Adams, Geoffrey. The Huguenots and French Opinion, 1685–1787: The Enlightenment Debate on Toleration. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Adams, John. The Works of John Adams. 6 vols. Ed. Adams, Charles Francis. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1850–6.Google Scholar

Allen, J. W. History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel. “Comparative Political Systems.” The Journal of Politics 18, no. 3 (1956): 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althusser, Louis. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx, trans. Brewster, Ben (London: NLB, 1972).Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1911).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics, trans. Reeve, C. D. C.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, de Tocqueville, and the Sociologists and the Revolution of 1848, ed. Anderson, Brian and Mahoney, Daniel. 2 vols. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael. Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakos, Adrianna E. Images of Kingship in Early Modern France: Louis XI in Political Thought, 1560–1789. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Barnett, S. J. The Enlightenment and Religion: The Myths of Modernity. Manchester University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrel, Rex A. Bolingbroke and France. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988.Google Scholar

Barrera, Guillaume. Les Lois du monde: Enquête sur le dessein politique de Montesquieu. Paris: Gallimard, 2009.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bart, Jean. “French Law.” In Dictionnaire Montesquieu, ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. Accessed March 27, 2017. http://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/fr/article/1367163217/en/Google Scholar

Bart, Jean. “Montesquieu et l’unification du droit.” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: Actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volphilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002, 137–46.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Robert C. The Idea of Enlightenment: A Post-mortem Study. University of Toronto Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, Robert C. “On the Politics of Faith and Reason: The Project of Enlightenment in Pierre Bayle and Montesquieu.” The Journal of Politics 63, no. 1 (2001): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Robert H., and Lien, Da-Hsiang Donald. “A Note on Taxation, Development, and Representative Government.” Politics & Society 14, no. 1 (1985): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, William David. A Philosophical Commentary on These Words of the Gospel, Luke 14.23, ‘Compel Them to Come In, That My House May Be Full’, ed. Kilcullen, John and Kukathas, Chandran. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

Bates, William David. States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Continuation des Pensées Diverses. Amsterdam: Herman Uytwerf, 1722.Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Political Writings, ed. Jenkinson, Sally L.. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Becker, Carl L. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald. Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald. What’s the Matter with Liberalism? Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belissa, Marc. “Montesquieu, L’Esprit des Lois et le droit des gens.” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: Actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002, 171–84.Google Scholar

Benrekassa, Georges. Montesquieu, la liberté et l’histoire. Paris: Librairie générale française, 1987.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Peter. Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Montesquieu.” In Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, ed. Hardy, Henry. Princeton University Press, 2001, 164–203.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder. Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Beyer, Charles-Jacques. “Montesquieu et la censure religieuse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue des sciences humaines 70 (1953): 105–31.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo. “‘L’auteur a loué Bayle, en l’appelant un grand homme:’ Bayle dans la Défense de L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu, oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Larrère, Catherine. Naples and Oxford: Liguori and Voltaire Foundation, 2005, 103–14.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo. “La funzione della religione in Europa e nei paesi orientali secondo Montesquieu.” In L’Europe de Montesquieu: Actes du olloque de Gêne, compiled by Palumbo, M. G. Bottaro and Postigliola, A.. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1995, 375–87.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo. “Histoire et nature: la religion dans L’Esprit des Lois.” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: Actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002, 289–304.Google Scholar

Binoche, Bertrand. Introduction à De l’esprit des lois de Montesquieu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar

Blitz, Mark. “How to Think about Politics and Culture.” Political Science Reviewer 25, no. 1 (1996): 5–21.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Les Six Livres De La République, ed. Mairet, Gérard. Paris: Livre du Poche, [1576] 1993.Google Scholar

Boesche, Roger. “Fearing Monarchs and Merchants: Montesquieu’s Two Theories of Despotism.” The Western Political Quarterly 43, no. 4 (1990): 741–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boone, Rebecca Ard. War, Domination, and the Monarchy of France: Claude de Seyssel and the Language of Politics in the Renaissance. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulainvilliers, Henri de. Histoire de l’ancien gouvernement de la France. The Hague and Amsterdam, 1727.Google Scholar

Boulainvilliers, Henri de. Lettres sur les anciens parlements de France que l’on nomme Etats-généraux. London: Wood and Palmer, 1753.Google Scholar

