Book contents
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Theories of Political Sociology
- 1 Power
- 2 Conflict Theories in Political Sociology
- 3 The Promise of Field Theory for the Study of Political Institutions
- 4 Culture in Politics and Politics in Culture
- 5 Political Sociology and the Postcolonial Perspective
- 6 Gender, State, and Citizenships
- 7 Theories of Race, Ethnicity, and the Racial State
- 8 Toward the Convergence of Culture and Political Economy?
- 9 Tasks for the Political Sociology of the Next Ten Years
- II Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals
- III The State and Its Political Organizations
- IV Civil Society: The Roots and Processes of Political Action
- V Established and New State Policies and Innovations
- VI Globalization and New and Bigger Sources of Power and Resistance
- Index
- References
6 - Gender, State, and Citizenships
Challenges and Dilemmas in Feminist Theorizing
from I - Theories of Political Sociology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2020
Book contents
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Theories of Political Sociology
- 1 Power
- 2 Conflict Theories in Political Sociology
- 3 The Promise of Field Theory for the Study of Political Institutions
- 4 Culture in Politics and Politics in Culture
- 5 Political Sociology and the Postcolonial Perspective
- 6 Gender, State, and Citizenships
- 7 Theories of Race, Ethnicity, and the Racial State
- 8 Toward the Convergence of Culture and Political Economy?
- 9 Tasks for the Political Sociology of the Next Ten Years
- II Media Explosion, Knowledge as Power, and Demographic Reversals
- III The State and Its Political Organizations
- IV Civil Society: The Roots and Processes of Political Action
- V Established and New State Policies and Innovations
- VI Globalization and New and Bigger Sources of Power and Resistance
- Index
- References
Summary
The concept of citizenships, in the plural, reflects different research traditions in citizenship theorizing: citizenship as legal status in a sovereign state, as a bearer of rights and obligations; citizenship as participation (civic republicanism); and citizenship as social membership. Each of these enhances capabilities of individuals to become participants in political, economic, and social spheres of life. Citizenships as a concept also embraces practices: how these aspects of citizenship are experienced in everyday encounters and the relationships of power – in families, workplaces, welfare offices, social movements – and their variations in institutional contexts.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Handbook of Political Sociology , pp. 153 - 190Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abraham, Margaret. 2010. “Globalization, Work and Citizenship: The Call Centre in India” pp. 41–56 in Abraham, Margaret, Ngan-ling Chow, Esther, Maratou-Alipranti, Laura, and Tastsoglou, Evangelia (eds.) Contours of Citizenship: Women, Diversity and Practices of Citizenship. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Abraham, Margaret, Ngan-ling Chow, Esther, Maratou-Alipranti, Laura, and Tastsoglou, Evangelia (eds.). 2010. Contours of Citizenship: Women, Diversity and Practices of Citizenship. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Anttonen, Anneli and Sipilä, Jorma. 1996. “European Social Care Services: Is It Possible to Identify Models?” Journal of European Social Policy 6(2): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bacchi, Carol Lee. 1990. Same Difference: Feminism and Sexual Difference. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Backlund-Rambaree, Brita. 2017. “Contextualising Constructions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Social Embeddedness in Discourse and Institutional Contexts.” PhD. dissertation. Stockholm Studies in Sociology, New Series 64. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Sikata. 2005. Make Me a Man! Masculinity, Hinduism, and Nationalism in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boje, Thomas and Leira, Arnlaug (eds.). 2000. Gender, Welfare State and the Market: Towards a New Division of Labour. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Guiliano and Natali, David (eds.). 2012. The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonvin, Jean Michel, Laruffa, Francesco, and Rosenstein, Emile. 2018. “Towards a Critical Sociology of Democracy: The Potential of the Capability Approach.” Critical Sociology 44(6): 953–968.Google Scholar
Boris, Eileen. 1995. “The Racialized Gendered State: Constructions of Citizenship in the United States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2(1): 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carbonnier, Clément and Nathelie, Morel (eds.). 2015. The Political Economy of Household Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen and Miller, Mark J.. 2003. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
CEDAW. 1979. “Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women.” www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw.htmGoogle Scholar
Choo, Hae Yeon. 2016. Decentering Citizenship: Gender, Labor, and Migrant Rights in South Korea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Choo, Hae Yeon and Ferree, Myra Marx. 2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory 8(2): 129–149.Google Scholar
