Book contents
- New Testament Theology and the Greek Language
- New Testament Theology and the Greek Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part I The Origins of New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part II The Present State of New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part III The Possible Futures of New Testament Theology
- Bibliography
- Modern Author Index
- Ancient Source Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
Book contents
- New Testament Theology and the Greek Language
- New Testament Theology and the Greek Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part I The Origins of New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part II The Present State of New Testament Theology and Greek Linguistics
- Part III The Possible Futures of New Testament Theology
- Bibliography
- Modern Author Index
- Ancient Source Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Testament Theology and the Greek LanguageA Linguistic Reconceptualization, pp. 288 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Adam, A. K. M. Making Sense of New Testament Theology: “Modern” Problems and Prospects (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Adam, A. K. M., Fowl, Stephen E., Vanhoozer, Kevin J., and Watson, Francis. Reading Scripture with the Church: Toward a Hermeneutic for Theological Interpretation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2006).Google Scholar
Adams, Edward. Constructing the World: A Study in Paul’s Cosmological Language (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Google Scholar
Adams, Sean A. “James Barr and Theological Lexicography,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:319–36.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard A., Farmer, Ann K., and Harnish, Robert M.. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication, 5th ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Alhindi, Yousif. “Ferdinand de Saussure,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 241–48.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics, 2nd ed. (London: Equinox, 2010).Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James, ICC (New York: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar
Andreski, Stanislav, ed. Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function and Evolution (London: Michael Joseph, 1971).Google Scholar
Andrews, Edna. Markedness Theory: The Union of Asymmetry and Semiosis in Language (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., eds. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina (Oxford: Clarendon, 1962).Google Scholar
Baird, William. History of New Testament Research, 3 vols. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1992–2013).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. Caryl Emerson (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Rabelais and His World, trans. Helene Iswolsky (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. Vern W. McGee, eds. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Jennifer A. “Franz Boas,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 41–42.Google Scholar
Balla, Peter. Challenges to New Testament Theology, WUNT 2/95 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997; repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1997).Google Scholar
Banks, David. A Systemic Functional Grammar of English: A Simple Introduction (London: Routledge, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bann, S., and Bowlt, J. E., eds. Russian Formalism: A Collection of Articles and Texts in Translation (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, Daniel. Group Beliefs: A Conception for Analyzing Group Structure, Processes, and Behavior (New York: Springer, 1990).Google Scholar
Barker, Joel. “Brevard S. Childs and the Canonical Approach,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:359–79.Google Scholar
Barr, James. “Biblical Theology,” in The Encyclopedia of Christianity, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans; Leiden: Brill, 1999–2008), 1:246–51, English translation of “Biblische Theologie,” in Evangelisches Kirchenlexikon, eds. Fahlbusch, Erwin et al., 5 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986–1997), 1: cols. 488–94.Google Scholar
Barr, James. “Biblical Theology,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, supplementary vol., ed. Crim, Keith (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1962), 104–109.Google Scholar
Barr, James. Biblical Words for Time, rev. ed., SBT 33 (London: SCM Press, 1969 [1962]).Google Scholar
Barr, James. Old and New in Interpretation: A Study of the Two Testaments (London: SCM Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Barr, James. “Revelation in History,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, supplementary vol., ed. Crim, Keith (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1962), 746–49.Google Scholar
Barr, James. “Revelation Through History in the Old Testament and in Modern Theology,” PSB 56 (1963) 4–14 (also published in Int 17 [1963] 193–205).Google Scholar
Barr, James. The Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Epistle to the Romans, trans. Edwin C. Hoskyns (London: Oxford University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author,” in Image–Music–Text, trans. S. Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 42–48.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Semiotic Challenge, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1988).Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Craig G. “Biblical Theology,” in Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible, ed. Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005), 84–90.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Craig G. Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics: A Comprehensive Framework for Hearing God in Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015).Google Scholar
Bateman, John A. “The Place of Systemic Functional Linguistics as a Linguistic Theory in the Twenty-First Century,” in The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, eds. Bartlett, Tom and O’Grady, Gerard (London: Routledge, 2017), 11–26.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew. “The External-Relational Shift in Faith (Pistis) in New Testament Research: Romans 1 as Gospel-Allegiance Test Case,” CBR 18 (2020) 176–202.Google Scholar
Battistella, Edwin L. Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008).Google Scholar
Bauer, Georg Lorenz. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 4 vols. (Leipzig: Weygand, 1800–1802).Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed., rev. and ed. Danker, Frederick William (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Baumgarten-Crusius, Ludwig F. O. Grundzüge der Biblischen Theologie (Jena: Friedrich Frommann, 1828).Google Scholar
Baur, Ferdinand Christian. Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ: His Life and Works, His Epistles and Teachings, 2 vols. (London: Williams & Norgate, 1873–1875; repr. in single vol., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003).Google Scholar
Baur, Ferdinand Christian. Vorlesungen über Neutestamentliche Theologie, ed. Baur, F. F. (Leipzig: Fues, 1864).Google Scholar
Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2011).Google Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert de. Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works (London: Longman, 1991).Google Scholar
Bebbington, D. W. Patterns in History: A Christian View (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1979).Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. “Language Style as Audience Design,” Language in Society 13 (1983) 145–202.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1966–1974), English translation Problems in General Linguistics, vol. 1, trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek (Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Berding, Kenneth, and Lunde, Jonathan, eds. Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2007).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation (London: Collins, 1980).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret. Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, 2 vols. (London: Batsford, 1975–1977).Google Scholar
Beyschlag, Willibald. New Testament Theology, 2 vols., trans. Neil Buchanan (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1895).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. “Representativeness in Corpus Design,” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993) 243–57.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan, Conrad. Register, Genre, and Style, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Billings, J. Todd. The Word of God for the People of God: An Entryway to the Theological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010).Google Scholar
Black, David Alan. It’s Still Greek to Me: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to Intermediate Greek (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998).Google Scholar
Black, David Alan. Linguistics for Students of New Testament Greek: A Survey of Basic Concepts and Applications (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1988; 2nd ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Black, Stephanie L. Sentence Conjunctions in the Gospel of Matthew: καί, δέ, τότε, γάρ, οὖν and Asyndeton in Narrative Discourse, JSNTSup 216, SNTG 9 (London: Sheffield Academic, 2002).Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich. Grammar of New Testament Greek, trans. Henry St. John Thackeray (London: Macmillan, 1898).Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich. Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Griechisch (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1896).Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich, and Debrunner, Albert. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. Robert W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Blomberg, Craig L. A New Testament Theology (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (London: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. “Introduction,” in Handbook of American Indian Languages, 3 vols. (Washington, DC: American Print Office, 1911–1938), 1:1–83.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. Race, Language, and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell L., and Charlesworth, James H., eds. The Parables of Enoch: A Paradigm Shift (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013).Google Scholar
Boman, Thorleif. Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek, trans. Jules L. Moreau (London: SCM Press, 1960 [1954]).Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. A Comparative Grammar of the Sanscrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic, German, and Sclavonic Languages, trans. Lieutenant Eastwick, ed. Wilson, H. H., 3 parts in 2 vols. (London: James Madden, 1845–1850; repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1985).Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache, ed. Windischmann, R. J. (Frankfurt am Main: Andreäischen, 1816; repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bormann, Lukas. “Das Theologische Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament im 21. Jahrhundert: Überlegungen zu seiner Geschichte und heutigen Benutzung,” in Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, 9 vols., eds. Kittel, Gerhard and Friedrich, Gerhard (repr., Darmstadt: Academic, 2019), 1:v–xxii.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. “The Stilling of the Storm in Matthew” (1948), inTradition and Interpretation in Matthew, by Bornkamm, Günther, Barth, Gerhard, and Held, Heinz Joachim, trans. Scott, Percy (London: SCM Press, 1963), 52–57.Google Scholar
Borsch, Frederick Houk. The Christian and Gnostic Son of Man, SBT Second Series 14 (London: SCM Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Borsch, Frederick Houk. The Son of Man in Myth and History, NTL (London: SCM Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf P. Challenging Chomsky: The Generative Garden Game (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar
Bouquet, Simon, and Engler, Rudolf. “Preface,” in Writings in General Linguistics, by de Saussure, Ferdinand (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), xi–xvi.Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. Kyrios Christos: Geschichte des Christusglaubens von den anfängen des Christentums bis Irenaeus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913), English translation Kyrios Christos: A History of the Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus, trans. John E. Steely (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1970).Google Scholar
Brant, Jo-Ann A. Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in John’s Gospel (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004).Google Scholar
Branton, James. “Our Present Situation in Biblical Theology,” Religion in Life 26 (1956–1957) 5–18.Google Scholar
Breytenbach, Cilliers. Versöhnung: Eine Studie zur paulinischen Soteriologie, WMANT 60 (Neukirchen: Neukirchener, 1989).Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1947).Google Scholar
Brooks, James A., and Winbery, Carlton L.. Syntax of New Testament Greek (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1979; repub., 1988).Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. Discourse Analysis, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. Kurze Vergleichende Grammatik der Indogermanische Sprachen, 3 vols. (Strassburg: Trübner, 1903).Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl, and Delbrück, Berthold. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen, 5 vols. (Strassburg: Trübner, 1886–1900).Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. Schriften zur Sprachtheorie, ed. Eschbach, Achim (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012).Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, trans. Donald Fraser Goodwin (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990), English translation of Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungfunktion der Sprache (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1934; repr., 1982).Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. The History of the Synoptic Tradition, rev. ed., trans. Marsh, John (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972 [1921]).Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament, 2 vols., trans. Kendrick Grobel (New York: Scribners, 1951–1955), English translation of Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2 vols. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1948–1953).Google Scholar
Burkett, Delbert. The Son of Man Debate: A History and Evaluation, SNTSMS 107 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Burkett, Delbert. The Son of the Man in the Gospel of John, JSNTSup 56 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1991).Google Scholar
Burridge, Richard A. What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography, SNTSMS 70 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992; 2nd ed, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004; 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar
Burton, Ernest De Witt. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses in New Testament Greek (1888; 3rd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903).Google Scholar
Buss, Martin J. The Changing Shape of Form Criticism: A Relational Approach, ed. Stipe, Nickie M. (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010).Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories, 2 vols. (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2003).Google Scholar
Butticaz, Simon. “Theologies of the New Testament in Twentieth-Century Francophone Scholarship: An Assessment of an (Absent) Tradition,” JSNT 41 (2019) 519–36.Google Scholar
Buttmann, Alexander. A Grammar of the New Testament Greek, trans. J. H. Thayer (Andover, MA: Warren F. Draper, 1880).Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. Historical Linguistics, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Caird, G. B. The Language and Imagery of the Bible (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1980).Google Scholar
