Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T14:45:03.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Imaging of myeloma

from Section 1 - Overview of myeloma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Stephen A. Schey
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, King’s College Hospital, London
Kwee L. Yong
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, University College Hospital, London
Robert Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, King’s College Hospital, London
Kenneth C. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Multiple myeloma and its related entities (Table 3.1) are a spectrum of disorders characterized by monoclonal proliferation of plasma cells, usually with associated excessive production and secretion of monoclonal proteins detectable in serum or urine. While their management relies much on clinical and laboratory derived parameters, imaging also plays an important role. The suspicion of myeloma may be raised when an incidental lytic bone lesion is identified on a radiological examination performed for other purposes. Skeletal survey with plain radiographs is one of the initial screening tests performed when there is a suspicion of myeloma. Imaging is essential in accurately characterizing the disease entity within the spectrum. In some circumstances, such as in solitary plasmacytoma, diagnosis may be confidently achieved only with bone or soft tissue biopsy under image guidance. In addition, imaging may provide important staging and prognostic information and allow evaluation of response to treatment.

The use of X-rays in the evaluation of myeloma has been documented as early as 1900. To this date, the skeletal survey has remained the first line imaging investigation of choice. The introduction of CT and body MRI systems in the 1970s and hybrid PET/CT imaging systems in the 1990s have expanded the armament of the radiologist. Paralleling these developments is our improving understanding of the pathophysiology of myeloma and the on-going development and refinement of therapeutic strategies. These advances have necessitated continual evolution and standardization of diagnostic, staging and response evaluation criteria. This chapter reviews the imaging techniques currently available in routine clinical practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Myeloma
Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
, pp. 28 - 38
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;131:749–57.Google Scholar
Weber, F. P., Hutchison, R., Macleod, J. J. R.Multiple myeloma (Myelomatosis) with Bence–Jones proteid in the urine. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1903;126(4):644–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durie, B. G., Salmon, S. E.A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. correlation of measured myeloma cell mass wth presenting clinical features, response to treatment and survival. Cancer 1975;36:842–54.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, R. A., Rajkumar, S. V.Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23(1):3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Sa, S., Abildgaard, N., Tighe, J., Shaw, P., Hall-Craggs, M.Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2007;137(1):49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, J. M., Owen, R. G., D'Sa, S. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br. J. Haematol. 2011;154(1):32–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimopoulos, M., Terpos, E., Comenzo, R. L. et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23(9):1545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. D.Multiple myeloma. Cancer Imaging. 2004;4 Spec. No. A:S47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, M. Q., Gertz, M. A., Hanson, C. A., Inwards, D., Kyle, R.Multiple myeloma associated with diffuse osteosclerotic bone lesions: a clinical entity distinct from osteosclerotic myeloma (POEMS syndrome). Am. J. Haematol. 1997;56:288–93.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, K., Aoyama, T., Yamauchi-Kawaura, C., et al. Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms. Br. J. Radiol. 2009;82(984):1010–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padhani, A. R., Gogbashian, A.Bony metastases: assessing response to therapy with whole-body diffusion MRI. Cancer Imaging 2011;11 Spec. No. A:S129–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durie, B. G.The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur. J. Cancer 2006;42(11):1539–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Even-Sapir, E., Mishani, E., Flusser, G., Metser, U.18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Seminars Nuclear Med. 2007;37(6):462–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agool, A., Schot, B. W., Jager, P. L., Vellenga, E.18-F-FLT PET in hematologic disorders: a novel technique to analyze the bone marrow compartment. J. Nuclear Med. 2006;2006(47):1592–8.Google Scholar
Dankerl, A., Liebisch, P., Glatting, G., et al. Multiple myeloma: molecular imaging with 11C-methionine PET/CT–initial experience. Radiology 2007;242(2):498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, E., Weiss, B. M., Mena, E., et al. Current and future imaging modalities for multiple myeloma and its precursor states. Leukemia Lymphoma 2011;52(9):1630–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×