Choo, Sumi, Crenshaw, Kimberlé, and Leslie, McCall. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Application and Praxis.” Signs 38(4): 785–810.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Dorte and Jensen, Sune Qvotrup. 2014. “Combining Hegemonic Masculinity and Intersectionality.” Norma: The International Journal for Masculinity Studies 9(1): 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Dorte and Larsen, Jørgen Elm. 2008. “Gender, Class, and Family: Men and Gender Equality in a Danish Context.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State & Society 15(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Churchwell, Sarah. 2018. Behold, America: A History of America First and the American Dream. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Clark, Lorenne M. G. and Lange, Lynda (eds.). 1979. The Sexism of Social and Political Theory: Women and Reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Richard and Sheldon, Sally. 2008. Fragmenting Fatherhood: A Socio-Legal Study. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 1990. “The State, Gender, and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal.” Theory and Society 19(5): 507–544.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn, Hearn, Jeff, and Kimmel, Michael. 2005. “Introduction” pp. 1–12 in Kimmel, Michael, Hearn, Jeff, and Connell, R. W. (eds.) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum, special issue: “Feminism and the Law: Theory, Practice and Criticism” 1989(1): 139–168.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2003. “Three Waves of Feminism in Denmark” pp. 341–350 in Griffin, Gabriele and Braidotti, Rosi (eds.) Thinking Differently: A Reader in European Women’s Studies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary and Lewis, Jane. 2000. “The Concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States.” British Journal of Sociology 51(2): 281–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, Alan and Williams, Fiona. 2004. “Introduction: Themed Section on Care, Values and the Future of Welfare.” Social Policy & Society 3(4): 467–493.Google Scholar
Dean, Hartley. 2009. “Critiquing Capabilities: The Distractions of a Beguiling Concept.” Critical Social Policy 29(2): 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jodi. 1996. Solidarity of Strangers: Feminist after Identity Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1992. “Context Is All: Feminism and Theories of Citizenship” pp. 63–85 in Mouffe, Chantel (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship and Community. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 2003. “Current Controversies in Feminist Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra and Tastsoglou, Evangelia (eds.). 2006. “Crossing Boundaries and Making Connections” pp. 1–36 in Tastsoglou, Evangelia and Dobrowolsky, Alexandra (eds.) Women, Migration and Citizenship: Making Local, National and Transnational Connections. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dobson, Andrew. 2003. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Mike, Hibbins, Raymond, Howson, Richard, and Pease, Bob (eds.). 2009. Migrant Men: Critical Studies of Masculinities and the Migration Experience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul K. and Elger, Toni (eds.). 1999. The Global Economy, National States, and the Regulation of Labour. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hochschild, Arlie (eds.). 2003. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Enarson, Elaine and Pease, Bob (eds.). 2016. Men, Masculinities and Disaster. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Anne R. and Fuchs, Rachel G. (eds.). 2017. Gender and Citizenship in Historical and Transnational Perspective: Agency, Space, Borders. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (ed.). 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2000. “Patriarchies and Feminisms: The Two Women’s Movements of Post-Unification Germany” pp. 156–172 in Hobson, Barbara (ed.) Gender and Citizenship in Transition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2018. “Review of Intersectionalities.” Contemporary Sociology 47(2): 127–132.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx and Tripp, Aili Mari (eds.). 2006. Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy, Olin Wright, Erik, Andersson, Jenny, Hearn, Jeff, Himmelweit, Sue, and Sterling, Andy. 2018. “The Multiple Directions of Social Progress: Ways Forward” pp. 815–845 in International Panel on Social Progress, Rethinking Society for the 21st Century: Report of the International Panel on Social Progress, Volume 3: Transformations in Values, Norms, Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franzway, Suzanne. 2016. “The Sexual Politics of Citizenship and Violence.” Women’s Studies International Forum 58: 18–24.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997b. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2003. “Rethinking Recognition: Overcoming Displacement and Reification in Cultural politics” pp. 21–34 in Hobson, Barbara (ed.) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda. 1994. “A Genealogy of Dependency – Tracing a Keyword of the United-States Welfare-State.” Signs 19: 309–336.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan and Kligman, Gail. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1999. The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nanako. 2004. Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hakim, Catherine. 2006. “Women, Careers, And Work–Life Preferences.” British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 34(3): 279–294.Google Scholar
