Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:42:52.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Resilience and longevity:

expert survivorship of centenarians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

By
Peter Martin ,
Maurice MacDonald ,
Jennifer Margrett  and
Leonard W. Poon
Edited by
Prem S. Fry  and
Corey L. M. Keyes
Prem S. Fry
Affiliation:
Trinity Western University, British Columbia
Corey L. M. Keyes
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Centenarians are survivors, and many among them exemplify sustained competence into very old age. This paper highlights three important resilience domains among centenarians: personal resilience (e.g., personality), cognitive resilience (e.g., intellectual functioning), and social and economic resilience (e.g., social support and economic resources). These psychosocial resources of resilience are linked to overall functioning and survivorship among centenarians. Our findings suggest that a “robust” personality, cognitive reserves, and social and economic resources are salient resilience factors necessary for survival and optimal functioning and well-being. To illustrate, personality traits (e.g., competence) and perceived economic status served as mediators between negative life stress and negative affect. With regard to cognition, some centenarians function very well despite low education or poor physical functioning. Finally, perceived economic status mediates the relation between physical functioning and negative affect. Taken together, we conclude that psychosocial resources and resilience are important components of quality of life in late life.

Introduction

Resilience is a descriptor placed on individuals or groups of individuals who survived in the face of adversities. Resilience has been used to describe survivors of the September 11, 2001 attack at the New York World Trade Center as well as the 2005 Katrina hurricane survivors in New Orleans. Masten (2001) defined resilience as “a class of phenomena characterized as good outcome in spite of serious threats to adaptation or development” (p. 227).

Type
Chapter
Information
New Frontiers in Resilient Aging
Life-Strengths and Well-Being in Late Life
 , pp. 213 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Alzheimer's Association. (2007). Alzheimer's Disease facts and figures. Chicago, IL. Retrieved April 20, 2007, from http://www.alz.org/national/documents/report_alzfactsfigures2008.pdf
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In Damon, W. and Eisenberg, N. (eds.), Handbook of child development, vol.III: Social, emotional, and personality psychology (5th edn., pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Frias, C. M., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., and Nilsson, L. G. (2007). Revisiting the dedifferentiation hypothesis with longitudinal multi-cohort data. Intelligence, 35, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1988). Multidimensional functional assessment of older adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetting, M., Martin P., Poon L. W., and Johnson, M. (1996). The economic well-being of community-dwelling centenarians. Journal of Aging Studies, 10, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondo, Y., Hirose, N., Arai, Y., et al. (2006). Functional status of centenarians in Tokyo, Japan: Developing better phenotypes of exceptional longevity. Journal of Gerontology, 61, 305–310.Google ScholarPubMed
Gondo, Y., and Poon, L.W. (2007). Cognitive function of centenarians and its influence on longevity. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 27, 129–150.Google Scholar
Hagberg, B., Alfredson, B. B., Poon, L. W., and Homma, A. (2001). Cognitive functioning in centenarians: A coordinated analysis of results from three countries. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B(3), P141–P151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzel, L., and Smith, A. (2001). The 65 years and over population: 2000. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Krach, C. A., and Velkoff, V. A. (1999). Centenarians in the United States. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P23–199RV. US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Li, K. Z. H., and Lindenberger, U. (2002). Connections among sensory, sensorimotor, and cognitive aging: Review of data and theories. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, D. A., Amigo, E., Duara, R.et al. (1989). A new scale for the assessment of functional status in Alzheimer's disease and related dis­orders. Journal of Gerontology, 44, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., and Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. (2007). Social support for centenarians' health, psychological well-being and longevity. In Poon, L. W. and Perls, T. T. (eds.) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. XXVII: Biopsychosocial approaches to longevity (pp. 107–127). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Marsiske, M., and Willis, S. L. (1995). Dimensionality of everyday problem solving in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P. (2002). Individual and social resources predicting well-being and functioning in later years: Conceptual models, research, and practice. Ageing International, 27, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. (2007). Personality and coping among centenarians. In Poon, L. W. and Perls, T. T. (eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. XXVII: Biopsychosocial approaches to longevity (pp. 89–106). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Martin, P., da Rosa, G., Siegler, I.et al. (2006). Personality and longevity: Findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study. Age, 28, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P., Kliegel, M., Rott, C.Poon, L. W., and Johnson, M. A. (2008). Age differences and changes of coping behavior in three age groups: Findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P., Long, M. V., and Poon, L. W. (2002). Age changes and differences in personality traits and states of the old and very old. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P., Poon, L. W., Clayton, G. M., Lee, H. S., Fulks, J. S., and Johnson, M. A. (1992). Personality, life events, and coping in the oldest-old. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P., Poon, L., Kim, E., and Johnson, M. A. (1996). Social and psychological resources in the oldest old. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P., Rott, C., Poon, L. W., Courtenay, B., and Lehr, U. (2001). A molecular view of coping behavior in older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 13, 72–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, A. S. (1999). Resilience comes of age: Reflections on the past and outlook for the next generation of research. In Glantz, M. D., Johnson, J., and Huffman, L. (eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 282–296). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, A. S., and Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masui, Y., Gondo, Y., Inagaki, H., and Hirose, N. (2006). Do personality characteristics predict longevity? Findings from the Tokyo Centenarian Study. Age, 28, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Center for Health Statistics. (2007). Health, United States, 2007 with chartbook on trend in the health of Americans. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Perls, T. (2004). Dementia-free centenarians. Experimental Gerontology, 39, 1587–1593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinquart, M., and Sörenson, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, L. W., and Perls, T. T. (2007a). The trials and tribulations of studying the oldest old. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 27, 1–10.Google Scholar
Poon, L. W., and Perls, T. (eds.) (2007b). Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Biopsychosocial approaches to longevity. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Poon, L. W., Clayton, G. M., Martin, P., et al. (1992a). The Georgia Centenarian Study. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, L. W., Jazwinski, S. M., Green, R. C., et al. (2007). Methodological considerations in studying centenarians: Lessons learned from the Georgia Centenarian Studies. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 27, 231–264.Google ScholarPubMed
Poon, L. W., Johnson, M. A., Davey, A., Dawson, D. V., Siegler, I. C., and Martin, P. (2000). Psycho-social predictors of survival among centenarians. In Martin, P., Rott, Ch., Hagberg, B., and Morgan, K. (eds.), Centenarians: Autonomy versus dependence in the oldest old (pp. 77–89). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Poon, L. W., Messner, S., Martin, P., and Noble, C. A. (1992b). The influences of cognitive resources on adaptation and old age. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34(1), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robine, J. M., Romieu, I., and Allard, M. (2003). French centenarians and their functional health status. Le Presse Medicale, 32, 360–364.Google ScholarPubMed
Samuelsson, S. M., Alfredson, B. B., Hagberg, B., et al. (1997). The Swedish Centenarian Study: A multidisciplinary study of five consecutive cohorts at the age of 100. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45, 223–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaie, K. W. (2005). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. OxfordUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, K., Hirose, N., Arai, Y., Gondo, Y., and Wakida, Y. (2001). Determinants of further survival in centenarians. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 1, 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, I. C., and Bosworth, H. B. (2002). Terminal change in cognitive function: an updated review of longitudinal studies. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 299–315.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., SetterstenJr., R., and Kunzmann, U. (1999). Sources of well-being in very old age. In Baltes, P. B. and Mayer, K. U. (eds.), The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100 (pp. 450–471). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eye, A. (1990). Introduction to configural frequency analysis: The search for types and antitypes in cross-classification. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×