Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:53:08.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - An NGS approach to archaeobotanical museum specimens as genetic resources in systematics research

from Part III - Next Generation Challenges and Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Oliver Smith
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Sarah A. Palmer
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Rafal Gutaker
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Robin G. Allaby
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Peter D. Olson
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Joseph Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
James A. Cotton
Affiliation:
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The study of evolution most typically involves inferring past events on the basis of evidence from extant organisms. There are a number of challenges associated with this, such as uncertainties about the precise time of origin of character states, the rate of molecular evolution and confounding effects of population processes. Accessing evolutionary information directly from the fossil and sub-fossil record – in fact, any past period from which a measurable change has occurred – is therefore extremely useful in addressing these uncertainties. Museum, archaeology department and herbarium collections are the ‘banks’ of biomolecular information from which our scientific understanding of such processes can be extrapolated. Precautions taken to preserve biological material such as controlled environments, tissue-specific storage materials and the conservation of depositional environments are often conducive to long-term survival of genetic material. Consequently, these biomolecular banks hold material with a wide geographical and temporal range, often outside the typical age range of material used in phylogenetic analyses, as well as genetic diversity that is rare or lost in the living world. The advent of ancient biomolecular analyses in the 1990s was a technological milestone in this respect, in which oligogenic analyses based on one or a few genes enabled the reconstruction of extinct stages of phylogenies, such as the renowned placement of the thylacine among dasyuroid marsupials using evidence from cytochrome b DNA sequences (Krajewski et al. 1992; 1997).

NGS allows deep sequencing of single PCR targets, so generating systematic data for thousands or millions of organisms (Sogin et al. 2006). It also facilitates the study of multiple PCR targets of exons, introns, non-coding regions, mRNA transcripts or even complete genomic organization between organisms allowing a much greater depth of understanding in genetic phylogenies than could be gained from a handful of genes or simple morphological analysis (Horner et al. 2010). For the most part, NGS technology has been applied to extant species in systematics research. The applicability of NGS to sub-fossil material was first demonstrated by Poinar et al. (2006) in permafrost preserved mammoth bones. Subsequently, the application of NGS to generate data directly from historical, archaeological or paleontological sources holds the potential to view genomic evolution in real time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allaby, R. G. (2010). Integrating the processes in the evolutionary system of domestication. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 935–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allaby, R. G., Fuller, D. Q. and Brown, T. A. (2008). The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13982–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asplund, L., Hagenblad, J. and Leino, M. W. (2010). Re-evaluating the history of the wheat domestication gene NAM-B1 using historical plant material. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 2303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, K. I., Schuenemann, V. J., Golding, B., et al. (2011). A draft genome of Yersina pestis from victims of the Black Death. Nature, 478, 506–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandstätter, A., Sanger, T., Lutz-Bonengel, S., et al. (2005). Phantom mutation hotspots in human mitochondrial DNA. Electrophoresis, 18, 3414–29.Google Scholar
Brotherton, P., Endicott, P., Sanchez, J. J., et al. (2007). Novel high-resolution characterization of ancient DNA reveals C > U-type base modification events as the sole cause of post mortem miscoding lesions. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, 5717–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, A. W., Good, J. M., Green, R. E., et al. (2009). Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neandertal mtDNA genomes. Science, 325, 318–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burbano, H. A., Hodges, E., Green, R. E., et al. (2010). Targeted investigation of the Neanderthal genome by array-based sequence capture. Science, 328, 723–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, E. (2010). Taking molecular snaps of ancient crops. Nature; Nature Journal (news); published online 13 September 2010. doi,10.1038/news.2010.464.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. and Poinar, H. N. (2000). Ancient DNA, do it right or not at all. Proceedings of the 5th International Ancient DNA Conference, Manchester, UK.CrossRef
Cronyn, J. M. and Robinson, W. S. (1990). The Elements of Archaeological Conservation. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debruyne, R., Schwarz, C. and Poinar, H. (2008). Comment on “Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing of Mitochondria from Ancient Hair Shafts”. Science, 322, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doebly, J. F., Gaut, B. S. and Smith, B. D. (2006). The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell, 127, 1309–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. J,. Magee, D. A., Park, S. D. E., et al. (2010). A complete mitochondrial genome sequence from a Mesolithic wild aurochos (Bos primigenius). PLoS ONE 5, e9255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbaum, R., Melamed-Bessudo, C., Tuross, N., Levy, A. A. and Weiner, S. (2009). New methods to isolate organic materials from silicified phytoliths reveal fragmented glycoproteins but no DNA. Quaternary International, 193, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, D. L., Smith, B. D., Clarke, A. C., Sandweiss, D. H. and Tuross, N. (2005). An Asian origin for a 10,000-year-old domesticated plant in the Americas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 18315–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freitas, F. O., Bendel, G., Allaby, R. G. and Brown, T. A. (2003). DNA from primitive maize landraces and archaeological remains: implications for the domestication of maize and its expansion into South America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 901–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D. Q. and Allaby, R. G. (2009). Seed dispersal and crop domestication: shattering, germination and seasonality in evolution under cultivation. Annual Plant Reviews, 38, 238–95.Google Scholar
