effective Pedagogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
Education Research Specialist, National Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) at the University of California, Santa Cruz
R. William Doherty
Affiliation:
Center for Research, Diversity, and Excellence, University of California, Santa Cruz
Georgia Epaloose
Affiliation:
Zuni Public School District, Zuni, New Mexico
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
Director, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE); Professor of Education and Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

The Standards Performance Continuum (SPC) is a 5-point rubric that provides a quantitative measure of classroom enactments of the Standards for Effective Pedagogy. The first standard, Joint Productive Activity, involves teachers and students working together on a common product or goal, with opportunities to converse about their work. The second standard, Language and Literacy Development, involves developing competence in the language and literacy of instruction and in the academic disciplines throughout all instructional activities. The third standard, Contextualization, situates new academic content in contexts familiar to students to connect it to prior knowledge or experience from the home, school, or community. The fourth standard, Challenging Activities, uses complex tasks requiring the application or use of content knowledge to achieve an academic goal. The fifth standard, Instructional Conversation, is a planned, goal-directed conversation between a teacher and a small group of students. Tharp, Estrada, Dalton, and Yamauchi (2000) proposed these standards as the most effective strategies for teaching culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse students who are less successful in school, but they also stress their importance for all learners.

There is growing evidence of the effectiveness of classroom implementations of these standards. For example, Padrón and Waxman (1999) found that in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms with largely Latino English language learners (ELLs) where the standards were used to a moderate degree, students perceived themselves as more capable readers, perceived more cohesion in the classroom, and spent slightly to moderately more time on task.

Type
Chapter
Information
Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity
, pp. 48 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, D. P. (1979). Social interaction and consciousness. New York: Wiley
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boneau, C. A. (1961). A note on measurement scales and statistical tests. American Psychologist, 16, 260–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluew (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Collier, V. P. (1995). Promoting academic success for ESL students: Understanding second language acquisition for school. Elizabeth, NJ: New Jersey Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages-Bilingual Educators
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 103–120). Orlando, FL: Academic PressCrossRef
Davidson, N. (1997). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: A selective review of the research. In E. Dubinski, D. Matthews, & B. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics. (pp. 59–68). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America
Doherty, R. W., Hilberg, R. S., Pinal, A. & Tharp, R. G. (2003). Five standards and student achievement. NABE Journal of Research and Practice. 1(1), 1–24
Doherty, R. W., & Pinal, A. (2002, November). Joint productive activity, cognitive reading strategies, and achievement. Paper presented at the annual Conference of the National Council of Teachers of English, Atlanta
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluew (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill
Frick, T., & Semmel, M. I. (1978). Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observational measures. American Educational Research 48(1), 157–184Google Scholar
Gaito, J. (1960). Scale classification and statistics. Psychological Review 67, 277–278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin, 87(3), 564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, C. (1991). Instructional Conversations and their classroom applications (Research Report No. 2). Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning
Harwell, M. R., & Gatti, G. G. (2001). Rescaling ordinal data to interval data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 105–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1997). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping, Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. In E. Dubinski, D. Matthews, & B. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics (pp. 159–171). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America
Hilberg, R. S., Tharp, R. G., & DeGeest, L. (2000). The efficacy of CREDE's standards-based instruction in American Indian mathematics classes. Equity and Excellence in Education, 33(2), 32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, G. J., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University
Menke, D. J., & Pressley, M. (1994). Elaborative interrogation: Using “why” questions to enhance the learning from text. Journal of Reading, 37(8), 642–645Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1982). Talking to children in Western Samoa. Language in Society, 11, 77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1999). Classroom observations of the Five Standards of Effective Teaching in urban classrooms with English language learners. Teaching and Change, 7(1), 79–100Google Scholar
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, R. (1999, April). Hart and Risley's research on everyday childhood experiences: Implications for English-language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada
Saunders, W. M., & Goldenberg, C. (1999). The effects of instructional conversations and literature logs on the story comprehension and thematic understanding of English proficient and limited English proficient students. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence, University of California
Schraw, G., & Sperling-Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S. S., & Yamauchi, L. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). The Instructional Conversation: Teaching and learning in social activity (Research Report No. 2). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research in Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning
Tharp, R. G., & Yamauchi, L. A. (1994). Effective instructional conversations in Native American classrooms (Research Report No. 10). Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1984). Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedder, P. (1988). Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children. Westerhaven Groningen, the Netherlands: Rijkuniversiteit Groningen
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Educational resilience in inner cities. In M. C. Wang & E. W. Gorden (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects (pp. 45–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, C. G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press
Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 297–314). New York: Macmillan
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. B. (1997). Understanding statistics: An introduction for the social sciences. London: Sage
Yamauchi, L. A., & Tharp, R. G. (1995). Culturally compatible conversations in Native American classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 7, 349–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×