Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:02:11.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction to the study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Joe Barnes
Affiliation:
Research FellowJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University
Mark H. Hayes
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
Amy M. Jaffe
Affiliation:
Rice University
David G. Victor
Affiliation:
Director, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
David G. Victor
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Amy M. Jaffe
Affiliation:
Rice University, Houston
Mark H. Hayes
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Natural gas is rapidly gaining importance in global energy markets. Prized for its relatively clean and efficient combustion, gas is becoming the fuel of choice for a wide array of uses, notably the generation of electric power. Natural gas is projected to be the fastest-growing major source of primary energy over the coming decades, with global consumption increasing nearly two-fold by 2030 (EIA 2004; IEA 2004). In the next few years, gas will surpass coal to become the world's second most important energy source; by 2050 gas could surpass oil to occupy the number one slot. Recent price increases do not fundamentally challenge the economic viability of this robust gas future.

There is plenty of gas to satisfy these visions of global gasification. The broadest measure of gas available totals about 350 trillion cubic meters (Tcm), or roughly 130 years at today's rate of consumption (USGS 2000). Even “proved reserves,” a narrower measure of just the gas that has been detected and is commercial to develop using today's technology, suggest that scarcity is unlikely to impede a global shift to gas. The widely referenced BP Statistical Review of World Energy reports 176 Tcm of proved gas worldwide, or nearly 70 years at current production levels (BP 2004).

The geographical, financial and political barriers to gas development, however, will be harder to clear.

Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Gas and Geopolitics
From 1970 to 2040
, pp. 3 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blinken, Antony J. (1987). Ally versus Ally: America, Europe, and the Siberian Pipeline Crisis. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
BP (2004). Statistical Review of World Energy, available at http://www.bp.com
Castaneda, Christopher J. (1999). Invisible Fuel: Manufactured and Natural Gas in America, 1800–2000. New York: TwayneGoogle Scholar
CEDIGAZ (2000). “CEDIGAZ news report September 2000” (November 16, 2001). http://www.ifp.fr/TXT/CE/CE400TH2.html
Darmstadter, Joel, Perry, D. Teitelbaum, and Jaroslav, G. Polach (1971). Energy in the World Economy: A Statistical Review of Trends in Output, Trade, and Consumption since 1925. Baltimore: the Johns Hopkins Press Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar
EIA (2004). “International energy outlook 2004.” Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration
EIA(2005). “International Energy Annual 2003.' Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration; available at http://www.eia.doe.gov
ESMAP (2003). “Cross-border oil and gas pipelines: problems and prospects.” Washington, DC: Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme, p. 130
Henisz, Witold Jerzy (2002). Politics and International Investment: Measuring Risks and Protecting Profits. Northampton, MA: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
ICRG (2002). International Country Risk Guide. Political Risk Services (IBC USA, Inc.). New York: International Reports
IEA (2003a). World Energy Investment Outlook (WEIO) 2003. Paris: International Energy Agency
IEA(2003b). “Historical gas statistics.” Paris: International Energy Agency
IEA(2004). World Energy Outlook (WEO). Paris: International Energy Agency
IIASA–WEC (1998). Global Energy Perspectives, N. Nakicenovic, A. Grübler, and A. McDonald (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jensen, James T. (2003). “The LNG revolution.”Energy Journal, 242, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Jensen, James T. (2004). A Global LNG Market: Is It Likely and if so, When?Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy StudiesGoogle Scholar
Klaasen, G., McDonald, A., and Zhao, J. (2000). “The future of gas infrastructures in Eurasia.”Energy Policy, 29, pp. 399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Brian and Pablo, T. Spiller (1994). “The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: a comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 102, pp. 201–246Google Scholar
L'Hagert, Guilliame, Boris Silverstova, and Christian von Hirschhausen (2004). International Market for Natural Gas? A Cointegration Analysis of Prices in Europe, North America, and Japan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Research
Paik, Keun-Wook (2002). “Natural gas expansion in Korea”, p. 188–229 in Wybrew-Bond, I. and Stern, J. P. (eds.), Natural Gas in Asia: The Challenges of Growth in China, India, Japan, and Korea. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Peebles, Malcolm W. (1980). Evolution of the Gas Industry. New York: New York University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell International (2002). “Global scenarios to 2020: energy needs, choices and possibilities.” Royal Dutch Shell, Inc.; available at http://www.Shell.com
Stern, Jonathan P. (1980). Soviet Natural Gas Development to 1990: The Implications for the CMEA and the West. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Stern, Jonathan P. (1986). International Gas Trade in Europe: The Policies of Exporting and Importing Countries. Aldershot: GowerGoogle Scholar
Stern, Jonathan P. (2005). The Future of Russian Gas and Gazprom. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
USGS (2000). “World petroleum assessment.” Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey
Vernon, Raymond (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1999). “Natural gas: private sector participation and market development.” Washington, DC: World Bank Group
World Bank (2004). Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation, and Competition. Washington, DC: World Bank Group
Yergin, Daniel and Stoppard, Michael (2003). “The next prize.” Foreign Affairs, November–DecemberGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction to the study
    • By Joe Barnes, Research FellowJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Mark H. Hayes, Research Fellow, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, David G. Victor, Director, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
  • Edited by David G. Victor, Stanford University, California, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, Houston, Mark H. Hayes, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Natural Gas and Geopolitics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493492.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction to the study
    • By Joe Barnes, Research FellowJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Mark H. Hayes, Research Fellow, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, David G. Victor, Director, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
  • Edited by David G. Victor, Stanford University, California, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, Houston, Mark H. Hayes, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Natural Gas and Geopolitics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493492.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction to the study
    • By Joe Barnes, Research FellowJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Mark H. Hayes, Research Fellow, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, David G. Victor, Director, Program on Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
  • Edited by David G. Victor, Stanford University, California, Amy M. Jaffe, Rice University, Houston, Mark H. Hayes, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Natural Gas and Geopolitics
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493492.002
Available formats
×