Caird, G. B. New Testament Theology, comp. and ed. Hurst, L. D. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. “Aspect and Tense in New Testament Greek,” in Linguistics in New Testament Greek: Key Issues in the Current Debate, eds. Black, David Alan and Merkle, Benjamin L. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2020), 37–53.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Caragounis, Chrys C. The Development of Greek and the New Testament: Morphology, Syntax, Phonology, and Textual Transmission, WUNT 167 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar
Caragounis, Chrys C. The Son of Man: Vision and Interpretation, WUNT 38 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1986).Google Scholar
Caragounis, Chrys C., ed. Greek: A Language in Evolution. Essays in Honour of Antonios N. Jannaris (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2010).Google Scholar
Casey, Maurice. Son of Man: The Interpretation and Influence of Daniel 7 (London: SPCK, 1979).Google Scholar
Casson, Sarah H. Textual Signposts in the Argument of Romans: A Relevance-Theory Approach (Atlanta, GA: SBL, 2019).Google Scholar
Caton, Charles E., ed. Philosophy and Ordinary Language (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Memoir,” in The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird, eds. Hurst, L. D. and Wright, N. T. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987), xvii–xxii.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, William Douglas. An Exegetical Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Macmillan, 1941; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994).Google Scholar
Chapman, Siobhan. “H. P. Grice,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 108–14.Google Scholar
Chapman, Siobhan. Language and Empiricism: After the Vienna Circle (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar
Charles, R. H. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John, ICC, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1920).Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Chilton, Bruce. “The Son of Man: Human and Heavenly,” in The Four Gospels 1992: Festschrift Frans Neirynck, eds. Van Segbroek, F., Tuckett, C. M., van Belle, G., and Verheyden, J., 3 vols., BETL 100 (Leuven: Peeters, 1992), 1:203–18.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. Language and Mind (New York: Harcourt, Brace, World, 1968; enlarged ed., 1972).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. “Linguistic Theory,” in Chomsky: Selected Readings on Transformational Theory, eds. Allen, J. P. B. and van Buren, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 [1965]), 152–59.Google Scholar
Cirafesi, Wally V. Verbal Aspect in Synoptic Parallels: On the Method and Meaning of Divergent Tense-Form Usage in the Synoptic Passion Narratives, LBS 7 (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Clackson, James. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Collinge, Nigel E. “Some Reflexions on Comparative Historical Syntax,” Archivum Linguisticum 12 (1960) 79–101.Google Scholar
Cölln, Daniel Georg Conrad von. Biblische Theologie, 2 vols., ed. Schulz, David (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1836).Google Scholar
Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. “Essai sur l’origine des connoissances humaines,” in Oeuvres de Condillac, 3 vols., ed. Le Roy, Georges (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947), 1:1–118.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. An Outline of the Theology of the New Testament, trans. John Bowden (London: SCM Press, 1969), English translation of Grundriss der Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2nd ed. (Munich: Christian Kaiser, 1968).Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St Luke, trans. Geoffrey Buswell (London: Faber and Faber, 1960 [1953]).Google Scholar
Cotterell, Peter, and Turner, Max. Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1989).Google Scholar
Cowie, Fiona. What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Crellin, Robert. The Syntax and Semantics of the Perfect Active in Literary Koine Greek (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).Google Scholar
Croft, William, and Alan Cruse, D.. Cognitive Linguistics, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Crowe, Brandon D. “J. J. Griesbach and Karl Lachmann,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:71–90.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Language, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999 [1992]).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History, trans. Floyd V. Filson (London: SCM Press, 1951 [1946]; 3rd rev. ed., 1962).Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. The Christology of the New Testament, trans. Shirley C. Guthrie and Charles A. M. Hall, NTL (London: SCM Press, 1959 [1957]; 2nd ed., 1963).Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. Immortality of the Soul or Resurrection of the Dead? The Witness of the New Testament (London: Epworth, 1958).Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. Salvation in History, trans. Sidney G. Sowers (London: SCM Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz. Les religions orientales dans le paganism romain (Paris: E. Leroux, 1906), English translation Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism (repr., New York: Dover, 1911).Google Scholar
Curtius, Georg. Die Bildiung der Tempora und Modi im Griechischen und Lateinischen sprachvergleichend dargestellt (Berlin: Wilhelm Besser, 1846), English translation The Greek Verb: Its Structure and Development, trans. Augustus S. Wilkins and Edwin B. England (London: John Murray, 1880).Google Scholar
Curtius, Georg. Erläuterungen zu meiner griechischen Schulgrammatik (Prague: F. Tempsky, 1863), English translation Elucidations of the Student’s Greek Grammar, 2nd ed., trans. E. Abbott (London: John Murray, 1875).Google Scholar
D’Elia, John A. A Place at the Table: George Eldon Ladd and the Rehabilitation of Evangelical Scholarship in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Dana, H. E., and Mantey, Julius R.. A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Macmillan, 1927).Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel, and Rocci, Andrea. Global Linguistics: An Introduction (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. The End of Mark’s Story: A Methodological Study, BINS 3 (Leiden: Brill, 1993).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. Grammatical and Exegetical Study of New Testament Verbs of Transference: A Case Frame Guide to Interpretation and Translation, LNTS 329 (London: T&T Clark, 2009).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. Linguistics and Exegesis in the Gospel of Mark: Applications of a Case Frame Analysis and Lexicon, JSNTSup 218 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. New Testament Verbs of Communication: A Case Frame and Exegetical Study, LNTS 520 (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. The Rhetoric of Characterization of God, Jesus, and Jesus’ Disciples in the Gospel of Mark, JSNTSup 290 (New York: T&T Clark, 2005).Google Scholar
Danove, Paul L. Theology of the Gospel of Mark: A Semantic, Narrative, and Rhetorical Study of the Characterization of God (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2019).Google Scholar
Davis, Thomas. Shifting Sands: The Rise and Fall of Biblical Archaeology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Davis, William Hersey. Beginner’s Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Doran, 1923).Google Scholar
Dawson, Zachary K. “Monogenēs and the Social Trinity: A Test Case for Using Lexical Semantics in Systematic Theology,” MJTM 18 (2016–2017) 32–66.Google Scholar
Dawson, Zachary K. “The Problem of Gospel Genres: Unmasking a Flawed Consensus and Providing a Fresh Way Forward with Systemic Functional Linguistics Genre Theory,” BAGL 8 (2019) 33–78.Google Scholar
Dawson, Zachary K., and Dvorak, James D.. “Conclusion: Linguistic Exegesis of the Epistle of James with Reference to Exegetical Commentary Writing,” in The Epistle of James: Linguistic Exegesis of an Early Christian Letter, eds. Dvorak, James D. and Dawson, Zachary K., LENT 1 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019), 306–17.Google Scholar
de Jonge, Marinus. Christology in Context: The Earliest Response to Jesus (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1988).Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “Semiology and Rhetoric,” in Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 3–19.Google Scholar
de Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht. Biblische Dogmatik: Alten und Neuen Testaments. Oder kritische Darstellung der Religionslehre des Hebrasimus, des Judenthums und Urchristenthums (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1813).Google Scholar
Decker, Rodney J. Reading Koine Greek: An Introduction and Integrated Workbook (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2014).Google Scholar
Deissmann, G. Adolf. Bible Studies, trans. Alexander Grieve, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1903).Google Scholar
Deissmann, G. Adolf. Light from the Ancient East, trans. L. R. M. Strachan (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1910).Google Scholar
Delling, Gerhard. “καιρός κτλ.,” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, eds. Kittel, Gerhard and Friedrich, Gerhard, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964–1976), 3:455–64.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “‘Genèsse et structure’ et la phénoménologie,” in Genèse et structure, eds. de Gandillac, Maurice, Goldmann, Lucien, and Piaget, Jean (The Hague: Mouton, 1964), English translation “‘Genesis and Structure’ and Phenomenology,” in Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), 154–68.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. On Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), English translation of De la Grammatologie (Paris: Minuit, 1967).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. David B. Allison (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973), English translation of La Voix et la phénomène: Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénoménologie de Husserl (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, eds. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugenio (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), 247–65.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), English translation of L’écriture et la difference (Paris: Seuil, 1967).Google Scholar
DeVries, D. “Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 350–55.Google Scholar
Dibelius, Martin. From Tradition to Gospel, trans. Bertram Lee Woolf (London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson, 1934 [1919]).Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. The Theory of Functional Grammar, 2 vols., ed. Hengeveld, Kees (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997).Google Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P. An Introduction to General Linguistics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P. “Linguistics and Classic Philosophy,” in Report of the Fourteenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, ed. Di Pietro, Robert J., Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 16 (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics, 1963), 3–10.Google Scholar
Doja, Albert. “Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: Toward a Future Anthropology,” TCS 25 (2008) 321–40.Google Scholar
Dooley, Robert A., and Levinsohn, Stephen H.. Analyzing Discourse: A Manual of Basic Concepts (Dallas: SIL International, 2001).Google Scholar
Downs, David J. The Offering of the Gentiles: Paul’s Collection for Jerusalem in Its Chronological, Cultural, and Cultic Contexts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul, Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Driver, Daniel R. Brevard Childs, Biblical Theologian: For the Church’s One Bible (repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2010).Google Scholar
Droste, Flip G., and Joseph, John E., eds. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991).Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. New Testament Theology: An Introduction (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2009).Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998).Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: An Inquiry into the Character of Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1977).Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G., and James, P. Mackey. New Testament Theology in Dialogue (London: SPCK, 1987).Google Scholar
Dvorak, James D., and Dawson, Zachary K., eds. The Epistle of James: Linguistic Exegesis of an Early Christian Letter, LENT 1 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019).Google Scholar
Easley, Kendall H. User-Friendly Greek: A Common Sense Approach to the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H, 1994).Google Scholar
Eichh, orn, Albert. Das Abendmahl im Neuen Testament, HCW 36 (Leipzig: Mohr Siebeck, 1898).Google Scholar
Eichrodt, Walter. Theology of the Old Testament, 2 vols., trans. John Baker (London: SCM Press, 1961–1967 [1933–1939]).Google Scholar
Elhindi, Yousif. “Ferdinand de Saussure,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 241–48.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. A History of Religious Ideas, 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979–1982).Google Scholar
Ellens, J. Harold. The Son of Man in the Gospel of John, NTM 28 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010).Google Scholar
Ellis, E. Earle. The Gospel of Luke, NCB (London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1966; 2nd ed., 1974).Google Scholar
Erickson, Richard J. James Barr and the Beginnings of Biblical Semantics (Notre Dame, IN: Foundations Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Esler, Philip F. New Testament Theology: Communion and Community (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2005).Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. Jesus and His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies, AGJU 25 (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Green, Melanie. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd ed. (London: Longman, 2010).Google Scholar
Fantin, Joseph D. The Greek Imperative Mood in the New Testament: A Cognitive and Communication Approach, SBG 12 (New York: Peter Lang, 2010).Google Scholar
Fantin, Joseph D. The Lord of the Entire World: Lord Jesus, a Challenge to Lord Caesar? NTM 31 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2011).Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Feine, Paul. Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 8th ed. (Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1953 [1922]).Google Scholar
Fergusson, David. “Bultmann, Rudolf,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. Donald, K. McKim (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 449–56.Google Scholar
Fewster, Gregory P. Creation Language in Romans 8: A Study in Monosemy, LBS 8 (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism” (1962), in Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method, Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 44–96.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. “The Case for Case,” in Universals in Linguistic Theory, eds. Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968), 1–88.Google Scholar
Filson, Floyd V. The New Testament Against Its Environment: The Gospel of Christ the Risen Lord, SBT 3 (London: SCM Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59, ed. Palmer, F. R. (London: Longmans, 1968).Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930–1955,” in Studies in Linguistic Analysis (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957), 1–32.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Fiske, John. Introduction to Communication Studies, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. “Doing Without What’s Within: Fiona Cowie’s What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered,” Mind 110 (2001) 99–148.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (New York: Pantheon, 1972 [1969]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self (New York: Vintage, 1988).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Bouchard, D. F., trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” (1969), in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Bouchard, D. F., trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977), 113–38.Google Scholar