Halsaa, Beatrice, Roseneil, Sasah, and Sümer, Sevil (eds.). 2012. Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe: Women’s Movements, Gender and Diversity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 1987. The Gender of Oppression: Men, Masculinity and the Critique of Marxism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 1998. “The Welfare of Men?” pp. 11–36 in Popay, Jennie, Hearn, Jeff, and Edwards, Julia (eds.) Men, Gender Divisions and Welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 2004a. “From Hegemonic Masculinity to the Hegemony of Men.” Feminist Theory 5(1): 49–72.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 2004b. “Tracking ‘the Transnational’: Studying Transnational Organizations and Managements, and the Management of Cohesion.” Culture and Organization 10(4): 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 2006. “The Implications of Information and Communication Technologies for Sexualities and Sexualized Violences: Contradictions of Sexual Citizenships.” Political Geography 25(8): 944–963.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 2011. “Neglected Intersectionalities in Studying Men: Age/ing, Virtuality, Transnationality” pp. 89–104 in Lutz, Helma, Herrera Vivar, Maria T., and Supik, Linda (eds.) Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 2015. Men of the World: Genders, Globalizations, Transnational Times. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff, Aboim, Sofia, and Shefer, Tamara. 2018. “Sexualities, Social Justice and Sexual Justice” pp. 228–240 in Craig, Gary (ed.) The Global Handbook on Social Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff and Blagojević, Marina. 2013. “Introducing and Rethinking Transnational Men” pp. 1–24 in Hearn, Jeff, Blagojević, Marina, and Harrison, Katherine (eds.) Rethinking Transnational Men: Beyond, Between and Within Nations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff and Pringle, Keith, with members of Critical Research on Men in Europe. 2006. European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hellgren, Zenia. 2015. “Markets, Regimes and the Role of Stakeholders: Explaining Precariousness of Migrant Care/Domestic Workers in Different Institutional Frameworks.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22(2): 220–241.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga Maria. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q. and Thompson, Graeme. 1999. Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. 1990. “No Exit No Voice: Women’s Economic Dependency and the Welfare State.” Acta Sociologia 33(3): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. 1994. “Solo Mothers, Social Policy Regimes and the Logics of Gender” pp. 170–187 in Sainsbury, Diane (ed.) Gendering Welfare States. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. (ed.). 2002. Making Men into Fathers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. (ed.). 2003. Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. 2004. “Solo Mothers, Policy Regimes, and the Logics of Gender” in Sainsbury, Diane (ed.) Gendering Welfare States. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara and Susanne, Fahlén. 2012. “Fathers’ Capabilities for Care. A European Perspective” pp. 85–89 in Betram, Hans and Elhert, Nancy (eds.) Family Ties and Care: Family Transformation in a Plural Modernity. Berlin: Barbara Budich.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara, Hellgren, Zenia, and Serrano, Inma. 2018. “Migrants, Markets and Domestic Work: Do Institutional Contexts Matter in the Personal Household Service Sector?” Journal of European Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717753578 (advance online publication).Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara and Lindholm, Marika. 1997. “Collective Identities, Women’s Power Resources, and the Making of Welfare states.” Theory and Society 26(4): 475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Barbara and Lister, Ruth. 2002. “Citizenship” pp. 23–54 in Hobson, Barbara, Lewis, Jane, and Siim, Birte (eds.) Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara and Morgan, David. 2002. “Introduction” pp. 1–24 in Hobson, Barbara (ed.) Making Men into Fathers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holter, Øystein Gullvåg. 2005. “Social Theories for Researching Men and Masculinities: Direct Gender Hierarchy and Structural Inequality” pp. 15–35 in Kimmel, Michael, Hearn, Jeff, and Connell, R. W. (eds.) The Handbook of Studies of Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO). 2011. Domestic Workers Convention 211 (189). www.Ilo.orgGoogle Scholar