Fuller, D. Q., Allaby, R. G. and Stevens, C. (2010). Domestication as innovation: the entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops. World Archaeology, 42, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D. Q., Wilcox, G. and Allaby, R. G. (2012). Early agricultural pathways: moving outside the ‘core area’ hypothesis in Southwest Asia. Journal of Experimental Biology, 63, 617–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Geigl., E. M. (2002). On the circumstances surrounding the preservation and analysis of very old DNA. Archaeometry, 44, 337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. T. P., Bandelt, H., Hofreiter, M. and Barnes, I. (2005a). Assessing ancient DNA studies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 541–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M. T. P., Barnes, I., Collins, M. J., et al. (2005c). Long-term survival of ancient DNA in Egypt: response to Zink and Nerlich (2003)American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128, 110–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. T. P., Drautz, D. I., Lesk, A. M., et al. (2008). Intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of Siberian woolly mammoths using complete mitochondrial genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 8327–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M. T. P., Shapiro, B., Drummond, A. and Cooper, A. (2005b). Post-mortem DNA damage hotspots in Bison (Bison bison) provide evidence for both damage and mutational hotspots in human mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1053–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, B. A., Leon, B., Buffen, A. M. and Thompson, L. G. (2010). Evidence of a high-Andean, mid-Holocene plant community: an ancient DNA analysis of glacially preserved remains. American Journal of Botany, 97, 1579–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., et al. (2010). A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science, 328, 710–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbig, C. and Maier, U. (2011). Flax for oil or fibre? Morphometric analysis of flax seeds and new aspects of flax cultivation in Late Neolithic wetland settlements in southwest Germany. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 20, 527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofreiter, M., Serre, D., Poinar, H.N., Kuch, M. and Paabo, S. (2001). Ancient DNA. Nature Reviews, 2, 353–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, S. H., Pavesi, G., Castrignanò, T., et al. (2010). Bioinformatics approaches for genomics and post genomics applications for next-generation sequencing. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 11, 181–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenicke-Després, V., Buckler, E., Smith, B., et al. (2003). Early allelic selection in maize as revealed by ancient DNA. Science, 302, 1206–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenicke-Després, V. and Smith, B. D. (2006). Ancient DNA and the integration of archaeological and genetic approaches to the study of maize domestication. In Histories of Maize, Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Prehistory, Biogeography, Domestication and Evolution of Maize (Zea Mays L.), ed. Staller, J. E., Tykot, R. H., and Benz, B. F., San Diego, Elsevier; pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
Jhala, A., Weslake, R. J. and Hall, L. M. (2009). Genetically engineered flax: potential benefits, risks, regulations, and mitigation of transgene movement. Crop Science, 49, 1943–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, M. and Hofreiter, M. (2010). Next generation sequencing of ancient DNA: requirements, strategies and perspectives. Genes, 1, 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, C., Buckley, L. and Westerman, M. (1997). DNA phylogeny of the marsupial wolf resolved. Proeedings of the Royal Society of London B-Biological Sciences, 264, 911–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Krajewski, C., Driskell, A. C., Baverstock, P. R. and Braun, M. J. (1992). Phylogenetic relationships of the thylacine (Mammalia, Thylacinidae) among Dasyuroid marsupials: evidence from cytochrome B DNA sequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B-Biological Sciences, 250, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, J. (2010). From genes to genomes: what is new in ancient DNA?Mitteilungen der Gessellschaft für Urgeshichte, 19, 11–33.Google Scholar
Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Kircher, M., et al. (2010b). A complete mtDNA genome of an early modern human from Kostenki, Russia. Current Biology, 20, 231–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, J., Dear, P. H., Pollack, J. L., et al. (2006). Multiplex amplification of the mammoth mitochondrial genome and the evolution of Elephantidae. Nature, 439, 724–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, J., Fu, Q., Good, J. M., et al. (2010a). The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia. Nature Letters, 464, 894–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehtonen, S., Tuomisto, H., Rouhan, G. and Christenhusz, M. J. M. (2010). Phylogenetics and classification of the pantropical fern family Lindsaeaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 163, 305–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leino, M. W., Hagenblad, J., Edqvist, E. M. and Strese, K. (2009). DNA preservation and utility of a historic seed collection. Seed Science Research, 19, 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindqvist, C., Schuster, S. C., Sun, Y., et al. (2010). Complete mitochondrial genome of a Pleisocene jawbone unveils the origin of polar bear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 5053–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, D. L., Bower, M. A. and Jones, M. K. (2010). Herbarium specimens expand the geographical and temporal range of germplasm data in phylogeographic studies. Taxon, 59, 1321–3.Google Scholar