Frampton, Travis L. “Spinoza and His Influence on Biblical Interpretation,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 120–50.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H. “Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Close Relative of French Functional Linguistics?” La Linguistique 37 (2001) 89–100.Google Scholar
Funk, Robert W. Parables and Presence: Forms of the New Testament Tradition (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1982).Google Scholar
Gabler, Johann P. “An Oration on the Proper Distinction between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology and the Specific Objectives of Each,” in The Flowering of Old Testament Theology, eds. Ollenburger, Ben C., Martens, Elmer A., and Hasel, Gerhard F. (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 489–502, English translation of Oratio de iusto discrimine theologiae biblicae et dogmaticae regundisque recte ultriusque finibus, repr. in Kleinere theologische Schriften, eds. Gabler, T. A. and Gabler, J. G., 2 vols. (Ulm: Stettin, 1831), 2:179–98.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, 2nd ed., trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (New York: Crossroad, 1989; 2nd rev. ed., New York: Continuum, 2002).Google Scholar
Galen, F. W. Historic Structures: The Prague School Project, 1928–1948 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan. The Theory of Speech and Language, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1951 [1932]).Google Scholar
Garvin, Paul L., ed. and trans. A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. Introducing Discourse Analysis: From Grammar to Society (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 3–30.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, trans. Jane E. Lewin (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Giacobbe, Mark S. Review of Intermediate Greek Grammar by David L. Mathewson and Elodie Ballantine Emig, WTJ 80 (2018) 376–79.Google Scholar
Giannakis, Georgios K. “Can a Historical Greek Grammar Be Written? – An Appraisal of A. N. Jannaris’ Work,” in Greek: A Language in Evolution. Essays in Honour of Antonios N. Jannaris, ed. Caragounis, Chrys C. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2010), 296–313.Google Scholar
Gibson, Richard J., and Campbell, Constantine R.. Reading Biblical Greek: A Grammar for Students (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2017).Google Scholar
Giles, Peter. A Short Manual of Comparative Philology, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1901).Google Scholar
Gilkey, Langdon. “Cosmology, Ontology, and the Travail of Biblical Language,” JR 41 (1961) 194–205.Google Scholar
Gleason Jr., Henry A. An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics, rev. ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961).Google Scholar
Godel, Robert, ed. A Geneva School Reader in Linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Goertz, Hans-Jürgen. Unsichere Geschichte: Zur Theorie historischer Referentialität (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2001).Google Scholar
Goetchius, Eugene Van Ness. The Language of the New Testament (New York: Scribner, 1965).Google Scholar
Goodwin, William Watson. Greek Grammar, rev. Charles Burton Gulick (Boston, MA: Ginn, 1930).Google Scholar
Goppelt, Leonhard. Theology of the New Testament, 2 vols., ed. Roloff, Jürgen, trans. John Alsup (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1981–1982), English translation of Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1975–1976).Google Scholar
Gordley, Matthew E. New Testament Christological Hymns: Exploring Texts, Contexts, and Significance (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2018).Google Scholar
Gordon, Scott. The History and Philosophy of Social Science (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Götzsche, Hans. “Louis Hjelmslev,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 124–27.Google Scholar
Götzsche, Hans. “Rasmus Rask,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 226–27.Google Scholar
Götzsche, Hans. “Roman Jakobson,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 139–47.Google Scholar
Grässer, Erich. “Beobachtungen zum Menschensohn in Hebr 2,6,” in Jesus und der Menschensohn, für Anton Vögtle, eds. Pesch, Rudolf and Schnackenburg, Rudolf (Freiburg: Herder, 1975), 404–14.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. Practicing Theological Interpretation: Engaging Biblical Texts for Faith and Formation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2011).Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. Seized by Truth: Reading the Bible as Scripture (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2007).Google Scholar
Green, Thomas Sheldon. A Treatise on the Grammar of the New Testament Dialect; Embracing Observations on the Literal Interpretation of Numerous Passages (London: Bagster, 1842).Google Scholar
Greimas, A.-J. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method, trans. Daniel McDowell, Ronald Schleifer, and Alan Velie (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983), English translation of Sémantique structurale: Recherche de méthode (Paris: Larousse, 1966).Google Scholar
Grenz, Stanley J., and Olson, Roger E.. Twentieth-Century Theology: God and the World in a Transitional Age (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1992).Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, eds. Cole, Peter and Jerry, L. Morgan (New York: Academic, 1975), 41–58.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Levinson, Stephen C., eds. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis: Translated and Explained, trans. Mark Biddle (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997 [1901]).Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann. Schöpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit: Eine religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung über Gen 1 und Ap Joh 12 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1895), English translation Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton: A Religio-Historical Study of Genesis 1 and Revelation 12, trans. K. William Whitney (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006).Google Scholar
Gupta, Nijay K. Worship that Makes Sense to Paul: A New Approach to the Theology and Ethics of Paul’s Cultic Metaphors, BZNW 175 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010).Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991; repr., Manchester: St. Jerome, 2010).Google Scholar
Hafemann, S. J. “Baur, F(erdinand) C(hristian),” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 285–89.Google Scholar
Hahn, Ferdinand. The Titles of Jesus in Christology: Their History in Early Christianity, trans. H. Knight and G. Ogg (New York: World, 1969).Google Scholar
Hahn, H.-C. “καιρός,” in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, ed. Colin, Brown, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975–1978), 3:833–39.Google Scholar
Hall Jr., Robert A. Linguistics and Your Language, 2nd ed. (Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1960).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed., rev. Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. “Introduction: On the ‘Architecture’ of Human Language,” in On Language and Linguistics, ed. Webster, Jonathan J., Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday 3 (London: Continuum, 2003), 1–29.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Arnold, 1978).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. “Language Structure and Language Function,” in New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. Lyons, John (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), 140–65.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. “Meaning as Choice,” in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, eds. Fontaine, Lise, Bartlett, Tom, and O’Grady, Gerard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 15–36.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Webster, Jonathan J.. Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning (Sheffield: Equinox, 2014).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, Ruqaiya. Language, Context, and Text, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. Pre-Existence, Wisdom and the Son of Man: A Study of the Idea of Pre-Existence in the New Testament, SNTSMS 21 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Hammann, Konrad. Rudolf Bultmann: A Biography, trans. Philip E. Devenish (Salem, OR: Polebridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Harris, Horton. The Tübingen School: A Historical and Theological Investigation of the School of F. C. Baur (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1990).Google Scholar
Harris, James. Hermes, Or, A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar (London, 1765).Google Scholar
Harris, Murray J. Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012).Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. Structural Linguistics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Harrisville, Roy A., and Sundberg, Walter. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002).Google Scholar
Hart, D. G. “Machen, J(ohn) Gresham,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. Donald, K. McKim (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 595–98.Google Scholar
Hasel, Gerhard. New Testament Theology: Basic Issues in the Current Debate (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1978).Google Scholar
Hasselbrook, David S. Studies in New Testament Lexicography: Advancing toward a Full Diachronic Approach with the Greek Language, WUNT 2/303 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar
Hatina, Thomas R. New Testament Theology and its Quest for Relevance: Ancient Texts and Modern Readers (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).Google Scholar
Hatzidakis, Georgios N. Einleitung in die Neugriechische Grammatik (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1892; repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1977).Google Scholar
Havránek, Bohuslav. “The Functional Differentiation of the Standard Language,” in A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style, ed. and trans. Garvin, Paul L. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1964), 3–16.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. “Humanity Prior to the Revelation of Faith,” in Beyond Bultmann: Reckoning a New Testament Theology, eds. Longenecker, Bruce W. and Parsons, Mikeal C. (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014), 61–77.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B., Alkier, Stefan, and Huizenga, Leroy A., eds. Reading the Bible Intertextually (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper & Row, 1962).Google Scholar
Heim, Erin M. Adoption in Galatians and Romans: Contemporary Metaphor Theories and the Pauline Huiothesia Metaphors, BINS 153 (Leiden: Brill, 2017).Google Scholar
Heitmüller, Wilhelm. Taufe und Abendmahl bie Paulus: Darstellung und religionsgeschichtliche Beleuchtung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1903).Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. “Essay on the Origin of Language,” in On the Origin of Language, trans. Alexander Gode (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), 87–166.Google Scholar
Herrmann-Kaliner, Eva. “André Martinet,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 187–89.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. J. B. The Son of Man in the Teaching of Jesus, SNTSMS 39 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Hirsch Jr., E. D. Validity in Interpretation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. La catégorie des cas: Étude de grammaire générale, 2 vols. (Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget, 1935–1937; repr., Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1972).Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. Whitfield, Francis J., rev. ed. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961 [1943]).Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. Résumé of a Theory of Language, ed. and trans. Whitfield, Francis J. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1975 [manuscript 1943–1944]).Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. The State of the Art, JL series minor 78 (The Hague: Mouton, 1968).Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F., ed. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology, abr. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Peter C. The Formation of Historical Theology: A Study of Ferdinand Christian Baur (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Ernst G., and von Siebenthal, Heinrich. Griechische Grammatik zum Neuen Testament (Riehen: Immanuel, 1985).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Otto. Die Griechischen Dialekte in ihrem historischen Zusammenhange, 3 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1891–1898).Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry, ed. Language in Culture: Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Heinrich Julius. Lehrbuch der Neutestamentlichen Theologie, 2 vols., eds. Jülicher, A. and Bauer, W. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1911).Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. “J. R. Firth,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 80–86.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. “Jacob Grimm,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 114–16.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. “Karl Brugmann,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 45–48.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. “N. S. Trubetzkoy,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 267–68.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. The Son of Man in Mark: A Study of the Background of the Term “Son of Man” and its Use in St Mark’s Gospel (London: SPCK, 1967).Google Scholar
Hordern, William E. A Layman’s Guide to Protestant Theology, rev. ed. (New York: Collier/Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar
Hordern, William E. New Directions in Theology Today, Volume 1: Introduction (London: Lutterworth, 1966).Google Scholar
Howe, Bonnie. Because You Bear This Name: Conceptual Metaphor and the Moral Meaning of 1 Peter, BINS 81 (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Howells, Christina. Derrida: Deconstruction from Phenomenology to Ethics (Cambridge: Polity, 1998).Google Scholar
Hübner, Hans. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 3 vols. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990–1995).Google Scholar
Hultgren, Arland J. The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, ed. Losonsky, Michael, trans. Peter Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts (Berlin: Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1836), English translation On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, ed. Losonsky, Michael, trans. Peter Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. “Scenes from the History of Poststructuralism: Davos, Freiburg, Baltimore, Leipzig,” NLH 41 (2010) 491–516.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D. “Caird, G(eorge) B(radford),” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 456–62.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Ancient Jewish Monotheism and Early Christian Jesus-Devotion: The Context and Character of Christological Faith (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. At the Origins of Christian Worship: The Context and Character of Earliest Christian Devotion (Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism (London: SCM Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. “Summary and Concluding Observations,” in “Who is This Son of Man?”: The Latest Scholarship on a Puzzling Expression of the Historical Jesus, eds. Hurtado, Larry W. and Owen, Paul L., LNTS 390 (London: T&T Clark, 2011), 159–77.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W., and Owen, Paul L., eds. “Who is This Son of Man?”: The Latest Scholarship on a Puzzling Expression of the Historical Jesus, LNTS 390 (London: T&T Clark, 2011).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations, trans. John N. Findlay (New York: Humanities, 1970), English translation of Logische Untersuchungen (Halle: M. Niemeyer, 1900–1901; 2nd ed., 1913).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Ivić, Milka. Trends in Linguistics, trans. Muriel Heppell, JL series minor 42 (The Hague: Mouton, 1965).Google Scholar