Isin, Engin F. and Nielsen, Greg M. (eds.). 2008. Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 1998. Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 2015. “Social Innovation: Redesigning the Welfare Diamond” pp. 89–106 in Nicholls, Alex, Simon, Julie, and Gabriel, Nathalie (eds.) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Kathleen. 1994, “Identity, Action and Locale: Thinking about Citizenship, Citizenship, Civic Action and Feminism.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 1(2): 256–270.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Paul. 2012. “The Just Commodification of Women, Equal Care Obligations for Men and Women in Autonomous Households: Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States in 20 OECD Countries.” Social Science & Medicine 75(8): 1332–1350.Google Scholar
Kilkey, Majela and Jonathan, Bradshaw. 1999. “Lone Mothers, Economic Well-Being and Policies” pp. 147–184 in Sainsbury, Diane (ed.) Gender and Welfare State Regimes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kilkey, Majella, Lutz, Helma, and Palenga-Möllenbeck, Ewa. 2010. “Introduction: Domestic and Care Work at the Intersection of Welfare, Gender and Migration Regimes: Some European Experiences.” Social Policy and Society 9(3): 379–384.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. 2002. “Global Masculinities: Restoration and Resistance” pp. 21–37 in Pease, Bob and Pringle, Keith (eds.) A Man’s World: Changing Men’s Practices in a Globalized World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael, Hearn, Jeff, and Connell, R. W. (eds.). 2005. The Handbook of Studies of Men and Masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kite, Cynthia. 2004. “The Stability of the Globalized Welfare State” pp. 213–238 in Södersten, Bo (ed.) Globalization and the Welfare State. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knauss, Peter R. 1987. The Persistence of Patriarchy: Class, Gender, and Ideology in Twentieth Century Algeria. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Knijn, Trudie and Kremer, Monique. 1997. “Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 4(3): 328–361.Google Scholar
Kofman, Eleanor and Raghuram, Parvati. 2015. Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship.” American Sociological Review 54(3): 309–329.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2000.“Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 7(2): 127–129.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, Ferrarini, Tommy, and Englund, Stefan. 2013. “Women’s Opportunities under Different Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-Examined.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 20(1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya. 1993. Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and The Origins of Welfare States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laliberté, André. 2017. “Responses to Abuse against Migrant Domestic Workers: A Multi-scalar Comparison of Taiwan, Hong Kong and Shanghai” pp. 115–142 in Michel, Sonya and Peng, Ito (eds.) Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (Springer International).Google Scholar
Leira, Arnlaug and araceno, Chiara. 2002. “Care: Actors, Relationships and Contexts” pp. 55–83 in Hobson, Barbara, Lewis, Jane, and Siim, Birte (eds.) Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Leon, Margarita (ed.). 2014. The Transformation of Care in European Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Levitas, Ruth. 1998. The Inclusive Society?: Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 1992. “Gender and Welfare Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–173.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 2009. Work–Family Balance and Gender Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 1994. “‘She Has Other Duties’ – Women, Citizenship and Social Security” pp. 31–44 in Baldwin, Sally and Falkingham, Jane (eds.) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 1998. “Citizenship and Difference. Towards a Differentiated Universalism.” European Journal of Social Theory 1: 71–90.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 2011. “From the Intimate to the Global: Reflections in Gendered Citizenship” pp. 27–41 in Oleksy, Elżbieta, Hearn, Jeff, and Golańska, Dorota (eds.) The Limits of Gendered Citizenship. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The Man of Reason: “Male” & “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith (ed.). 2005. Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Lutz, Helma (ed.). 2008. Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme. Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lutz, Helma, Herrera Vivar, Maria T., and Supik, Linda (eds.). 2011. Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2009. “The OECD’s Discourse on the Reconciliation of Work and Family Life.” Global Social Policy 9(2): 183–204.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne and McBride, Stephen (eds.). 2008. The OECD and Transnational Governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne and Michel, Sonya. 2017. “Out of Focus: Migrant Women Caregivers as seen by the ILO and OECD” pp. 269–295 in Michel, Sonya and Peng, Ito (eds.) Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (Springer International).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, A my and McBride, Dorothy. 2007. “State Feminism since the 1980s: From Loose Notion to Operationalized Concept.” Politics & Gender 3(4): 501–513.Google Scholar