Mason, V. C., Li, G., Helgen, K. M. and Murphy, W. J. (2011). Efficient cross-species capture hybridization and next-generation sequencing of mitochondrial genomes from noninvasively sampled museum specimens. Genome Research, 21, 1695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, C. D., Huynen, L., Subramanian, S., Mohandesan, E. and Lambert, D. (2008). New developments in ancient genomics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 386–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, W., Drautz, D. I., Janecka, J. E. et al. (2009). The mitochondrial genome sequence of the Tasmanian tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Genome Research 19, 213–20.Google Scholar
Miller, W., Drautz, D. I., Ratan, A., et al. (2008). Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. Nature, 456, 387–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, D., Willerslev, E. and Hansen, A. (2005). Damage and repair of ancient DNA. Mutation Research, 571, 265–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlando, L., Ginolhac, A., Raghavan, M., et al. (2011). True single-molecule DNA sequencing of a pleistocene horse bone. Genome Research, 21, 1705–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. A., Clapham, A. J., Rose, P., et al. (2012). Archaeogenomic evidence for recent punctuating genome evolution in cotton. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 2031–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, S. A., Moore, J. D., Clapham, A. J., Rose, P. and Allaby, R. G. (2009). Archaeogenetic evidence of ancient Nubian Barley evolution from six to two-row indicates local adaptation. PLoS One, 4, e6301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. A., Smith, O. and Allaby, R. G. (2012a). The blossoming of plant archaeogenetics. Annals of Anatomy, 194, 146–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R. and Sorenson, M. D. (2002). Museum collections as sources of genetic DNA. Bonner Zoologische Beitrage, 51, 97–104.Google Scholar
Peleg, Z., Fahima, T., Korol, A.B., Abbo, S. and Saranga, Y. (2011). Genetic analysis of wheat domestication and evolution under domestication. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 5051–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, J., Ronin, Y. R., Fahima, T., et al. (2003). Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 2489–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poinar, H. N., Schwarz, C., Shapiro, B., et al. (2006). Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science, 211, 392–4.Google Scholar
Prüfer, K., Stenzel, U., Hofreiter, M., et al. (2010). Computational challenges in the analysis of ancient DNA. Genome Biology, 11, R47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, O., Gigli, E., Bover, P., et al. (2009). Paleogenomics in a temperate environment: shotgun sequencing from an extinct Mediterranean caprine. PLoS One, 4, e5670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, M., Guo, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2011). An Aboriginal Australian genome reveals separate human dispersals into Asia. Science, 224, 94–8.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M., Li, Y., Lindgreen, S., et al. (2010). Ancient human genome sequence of an extinct Palaeo-Eskimo. Nature, 463, 757–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollo, F. (1985). Characterisation by molecular hybridization of RNA fragments isolated from ancient (1400 B.C.) seeds. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 71, 330–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Sallon, S., Solowey, E., Cohen, Y., et al. (2008). Germination, genetics and growth of an ancient date seed. Science, 320, 1464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Särkinen, T., Staats, M., Richardson, J. E., Cowan, R. S. and Bakker, F. T. (2012). How to open the treasure chest? Optimising DNA extraction from herbarium specimens. PLoS One, 7, e43808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savolainen, V., Cuenoud, P., Spichiger, R., et al. (1995). The use of herbarium specimens in DNA phylogenetics: evaluation and improvement. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 197, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, P., Schaefer, H. and Renner, S. S. (2010). Darwin's Galapagos gourd: providing new insights 175 years after his visit. Journal of Biogeograpy, 37, 975–8.Google Scholar
Smith, O., Clapham, A., Rose, P., Liu, Y., Wang, J. and Allaby, R. G. (2014a). A complete ancient RNA genome: identification, reconstruction and evolutionary history of archaeological Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus. Scientific Reports, 4, 4003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, O., Clapham, A., Rose, P., Liu, Y., Wang, J. and Allaby, R. G. (2014b). Genomic methylation patterns in archaeological barley show de-methylation as a time-dependent diagenetic process. Scientific Reports, 4, 5559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smýkal, P., Bačová-Kerteszová, N., Kalendar, R., et al. (2011). Genetic diversity of cultivated flax (Linum isitatissimum L.) germplasm assessed by retrotransposon-based markers. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 1385–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sogin, M. L., Morrison, H. G., Huber, J. A., et al. (2006). Microbial diversity in the deep sea and underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 12115–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sønstebø, J. H., Gielly, L., Brysting, A. K., et al. (2010). Using next-generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 1009–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiller, M., Knapp, M., Stenzel, U., Hofreiter, M. and Meyer, M. (2009). Direct multiplex sequencing (DMPS): a novel method for targeted high-throughput sequencing of ancient and highly degraded DNA. Genome Research, 19, 1843–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuckenbrock, E. H. and McDonald, B. A. (2008). The origins of plant pathogens in agro-ecosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 46, 75–100.Google Scholar
Travis, J. (2010). Archaeologists see big promise in going molecular. Science, 330, 28–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vromans, J. (2006). Molecular genetic studies in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Wang, S. and Kool, E. T. (2005). Origins of the large differences in stability of DNA and RNA helixes, C-5 methy and 2′-hydroxyl effects. Biochemistry, 34, 4125–32.Google Scholar
Willerslev, E., Gilbert, M. T.P., Binladen, J., et al. (2009). Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshida, K., Schuenemann, V. J., Cano, L. M., et al. (2013). The rise and fall of the Pytopthra infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. eLife 2, e00731.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×