Jackson, Leonard. The Poverty of Structuralism: Literature and Structuralist Theory (London: Longman, 1991).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. “Autobiographical Notes on N. S. Trubetzkoy, As Related by Roman Jakobson,” in Introduction to the Principles of Phonological Descriptions, by Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., trans. L. A. Murray, ed. Bluhme, H. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968), 309–23.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. “Linguistics and Poetics,” in Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, Thomas A. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960), 350–77.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. On Language, eds. Waugh, Linda R. and Monville-Burston, Monique (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. “Signe zéro,” in Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie offerts à J. van Ginneken à l’occasion du soixantième anniversaire de sa naissance (21 avril 1937) (Paris: Klincksieck, 1937), 143–52, repr. in Selected Writings II: Word and Language (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), 212–19.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New Left Review 146 (1984) 53–92.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Jannaris, A. N. A Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect (London: Macmillan, 1897).Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1922).Google Scholar
Jodock, Darrell. “Biblical Interpretation in the Work of F. C. Baur and the Tübingen School,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 170–91.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aubrey R. The One and the Many in the Israelite Conception of God (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Johnson, Aubrey R. The Vitality of the Individual in the Thought of Ancient Israel (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1949; 2nd ed., 1964).Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Writings of the New Testament (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1986).Google Scholar
Johnson, Marta K., ed. and trans. Recycling the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 1978).Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul. The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815–1830 (New York: HarperCollins, 1991).Google Scholar
Johnston, Charles M. McMaster University, 2 vols. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976–1981).Google Scholar
Jones, William. Discourses: Delivered at the Asiatick Society 1785–1792 (repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Joseph, John E., and Taylor, Talbot J., eds. Ideologies of Language (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Kähler, Martin. The So-Called Historical Jesus and the Historic, Biblical Christ, trans. Carl E. Braaten (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1964).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Gottlob Philipp Christian. Die biblische Theologie, oder Judaismus und Christianismus nach der grammatisch-historischen Interpretation und nach einer freymütigen Stellung in die kritischvergleichende Universalgeschichte der Religionen, und die universale Religion, 3 vols. (Erlangen: Johann Jacob Palm, 1813–1821).Google Scholar
Kapahu, William K. K. “Walther Eichrodt: His Times and His Theology,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:367–85.Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa. “J. L. Austin,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 10–16.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. “Franz Bopp,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 42–43.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. “Wilhelm von Humboldt,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 128–31.Google Scholar
Kim, Seyoon. “The ‘Son of Man’” as the Son of God (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1983; repr., Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985).Google Scholar
King, Winston L. “Some Ambiguities in Biblical Theology,” Religion in Life 27 (1957–1958) 95–104.Google Scholar
Kittel, Gerhard, and Friedrich, Gerhard, eds. Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, 9 vols. (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1933–1979), English translation Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1964–1976).Google Scholar
Klink III, Edward W., and Darian, R. Lockett. Understanding Biblical Theology: A Comparison of Theory and Practice (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012).Google Scholar
Klutz, Todd. The Exorcism Stories in Luke–Acts: A Sociostylistic Reading, SNTSMS 129 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. “Notes on the History of the Concept of Language as a System ‘Où tout se tient,’” Linguistica Atlantica 19 (1997) 1–20.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. “Early Christianity from the Perspective of the History of Religions: Rudolf Bultmann’s Contribution” (1985), repr. in Paul and His World: Interpreting the New Testament in Its Context (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007), 267–78.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. “The History-of-Religions School, Gnosis, and the Gospel of John” (1986), repr. in From Jesus to the Gospels: Interpreting the New Testament in Its Context (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007), 105–21.Google Scholar
Köstenberger, Andreas J., Merkle, Benjamin L., and Plummer, Robert L.. Going Deeper with New Testament Greek: An Intermediate Study of the Grammar and Syntax of the New Testament (Nashville, TN: B&H, 2016).Google Scholar
Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia. “Julia Kristeva,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 166–72.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kretschmer, Paul. Einleitung in die Geschichte der Griechischen Sprache (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1896).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Language – The Unknown: An Initiation into Linguistics, trans. Anne M. Menke (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. La révolution du langage poétique: L’avant-garde à la fin du XIXe siècle. Lautréamont et Mallarmé (Paris: Seuil, 1974).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Margaret Waller (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language,” in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Moi, Toril (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 90–136.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue and Novel,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, Léon S., trans. Alice Jardine, Tomas A. Gora, and Léon S. Roudiez (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980), 52–91, English translation of Σημειωτικὴ: Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris: Seuil, 1969), 82–112.Google Scholar
Krumbacher, Karl. Das Problem des neugriechischen Schriftsprache (Munich: G. Frank’schen, 1902).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability” (1983), in The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, eds. Conant, James and Haugeland, John (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 32–57.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. “Reflections on my Critics,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 231–78.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner Georg. The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of its Problems, trans. S. MacLean Gilmour and Howard Clark Kee (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1972).Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner Georg. Promise and Fulfillment: The Eschatological Message of Jesus (London: SPCK, 1957).Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner Georg. The Theology of the New Testament, trans. John E. Steely (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1978), English translation of Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1969).Google Scholar
Kuss, Otto. Die Theologie des Neuen Testamentes: Eine Einführung (Regensburg: Pustet, 1937).Google Scholar
Kwong, Ivan Shin Chun. The Word Order of the Gospel of Luke: Its Foregrounded Messages, LNTS 298 (London: T&T Clark, 2006).Google Scholar
Ladd, George Eldon. The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974).Google Scholar
Ladd, George Eldon. A Theology of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974; rev. Donald A. Hagner, 1993).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1990) 39–74.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Lamb, David A. Text, Context and the Johannine Community: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Johannine Writings, LNTS 477 (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Land, Christopher D. The Integrity of 2 Corinthians and Paul’s Aggravating Absence, NTM 36 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2015).Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. Language and Its Structure: Some Fundamental Linguistic Concepts (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968).Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. The London School of Linguistics: A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinowski and J. R. Firth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Lanier, Gregory R. Old Testament Conceptual Metaphors and the Christology of Luke’s Gospel, LNTS 591 (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar
Lappenga, Benjamin J. Paul’s Language of Ζῆλος: Monosemy and the Rhetoric of Identity and Practice, BINS 137 (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
LaSor, William Sanford. Handbook of New Testament Greek: An Inductive Approach Based on the Greek Text of Acts, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1973).Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. The History of Linguistics in Europe, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Lechte, John. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Post-Humanism, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Lee, Jae-Hyun. Paul’s Gospel in Romans: A Discourse Analysis of Rom 1:16–8:39, LBS 3 (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Lee, John A. L. A History of New Testament Lexicography, SBG 8 (New York: Peter Lang, 2003).Google Scholar
Lee, John J. H. “Kenneth Lee Pike’s Tagmemics and Its Discourse Analytic Implications for the Interpretation of the New Testament,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: Further Essays on Prevailing Methods, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Dawson, Zachary K., MBBS 6 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2021), 333–53.Google Scholar
Lee, Penny. The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1996).Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, and Thomas, Jenny. “Language, Meaning and Context: Pragmatics,” in An Encyclopaedia of Language, ed. Collinge, N. E. (London: Routledge, 1990), 173–206.Google Scholar
Legaspi, Michael C. “The Term ‘Enlightenment’ and Biblical Interpretation,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 73–92.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P., ed. and trans. A Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Discourses in Conflict: Heteroglossia and Text Semantics,” in Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse: Selected Papers from the 12th International Systemic Workshop, eds. Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988), 29–50.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Ideology, Intertextuality and the Communication of Science,” in Relations and Functions within and around Language, eds. Fries, Peter H., Cummings, Michael, Lockwood, David, and Spruiell, William (London: Continuum, 2002), 32–55.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Ideology, Intertextuality, and the Notion of Register,” in Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, eds. Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985), 275–94.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Interpersonal Meaning in Discourse: Value Orientations,” in Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, eds. Davies, Martin and Ravelli, Louise (London: Pinter, 1992), 82–104.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Intertextuality and Text Semantics,” in Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives, eds. Howard Fries, Peter, Gregory, Michael, and Halliday, M. A. K. (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1995), 85–114.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Intertextuality and the Project of Text Linguistics,” Text 20 (2000) 221–25.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. “Thematic Analysis: Systems, Structures, and Strategies,” Semiotic Inquiry 3 (1983) 159–87.Google Scholar
Lemon, Lee T., and Reis, Marion J., eds. and trans. Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C. A Survey of Structural Linguistics (London: Andre Deutsch, 1970; 2nd ed., 1985).Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. History of Linguistics: Classical and Medieval Linguistics (London: Longman, 1990).Google Scholar
Leroy, Maurice. The Main Trends in Modern Linguistics, trans. Glanville Price (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship, trans. James Bell, John von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, MA: Beacon, 1969).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Raw and the Cooked, trans. John and Doreen Wightman (New York: Harper and Row, 1969).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Tristes tropiques, trans. John Russell (London: Hutchinson, 1961).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, and Jakobson, Roman. “‘Les Chats’ de Charles Baudelaire,” L’Homme 2 (1962) 5–21, English translation “Charles Baudelaire’s ‘Les Chats,’” in Introduction to Structuralism, ed. Lane, Michael (New York: Basic Books, 1970), 202–21.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. Discourse Features of New Testament Greek: A Coursebook on the Information Structure of New Testament Greek, 2nd ed. (Dallas, TX: SIL International, 2000).Google Scholar
Libby, James A. “The Pauline Canon Sung in a Linguistic Key: Visualizing New Testament Text Proximity by Linguistic Structure, System, and Strata,” BAGL 5 (2016) 122–201.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Jacobus. The Language of the Kingdom and Jesus: Parable, Aphorism, and Metaphor in the Sayings Material Common to the Synoptic Tradition and the Gospel of Thomas, BZNW 102 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. An die Korinther I-II, 3rd ed., HNT 9 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1931).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. Der Menschensohn: Ein Beitrag zur neutestamentlichen Theologie (Freiburg: Mohr, 1896).Google Scholar
Lincicum, David. “Ferdinand Christian Baur and Biblical Theology,” ASE 30 (2013) 79–92.Google Scholar
Lindars, Barnabas. Jesus Son of Man: A Fresh Examination of the Son of Man Sayings in the Gospels (London: SPCK, 1983).Google Scholar
Loisy, Alfred. The Gospel and the Church, trans. Christopher Home (London: Isbister, 1903).Google Scholar
Long, Frederick J. Κοινὴ Γραμματική Koine Greek Grammar: A Beginning-Intermediate Exegetical and Pragmatic Handbook (Wilmore, KY: Glossa House, 2015).Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. “Tagmemics as a Framework for Discourse Analysis,” in Second Annual Linguistic Metatheory Conference Proceedings 1977, ed. Wang, James (East Lansing, MI: Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University, 1977), 1–27.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Bruce W., and Parsons, Mikeal C., eds. Beyond Bultmann: Reckoning a New Testament Theology (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Longenecker, Richard N. Galatians, Word Biblical Commentary 41 (Dallas, TX: Word, 1990).Google Scholar
