References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Objectivity and the Rule of Law , pp. 237 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Bix, Brian. 2005. “Cautions and Caveats for the Application of Wittgenstein to Legal Theory.” In , , and (eds.), Law and Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 217–28.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules, and Leiter, Brian. 1995. “Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority.” In (ed.), Law and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 203–78.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework.” Public Law467–87.Google Scholar
. 1965. “Philosophy, Morality and Law – Observations Prompted by Professor Fuller's Novel Claim.” 113 University of Pennsylvania Law Review668–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. “No Right Answer?” In and (eds.), Law, Morality, and Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 58–84.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1991. “On Gaps in the Law.” In and (eds.), Controversies about Law's Ontology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
. 1996. “Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Believe It.” 25 Philosophy and Public Affairs87–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Dworkin's Fallacy, or What the Philosophy of Language Can't Teach Us about the Law.” 89 Virginia Law Review1897–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. “Principles.” In Essays in Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 49–65.Google Scholar
1983. “Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law.” In Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. 1998. “Rights without Trimmings.” In , , and , A Debate over Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 7–111.Google Scholar
. 1999b. In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. 2001. “Getting Rights Right.” In (ed.), Rights, Wrongs, and Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 28–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. “The Big Bad Wolf: Legal Positivism and Its Detractors.” 49 American Journal of Jurisprudence1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Moral Rights and the Limits of the Ought-Implies-Can Principle: Why Impeccable Precautions Are No Excuse.” 48 Inquiry307–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Wittgenstein, Realism, and CLS: Undermining Rule Skepticism.” 9 Law and Philosophy177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2001. “Introduction.” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 1–11.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975 [1689]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by .Google Scholar
. 2005. “The Possibility of Impartiality.” 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1961 [1788]. “Federalist Paper No. 10.” In , , and , The Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library), 77–84. Edited by .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1985. “Values and Secondary Qualities.” In (ed.), Objectivity and Morality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 110–29.Google Scholar
. 2001. Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Rationality, Reasonableness, and Morality.” 10 Logos: Philosophic Issues in Christian Perspective73–88.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Wittgenstein on Understanding and Interpretation.” 29 Philosophical Investigations129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2001. “Embracing Objectivity in Ethics.” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 234–86.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald. 2001. “Objectivity Fit for Law.” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 99–143.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1996. “Intention in Interpretation.” In (ed.), The Autonomy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 249–86.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2001. “Notes on Value and Objectivity.” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 193–233.Google Scholar
. 2005. Punishment, Compensation, and Law: A Theory of Enforceability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. “Straightforwardly False: The Collapse of Kramer's Positivism.” 63 Cambridge Law Journal98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, David. 2001. “Pathetic Ethics.” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 287–329.Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, Nicos. 2005. “Objectivity.” In and (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Sigrún. 2001. “Objective Values: Does Metaethics Rest on a Mistake?” In (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 144–93.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1992. “The Irrelevance of Moral Objectivity.” In (ed.), Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 158–87.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. “Ethics and the Fabric of the World.” In (ed.), Morality and Objectivity (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 203–14.Google Scholar
. 2001. “From Freedom to Liberty: The Construction of a Political Value.” 30 Philosophy and Public Affairs3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar