Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:36:42.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2009

Bobbi Low
Affiliation:
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Elinor Ostrom
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 513 North Park Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA
Carl Simon
Affiliation:
Center for Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
James Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469–5782, USA
Fikret Berkes
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Johan Colding
Affiliation:
Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
Carl Folke
Affiliation:
Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
Get access

Summary

The command-and-control approach, when extended uncritically to treatment of natural resources, often results in unforeseen and undesirable consequences. A frequent, perhaps universal result of command and control as applied to natural resource management is reduction of the range of natural variation of systems – their structure, function, or both – in an attempt to increase their predictability or stability.

(Holling and Meffe, 1996: 329).

Introduction

In many fields, there are fashions in favored approaches – what is assumed to be ‘best.’ A recurrent theme in American academia – particularly among students of public administration, policy analysis, and resource economics – has been to criticize ‘redundancy’ in government, decrying the number of governments that exist in the USA and the competition that exists among them. Consider education policy: beliefs that large numbers of schools were inefficient and that massive consolidation would be effective led to the reduction of ‘redundant’ school districts in a massive campaign during the first half of the twentieth century. In 1932, there were almost 130000 school districts in the USA. This number was halved by 1952 and quartered by 1962, and halved once again by the early 1970s. The massive consolidation of school districts has slowed down during the past two decades. However, today we have around 15000 school districts in the USA for a population that has almost doubled since the campaign to consolidate schools was initiated (see Ostrom, Bish, and Ostrom, 1988).

Type
Chapter
Information
Navigating Social-Ecological Systems
Building Resilience for Complexity and Change
, pp. 83 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, J. M. 1988. The Lobster Gangs of Maine. Hanover, NH: New England University Press
Acheson, J. M. 1993. Capturing the commons: legal and illegal strategies. In The Political Economy of Customs and Culture: Informal Solutions to the Commons Problem, pp. 69–83, ed. T. L. Anderson and R. T. Simmons. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Acheson, J. M., Wilson, J. A., and Steneck R. S. 1998. Managing chaotic fisheries. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, pp. 390–413, ed. F. Berkes and C. Folke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ames, T., Watson, S., and Wilson, J. 2000. Rethinking overfishing: insights from oral histories of retired groundfishermen. In Finding Our Sealegs: Linking fishery People and their Knowledge with Science and Management, pp. 153–64, ed. B. Neis and L. Felt. St Johns, Canada: ISER Press
Ashby, W. R. 1960. Design for a Brain: the Origin of Adaptive Behavior, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley
Axelrod, R. and Cohen, M. D. 2000. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: The Free Press
Baland, J. M. and Platteau, J. P. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources. Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press
Bendor, J. 1985. Parallel Systems: Redundancy in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press
Bengtsson, J. 1998. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology 10: 191–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, R. L. 2001. Local government amalgamations: discredited nineteenth-century ideals alive in the twenty-first. C.D.Howe Institute Commentary 150 (March): 1–35Google Scholar
Brookfield, J. F. Y. 1997. Genetic redundancy. Advances in Genetics 36: 137–55Google ScholarPubMed
Budiansky, S. 1995. Nature's Keepers: the New Science of Nature Management. New York: The Free Press
Callaghan, A., Guillemaud, T., Matake, N., and Raymond, M. 1998. Polymorphisms and fluctuations in copy number of amplified esterase genes in Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Insect Moleular Biology 7: 295–300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, S. R., Ludwig, D., and Brock, W. A. 1999. Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecological Applications 9(3): 751–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J. M. and Doyle, J. 1999. Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Physical Review E 60(2): 1412–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. 1985. Selfish DNA and the origin of introns. Nature 315: 283–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. G. 1994. Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 2950–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costanza, R., Low, B. S., Ostrom, E., and Wilson, J., eds. 2001. Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press
Cyert, R. and March, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Daily, G. C. and Ehrlich, P. R. 1995. Population extinction and the biodiversity crisis. In Biodiversity Conservation, pp. 45–55, ed. C. A. Perrings, K.-G. Mäler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, and B.-O. Jansson. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Doyle, J. 1999. http://www.cds.caltech.edu/∼doyle/notes/1.html
Drayton, B. and Primack, R. B. 1996. Plant species lost in an isolated conservation area in Metropolitan Boston from 1894 to 1993. Conservation Biology 10: 30–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H., and Perelson, A. S. 1986. The immune system, adaptation and machine learning. Physica D22: 187–204Google Scholar
Field, L. M. and Devonshire, A. L. 1998. Evidence that E4 and FE4 esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are part of a gene family. Biochemical Journal 330: 169–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlay, B. J., Maberly, S. C., and Cooper, J. I. 1997. Microbial diversity and ecosystem function. OIKOS 80: 209–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A. and McNaughton, S. J. 1991. Stability increases with diversity in plant communities: empirical evidence from the 1988 Yellowstone drought. OIKOS 62: 360–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeland, S. J. and Hurst, L. D. 1998. The genetic code: one in a million. Journal of Molecular Evolution 47: 238–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryxell, K. J. 1996. The coevolution of gene family trees. Trends in Genetics 12: 364–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, D. B. and Holsinger, K. E. 1992. Maintenance of polygenic variation in spatially structured poulations. Evolution 46: 412–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Gaitán, M., Rothe, M., Wimmer, E. A., Taubert, H., and Jäckle, H. 1994. Redundant functions of the genes knirps and knirps-related for the establishment of anterior Drosophila head structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91: 8567–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graur, D. and Li, W-H. 2000. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, Inc
Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D.et al. 2000. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. OIKOS 90: 279–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277: 1260–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groffman, P. M., and Bohlen, P. J. 1999. Soil and sediment biodiversity: cross-system comparisons and large-scale effects. Bioscience 49: 139–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., and Light, S. S. 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press
Hampson, C. W. 1997. Redundancy and high volume manufacturing methods. Intel Technology Journal Q4'97. (Available at http://developer.intel.com)
Hawkins, B. W. and Ihrke, D. M. 1999. Reexamining the Suburban Exploitation Thesis in American Metropolitan Areas. Publius 29(3): 109–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, A. and Zimmer, B. G. 1970. The Metropolitan Community: its People and Government. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
Hirsch, W. Z. 1970. The Economics of State and Local Government. New York: McGraw-Hill
Hodgson, J. G., Thompson, K., and Wilson, P. J. 1998. Does biodiversity determine ecosystem function? The Ecotron experiment reconsidered. Functional Ecology 12: 843–56Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. 1995. Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. London: John Wiley
Holling, C. S. and Meffe, G. K. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10(2): 328–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoxby, C. 1994. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? Working Paper No. 4979. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
Hurst, L. D. 1996. Further evidence consistent with Stellate's involvement in meiotic drive. Genetics 142: 641Google ScholarPubMed
Ives, A. R., Klug, J. L., and Gross, K. 2000. Stability and species richness in complex communities. Ecology Letters (2000)3: 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, H. 1977. Reflections on administrative reorganization. In Setting National Priorities: the 1978 Budget, ed. J. Pechman. Washington DC: Brookings Institution
Kinder, D.and Weiss, J. 1978. In lieu of rationality: psychological perspectives on foreign policy decision-making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 22(4): 707–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. 1969. Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review 29(4): 346–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. 1973. Federalism, redundancy, and system reliability. Publius, 3(2): 533–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, C. L. and Tilman, D. 2000. Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities. American Naturalist 156: 534–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, S. 1995. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1: 431–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. 1999. Fragile Dominion. Complexity and the Commons. Reading, MA: Perseus Books
Levine, J. M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R. 1992. Evolutionary ecology looks at environmentalism. Paper delivered at the Symposium on Science, Reason and Modern Democracy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, May 1, 1992, 3–6. Quoted by Marc Landy in Civic environmentalism in the American political tradition, Presented at the Conference on Civic Environmentalism Working Group, Portland, ME, August 18, 2000
Low, B., Costanza, R., Ostrom, E., Wilson, J., and Simon, C. P. 1999. Human–ecosystem interactions: a dynamic integrated model. Ecological Economics 31(2): 227–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36: 533–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine Department of Marine Resources, 2000. http://janus.state.me.us/dmr/Comfish/am.lobster.htm
Maniloff, J. 1996. The minimal cell genome: ‘on being the right size.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93: 10004–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margalef, R. 1969. Diversity and stability: a practical proposal and a model of interdependence. In Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems, pp. 25–37. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology Vol. 22. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Maroni, G., Wise, J., Young, J. E., and Otto, E. 1987. Metallothionein gene duplication and metal tolerance in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 739–44Google ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McGinnis, M., ed. 1999a. Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