Louw, J. P. Semantics of New Testament Greek (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress; Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Louw, Johannes P., and Nida, Eugene A.. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2 vols. (New York: American Bible Society, 1988).Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Lyons, John. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Lyons, John. Structural Semantics: An Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato, Publications of the Philological Society 20 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963).Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea (New York: Dutton, 1961 [1922]).Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages,” in The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, by Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., 3rd ed. rev. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1930 [1923]), 296–336.Google Scholar
Marchese, Maria Pia, ed. Ferdinand de Saussure, Phonétique: Il manoscritto di Harvard Houghton Library bMS Fr 266 (8) (Florence: Unipress, 1995).Google Scholar
Marshall, I. Howard. Beyond the Bible: Moving from Scripture to Theology, with essays by Kevin J. Vanhoozer and Stanley E. Porter (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2004).Google Scholar
Marshall, I. Howard. New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2004).Google Scholar
Martín-Asensio, Gustavo. Transitivity-Based Foregrounding in the Acts of the Apostles: A Functional-Grammatical Approach to the Lukan Perspective, JSNTSup 202, SNTG 8 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000).Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. Biblical Truths: The Meaning of Scripture in the Twenty-First Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. Inventing Superstition from the Hippocratics to the Christians (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. New Testament History and Literature (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. Pedagogy of the Bible: An Analysis and Proposal (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2008).Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. Sex and the Single Savior: Gender and Sexuality in Biblical Interpretation (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2006).Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. Slavery as Salvation: The Metaphor of Slavery in Pauline Christianity (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Martinet, André. Elements of General Linguistics, trans. Elisabeth Palmer (London: Faber and Faber, 1964), English translation of Elements de Linguistique Générale (Paris: Armand Colin, 1960).Google Scholar
Marxsen, Willi. Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel, trans. James Boyce et al. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1969 [1956]).Google Scholar
Masterman, Margaret. “The Nature of a Paradigm,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 59–90.Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav. “Jakobson’s Response to Saussure’s Cours,” Cahiers de l’ILSL 9 (1997) 169–76.Google Scholar
Matera, Frank J. New Testament Theology: Exploring Diversity and Unity (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2007).Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém. “On the Potentiality of the Phenomena of Language,” in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. Vachek, Josef (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964), 1–32.Google Scholar
Mathewson, David L., and Ballantine Emig, Elodie. Intermediate Greek Grammar: Syntax for Students of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2016).Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky, CSL 67 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Matthiae, Augustus. A Copious Greek Grammar, trans. Edward Valentine Blomfield, 5th ed., rev. John Kenrick, 2 vols. (London: John Murray, 1832).Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. “Register in the Round: Diversity in a Unified Theory of Register Analysis,” in Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, ed. Ghadessy, Mohsen (London: Pinter, 1993), 221–92.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. W. D. Halls (New York: Norton, 1990).Google Scholar
Mayser, Edwin. Grammatik der Griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit, 2 vols. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1906–1934; vol. 1 rev. 1970).Google Scholar
McDonald, Edward. Grammar West to East: The Investigation of Linguistic Meaning in European and Chinese Traditions (Singapore: Springer Nature, 2020).Google Scholar
McDonald, L. M. “Ladd, George Eldon,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 588–94.Google Scholar
McGaughy, Lane C. A Descriptive Analysis of ῏ΕΙΝΑΙ as a Linking Verb in New Testament Greek (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1972).Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot. Jesus and His Death: Historiography, the Historical Jesus, and Atonement Theory (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
McNeel, Jennifer. Paul as Infant and Nursing Mother: Metaphor, Rhetoric, and Identity in 1 Thessalonians 2:5–8 (Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes (Paris: Hachette, 1903).Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. “Les lois du langage I: Les lois phonétiques,” Revue internationale de sociologie (Paris) 1 (1893) 311–21.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine, and Vendryes, Joseph. Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques (Paris: Champion, 1924).Google Scholar
Merkle, Benjamin L., and Plummer, Robert L.. Greek for Life: Strategies for Learning, Retaining, and Reviving New Testament Greek (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2017).Google Scholar
Moo, Douglas J. The Letter to the Romans, 2nd ed., New International Commentary: New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018).Google Scholar
Morales, Nelson R. Poor and Rich in James: A Relevance Theory Approach to James’s Use of the Old Testament (University Park, PA; Eisenbrauns, 2018).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R., eds. Syntax and Semantics: Current Approaches to Syntax (New York: Academic, 1980).Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert. “F. C. Baur’s New Testament Theology,” in Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity, eds. Baus, Martinpiess, Christof Landmesser, , and Lincicum, David, trans. Peter C. Hodgson and Robert F. Brown (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 236–60.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert. “Two Types of Critical Theological Interpretation,” JSNT 41 (2018) 204–22.Google Scholar
Morrow, Jeffrey L. Three Skeptics and the Bible: La Peyrère, Hobbes, Spinoza, and the Reception of Modern Biblical Criticism (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016).Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953; 2nd ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. “Neglected Features in the Problem of the Son of Man,” in Neues Testament und Kirche (FS Rudolf Schnackenburg), ed. Gnilka, Joachim (Freiburg: Herder, 1974), 413–28, repr. in Essays in New Testament Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 75–90.Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. The Origin of Christology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. “‘The Son of Man’: Some of the Facts,” NTS 41 (1995) 277–79; repr. in Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Biblical and Theological Essays (London: SPCK, 1998), 205–208.Google Scholar
Moulton, James Hope. A Grammar of New Testament Greek, Volume 1: Prolegomena (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1906; 2nd ed., 1906; 3rd ed., 1908).Google Scholar
Moulton, James Hope, and Francis Howard, Wilbert. A Grammar of New Testament Greek, Volume 2: Accidence and Word-Formation (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1919–1929).Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, Jan. “Standard Language and Poetic Language,” in A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style, ed. and trans. Garvin, Paul L. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1964), 17–30.Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, Jan. The Word and Verbal Art, trans. and eds. Burbank, John and Steiner, Peter (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Müller, Mogens. The Expression “Son of Man” and the Development of Christology: A History of Interpretation (Sheffield: Equinox, 2008).Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. Linguistics: An Introduction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Naylor, Michael P. “Peter Stuhlmacher and Biblical Theology,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:158–78.Google Scholar
Neill, Stephen, and Wright, N. T.. The Interpretation of the New Testament 1861–1986, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. “Identity, Similarity, and Continuity: Saussure’s and Wittgenstein’s Search for Linguistic Units,” in The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences: Studies on the Transition from Historical-Comparative to Structural Linguistics in Honour of E. F. Konrad Koerner, eds. Joseph, John E., Niederehe, Hans-Josef, and Embleton, Sheila (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999), 151–69.Google Scholar
Neuer, Werner. Adolf Schlatter: A Biography of Germany’s Premier Biblical Theologian, trans. Robert W. Yarbrough (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1995).Google Scholar
Newman, Anthony. “John Searle,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 248–54.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Ernest, and Barton, John. “James Barr Remembered,” Proceedings of the British Academy 153 (2008), repr. in Bible and Interpretation: The Collected Essays of James Barr, 3 vols., ed. Barton, John (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 ), 1:xiii–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. “A New Methodology in Bible Translation,” The Bible Translator 3 (1952) 97–111.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A., and Taber, Charles R.. The Theory and Practice of Translation (Leiden: Brill, 1969).Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A., and Louw, J. P.. Lexical Semantics of the Greek New Testament (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Norden, Eduard. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur formengeschichte religiöser Rede (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1913; repr., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar
Nylund, Jan H. “The Prague School of Linguistics and Its Influence on New Testament Language Studies,” in The Language of the New Testament: Context, History, and Development, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., ECHC 3, LBS 6 (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 155–221.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Matthew Brook. Corpus Linguistics and the Greek of the New Testament, NTM 6 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2005).Google Scholar
O’Grady, William, and Archibald, John. Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction, 7th ed. (Toronto: Pearson, 2012).Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. C. The Bible’s Authority: A Portrait Gallery of Thinkers from Lessing to Bultmann (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991).Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard. “Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1971) 1–19.Google Scholar
Ong, Hughson T. “Ferdinand Christian Baur’s Historical Criticism and Tendenzkritik,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:118–38.Google Scholar
Ong, Hughson T. The Multilingual Jesus and the Sociolinguistic World of the New Testament, LBS 12 (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Oropeza, B. J., and Moyise, Steve, eds. Exploring Intertextuality: Diverse Strategies for New Testament Interpretation of Texts (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016).Google Scholar
Palmer, Micheal W. Levels of Constituent Structure in New Testament Greek, SBG 6 (New York: Peter Lang, 1995).Google Scholar
Pasor, Georg. Grammatica graeca sacra Novi Testamenti Domini nostri Jesu Christi (1655).Google Scholar
Patte, Daniel. Paul’s Faith and the Power of the Gospel: A Structural Introduction to the Pauline Letters (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1983).Google Scholar
Pattemore, Stephen. The People of God in the Apocalypse: Discourse, Structure and Exegesis, SNTSMS 128 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pattemore, Stephen. Souls under the Altar: Relevance Theory and the Discourse Structure of Revelation (New York: United Bible Societies, 2003).Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. Principles of the History of Language, trans. H. A. Strong (London: Longmans, Green, 1888).Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G. The Spell of Language: Poststructuralism and Speculation, trans. Linda Jordan and Thomas G. Pavel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Peabody, D. B. “Griesbach, Johann Jakob,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 319–25.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Johannes. Israel, its Life and Culture, 2 vols. (London: Oxford University Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Peláez, Jesús, and Mateos, Juan. New Testament Lexicography: Introduction, Theory, Method, trans. Andrew Bowden, ed. du Toit, David S., Fontes et Subsidia ad Bibliam Pertinentes 6 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018).Google Scholar
Penchansky, D. “Barr, James,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 423–26.Google Scholar
Peters, Ronald D. The Greek Article: A Functional Grammar of ὁ-items in the Greek New Testament with Special Emphasis on the Greek Article, LBS 9 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).Google Scholar
Pierce, Marc. Review of Saussure and Sechehaye: Myth and Genius, by Pieter A. M. Seuren, Linguist List 30–4335 (November 14, 2019), https://linguistlist.org/issues/30/30-4335.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. “Ludwig Wittgenstein,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 271–78.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, 2nd ed. (The Hague: Mouton, 1967).Google Scholar
Piller, Ingrid. “Mikhail Bakhtin,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 23–27.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (New York: William Morrow, 1994).Google Scholar
Piper, John. The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2007).Google Scholar
Pitts, Andrew W. History, Biography, and the Genre of Luke–Acts: An Exploration of Literary Divergence in Greek Narrative Discourse, BINS 177 (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Pitts, Andrew W. “Martin Hengel, the New Tübingen School, and the Study of Christian Origins,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 2:137–57.Google Scholar
Pitts, Andrew W. “Style and Pseudonymity in Pauline Scholarship: A Register Based Configuration,” in Paul and Pseudepigraphy, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Fewster, Gregory P., Pauline Studies 8 (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 113–54.Google Scholar
Pitts, Andrew W., and Tyra, Joshua D.. “Exploring Linguistic Variation in an Ancient Greek Single-Author Corpus: A Register Design Analysis of Josephus and Pauline Pseudonymity,” in The Language and Literature of the New Testament: Essays in Honor of Stanley E. Porter’s 60th Birthday, eds. Fuller Dow, Lois K., Evans, Craig A., and Pitts, Andrew W., BINS 150 (Leiden: Brill, 2017), 257–83.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey. “Noam Chomsky,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 53–59.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Routledge, 2002 [1959]; German original 1935).Google Scholar