Bourke, Richard. “Hume’s Call to Action.” The Nation, April 20, 2016. www.thenation.com/article/humes-call-to-action/.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel. “Is Liberal Society a Parasite on Tradition?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 39, no. 1 (2011): 46–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Jerry H. Politics and Culture in Renaissance Naples. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Brague, Remi. The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea. University of Chicago Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Daniel. The Enlightenment Past: Reconstructing Eighteenth-Century French Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Brown, Wendy. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bryan, William Jennings. “Imperialism.” In Vol. 2 of Speeches of William Jennings Bryan, ed. Bryan, William Jennings. New York, London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1909, 17–49.Google Scholar

Budé, Guillaume. Annotationes in quator et viginti Pandectarum libros. Paris: 1535.Google Scholar

Budé, Guillaume. “On the Education of the Prince.” In Vol. 2 of Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts: Political Philosophy, trans. Kenny, Neil, ed. Kraye, Jill. Cambridge University Press, 1997. 258–73.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Downs, George W.. “Intervention and Democracy.” International Organization 60, no. 3 (2006): 627–49.Google Scholar

Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bush, George W. “Inaugural Address, January 20, 2005.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush, 2005, Book 2, Presidential Documents – January 1 to June 30, 2005. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, 2007.Google Scholar

Bush, George W. “Remarks on the 20th Anniversary of the National Endowment for Democracy, November 6, 2003.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush, 2003, Book 2, Presidential Documents – July 1 to December 31, 2003. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, 2006.Google Scholar

Bush, George W. “Remarks at Whitehall Palace in London, United Kingdom, November 19, 2003.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush, 2003, Book 2, Presidential Documents – July 1 to December 31, 2003. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, 2006.Google Scholar

Bush, Sara Sunn. The Taming of Democracy Assistance. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carcassone, Élie. Montesquieu et le problème de la constitution française au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1927.Google Scholar

Carlyle, R. W., and Carlyle, A. J.. Political Theory from 1300 to 1600. Vol. 6 of A History of Medieval Political Theory in the West. Edinburgh and London: W. Blackwood and Sons, 1936.Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas. “Democracy Assistance: Political vs. Developmental?” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 1 (2009): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrese, Paul O. The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism. University of Chicago Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrese, Paul O. Democracy in Moderation: Montesquieu, Tocqueville, and Sustainable Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrese, Paul O. “The Machiavellian Spirit of Montesquieu’s Republic.” In Machiavelli’s Liberal Republican Legacy, ed. Rahe, Paul A.. Cambridge University Press, 2006, 121–42.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Introduction.” In The Spirit of Laws: A Compendium of the First English Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977, 3–90.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Introduction: An Appreciation of The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David, Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 1–40.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Montesquieu and the Liberal Philosophy of Jurisprudence.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 291–334.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Punishment.” History of Political Thought 19, no. 2 (1998): 213–40.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Montesquieu and Tocqueville as Philosophical Historians: Liberty, Determinism, and the Prospects for Freedom.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2009, 149–78.Google Scholar

Casson, Douglass. Liberating Judgment: Fanatics, Skeptics, and John Locke’s Politics of Probability. Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ceaser, James W. “Alexis de Tocqueville and the Two-Founding Thesis.” Review of Politics 73, no. 2 (2011): 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceaser, James W. Designing a Polity: America’s Constitution in Theory and Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar

Ceaser, James W. Liberal Democracy and Political Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charron, Pierre. De la sagesse. Rouen: Chez L. Costé, [1601] 1614.Google Scholar

Chauveau-Maulini, Bruce. “La notion de monarchie tempérée dans les remontrances des parlements au XVIIe siècle: Montesquieu et l’idéologie de robe.” In Annales: Droit, Histoire, Philosophie, Sociologie, Procès. Paris: École doctorale d’histoire du droit, sociologie du droit, philosophie du droit et droit processuel, Université Panthéon-Assas, 2006, 197–242.Google Scholar

Chevallier, Jean-Jacques. “Montesquieu, ou Le Libéralisme aristocratique.” Revue internationale de la philosophie 9 (1955): 330–45.Google Scholar

Chinard, Gilbert. Jefferson et les idéologues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1925.Google Scholar