McGinnis, M., ed. 1999b. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
McGinnis, M., ed. 2000. Polycentric Games and Institutions: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M., and Morin, P. J. 1997. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390: 162–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrady-Steed, J. and Morin, P. J. 1998. Biodiversity, density compensation, and the dynamics of populations and functional groups. Ecology 81: 361–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. 1980. Executive reorganization of government: impact on employment and expenditures. American Journal of Political Science 23(3): 396–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, R.and Lerner, A. 1995. Bureaucracy, organizational redundancy, and the privatization of public services. Public Administration Review 55(2): 193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouchès, C., Pasteur, N., Bergé, J. B.et al. 1986. Amplification of an esterase gene is responsible for insecticide resistance in a California Culex mosquito. Science 233: 778–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, J. H. and Sankoff, D. 1997. Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution. Genetics 147: 1259–66Google ScholarPubMed
Naeem, S. 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology 12: 39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S., Hahn, D. R., and Schuurman, G. 2000. Producer–composer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature 403: 762–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeem, S.and Li, S. 1997. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390: 507–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagl, W. 1990. Polyploidy in differentiation and evolution. International Journal of Cell Cloning 8: 216–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niskanen, W. 1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18(3): 617–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, B.and Bean, J. 1999. A genetic algorithm methodology for complex scheduling problems. Naval Research Logistics 46: 199–2113.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Boerlljst, M. C., Cooke, J., and Smith, J. M. 1997. Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature 388: 167–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakerson, R. J. 1999. Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press
Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Berlin: Springer
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press
Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., and Whitaker, G. P. 1973. Do we really want to consolidate urban police forces? Public Administration Review 33: 423–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, V. 1987. The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment, 2nd revised edn. San Francisco: ICS Press
Ostrom, V. 1991. The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco: ICS Press
Ostrom, V. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: a Response to Tocqueville's Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Ostrom, V., Bish, R., and Ostrom, E. 1988. Local Government in the United States. San Francisco: ICS Press
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., and Warren, R. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55(4): 831–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankhurst, C. E., Ophel-Keller, K., Doube, B. M., and Gupta, V. V. S. R. 1996. Biodiversity of soil microbial communities in agricultural systems. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. B. and Ostrom, E. 1999. Complex models of urban service systems. In Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, pp. 355–80, ed. M. McGinnis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Originally published in Clark, T. N. 1981. Policy Analysis: Directions for Future Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., and Holling, C. S. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity and scale. Ecosystems1: 6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polski, M. M. 2000. Institutional evolution and change: interstate banking reform in the United States. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Pritchett, L.and Filmer, D. 1999. What education production functions really show: a positive theory of education expenditures. Economics of Education Review 18(2): 223–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, P. G. 1995. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Conservation Biology 9: 742–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, D. 1993. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press
Simon, H. 1947. Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan
Smith, V., Chou, K. N., Lashkari, D., Botstein, D., and Brown, P. O. 1996. Functional analysis of the genes of yeast chromosome V by genetic footprinting. Science 274: 2069–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Stephens, G. R. and Wikstrom, N. 1999. Metropolitan Government and Governance: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Analysis, and the Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Symstad, A. J., Tilman, D., Willson, J., and Knops, J. M. H. 1998. Species loss and ecosystem functioning: effects of species identity and community composition. OIKOS 81: 389–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautz, D. 1992. Redundancies, development, and the flow of information. BioEssays 14(4): 263–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. H. 1993. Thinking about genetic redundancy. Trends in Genetics 9: 395–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1996. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77(2): 350–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, J. 1956. Probabilistic logics and the synthesis of reliable organisms from unreliable components. In Automata Studies, pp. 43–98, ed. C. E. Shannon and J. McCarthy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Wagner, A. 1998. The fate of duplicated genes: loss or new function? BioEssays 20: 785–83.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, A. 1999. Redundant gene functions and natural selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, A. 2000. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nature Genetics 24: 355–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, B. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6: 18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., Kinzig, A., and Langridge, J. 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function. Ecosystems 2(2): 139–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J. B. 1995. How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics 139: 421–8Google ScholarPubMed
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., and Nicholson, K. S. 1997. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. OIKOS 79: 247–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Wilson, J. A. 1997. Maine fisheries management initiative. In The Social Impacts of Individual Transferable Quotas, pp. 335–53, ed. G. Palsson. Copenhagen: TemaNord
Wilson, J. A. 2002. Scientific uncertainty, complex systems and the design of common pool institutions. In The Drama of the Commons, pp. 327–59, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber. Washington DC: National Academy Press
Wilson, J. A., Low, B., Costanza, R., and Ostrom, E. 1999. Scale misperceptions and the spatial dynamics of a social–ecological system. Ecological Economics 31(2): 243–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management?
    • By Bobbi Low, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, Elinor Ostrom, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 513 North Park Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA, Carl Simon, Center for Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, James Wilson, School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469–5782, USA
  • Edited by Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba, Canada, Johan Colding, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm, Carl Folke, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
  • Book: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management?
    • By Bobbi Low, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, Elinor Ostrom, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 513 North Park Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA, Carl Simon, Center for Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, James Wilson, School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469–5782, USA
  • Edited by Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba, Canada, Johan Colding, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm, Carl Folke, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
  • Book: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management?
    • By Bobbi Low, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, Elinor Ostrom, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 513 North Park Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA, Carl Simon, Center for Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA, James Wilson, School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469–5782, USA
  • Edited by Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba, Canada, Johan Colding, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm, Carl Folke, Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
  • Book: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems
  • Online publication: 13 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957.007
Available formats
×