Porsch, Felix. Viele Stimmen – ein Glaube: Anfänge, Entfaltung und Grundzüge neutestamentlicher Theologie (Kevelaer: Verlag Butzon & Bercker; Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1982).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikuláš, eds. Romanticism in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “The Adjectival Attributive Genitive in the New Testament: A Grammatical Study,” TJ NS 4 (1983) 3–17.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Biblical Hermeneutics and Theological Responsibility,” in The Future of Biblical Interpretation: Responsible Plurality in Biblical Hermeneutics, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Malcolm, Matthew R. (Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2013), 16–35.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Commentaries on the Book of Romans,” in On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries: Festschrift for Grant R. Osborne on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Schnabel, Eckhard J., TENT 8 (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 365–404.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Constantine Tischendorf: The Life and Work of a 19th Century Bible Hunter (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Dialect and Register in the Greek of the New Testament: Theory,” in Rethinking Contexts, Rereading Texts: Contributions from the Social Sciences to Biblical Interpretation, ed. Carroll R., M. Daniel, JSOTSup 299 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000), 190–208.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “The Functional Distribution of Koine Greek in First-Century Palestine,” in Diglossia and Other Topics in New Testament Linguistics, ed. Porter, Stanley E., JSNTSup 193 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000), 53–78.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Greek Linguistics and Lexicography,” in Understanding the Times: New Testament Studies in the 21st Century. Essays in Honor of D. A. Carson on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, eds. Köstenberger, Andreas J. and Yarbrough, Robert W. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2011), 19–61.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Greek Prepositions in a Systemic Functional Linguistic Framework,” BAGL 6 (2017) 17–43.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1992; 2nd ed., 1994).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Introduction: The Greek of the New Testament as a Disputed Area of Research,” in The Language of the New Testament: Classic Essays, ed.Porter, Stanley E., JSNTSup 60 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1991), 11–38.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “James Hope Moulton and Koine Greek: An Introduction to Moulton’s Prolegomena,” in A Grammar of New Testament Greek, Volume 1: Prolegomena, by Moulton, James Hope, 3rd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1908; repr., London: Bloomsbury, 2019), vii–xlv.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “James Hope Moulton and Wilbert Francis Howard and Greek Phonology and Morphology: An Introduction to Moulton and Howard’s Accidence and Word-Formation,” in A Grammar of New Testament Greek, Volume 2: Accidence and Word-Formation, by Moulton, James Hope and Howard, Wilbert Francis (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1919–1929; repr., London: Bloomsbury, 2019), ix–lxxii.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. John, His Gospel, and Jesus: In Pursuit of the Johannine Voice (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2015).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Καταλλάσσω in Ancient Greek Literature, with Reference to the Pauline Writings, Estudios de Filología Neotestamentaria 5 (Córdoba: Ediciones El Almendro, 1994).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. The Letter to the Romans: A Linguistic and Literary Commentary, NTM 37 (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2015).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Lexical Semantics and New Testament Greek: A Review Article of Some Major Works,” FN 32 (2019) 113–55.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament: Studies in Tools, Methods, and Practice (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “The Linguistic Competence of New Testament Commentaries,” in On the Writing of New Testament Commentaries: Festschrift for Grant R. Osborne on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Schnabel, Eckhard J., TENT 8 (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 33–56.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Linguistic Schools,” in Linguistics in New Testament Greek: Key Issues in the Current Debate, eds. Alan Black, David and Merkle, Benjamin L. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2020), 11–36.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Matthew and Mark: The Contribution of Recent Linguistic Thought,” in Mark and Matthew I. Comparative Readings: Understanding the Earliest Gospels in their First-Century Settings, eds. Becker, Eve-Marie and Runesson, Anders, WUNT 271 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011), 97–119.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “New Testament History and Historiography: The Cleansing of the Temple as a Test Case,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Biblical Exegesis, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Fuller, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Nigel Turner and Greek Style: An Introduction to Moulton’s Fourth Volume, Style,” in A Grammar of New Testament Greek by James Hope Moulton, Volume 4: Style, byTurner, Nigel (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1976; repr., London: Bloomsbury, 2019), vii–xliv.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Nigel Turner and Greek Syntax: An Introduction to Moulton’s Third Volume, Syntax,” in A Grammar of New Testament Greek by James Hope Moulton, Volume 3: Syntax, byTurner, Nigel (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1963; repr., London: Bloomsbury, 2019), ix–l.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Paul Confronts Caesar with the Good News,” in Empire in the New Testament, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Long Westfall, Cynthia, New Testament Studies (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2011), 164–96.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Pauline Techniques of Interweaving Scripture into His Letters,” in Paulinische Schriftrezeption: Grundlagen – Ausprägungen – Wirkungen – Wertungen, eds. Wilk, Florian and Markus, Öhler, FRLANT 268 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017), 23–55.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Register in the Greek of the New Testament: Application with Reference to Mark’s Gospel,” in Rethinking Contexts, Rereading Texts: Contributions from the Social Sciences to Biblical Interpretation, ed. Carroll R., M. Daniel, JSOTSup 299 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000), 209–29.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “A Response to Dan Wallace, or Why a Critical Book Review Should be Left Alone,” JETS 56 (2013) 93–100.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Review of Granville Sharp’s Canon and Its Kin, by Daniel B. Wallace, JETS 53 (2010) 828–32.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Sacred Tradition in the New Testament: Tracing Old Testament Themes in the Gospels and Epistles (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2016).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “So What Have We Learned in the Last Thirty Years of Greek Linguistic Study?” in Getting into the Text: New Testament Essays in Honor of David Alan Black, eds. Aiken, David L. and Hudgins, Thomas W. (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2017), 9–38.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Studies in the Greek New Testament: Theory and Practice, SBG 6 (New York: Peter Lang, 1996).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Studying Ancient Languages from a Modern Linguistic Perspective: Essential Terms and Terminology,” FN 2 (1989) 147–72.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Greek Language: The Need for Further Modeling,” in Modeling Biblical Language: Selected Papers from the McMaster Divinity College Linguistics Circle, eds. Porter, Stanley E., Fewster, Gregory P., and Land, Christopher D., LBS 13 (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 9–47.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Tense Terminology and Greek Language Study: A Linguistic Re-Evaluation,” SWPLL 3 (1986) 77–86.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Θαυμάζω in Mark 6:6 and Luke 11:38: A Note on Monosemy,” BAGL 2 (2013) 75–79.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “Two Myths: Corporate Personality and Language/Mentality Determinism,” SJT 43 (1990) 289–307.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament with Reference to Tense and Mood, SBG 1 (New York: Peter Lang, 1989).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “What Exactly Is Theological Interpretation of Scripture, and Is It Hermeneutically Robust Enough for the Task to Which It Has Been Appointed?” in Horizons in Hermeneutics: A Festschrift in Honor of Anthony C. Thiselton, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Malcolm, Matthew R. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013), 234–67.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “What is a Text? The Linguistic Turn and Its Implications for New Testament Studies,” in Studies on the Intersection of Text, Paratext, and Reception: A Festschrift in Honor of Charles E. Hill, eds. Lanier, Gregory R. and Reid, J. Nicholas, TENT 15 (Leiden: Brill, 2021), 175–98.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “What Is the Relationship between Exegesis and Our Views of Greek, or Vice Versa?” in Linguistics and the Bible: Retrospects and Prospects, eds. Porter, Stanley E., Land, Christopher D., and Pang, Francis G. H., MNTS (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019), 185–209.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. When Paul Met Jesus: How an Idea Got Lost in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. “William Fiddian Moulton and Greek Grammar: An Introduction to Moulton’s Translation of Winer’s Grammar,” in A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament Greek, by Benedikt Winer, Georg, trans. William Fiddian Moulton, 3rd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1882; repr., London: Bloomsbury, 2019), xi–xl.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Dyer, Bryan R.. Origins of New Testament Christology: An Introduction to the Traditions and Titles Applied to Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Land, Christopher D.. “Modeling Negation in Ancient Greek,” FN 32 (2019) 3–20.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Robinson, Jason C.. Active Hermeneutics: Seeking Understanding in an Age of Objectivism (London: Routledge, 2021).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Robinson, Jason C.. Hermeneutics: An Introduction to Interpretive Theory (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Reed, Jeffrey T.. “Greek Grammar since BDF: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis,” FN 4 (1991) 143–64.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Brook O’Donnell, Matthew. “Conjunctions, Clines and Levels of Discourse,” FN 2 (2007) 3–14.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Brook O’Donnell, Matthew. Discourse Analysis and the Greek New Testament: Text-Generating Resources (London: T&T Clark, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., Reed, Jeffrey T., and Brook O’Donnell, Matthew. Fundamentals of New Testament Greek (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010).Google Scholar
Powers, B. Ward. Learn to Read the Greek New Testament: An Approach to New Testament Greek Based upon Linguistic Principles (Adelaide: SPCK Australia, 1979; 5th ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Price, Todd L. Structural Lexicology and the Greek New Testament: Applying Corpus Linguistics for Word Sense Possibility Delimitation Using Collocational Indicators (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2015).Google Scholar
Radermacher, Ludwig. Neutestamentliche Grammatik, HNT 1 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1911; 2nd ed., 1925).Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki. Beyond New Testament Theology: A Story and a Programme (London: SCM Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. The Theory and Practice of History, ed. Iggers, George G. (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973).Google Scholar
Reed, Jeffrey T. A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Method and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity, JSNTSup 136 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1997).Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, Richard. Die hellenistischen Mysterienreligionen nach ihren Grundgedanken und Wirkungen (1901; 3rd ed., Stuttgart: Teubner, 1926), English translation Hellenistic Mystery-Religions: Their Basic Ideas and Significance, trans. John Steely (repr., Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Reventlow, Henning Graf. History of Biblical Interpretation, 4 vols., trans. Leo G. Perdue and James O. Duke (Atlanta, GA: SBL, 2009–2010).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Benjamin E. The Apocalyptic Son of Man in the Gospel of John, WUNT 2/249 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008).Google Scholar
Rhea, Robert. The Johannine Son of Man, AThANT 76 (Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1990).Google Scholar
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. The Emergence of Romanticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Rico, Christophe. Speaking Ancient Greek as a Living Language, 2 vols. (Jerusalem: Polis Institute Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, trans. John B. Thompson (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Ridderbos, Herman. Bultmann, trans. David H. Freeman (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1974).Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. “Describing Poetic Structures: Two Approaches to Baudelaire’s les Chats,” in Structuralism, ed. Ehrmann, Jacques (New York: Doubleday, 1966), 188–230.Google Scholar
Ra, jagopalan, Kanavillil. “Jacques Derrida,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 66–71.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. T. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1914; 2nd ed., 1915; 3rd ed., 1919; 4th ed., 1923 [copyright 1934]).Google Scholar
Robertson, A. T. A Short Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1908; 10th ed., with W. Hersey Davis, 1933).Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. Ancient and Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1955).Google Scholar
Robinson, H. Wheeler. “Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel,” in Werden und Wesen des Alten Testaments: Vorträge gehalten auf der Internationalen Tagung Alttestamentlicher Forscher zu Göttingen vom 4.–10. September 1935, eds. Volz, P., Stummer, F., and Hempel, J., BZAW 66 (Berlin: Töpelmann, 1936), 49–62; repr. in Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel, rev. ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1981), 25–44.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. Wheeler. “The Group and the Individual in Israel,” repr. in Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel, rev. ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1981), 45–60.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. T. In the End, God …: A Study of the Christian Doctrine of the Last Things (London: SCM Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Robinson, Thomas A. Mastering New Testament Greek: Essential Tools for Students (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, William E. W. Metaphor, Morality, and the Spirit in Romans 8:1–17 (Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Rogerson, John W. “De Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 298–302.Google Scholar
Rogerson, John W. “The Hebrew Conception of Corporate Personality: A Re-Examination,” JTS 21 (1970) 1–16.Google Scholar