Chinard, Gilbert. “Montesquieu’s Historical Pessimism.” In Studies in the History of Culture: The Disciplines of the Humanities, ed. Chinard, Gilbert. Menasha, WI: George Banta, 1942, 161–72.Google Scholar

Church, William Farr. Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Church, William Farr. “The Decline of French Jurists as Political Theorists.” French Historical Studies 3 (1967): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicero. Les Offices, trans. du Bois, Philippe Goibaud. Paris: 1714.Google Scholar

Cicero. On Duties, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M.. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Cohler, Anne M. Montesquieu’s Comparative Politics and the Spirit of American Constitutionalism. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1989.Google Scholar

Collins, James B. The State in Early Modern France. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Essay on the Constitution and Functions of the Provincial Assemblies.” In Condorcet, Selected Writings, ed. Barker, Keith. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Observations on the Thirty-First Book.” In de Tracy, Antoine Louis Claude Destutt, A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of Laws, To Which Are Annexed, ‘Observations on the Thirty-First Book,’ by the Late M. Condorcet, and Two Letters of Helvétius, On the Merits of the Same Work, trans. Jefferson, Thomas. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In Political Writings, trans. Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge University Press, 1988, 307–28.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. “The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation and Their Relation to European Civilization.” In Political Writings, trans. Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge University Press, 1988, 43–168.Google Scholar

Cotta, Sergio. “La funzione politica della religione secondi Montesquieu.” Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 43 (1966): 582–603.Google Scholar

Courtney, C. P. “L’Esprit des lois dans la perspective de l’histoire du livre (1748–1800).” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: Actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 octobre 1998), eds. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002, 65–96.Google Scholar

Courtney, C. P. Montesquieu and Burke. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar

Courtney, C. P. “Montesquieu and Natural Law.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 41–68.Google Scholar

Courtois, Jean-Patrice. Inflexions de la rationalité dans L’Esprit des lois – Écriture et pensée chez Montesquieu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Iris. Montesquieu and the History of French Laws. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1983.Google Scholar

Cox, Iris. “Montesquieu and the History of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 409–30.Google Scholar

Craiutu, Aurelian. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Crevier, J. B. L. Observations sur le livre de l’Esprit des lois. Paris: Desaint et Saillant, 1764.Google Scholar

Curran, Mark. Atheism, Religion and Enlightenment in Pre-Revolutionary Europe. London: Royal Historical Society, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curren, Randall. Aristotle on the Necessity of Public Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Curtis, William. Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and Liberal Virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagger, Richard. Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlinger, James H. Etienne Pasquier on Ethics and History. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar

Dallmyr, Fred. “Montesquieu’s Persian Letters: A Timely Classic.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2009, 239–58.Google Scholar

Davis, Michael. The Politics of Philosophy: A Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, [1947] 1996.Google Scholar

Dawson, John P. “The Codification of the French Customs.” Michigan Law Review 38, no. 6 (1940): 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dedieu, Joseph. Montesquieu. Paris: F. Alcan, 1913.Google Scholar

Dedieu, Joseph. Montesquieu et la Tradition Politique Anglaise en France. Paris: Librairie Victor Lecoffre, 1909.Google Scholar

Desgraves, Louis, and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, eds. Catalogue de la bibliothèque de Montesquieu à La Brède. Naples: Liguori Editore, 1999.Google Scholar

Desserud, Donald. “Commerce and Political Participation in Montesquieu’s Letter to Domville.” History of European Ideas 25, no. 3 (1999): 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Destutt de Tracy, Antoine Louis Claude. A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of Laws, To Which Are Annexed, ‘Observations on the Thirty-First Book,’ by the Late M. Condorcet, and Two Letters of Helvétius, On the Merits of the Same Work, trans. Jefferson, Thomas. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press , 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dictionnaire de L’Académie française, 4th edn. Paris: Veuve Brunet, 1762.Google Scholar

De Dijn, Annelien. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society? Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Dijn, Annelien. “Montesquieu’s Controversial Context: The Spirit of the Laws as a Monarchist Tract.” History of Political Thought 34 (2013): 66–88.Google Scholar

De Dijn, Annelien. “On Political Liberty: Montesquieu’s Missing Manuscript,” Political Theory 39, no. 2 (2001): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Dijn, Annelien. “Was Montesquieu a Liberal Republican?” Review of Politics 76 (2014): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimoff, Paul. “Cicéron, Hobbes et Montesquieu.” Annales Universitatis Saraviensis 1 (1952): 19–47.Google Scholar