Michel, Sonya and Peng, Ito. 2017. “Introduction” pp. 2–23 in Michel, Sonya and Peng, Ito (eds.) Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (Springer International).Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Misra, Joya. 2018. “Categories, Structures, and Intersectional Theory” pp. 111–130 in Messerschmidt, James W., Yancey Martin, Patricia, Messner, Michael A., and Connell, Raewyn (eds.) Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” boundary 2 12(3): 333–358.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. “‘Under Western Eyes’ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles.” Signs 28(2): 499–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes M. (eds.). 1991. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Anna, Moring (ed.). 2006. Democracy and Gender: A Publication to Honour the 100th Anniversary of Women’s Right to Vote. Helsinki, Finland: Nytkis/Otava.Google Scholar
Munro, Surya and Warren, Lorna. 2004. “Transgendering Citizenship.” Sexualities 7(3): 345–362.Google Scholar
Naobumi, Abe and Brase, Michael. 2012. The Complete Guide to Japanese Systems. Tokyo: IBC.Google Scholar
Novikova, Irina and Kambourov, Dimitrar (eds.). 2003. Men and Masculinities in the Global World: Integrating Postsocialist Perspectives. Helsinki, Finland: Kikimora/Aleksantteri Institute.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Julia S. 1993. “Gender, Class and Citizenships in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Journal of British Sociology 44(30): 501–518.Google Scholar
Oechsle, Mechtild, Müller, Ursula, and Hess, Sabine (eds.). 2012. Fatherhood in Late Modernity: Cultural Images, Social Practices, Structural Frames. Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller and Cohen, Joshua. 1999. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oleksy, Elżbieta, Hearn, Jeff, and Golańska, Dorota (eds.). 2011. The Limits of Gendered Citizenship: Contexts and Contradictions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, K aren. 2012. International Migration and Social Theory. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship – the Comparative-Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58: 303–328.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann. 2009. “Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda.” Sociological Theory 27(3): 317–343.Google Scholar
Parreñas, Rhacel. 2001. Servants of Globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascall, Gillian. 1993. “Citizenship – A Feminist Analysis” pp. 113–126 in Drover, Glenn and Kerans, Patrick (eds.) New Approaches to Welfare Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Paternotte, David. 2015. “Global Times, Global Debates: Same Sex Marriage Worldwide.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22(4): 510–533.Google Scholar
Pessar, Patricia R. and Mahler, Sarah J.. 2003. “Transnational Migration: Bringing Gender In.” International Migration Review 37(3): 812–846.Google Scholar
Petras, James and Veltmeyer, Henry. 2001. Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Pettman, Jan Jindy. 1999. “Globalization and the Gendered Politics of Citizenship” pp. 207–220 in Yuval-Davis, Nira and Werbner, Pnina (eds.) Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1992. “Universal Pretensions in Political Thought” pp. 10–20 in Phillips, Anne and Barrett, Michèle (eds.) Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2003. “Recognition and the Struggle for Political Voice” pp. 263–273 in Hobson, Barbara (ed.) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2007. Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Plummer, Ken. 2001. “The Square of Intimate citizenship: Some Preliminary Proposals.” Citizenship Studies 5(3): 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponzanesi, Sandra (ed.). 2014. Gender, Globalization, and Violence: Postcolonial Conflict Zones. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Predelli, Line Nyhagen and Halsaa, Beatrice (eds.). 2012. Majority–Minority Relations in Contemporary Women’s Movements: Strategic Sisterhood. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Razavi, Shahrashoub and Staab, Silke. 2018. “Rethinking Social Policy; A Gender Perspective from the Developing World” pp. 74–89 in haver, Sheila (ed.) Handbook on Social Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland. 1995. “Glocalization: Time-space and Homogeneity-heterogeneity” pp. 25–44 in Featherstone, Mike, Lash, Scott, and Robertson, Roland (eds.) Global Modernities. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland and Khondker, Habib Haque. 1998. “Discourses of Globalization: Preliminary Considerations.” International Sociology 13(1): 25–40.Google Scholar
Roggeband, Conny and Lettinga, Doutje. 2016. “In Defence of Gender Equality. Comparing the Political Debates about Headscarves and Honor-Related Violence in France and Netherlands.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 23(2): 239–262.Google Scholar
Ruhs, Martin and Anderson, Bridgit. 2010. “Semi-Compliance and Illegality in Migrant Labour Markets: An Analysis of Migrants, Employers And the State in the UK.” Population, Space and Place 16(3): 195–221.Google Scholar