Rogerson, John. Old Testament Criticism in the Nineteenth Century: England and Germany (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1984).Google Scholar
Rogerson, John W. W. M. L. de Wette: Founder of Modern Biblical Criticism: An Intellectual Biography, JSOTSup 126 (Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Rogerson, John W. “Wilhelm De Wette and His Contemporaries,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: The Enlightenment through the Nineteenth Century, eds. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017), 236–51.Google Scholar
Rollmann, H. “Semler, Johann Salomo,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 355–59.Google Scholar
Rollmann, H. “Wrede, William,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 394–98.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. “Science as Solidarity,” in The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, eds. Nelson, John S., Megill, Allan, and McCloskey, Donald (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987), 37–52.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard M., ed. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Roth, Dieter. “William Wrede and Julius Wellhausen,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, 2 vols., eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A., MBSS 2 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016), 1:189–210.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Essay on the Origin of Languages,” in On the Origin of Language, trans. John H. Moran (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), 5–74.Google Scholar
Routledge, Christopher. “Roland Barthes,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 27–30.Google Scholar
Routledge, Christopher. “Tzvetan Todorov,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 264–67.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles D. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics, SUNY Series in Linguistics (New York: SUNY Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Runge, Stephen E. Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament: A Practical Introduction for Teaching and Exegesis (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. “The Thinking of Thoughts: What is ‘Le Penseur’ Doing?” (1949), repr. in Collected Papers, 2 vols. (London: Hutchinson, 1971), 2:480–96.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. The “Language Instinct” Debate, rev. ed. (London: Continuum, 2005 [1997]).Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. Schools of Linguistics (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Sanday, William, and Headlam, Arthur C.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, 5th ed., ICC (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1902 [1895]).Google Scholar
Sandys-Wuns, ch, J. “Eichhorn, J(ohann) G(ottfried),” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 312–18.Google Scholar
Sandys-Wunsch, John, and Eldredge, Laurence. “J. P. Gabler and the Distinction between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology: Translation, Commentary, and Discussion of His Originality,” SJT 33 (1980) 133–58.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1921).Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality, ed. Mandelbaum, David G. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. “A propos de l’accentuation lituanienne,” MSL 8 (1894) 425–46.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. “Accentuation lituanienne,” Indogermanische Forschungen Anzeiger 6 (1896) 157–66.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics, eds. Bally, Charles, Sechehaye, Albert, and Riedlinger, Albert, trans. Wade Baskin (New York: Philosophical Library, 1959), English translation of Cours de linguistique générale, eds. Bally, Charles, Sechehaye, Albert, and Riedlinger, Albert (Paris: Payot et Rivages, 1995 [1916]).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. “Essai d’une distinction des différents a indo-européens,” MSL 3 (1878) 359–70.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. “Mémoire on the Primitive System of Vowels in the Indo-European Languages,” in A Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics, ed. and trans. Lehmann, Winfred P. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967), 217–24, English translation of Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes (Paris: Vieweg, 1887).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes (Leipzig: Teubner, 1879).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Writings in General Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip. A Companion to the Greek Testament and the English Version (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1889).Google Scholar
Schelkle, Karl Hermann. Theology of the New Testament, 4 vols. (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1971–1978).Google Scholar
Schlatter, Adolf. The History of the Christ: The Foundation of New Testament Theology, trans. Andreas J. Köstenberger (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1997), English translation of Die Geschichte des Christus, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Calwer, 1923).Google Scholar
Schlatter, Adolf. The Theology of the Apostles: The Development of New Testament Theology, trans. Andreas J. Köstenberger (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998), English translation of Die Theologie der Apostel, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Calwer, 1922).Google Scholar
Schlatter, Adolf. “The Theology of the New Testament and Dogmatics,” in The Nature of New Testament Theology: The Contribution of William Wrede and Adolf Schlatter, trans. and ed. Robert Morgan, SBT Second Series 25 (London: SCM Press, 1973), 117–66, English translation of “Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments und die Dogmatik,” Beiträge zur Förderung christlicher Theologie 13 (1909) 7–82.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. Ueber die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde (Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1808; repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen; kurzer Abriss einer Laut- und Formenlehre der indogermanischen Ursprache (Weimar: Hermann Böhlau, 1861; 4th ed., 1876).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings, ed. Bowie, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers, trans. John Oman (New York: Harper, 1958 [1799]).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Daryl Dean. Hellenistic Greek Grammar and Noam Chomsky: Nominalizing Transformations (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Ludwig. The Place of the Gospel in the General History of Literature, trans. Byron R. McCane (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Ludwig. Der Rahmen der Geschichte Jesu: Literarkritische Untersuchungen zur ältesten Jesusüberlieferung (Berlin: Trowitzsch, 1919).Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. The Theology of the First Christians, trans. O. C. Dean Jr. (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1997), English translation of Theologiegeschichte des Urchristentums: Eine Problemgeschichtliche Darstellung (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1994).Google Scholar
Schnabel, Eckhard J. “Biblical Theology from a New Testament Perspective,” JETS 62 (2019) 225–49.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. New Testament Theology Today, trans. David Askew (Montreal: Palm, 1963), English translation of La Théologie du Nouveau Testament, Studio Neotestamentica (Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer, 1961), German version Neutestamentliche Theologie, Der Stand der Forschung (Munich: Kösel, 1965).Google Scholar
Schnelle, Udo. Theology of the New Testament, trans. M. Eugene Boring (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007), English translation of Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007).Google Scholar
Schreiner, Thomas R. New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2008).Google Scholar
Schröter, Jens. From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian Theology and the Origin of the New Testament Canon, trans. Wayne Coppins (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. The Quest of the Historical Jesus: A Critical Study of Its Progress from Reimarus to Wrede, trans. Montgomery, W. (London: A&C Black, 1920).Google Scholar
Schweizer, Eduard. Grammatik der Pergamenischen Inschriften (Berlin: Weidmannsche, 1898).Google Scholar
Schweizer, Eduard. “Menschensohn und eschatologischer Mensch im Frühjudentum,” in Jesus und der Menschensohn, für Anton Vögtle, eds. Pesch, Rudolf and Schnackenburg, Rudolf (Freiburg: Herder, 1975), 100–16.Google Scholar
Scott, Bernard Brandon. Hear Then the Parable: A Commentary on the Parables of Jesus (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1998).Google Scholar
Scott, J. Julius. New Testament Theology: A New Study of the Thematic Structure of the New Testament (Fearn, Ros-shire, Scotland: Mentor, 2008).Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. “Benjamin Lee Whorf,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 268–71.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. “Edward Sapir,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 238–41.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. “Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts,” Philosophical Review 57 (1968) 405–24.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Searle, John R. “Indirect Speech Acts,” in Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, eds. Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (New York: Academic, 1975), 59–82.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. Saussure and Sechehaye: Myth and Genius. A Study in the History of Linguistics and the Foundations of Language (Leiden: Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998).Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. “The Whorf Hypothesis,” in From Whorf to Montague: Explorations in the Theory of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 29–84.Google Scholar
Sheppard, G. T. “Childs, Brevard,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 575–84.Google Scholar
Siebenthal, Heinrich von. Griechische Grammatik zum Neuen Testament, new ed. (Giessen: Brunnen, 2011), English translation Ancient Greek Grammar for the Study of the New Testament (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2019).Google Scholar
Silva, Moisés. Biblical Words and Their Meaning: An Introduction to Lexical Semantics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983; 2nd ed., 1994).Google Scholar
Silva, Moisés. God, Language, and Scripture: Reading the Bible in the Light of General Linguistics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990).Google Scholar
Silva, Moisés, ed. New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis, rev ed., 5 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014).Google Scholar
Sim, Margaret G. Marking Thought and Talk in New Testament Greek: New Light from Linguistics on the Particles ἵνα and ὅτι (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2010).Google Scholar
Sim, Margaret G. A Relevant Way to Read: A New Approach to Exegesis and Communication (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2016).Google Scholar
Simcox, William Henry. The Language of the New Testament (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1890).Google Scholar
Smart, James D. The Past, Present, and Future of Biblical Theology (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1979).Google Scholar
Smit, Peter-Ben, and Renssen, Toon. “The Passivum Divinum: The Rise and Future Fall of an Imaginary Linguistic Phenomenon,” FN 27 (2014) 3–24.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert Weir. Greek Grammar, rev. Gordon M. Messing (repr., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984 [1920]).Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Klyne R. Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018).Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, 2 vols. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Soards, Marion L. The Speeches in Acts: Their Content, Context, and Concerns (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1994).Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. Theological-Political Treatise, 2nd ed., trans. Samuel Shirley (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2001).Google Scholar
Stauffer, Ethelbert. New Testament Theology, trans. John Marsh (London: SCM Press, 1955), English translation of Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1948).Google Scholar
Stein, Robert H. The Method and Message of Jesus’s Teaching, rev. ed. (Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 1994).Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter, ed. The Prague School: Selected Writings, 1929–1946 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Stevens, Anne H. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Stevens, George Barker. The Theology of the New Testament, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1911 [1901]).Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey. “A Lexicon of Postmodern Philosophy,” Religious Studies Review 13 (1987) 18–22.Google Scholar
Stovell, Beth M. Mapping Metaphorical Discourse in the Fourth Gospel: John’s Eternal King, LBS 5 (Leiden: Brill, 2012).Google Scholar
Straub, Jürgen. “Geschichte erzählen, Geschichte bilden: Grundzüge einer narrativen Psychologie einer historischer Sinnbildung,” in Erzählung, Identität und historisches Bewusstsein: Die psychologische Konstruktion von Zeit und Geschichte, ed. Straub, Jürgen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998), 81–169.Google Scholar
Straub, Jürgen. “Temporale Orientierung und narrative Kompetenz,” in Geschichtsbewusstsein: Psychologische Grundlagen, Entwicklungskonzepte, empirische Befunde, ed. Rüsen, Jörn (Cologne: Böhlau, 2001), 15–44.Google Scholar
Straub, Jürgen. “Über das Bilden von Vergangenheit,” in Geschichtsbewusstsein: Psychologische Grundlagen, Entwicklungskonzepte, empirische Befunde, ed. Rüsen, Jörn (Cologne: Böhlau, 2001), 45–113.Google Scholar
Strecker, Georg. Theology of the New Testament, ed. Wilhelm Horn, Friedrich, trans. M. Eugene Boring (New York: de Gruyter; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2000), English translation of Theologie des Neues Testaments (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996).Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, Peter. Biblical Theology of the New Testament, trans. Daniel P. Bailey (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2018), English translation of Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments, 2nd ed. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999).Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. Studies in Greek Noun Formation, 4 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1910–1913).Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, ed. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (London: Academic, 1978).Google Scholar
Talbert, C. H. “Conzelmann, Hans Georg,” in Historical Handbook of Major Biblical Interpreters, ed. McKim, Donald K. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 462–67.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., and Schiffrin, Deborah, eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2 vols., 2nd ed. (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015).Google Scholar
Tappenden, Frederick S. Resurrection in Paul: Cognition, Metaphor, and Transformation (Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Vincent. The Formation of the Gospel Tradition: Eight Lectures (London: Macmillan, 1933).Google Scholar
“Thèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves,” in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. Vachek, Josef (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964), 33–58.Google Scholar
Thielman, Frank. Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2005).Google Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. Fifty Key Thinkers on Language and Linguistics (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. “M. A. K. Halliday,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 116–22.Google Scholar
Thompson, Jeremy, and Widder, Wendy. “Major Approaches to Linguistics,” in Linguistics and Biblical Exegesis, eds. Mangum, Douglas and Westbury, Josh (Bellingham, WA: Lexham, 2017), 87–133.Google Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. Greek for Everyone: Introductory Greek for Bible Study and Application (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2016).Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret E. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, 2 vols., ICC (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994).Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert. Die griechische Sprache im Zeitalter des Hellenismus: Beiträge zur Geschichte und Beurteilung der κοινή (Strassburg: Trübner, 1901).Google Scholar
Thüsing, Wilhelm. Die neutestamentlichen Theologien und Jesus Christus, vol. 1 (Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1981), vols. 2–3, ed. Süding, Thomas (Münster: Aschendorff, 1998–1999).Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose, trans. Richard Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977).Google Scholar
Tödt, Heinz Eduard. The Son of Man in the Synoptic Tradition, trans. Dorothea M. Barton (London: SCM Press, 1965 [1963]).Google Scholar
Tooke, John Horne. ΕΠΕΑ ΠΤΕΡΟΕΝΤΑ, or the Diversions of Purley, 2 vols., ed. Taylor, Richard (London: Thomas Tegg, 1829; repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Treier, Daniel J. Introducing Theological Interpretation of Scripture: Recovering a Christian Practice (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008).Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. Introduction to the Principles of Phonological Descriptions, trans. L. A. Murray, ed. Bluhme, H. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968), English translation of Anleitung zu phonologischen Beschreibungen (Brno: Cercle linguistique de Prague, 1935).Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. Principles of Phonology, trans. Christiane A. M. Baltaxe (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), English translation of Grundzüge der Phonologie (Prague: Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, 1939).Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. “A Theory of Phonological Oppositions,” in Studies in General Linguistics and Language Structure, ed. Liberman, Anatoly, trans. Marvin Taylor and Anatoly Liberman (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001), 14–21, English translation of “Essai d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques,” JP 33 (1936) 5–18.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. “Zur allgemeinen Theorie phonologischer Vokalsysteme,” TCLP 1 (1929) 36–67; repr. in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. Vachek, Josef (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964), 108–42.Google Scholar
Turner, Nigel. A Grammar of New Testament Greek by James Hope Moulton, Volume 3: Syntax (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1963).Google Scholar
Turner, Nigel. A Grammar of New Testament Greek by James Hope Moulton, Volume 4: Style (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1976).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its Theory and Practice (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef, ed. A Prague School Reader in Linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Jermo, Van Nes. Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles: A Study of Linguistic Variation in the Corpus Paulinum, LBS 16 (Leiden: Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Ray, Van Neste. Cohesion and Structure in the Pastoral Epistles, JSNTSup 280 (London: T&T Clark, 2004).Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D., and Randy, LaPolla. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function, CTL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. “Is the Theology of the New Testament One or Many? Between (the Rock of) Systematic Theology and (the Hard Place of) Historical Occasionalism,” in Reconsidering the Relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology in the New Testament, eds. Reynolds, Benjamin E., Lugioyo, Brian, and Vanhoozer, Kevin J., WUNT 2/369 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), 17–38.Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J., ed. Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005).Google Scholar
Varner, William. The Book of James: A New Perspective. A Linguistic Commentary Applying Discourse Analysis (The Woodlands, TX: Kress, 2010).Google Scholar
Vaughan, Curtis, and Gideon, Virtus E.. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament: A Workbook Approach to Intermediate Grammar (Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1979).Google Scholar
Vermes, Geza. “The Son of Man Debate Revisited (1960–2012),” in The Parables of Enoch: A Paradigm Shift, eds. Bock, Darrell L. and Charlesworth, James H. (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013), 3–17.Google Scholar
Vermes, Geza. “The Use of bar nash/bar nasha in Jewish Aramaic,” in An Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts, by Black, Matthew, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1967), 310–28.Google Scholar
Viteau, Joseph. Étude sur le grec du Nouveau Testament: Le Sujet (Paris: Emile Bouillon, 1896).Google Scholar
Viteau, Joseph. Étude sur le grec du Nouveau Testament: Le Verbe (Paris: Emile Bouillon, 1893).Google Scholar
Von Thaden Jr., Robert H. Sex, Christ, and Embodied Cognition: Paul’s Wisdom for Corinth (Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Vouga, François. Une théologie du Nouveau Testament, Le monde de la Bible 43 (Geneva: Labor et Fides, 2001).Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. Lectures on Syntax, ed. Langslow, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996).Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. Review of The Greek Article: A Functional Grammar of ὁ-items in the Greek New Testament with Special Emphasis on the Greek Article by Ronald D. Peters, Review of Biblical Literature (2015) (online).Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Agape, Eros, Gender: Towards a Pauline Sexual Ethic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith (London: T&T Clark International, 2004).Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Text and Truth: Redefining Biblical Theology (London: T&T Clark, 1997).Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. Text, Church and World: Biblical Interpretation in Theological Perspective (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994).Google Scholar
Weinel, Heinrich. Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments: Die Religion Jesu und des Urchristentums, 4th ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1928 [1911]).Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernhard. Biblical Theology of the New Testament, 2 vols., trans. David Eaton and James E. Duguid (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1882–1883), English translation of Lehrbuch der Biblischen Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Berlin: W. Hertz, 1868).Google Scholar
Weiss, Johannes. Das Urchristentum (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1914), English translation The History of Primitive Christianity, ed. Grant, F. C. (New York: Erickson, 1937), repr. Earliest Christianity: A History of the Period A.D. 30–150, 2 vols. (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1970).Google Scholar
Wellek, René. “Vilém Mathesius (1882–1945): Founder of the Prague Linguistic Circle,” in Sound, Sign and Meaning: Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle, ed. Matejka, Ladislav (Ann Arbor: Department of Slavic Languages and Literature University of Michigan, 1976), 1–5.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, and Warren, Austin. Theory of Literature (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949).Google Scholar
Wenham, David. Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity? (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995).Google Scholar
Wernle, Paul. Die Anfänge unserer Religion (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1901), English translation The Beginnings of Christianity, 2 vols., trans. G. A. Bienemann, ed. Morrison, W. D. (New York: Putnam’s Sons, 1903–1904).Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia Long. A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning, LNTS 297 (London: T&T Clark, 2005).Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “The Philosophical/Theological Response,” in Biblical Hermeneutics: Five Views, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Stovell, Beth M. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2012), 160–73.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. Whose Community? Which Interpretation? Philosophical Hermeneutics for the Church (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2009).Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. The Life and Growth of Language (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1875; repr., London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, eds. Carroll, John B., Levinson, Stephen C., and Lee, Penny, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Williams, John. “Bronislaw Malinowski,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 186–87.Google Scholar
Wimsatt Jr., William K., and Monroe, C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy,” repr. in The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry by Wimsatt Jr., William K. (New York: Noonday Press, 1954), 3–18.Google Scholar
Winer, Georg Benedikt. Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Sprachidioms (Leipzig: Vogel, 1822; 2nd ed., 1828; 3rd ed., 1830; 4th ed., 1836; 5th ed., 1844; 6th ed., 1855; 7th ed., ed. Lünemann, Gottlieb, Leipzig: Vogel, 1868; 8th ed., ed. Schmiedel, Paul, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1894–1898).Google Scholar
Winer, Georg Benedikt. A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament Greek, Regarded as A Sure Basis for New Testament Exegesis, 3rd ed., trans. W. F. Moulton (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1882).Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas G. “Jan Mukarovsky: The Beginnings of Structural and Semiotic Aesthetics,” in Sound, Sign and Meaning: Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle, ed. Matejka, Ladislav (Ann Arbor: Department of Slavic Languages and Literature University of Michigan, 1976), 433–55.Google Scholar
Winters, Clifford T. Argument is War: Relevance-Theoretic Comprehension of the Conceptual Metaphor of War in the Apocalypse, LBS 18 (Leiden: Brill, 2020).Google Scholar
Wishart, Ryder A. “Friedrich Blass and A. T. Robertson: Comprehensive and Comparative Greek Grammars from the Modern Vantage Point,” in Pillars in the History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: Further Essays on Prevailing Methods, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and Dawson, Zachary K., MBSS 6 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2021), 89–109.Google Scholar
Wishart, Ryder A. “Monosemy: A Theoretical Sketch for Biblical Studies,” BAGL 7 (2018) 107–39.Google Scholar
Wishart, Ryder A. “Monosemy in Biblical Studies: A Critical Analysis of Recent Work,” BAGL 6 (2017) 99–126.Google Scholar
Witherington III, Ben. The Indelible Image: The Theological and Ethical Thought World of the New Testament, 2 vols. (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009–2010).Google Scholar
Witkosky, David V. “Leonard Bloomfield,” in Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, eds. Chapman, Siobhan and Routledge, Christopher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 34–41.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, eds. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Wong, Simon S. M. A Classification of Semantic Case-Relations in the Pauline Epistles, SBG 9 (New York: Peter Lang, 1997).Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William, and Taylor Coleridge, Samuel. Lyrical Ballads, eds. R. L. Brett and A. R. Jones, 2nd ed. (repr., London: Routledge, 1991 [1798]).Google Scholar
Wrede, William. The Messianic Secret, trans. Greig, J. C. G. (Cambridge: J. Clarke, 1971 [1901]).Google Scholar
Wrede, William. Paul, trans. Edward Lummis (London: Philip Green, 1907), English translation of Paulus, RV (Halle: Gebauer-Schwetschke, 1904).Google Scholar
Wrede, William. “The Task and Methods of ‘New Testament Theology,’” in The Nature of New Testament Theology: The Contribution of William Wrede and Adolf Schlatter, trans. and ed. Robert Morgan, SBT Second Series 25 (London: SCM Press, 1973), 68–116, English translation of Über Aufgabe und Methode der sogenannten neutestamentlichen Theologie (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1897).Google Scholar
Wright, Adam K. Of Conflict and Concealment: The Gospel of Mark as Tragedy, MBSS 5 (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2020).Google Scholar
Wright, G. Ernest. Biblical Archaeology (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster; London: Gerald Duckworth, 1957).Google Scholar
Wright, G. Ernest. The God Who Acts: Biblical Theology as Recital, SBT 8 (London: SCM Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Wright, G. Ernest. The Old Testament Against Its Environment, SBT 2 (London: SCM Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Wright, G. Ernest, and Fuller, Reginald H.. The Book of the Acts of God: Contemporary Scholarship Interprets the Bible (Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday, 1960).Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. Comparative Grammar of the Greek Language (London: Oxford University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. “Adam in Pauline Christology,” in SBLSP 1983, ed. Harold Richards, Kent (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983), 359–89; repr. in edited form in The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991), 18–40.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. The Kingdom New Testament: A Contemporary Translation (New York: HarperCollins, 2011).Google Scholar
Xue, Xiaxia E. Paul’s Viewpoint on God, Israel, and the Gentiles in Romans 9–11: An Intertextual Thematic Analysis (Carlisle: Langham, 2015).Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Robert W. “Modern Reception of Schlatter’s New Testament Theology,” in The Theology of the Apostles: The Development of New Testament Theology, by Schlatter, Adolf, trans. Andreas J. Köstenberger (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998), English translation of Die Theologie der Apostel, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Calwer, 1922), 417–31.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Robert W. The Salvation Historical Fallacy? Reassessing the History of New Testament Theology, HB 2 (Leiden: Deo, 2004).Google Scholar
Yoon, David I. A Discourse Analysis of Galatians and the New Perspective on Paul, LBS 17 (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Yoon, David I. “James Barr and Erroneous Method in Biblical Theology: Paul and the Gift as a Test Case,” in James Barr Assessed: Evaluating His Legacy over the Last Sixty Years, ed. Porter, Stanley E., BINS 192 (Leiden: Brill, 2021), 278–94.Google Scholar
Yoon, David I. “The Theological Inception of Intertextuality and its Dissonance in Current Biblical Studies,” CBR 12 (2012) 58–76.Google Scholar
Yoon, Hye-Joon. The Rhetoric of Tenses in Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations (Leiden: Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Young, Richard A. Intermediate New Testament Greek: A Linguistic and Exegetical Approach (Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman, 1994).Google Scholar
Yule, George. The Study of Language, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [1985]).Google Scholar
Zerwick, Maximilian. Biblical Greek Illustrated by Examples, trans. Joseph Smith (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1963 [1944]).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Ruben. Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretation (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2005).Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Jan, ed. On Philology (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990).Google Scholar