Djaït, Hichem. Europe and Islam, trans. Heinegg, Peter. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Donno, Daniela, and Russett, Bruce. “Islam, Authoritarianism, and Female Empowerment: What Are the Linkages?” World Politics 56, no. 4 (2004): 582–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dos Santos, Antonio Carlos. “L’intolérance dans la Querelle de L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, 6–8 décembre 2001, ed. Larrère, Catherine. Napoli: Liguori Editore Srl, 2005, 131–40.Google Scholar

Douen, Emmanuel-Orentin. “Le Fondateur de la Caisse des Conversions.” Bulletin de la Société de l’histoire du protestantisme francais 30 (1853): 145–60.Google Scholar

Douglass, Frederick. The Narrative Life of Frederick Douglass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dubos, Jean-Baptiste. Histoire critique de l’établissement de la monarchie française. Paris, 1742.Google Scholar

Duconseil, Marc. Machiavel et Montesquieu: recherche sur un principe d’autorité. Paris: Les Éditions Denoël, 1943.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. Political Obligation in Its Historical Context: Essays in Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of Sociology, trans. Manheim, Ralph. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyck, Andrew R. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. “Nationalism, Irony, and Commitment.” In Eagleton, Terry, Jameson, Fredric, and Said, Edward W., Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990, 23–42.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry. “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.” American Political Science Review 82, no. 3 (1988): 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. L’idée de Nature en France à l’aube des Lumières. Paris: Flammarion, 1970.Google Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. Politique de Montesquieu. Paris: Armand Colin, 1965.Google Scholar

Ellis, Elizabeth. Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Ellis, Harold A. Boulainvilliers and the French Monarchy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ellis, Harold A. “Montesquieu’s Modern Politics: The Spirit of the Laws and the Problem of Modern Monarchy in Old Regime France.” History of Political Thought 10, no. 4 (1989): 665–700.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Alexis de Tocqueville: The First Social Scientist. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenmann, Charles. “L’Esprit des lois et la séparation des pouvoirs.” Cahiers de philosophie politique 2–3 (1985): 3–34.Google Scholar

Eisenmann, Charles. “La pensée constitutionnelle de Montesquieu.” Cahiers de philosophie politique (1985): 35–66.Google Scholar

Finkel, Steven E., Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. “The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990–2003.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 404–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics 55, no. 1 (2002): 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, Frank Thomas Herbert. Montesquieu and English Politics (1750–1800). London: Porcupine Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Frank Thomas Herbert. “Montesquieu’s Influence on Anti-Slavery Opinion in England.” Journal of Negro History 28 (1933): 414–26.Google Scholar

Florus, . The Epitome of Roman History, trans. Forster, E. S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Force, Pierre. Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, Franklin. Robe and Sword: The Regrouping of the French Aristocracy after Louis XIV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Franco, Paul N. Hegel’s Philosophy of Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedom House. “Freedom in the World 2013.” Accessed March 27, 2017. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FIW%202013%20Booklet.pdf.Google Scholar

Freedom House. “Freedom in the World 2016.” Accessed March 27, 2017. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FITW_Report_2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, Carl Joachim. The Philosophy of Law in Historical Perspective. University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Galston, William. Liberal Purposes: Good, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1966.Google Scholar

Gay, Peter. The Science of Freedom. Vol. 2 of The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969.Google Scholar

Gaynor, Tim. “U.S. project flies democracy message on Afghan kites.” Reuters, September 24, 2010. Accessed March 26, 2017. www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-kites-idUSTRE68N2SS20100924.Google Scholar

Giesey, Ralph E. “The Monarchomach Triumvirs: Hotman, Beza, and Mornay.” Bibliothèque D’Humanisme Et Renaissance 32, no. 1 (1970): 41–56.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher. “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” In Vol. 6 of Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Annas, Julia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, 169–99.Google Scholar

Gill, Emily R. Becoming Free: Autonomy and Diversity in the Liberal Polity. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, 2001.Google Scholar

Gilmore, Myron Piper. Argument from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200–1600. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, Victor. “L’état de nature dans L’Esprit des Lois.” In Anthropologie et politique: Les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1974, 189–217.Google Scholar

