National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2012 State and National Summary Tables. CDC. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2009_ed _web_tables.pdf. [Accessed 18 February 2016]Google Scholar

Lindsell, CJ, Anantharaman, V, Diercks, D, et al. The Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS): a multicenter registry of patients with suspicion of acute coronary syndromes reported using the standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department chest pain studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(6):666–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pope, JH, Aufderheide, TP,Ruthazer, R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1163–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christensen, J, Innes, G, McKnight, D, et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort. CMAJ. 2004;170(12):1803–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, TW, McCarthy, ML, Kelen, GD, et al. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, K, Severance, H. Identification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19:35–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodacre, S, Nicholl, J, Dixon, S, et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, CD, Hoekstra, JW, Lefebvre, C, et al. Provider-directed imaging stress testing reduces health care expenditures in lower-risk chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibbons, RJ, Balady, GJ, Bricker, JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsterdam, EA, Wenger, NK, Brindis, RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2354–94.Google Scholar

Morise, AP. Are the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for exercise testing for suspected coronary artery disease correct? Chest. 2000;118:535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, DB, Shaw, L, Harrell, FE Jr, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:849–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amsterdam, EA, Kirk, JD, Bluemke, DA, et al. American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(17):1756–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simari, RD, Miller, TD, Zinsmeister, AR, et al. Capabilities of supine exercise electrocardiography versus exercise radionuclide angiography in predicting coronary events. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67:573–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klocke, FJ, Baird, MG, Bateman, TM, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging); 2003.Google Scholar

Scott-Moncrieff, A, Yang, J, Levine, D, et al. Real-world estimated effective radiation doses from commonly used cardiac testing and procedural modalities. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27(5):613–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duvall, WL, Wijetunga, MN, Klein, TM, et al. Stress-only Tc-99m Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in an Emergency Department Chest Pain Unit. J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, TM, Heller, GV, McGhie, AI, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13(1):24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Navare, SM, Mather, JF, Shaw, LJ, et al. Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(5):551–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chow, BJ, Wong, JW, Yoshinaga, K, et al. Prognostic significance of dipyridamole-induced ST depression in patients with normal 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(7):1095–1101.Google ScholarPubMed

Pellikka, PA, Nagueh, SF, Elhendy, AA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(9):1021–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bedetti, G, Pasanisi, EM, Tintori, G, et al. Stress echo in chest pain unit: the SPEED trial. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 20;102(3):461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaibazzi, N, Reverberi, C, Badano, L. Usefulness of contrast stress-echocardiography or exercise-electrocardiography to predict long-term acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain without electrocardiographic abnormalities or 12-hour troponin elevation. Am J Cardiol.2011;107(2):161–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plein, S, Greenwood, JP, et al.Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2173–2181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lerakis, S, McLean, DS,Anadiotis, AV,et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, CD, Hwang, W, Case, D, et al. Stress CMR imaging observation unit in the emergency department reduces 1-year medical care costs in patients with acute chest pain: a randomized study for comparison with inpatient care. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(8):862–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blankstein, R, Shturman, LD, Rogers, IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:1072–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chow, BJ, Abraham, A, Wells, GA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:16–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hu, XH, Zheng, WL, Wang, D, et al. Accuracy of high-pitch prospectively ECG-triggering CT coronary angiography for assessment of stenosis in 103 patients: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Clin Radiol. 2012; 67(11):1083–1088; Available online 2012 May 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giesler, T, Baum, U, Ropers, D, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection.AJR. 2002;179:911–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Litt, HI, Gatsonis, C, Synder, B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:1393–1403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

BaireyMerz, CN, Shaw, LJ, Reis, SE, et al. WISE Investigators. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–29.Google Scholar

Mieres, JH, Shaw, LJ, Hendel, RC et al. Writing Group on Perfusion Imaging in Women. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease – the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction].J Nucl Cardiol. 2003;10(1):95–101.nCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwok, Y, Kim, C, Grady, D, et al. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:660–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gulati, M, Pandey, DK, Arnsdorf, MF, et al. Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation. 2003;108:1554–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roger, VL, Jacobsen, SJ, Pellikka, PA, et al. Prognostic value of treadmill exercise testing: a population-based study in Olmsted county, Minnesota. Circulation. 1998;98:2836–2841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lauer, MS, Francis, GS, Okin, PM, et al. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality. JAMA. 1999;281:524–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marwick, TH, Anderson, T, Williams, MJ, et al. Exercise echocardiography is an accurate and costefficienttechnique for detection of coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mieres, JH, Makaryus, AN, Cacciabaudo, JM, et al. Value of electrocardiographically gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a cohort of symptomatic postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1096–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsang, JC, Min, JK, Lin, FY, et al. Sex comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: Results from the multicenter ACCURACY trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. Published online 2012 June 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coelho-Filho, OR, Seabra, LF, Mongeon, FP, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient’s sex. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(8):850–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mieres, JH, Heller, GV, Hendel, RC, et al. Signs and symptoms of suspected myocardial ischemia in women: results from the What is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women? trial. J Womens Health. 2011;20(9):1261–1268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Penumetsa, SC, Mallidi, J, Friderici, JL, et al. Outcomes of patients admitted for observation of chest pain. Arch Intern Med. Published online 7 May 2012. [Accessed June 12, 2012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwok, JM, Miller, TD, Christian, TF, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG. JAMA. 1999;282(110):1047–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheitlin, MD, Armstrong, WF, Aurigemma, GP, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography); 2003. www.accorg/clinical/guidelines/echo/index.pdf. [Accessed June 12, 2012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Picano, E, Molinaro, S, Pasanisi, E. The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Husmann, L, Wiegand, M, Valenta, I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24(5):511–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Einstein, AJ, Moser, KW, Thompson, RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116(11):1290–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bertaso, AG, Richardson, JD, Wong, DT, et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress perfusion cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement in an intermediate cardiovascular risk population. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 2. [Epub ahead of print] [Accessed June 14, 2012].Google Scholar

Hulten, EA, Carbonaro, S, Petrillo, SP, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(10):1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Min, JK, Dunning, A, Lin, FY, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings. Results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(8):849–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genders, TS, Petersen, SE, Pugliese, F, et al. The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:474–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed