Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:44:47.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Brain plasticity and environmental enrichment in Ts65Dn mice, an animal model for Down syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Adam Golabek
Affiliation:
Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities
Katarzyna Jarząbek
Affiliation:
Medical University of Bialystok
Sonia Palminiello
Affiliation:
IRCSS San Raffaele Pisana
Marius Walus
Affiliation:
Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities
Ausma Rabe
Affiliation:
Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities
Giorgio Albertini
Affiliation:
IRCSS San Raffaele Pisana
Elizabeth Kida
Affiliation:
Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities
Jean-Adolphe Rondal
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Belgium
Juan Perera
Affiliation:
Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca
Donna Spiker
Affiliation:
Stanford Research Institute International
Get access

Summary

The concept of neuronal plasticity and enriched environment

With an occurrence of ~1 in 800 live births, Down syndrome (DS), a chromosome 21 (HSA21) trisomy, is the most common genetic cause of mental retardation (Epstein, 1986). Although the somatic phenotype of DS affects nearly every organ in the body, the predominant and most consistent feature of DS is subnormal intellectual functioning, ranging from mild to severe (Chapman & Hesketh, 2000), resulting from abnormal cognitive and language development, learning and memory impairments, and significant behavioral alterations (Pennington et al., 2003). Underlying the complex neurological phenotype of DS are a number of different central nervous system abnormalities such as hypocellularity (already observed in the fetus), delayed myelination, altered cortical lamination, dendritic and synaptic alterations, and abnormal neurogenesis (Wisniewski et al., 2006). Despite enormous scientific efforts, the cause of the subnormal intellectual functioning of DS patients on the molecular level remains unanswered. It is also unknown whether, which, and to what extent the developmental abnormalities caused by the triplicated chromosome 21 can be mitigated by environmental factors and behavioral therapies (Guralnick, 2005).

Although sophisticated genetic and epigenetic programs predetermine the structural integrity and basal functionality of the mammalian brain at the time of birth, further brain development and refinement of neuronal circuitry are determined through interaction with the surrounding environment. Only with the development of the concepts of neuronal (brain) plasticity and enriched environment has it been possible to more rigorously study the effect of environment on the development and functioning of the mammalian brain in adulthood, under normal and various pathological conditions, both genetic and acquired.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altafaj, X., Dierssen, M., Baamonde, C., et al. (2001). Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Human Molecular Genetics, 10, 1915–1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, J. & Das, G. D. (1965). Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 124, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonarakis, S. E., Lyle, R., Dermitzakis, E. T., Reymond, A., Deutsch, S. (2004). Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. National Reviews Genetics, 5, 725–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belichenko, N. P., Belichenko, P. V., Kleschevnikov, A. M., et al. (2009). The “Down syndrome critical region” is sufficient in the mouse model to confer behavioral, neurophysiological, and synaptic phenotypes characteristic of Down syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5938–5948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belichenko, P. V., Masliah, E., Kleschevnikov, A. M., et al. (2004). Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down Syndrome. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 480, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezard, E., Dovero, S., Belin, D., et al. (2003). Enriched environment confers resistance to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and cocaine: involvement of dopamine transporter and trophic factors. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 10999–101007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodsky, F. M., Chen, C. Y., Knuehl, C., Towler, M. C., Wakeham, D. E. (2001). Biological basket weaving: formation and function of clathrin-coated vesiclesAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 17, 517–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakrabarti, L., Galdzicki, Z., Haydar, T. F. (2007). Defects in embryonic neurogenesis and initial synapse formation in the forebrain of the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1483–1495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, R. S. & Hesketh, L. J. (2000). Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6, 84–95.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, S., Schwalbe, J., Stasko, M. R., Yarowsky, P. J., Costa, A. C. (2006). Fluoxetine rescues deficient neurogenesis in hippocampus of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome. Experimental Neurology, 200, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contestabile, A., Fila, T., Bartesaghi, R., Ciani, E. (2009). Cell cycle elongation impairs proliferation of cerebellar granule cell precursors in the Ts65Dn mouse, an animal model for Down syndrome. Brain Pathology, 19, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contestabile, A., Fila, T., Ceccarelli, C., et al. (2007). Cell cycle alteration and decreased cell proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and in the neocortical germinal matrix of fetuses with Down syndrome and in Ts65Dn mice. Hippocampus, 17, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davisson, M. T., Schmidt, C., Akeson, E. C. (1990). Segmental trisomy of murine chromosome 16: a new model system for studying Down syndrome. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 360, 263–280.Google ScholarPubMed
Delabar, J. M., Theophile, D., Rahmani, Z., et al. (1993). Molecular mapping of twenty-four features of Down syndrome on chromosome 21. European Journal of Human Genetics, 1, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dierssen, M., Benavides-Piccione, R., Martínez-Cué, C., et al. (2003). Alterations of neocortical pyramidal cell phenotype in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: effects of environmental enrichment. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 758–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowjat, W. K., Adayev, T., Kuchna, I., et al. (2007). Trisomy-driven overexpression of DYRK1A kinase in the brain of subjects with Down syndrome. Neuroscience Letters, 413, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, C. J. (1986). Developmental genetics. Experientia, 42, 1117–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, F., Trinidad, J. C., Blank, M., et al. (2009). Normal protein composition of synapses in Ts65Dn mice: a mouse model of Down syndrome. Journal of Neurochemistry, 110, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiala, B. A., Joyce, J. N., Greenough, W. T. (1978). Environmental complexity modulates growth of granule cell dendrites in developing but not adult hippocampus of rats. Experimental Neurology, 59, 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, V., Dierssen, M., Alcántara, S., et al. (2002). Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 22, 6636–6647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, K. J. (2010). Molecular basis of pharmacotherapies for cognition in Down syndrome. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 31, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, E., Tanapat, P., Hastings, N. B., Shors, T. J. (1999). Neurogenesis in adulthood: a possible role in learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimerá, J., Casas, C., Pucharcòs, C., et al. (1996). A human homologue of Drosophila minibrain (MNB) is expressed in the neuronal regions affected in Down syndrome and maps to the critical region. Human Molecular Genetics, 5, 1305–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guralnik, M. J. (ed.) (2005). Developmental Systems Approach to Early Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hämmerle, B., Carnicero, A., Elizalde, C., et al. (2003). Expression patterns and subcellular localization of the Down syndrome candidate protein MNB/DYRK1A suggest a role in late neuronal differentiation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2277–2286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebb, D. O. (1947). The effects of early experience on problem solving at maturity. The American Psychologist, 2, 306–307.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Ishihara, K., Amano, K., Takaki, E., et al. (2010). Enlarged brain ventricles and impaired neurogenesis in the Ts1Cje and Ts2Cje mouse models of Down syndrome. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1131–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempermann, G., Gast, D., Kronenberg, G., Yamaguchi, M., Gage, F. H. (2003). Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. Development, 130, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., Gage, F. H. (1997). More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature, 386, 493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleschevnikov, A. M., Belichenko, P. V., Villar, A. J., et al. (2004). Hippocampal long-term potentiation suppressed by increased inhibition in the Ts65Dn mouse, a genetic model of Down syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8153–8160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korbel, J. O., Tirosh-Wagner, T., Urban, A. E., et al. (2009). The genetic architecture of Down syndrome phenotypes revealed by high-resolution analysis of human segmental trisomies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12031–12036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korenberg, J. R., Bradley, C., Disteche, C. M. (1992). Down syndrome: molecular mapping of the congenital heart disease and duodenal stenosis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 50, 294–302.Google ScholarPubMed
Kurt, M. A., Kafa, M. I., Dierssen, M., Davies, D. C. (2004). Deficits of neuronal density in CA1 and synaptic density in the dentate gyrus, CA3 and CA1, in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Brain Research, 1022, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, T. J., Fernandez, S. M., Frick, K. M. (2005). Different types of environmental enrichment have discrepant effects on spatial memory and synaptophysin levels in female mice. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 83, 206–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarov, O., Robinson, J., Tang, Y. P., et al. (2005). Environmental enrichment reduces Ab levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice. Cell, 120, 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzi, H. A. & Reeves, R. H. (2006). Hippocampal hypocellularity in the Ts65Dn mouse originates early in development. Brain Research, 1104, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyle, R., Béna, F., Gagos, S., et al. (2009). Genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial trisomy and partial monosomy chromosome 21. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17, 454–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Cué, C., Baamonde, C., Lumbreras, M., et al. (2002). Differential effects of environmental enrichment on behavior and learning of male and female Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome. Behavioral Brain Research, 134, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyabara, S., Gropp, A., Winking, H. (1982). Trisomy 16 in the mouse fetus associated with generalized edema and cardiovascular and urinary tract anomalies. Teratology 25, 369–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morice, E., Andreae, L. C., Cooke, S. F., et al. (2008). Preservation of long-term memory and synaptic plasticity despite short-term impairments in the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome. Learning and Memory, 15, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nithianantharajah, J. & Hannan, A. J. (2006). Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. National Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 697–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Doherty, A., Ruf, S., Mulligan, C., et al. (2005). An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with Down syndrome phenotypes. Science, 23, 2033–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, L. E., Richtsmeier, J. T., Leszl, J., Reeves, R. H. (2004). A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science, 306, 687–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, L. E., Roper, R. J., Sengstaken, C. L., et al. (2007). Trisomy for the Down syndrome ‘critical region’ is necessary but not sufficient for brain phenotypes of trisomic mice. Human Molecular Genetics, 16, 774–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, B. F., Moon, J., Edgin, J., Stedron, J., Nadel, L. (2003). The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction. Child Development, 74, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, P. L., Magnol, L., Sahún, I., et al. (2009). A new mouse model for the trisomy of the Abcg1-U2af1 region reveals the complexity of the combinatorial genetic code of Down syndrome. Human Molecular Genetics, 18, 4756–4769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollonini, G., Gao, V., Rabe, A., et al. (2008). Abnormal expression of synaptic proteins and neurotrophin-3 in the Down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn. Neuroscience, 156, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, R. H., Irving, N. G., Moran, T. H., et al. (1995). A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits. Nature Genetics, 11, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Restivo, L., Ferrari, F., Passino, E., et al. (2005). Enriched environment promotes behavioral and morphological recovery in a mouse model for the fragile X syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 11557–11562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. R. (1966). Environmental complexity, cerebral change, and behavior. The American Psychologist, 21, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L., Hebert, M., Morimoto, H. (1978). Social grouping cannot account for cerebral effects of enriched environments. Brain Research, 153, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueda, N., Mostany, R., Pazos, A., Flórez, J., Martínez-Cué, C. (2005). Cell proliferation is reduced in the dentate gyrus of aged but not young Ts65Dn mice, a model of Down syndrome. Neuroscience Letters, 380, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sago, H., Carlson, E. J., Smith, D. J., et al. (1998). Ts1Cje, a partial trisomy 16 mouse model for Down syndrome, exhibits learning and behavioral abnormalities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 95, 6256–6261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sago, H., Carlson, E. J., Smith, D. J., et al. (2000). Genetic dissection of region associated with behavioral abnormalities in mouse models for Down syndrome. Pediatric Research, 48, 606–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sérégaza, Z., Roubertoux, P. L., Jamon, M., Soumireu-Mourat, B. (2006). Mouse models of cognitive disorders in trisomy 21: a review. Behavior Genetics, 36, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siarey, R. J., Carlson, E. J., Epstein, C. J., et al. (1999). Increased synaptic depression in the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for mental retardation in Down syndrome. Neuropharmacology, 38, 1917–1920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siarey, R. J., Villar, A. J., Epstein, C. J., Galdzicki, Z. (2005). Abnormal synaptic plasticity in the Ts1Cje segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of Down syndrome. Neuropharmacology, 49, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, W. J., Sternberg, L. R., Kasten-Sportès, C., et al. (1996). Isolation of human and murine homologues of the Drosophila minibrain gene: human homologue maps to 21q22.2 in the Down syndrome “critical region”. Genomics, 15, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spires, T. L., Grote, H. E., Varshney, N. K., et al. (2004). Environmental enrichment rescues protein deficits in a mouse model of Huntington's disease, indicating a possible disease mechanism. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2270–2276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudhof, T. C. (2004). The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 509–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praag, H., Kempermann, G., Gage, F. H. (1999). Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 266–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praag, H., Kempermann, G., Gage, F. H. (2000). Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohlen Und Halbach, O. (2007). Immunohistological markers for staging neurogenesis in adult hippocampus. Cell and Tissue Research, 329, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R. N., Budtz-Olsen, O. E., Penny, J. E., Cummins, R. A. (1969). The effects of environmental complexity on the histology of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 137, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegiel, J., Dowjat, K., Kaczmarski, W., et al. (2008). The role of overexpressed DYRK1A protein in the early onset of neurofibrillary degeneration in Down syndrome. Acta Neuropathologica, 116, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigge, P. & McMahon, H. T. (1998). The amphiphysin family of proteins and their role in endocytosis at the synapse. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiseman, F. K., Alford, K. A., Tybulewicz, V. L. J., Fisher, E. M. C. (2009). Down syndrome – recent progress and future prospects. Human Molecular Genetics, 18, R75–R83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisniewski, K. E., Kida, E., Golabek, A. A., et al. (2006). Down syndrome: from pathology to pathogenesis. In J. A. Rondal & J. Perera (eds.), Down Syndrome: Neurobehavioral Specificity. Down syndrome series, pp. 17–33. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, K. E., Laure-Kamnionowska, M., Connell, F., Wen, G. Y. (1986). Neuronal density and synaptogenesis in the postnatal stage of brain maturation in Down syndrome. In C. J. Epstein (ed.), The Neurobiology of Down Syndrome, pp. 29–44. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Yabut, O., Domogauer, J., D'Arcangelo, G. (2010). Dyrk1A overexpression inhibits proliferation and induces premature neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4004–4014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, T., Li, Z., Jia, Z., et al. (2010). A mouse model of Down syndrome trisomic for all human chromosome 21 syntenic regions. Human Molecular Genetics, 5, 2780–2791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×