Goldthwaite, Richard A. The Economy of Renaissance Florence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Rob. “Doux Commerce, Jew Commerce: Intolerance and Tolerance in Voltaire and Montesquieu,” History of Political Thought 37, no. 3 (2016): 530–55.Google Scholar

Gordon, Daniel. Citizens without Sovereignty: Equality and Sociability in French Thought, 1670–1789. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu, adversaire de Hobbes. Paris: Lettres Modernes, 1980.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. “Montesquieu entre Domat et Portalis.” McGill Law Journal 35 (1990): 716–45.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu: La Nature, les lois, la liberté. Paris: Presses Universitaires France, 1993.Google Scholar

Granato, Jim, Inglehart, Ronald, and Lebland, David. “The Effect of Cultural Values on Economic Development: Theory, Hypotheses, and Some Empirical Tests.” American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3 (1966): 607–31.Google Scholar

Granato, Jim, Inglehart, Ronald, and Lebland, David. John Locke’s Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. “John Locke on Custom’s Power and Reason’s Authority.” The Review of Politics 74 (2012): 607–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grasso, Christopher. “The Boundaries of Toleration and Tolerance: Religious Infidelity in the Early American Republic.” In The First Prejudice: Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Early America, eds. Beneke, Chris and Grenda, Christopher S.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, John. Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. New York: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, John. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: New Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Grenberg, Jeanine. Kant and the Ethics of Humility. Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gressaye, Jean Brethe de la. “Notes.” In Montesquieu, De L’Esprit des Loix, ed. de la Gressaye, Jean Brethe. 4 vols. Paris: Société des Belles Lettres, 1950–1961.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy. Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. “Enlightened Dissent: An Introduction.” In Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 1–11.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Modernity versus Postmodernity.” In Modernity: After Modernity, ed. Waters, Malcolm. London: Routledge, 1999, 5–16.Google Scholar

Hamscher, Albert N. The Parlement of Paris after the Fronde. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hannaford, Ivan. Race: The History of an Idea in the West. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Harrington, James. The Commonwealth of Oceana and a System of Politics, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Natural Law: The Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, Its Place in Moral Philosophy, and Its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Law, trans. Knox, T. M.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Henshall, Nicholas. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early European Monarchy. London: Longman Group, 1992.Google Scholar

Herodotus, . The Histories, trans. Waterfield, Robin. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hexter, J. H. “Claude de Seyssel and Normal Politics in the Age of Machiavelli.” In Art, Science, and History in the Renaissance, ed. Singleton, Charles S.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967, 389–415.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. “The Concept of Interest: From Euphemism to Tautology.” In Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays, ed. Hirschman, Albert O.. New York: Viking Penguin, 1986, 35–55.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Opera philosophica, quae Latine scripsit omnia. Amsterdam: Apud J. Blaev, 1668.Google Scholar

Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hotman, François. Antitribonian. Paris: 1603; facsimile ed. in Images et temoins de l’age classique, no. 9 [Publications de L’Université de Saint-Etienne, 1980].Google Scholar

Hotman, François. Francogallia, ed. Giesey, Ralph and Salmon, J. H. M.. Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Hoquet, Thierry, and Spector, Céline. “Comment lire Montesquieu?” In Lectures de l’Esprit des lois, eds. Hoquet, Thierry and Spector, Céline, 7–33. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004.Google Scholar

Hulliung, Mark. Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Huppert, George. The Idea of Perfect History. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hurt, John. J. Louis XIV and the Parlements: The Assertion of Royal Authority. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ivison, Duncan. Postcolonial Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Jackman, Robert W., and Miller, Ross A.. “The Poverty of Political Culture.” American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3 (1996): 697–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jameson, Russell Parson. Montesquieu et l’esclavage: étude sur l’origines de l’opinion antiesclavagiste en France au XVIIIe siècle. New York: Burt Franklin, 1911.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. Political Writings, eds. Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terence. Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. “Thomas Jefferson to William Duane, September 16, 1810.” In Vol. 11 of The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Bergh, Albert Ellery. Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1907, 413.Google Scholar