Safa, Helen Icken. 1990. “Women’s Movements in Latin America.” Gender & Society 4(3): 354–369.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality, and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Saraceno, Chiara and Keck, Wolfgang. 2011. “Towards an Integrated Approach for the Analysis of Gender Equity in Policies Supporting Paid Work and Care Responsibilities.” Demographic Research 25: 371–406.Google Scholar
Scambor, Elli, Wojnicka, Katarzyna, and Bergmann, Nadja (eds.). 2013. Study on the Role of Men in Gender Equality. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. https://bit.ly/2uwNEoO.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1993. “Capability and Well-being” pp. 30–53 in Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya (eds.) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaver, Sheila. 1994. “Body Rights, Social Rights and the Liberal Welfare State.” Critical Social Policy 13(39): 66–93.Google Scholar
Shire, Karen. 2015. “Family Supports and Insecure Work: The Politics of Household Service Employment in Conservative Welfare Regimes.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22(2): 220–241.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte. 2000. Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonazzi, Annamara. 2009. “Care Regimes and National Employment Models.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(2): 211–232.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark J. and Pangsapa, Piya. 2008. Environment and Citizenship: Integrating Justice, Responsibility and Civic Engagement. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. 2011. “Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness and the Right to Have Rights.” Socio-Economic Review 9(2): 395–418.Google Scholar
Song, Sarah. 2009. Gender and the Politics of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490354.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988a. ”Can the Subaltern Speak?” pp. 271–313 in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988b. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2005. “Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation.” Social Politics 12(3): 366–388.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietland and Lewis, Jane. 2002. “Social Capital – An Emerging Concept” pp. 195–239 in Hobson, Barbara, Lewis, Jane, and Siim, Birte (eds.) Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tastsoglou, Evangelia and Dobrowolsky, Alexandra (eds.). 2006. Women, Migration and Citizenship: Making Local, National and Transnational Connections. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, Anna (ed.). 2013. Irregular Migrant Domestic Workers in Europe: Who Cares? Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1990. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1993. “Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Citizenship” pp. 1–18 in Turner, Bryan S. (ed.) Citizenship and Social Theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
van den Broek, Thijs and Dykstra, Pearl A.. 2016. “Care Ideals in the Netherlands: Shifts between 2011 and 2011.” Canadian Journal of Aging 34(3): 268–281.Google Scholar
Verloo, Mieke. 2005. “Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics 12(3): 321–343.Google Scholar
Jeremy, Waddington (ed.). 1999. Globalization and Patterns of Labour Resistance. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia, Armstrong, Jo, and Strid, Sophia. 2012. “Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory.” Sociology 46(2):224–240.Google Scholar
Werbner, Pnina. 1999. “Political Motherhood and the Feminisation of Citizenship: Women’s Activism and the Transformation of the Public Sphere” pp. 221–245 in Yuval-Davis, Nira and Werbner, Pnina (eds.) Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 1995. “Race Ethnicity, Gender, and Class in Welfare States – a Framework for Comparative-Analysis.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2: 127–159.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 2003. “Contesting ‘Race’ and Gender in the European Union: A Multilayered Recognition Struggle for Voice And Visibility” pp. 141–143 in Hobson, Barbara (ed.) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 2012. “Converging Variations in Migrant Care Work in Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 22(4): 363–376.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 2017. “Intersections of Migrant Care Work: An Overview” pp. 23–40 in Michel, Sonya and Peng, Ito (eds.) Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (Springer International).Google Scholar
Woodward, Alison. 2004. “Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance” pp. 76–94 in Christiansen, Thomas and Piattoni, Simona (eds.) Informal Governance in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2007. “Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging” pp. 7–22 in Bennett, Jennifer (ed.) Scratching the Surface: Democracy, Traditions, Gender. Lahore, Pakistan: Heinrich Böll Foundation.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2013. “Citizenship, Autochthony, and the Question of Forced Migration.” Refugee Studies Quarterly 32(2): 53–66.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by