Book contents
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Expanding the Debate on Moral and Political Approaches to the Philosophy of Human Rights
- Part I
- 1 Theory, Politics, and Practice
- 2 The Point of the Practice of Human Rights
- 3 Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights
- 4 Theories of Human Rights
- 5 Mediating the Theory and Practice of Human Rights in Morality and Law
- 6 Kantian Human Rights or How the Individual Has Come to Matter in International Law
- Part II
- Index
- References
5 - Mediating the Theory and Practice of Human Rights in Morality and Law
from Part I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
By
Book contents
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Expanding the Debate on Moral and Political Approaches to the Philosophy of Human Rights
- Part I
- 1 Theory, Politics, and Practice
- 2 The Point of the Practice of Human Rights
- 3 Rawls’s Relational Conception of Human Rights
- 4 Theories of Human Rights
- 5 Mediating the Theory and Practice of Human Rights in Morality and Law
- 6 Kantian Human Rights or How the Individual Has Come to Matter in International Law
- Part II
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Moral and Political Conceptions of Human RightsImplications for Theory and Practice, pp. 97 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Apel, K. O. (2002) “Regarding the Relationship of Morality, Law, and Democracy: On Habermas’s Philosophy of Law from a Transcendental Pragmatic Point of View,” in Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M., and Kemp, C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, New York: Routledge, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Baynes, K. (2009) “Discourse Ethics and the Political Conception of Human Rights,” Ethics and Global Policy, vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2013) “Reason-Giving and Rights-Bearing: Constructing the Subject of Rights,” Constellations, vol. 20 no. 1, pp. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2013) The Heart of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2006) “Taking the Human Out of Human Rights,” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 150–68.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean. (2004) “Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law,” Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 18 no. 3, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua.(2004) “Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12 no. 2, pp. 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, J. G. and Freyenhagen, F. (eds.) (2011) Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. (2014) Reframing the Intercultural Dialogue on Human Rights, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2011) “The Justification of Justice: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue,” In Finlayson, J. G. and Freyenhagen, F. (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, pp. 153–180.Google Scholar
Gilabert, P. (2015) “Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Power,” In Cruft, R., Liao, M., and Renzo, M. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1988) “Law and Morality,” in McMurrin, S. M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 8, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 217–279.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995) “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92 no. 3, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1998a) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1998b) “Reasonable versus True, or, the Morality of Worldviews,” in Finlayson, J. G. and Freyenhagen, F. (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, pp. 75–101.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2010) “The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 41 no. 1, pp. 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2011) “A Reply to My Critics,” In Finlayson, J. G. and Freyenhagen, F. (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, pp. 283–304.Google Scholar
Hedrick, T. (2010) Rawls and Habermas: Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophy, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (2003) “Between Political Liberalism and Postnational Cosmopolitanism: Toward an Alternative Theory of Human Rights,” Political Theory, vol. 31 no. 3, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (2014a) “Pluralizing Constitutional Review in International Law: A Critical Theory Approach,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, special issue: Law and Philosophy: Foundations and Hermeneutics, vol. 70 no. 2–3, pp. 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (2014b) “Reconciling Positivism and Realism: Kelsen and Habermas on Democracy and Human Rights,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 40 no. 3, pp. 237–267.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2014) Human Rights, Sovereignty, and the Right to Protect. Critical Theory in Critical Times, New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Letsas, G. (2014) “Review of Allen Buchanan’s The Heart of Human Rights,” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews [Electronic Journal], May 5th 2014.Google Scholar
Macleod, A. (2006) “Rawls’s Narrow Doctrine of Human Rights,” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.) (2006) Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Nickel, J, (2006) “Are Human Rights Mainly Implemented by Intervention?,” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 263–77.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2006) “Do Rawls’s Two Theories of Justice Fit Together?,” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. A. (eds.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 206–225.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993b) “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92 no. 3, pp. 132–80.Google Scholar