Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:25:47.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Goal-directedness as a target for early intervention in Down syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

By
Deborah Fidler ,
Susan L. Hepburn  and
Diane Osaki
Edited by
Jean-Adolphe Rondal ,
Juan Perera  and
Donna Spiker
Deborah Fidler
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Susan L. Hepburn
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Diane Osaki
Affiliation:
Osaki Consulting
Jean-Adolphe Rondal
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Belgium
Juan Perera
Affiliation:
Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca
Donna Spiker
Affiliation:
Stanford Research Institute International
Get access

Summary

Goal-directedness as a target for early intervention in Down syndrome

In discussing the notion of temperament, Wachs (1999) proposes that it is best viewed as a fuzzy set or a hybrid class. He explains that behaviors that are considered to be at the core of the notion of temperament are also considered integral to other areas of development. Wachs (1999) identifies temperament components such as attention skills and goal-directed behavior as critical to many of the leading theories of temperament, but he also notes that attention and goal-directed behavior are discussed as foundational to conceptualizations of other domains of development, such as cognitive development and motivation orientation.

The notion of temperament as a fuzzy set may be of particular interest to research on the emergence of the Down syndrome (DS) behavioral phenotype, and is of great clinical relevance for individuals with DS as well. This is because the early development of goal-directed behavior, one of the two overlapping constructs identified by Wachs (1999), may follow an atypical course in DS (Fidler, 2006). The fact that goal-directed behavior may be foundational to several different developmental domains means that atypical development in this area may have far reaching downstream effects in many different areas of functioning.

While work to uncover the developmental pathway is still quite preliminary, there is evidence that individuals with DS may show a disruption in the development of goal-directed behavior, manifested in the form of difficulties with problem solving and instrumental thinking throughout childhood.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neurocognitive Rehabilitation of Down Syndrome
Early Years
 , pp. 191 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baer, D. M. & Pinkston, E. M. (1997). Environment and Behavior. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (1995). Continuities and discontinuities in mastery motivation during infancy and toddlerhood: a conceptualization and review. In MacTurk, R. H. & Morgan, G. A. (eds.), Mastery Motivation: Origins, Conceptualizations, and Applications, pp. 57–93. Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: a cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17, 630–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. (2001). Awakening Children's Minds: How Parents and Teachers Can Make a Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, M. E. (1991). Motor development in children with Down syndrome: a review of the literature. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojczyk, K. E. & Corbetta, D. (2004). Object retrieval in the 1st year of life: learning effects of task exposure and box transparency. Developmental Psychology, 40, 54–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourgeois, K. S., Khawar, A. W., Neal., S. A., Lockman, J. J. (2005). Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy, 8, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. J., Bertenthan, B. I., Kermoian, R. (1992). Early experience and emotional development: the emergence of wariness of heights. Psychological Science, 3, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M. (2003). Executive function in context: development, measurement, theory and experience. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H. & Woolley, P. V. (1978). A developmental assessment chart for non-institutionalized Down syndrome children. Growth, 42, 157–165.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunst, C. (1988). Stage transitioning in the sensorimotor development of Down's syndrome infants. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 32, 405–410.Google ScholarPubMed
Fidler, D. J. (2006). The emergence of a syndrome-specific personality-motivation profile in young children with Down syndrome. In Rondal, J. A. & Perera, J. (eds.), Down Syndrome Neurobehavioral Specificity. West Sussex: Wiley Publishers.Google Scholar
Fidler, D. J., Hepburn, S., Mankin, G., Rogers, S. (2005). Praxis skills in young children with Down syndrome, other developmental disabilities, and typically developing children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnie, N. (1975). Handling the Young Cerebral Palsy Child at Home. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, S., Kahrs, B. A., Neal, S. A., Newton, A. T., Lockman, J. J. (2007). Infant manual exploration of composite substrates. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, R. & Cohen, M. (1988). Qualitative differences in the way Down syndrome and normal children solve a novel counting problem. In Nadel, L. (ed.), The Psychobiology of Down Syndrome: Issues in the Biology of Language and Cognition, pp. 51–99. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. R. & Shea, A. M. (1991). Down syndrome. In Campbell, S. K. (ed.), Pediatric Neurologic Physical Therapy (2nd edn.), pp. 131–168. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Kasari, C. & Freeman, S. F. N. (2001). Task-related social behavior in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106, 253–264.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockman, J. (2000). A perception-action perspective on tool use development. Child Development, 71, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacTurk, R. H., Vietze, P. M., McCarthy, M. E., McQuiston, S., Yarrow, L. J. (1985). The organization of exploratory behavior in Down syndrome and nondelayed infants. Child Development, 56, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Needham, A. (2000). Improvements in object exploration skills may facilitate the development of object segregation in early infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, A., Barrett, T., Peterman, K. (2002). A pick-me-up for infants' exploratory skills: early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants' object exploration skills. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohr, P. S. & Fagen, J. W. (1994). Contingency learning in 9-month-old infants with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 74–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (2001). The Child's Conception of Physical Causality. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1987). The sensori-motor level. In Oates, J. & Sheldon, S. (eds.), Cognitive Development in Infancy, pp. 51–57. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pitcairn, T. K. & Wishart, J. G. (1994). Reactions of young children with Down's syndrome to an impossible task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P. (1987). Mouthing and grasping in neonates: evidence for the early detection of what hard or soft substances afford for action. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P. (1989). Object manipulation and exploration in 2- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 25, 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, E. M., Kasari, C., Mundy, P., Sigman, M. (1994). Attention to people and toys during social and object mastery in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 103–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A. (2007). Detecting causal structure: the role of interventions in infants' understanding of psychological and physical causal relations. In Gopnik, A. & Schulz, L. (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation, pp. 48–57. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J. A., Hildebrand, E. A., Crane, C. C. (2008). Experience matters: the impact of doing versus watching on infants; subsequent perception of tool-use events. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1249–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachs, T. (1999). The what, why, and how of temperament: a piece of the action. In Balter, L. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (eds.), Child Psychology: A Handbook of Contemporary Issues, pp. 23–44. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wishart, J. G. (1996). Avoidant learning styles and cognitive development in young children. In Stratford, B. & Gunn, P. (eds.), New Approaches to Down Syndrome, pp. 157–172. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeitlin, S. & Williamson, G. G. (1994). Coping in Young Children: Early Intervention Practices to Enhance Adaptive Behavior and Resilience. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. & Cunningham, W. A. (2007). Executive function: mechanisms underlying emotion regulation. In Gross, J. J. (ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation, pp. 135–158. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×