Johnson, James. “Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science: Four Decades of Political Culture Research.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, no. 1 (2003): 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, James F. Jr. “Montesquieu and Jefferson Revisited: Aspects of a Legacy.” The French Review 51, no. 4 (1978): 577–85.Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert. The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Vintage Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.” In Kant’s Political Writings, 2nd edn., ed. Reiss, H. S.. Cambridge University Press, 1991, 93–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassem, Badreddine. Décadence et absolutism dans l’oeuvre de Montesquieu. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1960.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press, [1931] 1970.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. François Hotman: A Revolutionary’s Ordeal. Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “Legal Humanism and the Sense of History.” Studies in the Renaissance 13 (1966): 184–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “Louis Le Caron Philosophe.” In Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Mahoney, Edward Patrick. Leiden: Brill, 1976, 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “‘Second Nature’: The Idea of Custom in European Law, Society, and Culture. In The Transmission of Culture in Early Modern Europe, eds. Grafton, Anthony and Blair, Ann. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990, 131–72.Google Scholar

Kelly, Christopher J. “Rousseau and the Illustrious Montesquieu.” In The Challenge of Rousseau, eds. Grace, Eve and Kelly, Christopher J.. Cambridge University Press, 2013, 19–33.Google Scholar

Kenshur, Oscar. Dilemmas of Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Nannerl O. “Virtuous Republics and Glorious Monarchies: Two Models in Montesquieu’s Political Thought.” Political Studies 20, no. 4 (1972): 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kesler, Charles R. “Democracy and the Bush Doctrine.” In Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: Ten Years of the Claremont Review of Books, eds. Kesler, Charles R. and Kienker, John B.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012, 167–75.Google Scholar

Kessler, Sanford. “Religion and Liberalism in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters.” Polity 15, no. 3 (1983): 380–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. Montesquieu and the Parlement of Bordeaux. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1996.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. “Montesquieu on Religion and the Question of Toleration.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 375–408.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. Public Passion: Rethinking the Grounds for Political Justice. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. “Religion.” In Dictionnaire Montesquieu, ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. Accessed March 27, 2017. http://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/en/article/1377637039/en/.Google Scholar

Kingwell, Mark. A Civil Tongue: Justice, Dialogue, and the Politics of Pluralism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James T. The Virtues of Liberalism. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Koganzon, Rita. “Contesting the Empire of Habit: Habituation and Liberty in Lockean Education,” American Political Science Review 110, no. 3 (2016): 547–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “Despotism in the Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 231–72.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. Liberalism with Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” The Review of Politics 62, no. 2 (2000): 231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “The Uncertain Inevitability of Decline in Montesquieu.” Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002): 702–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labrousse, Élizabeth. “Calvinism in France, 1598–1685.” In International Calvinism, ed. Prestwich, Menna. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986, 285–314.Google Scholar

Lange, Tyler. The First French Reformation: Church Reform and the Origins of the Old Regime. Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, Melissa. “Claims to Rule: The Case of the Multitude.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, eds. Deslauriers, Marguerite and Destrée, Pierre. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, [1956] 2013, 247–74.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. Actualité de Montesquieu. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 1999.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “L’empire, entre fédération et république.” Revue Montesquieu 8 (2005–2006): 111–36.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu and Liberalism: The Question of Pluralism.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2009, 279–302.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu et le stoïcisme.” In Stoïcisme antique et droit naturel moderne, ed. Terrel, Jean. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2003, 59–84.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Les typologies des gouvernements chez Montesquieu.” In Études sur le XVIIIe siècle, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des publications de la Faculté des Lettres, 1979, 87–103.Google Scholar

Launay, Robert. “Montesquieu: The Specter of Despotism and the Origins of Comparative Law.” In Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law, ed. Riles, Annelise. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001, 22–39.Google Scholar

Lemarié, Louis. Les Assemblées franques et les historiens réformateurs du XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Imprimerie Bonvalot-Jouve, 1906.Google Scholar

Levine, Alan. “The Idea of Commerce in Enlightenment Political Thought.” In Rediscovering Political Economy, eds. Postell, Joseph and Watson, Bradley C. S.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2011, 53–82.Google Scholar

Levin, Lawrence M. The Political Doctrine of Montesquieu’s Esprit des Lois: Its Classical Background. New York: Publications of the Institute of French Studies, Columbia University, 1936.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. “Montesquieu’s Constitutional Legacies.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2009, 115–38.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Linton, Marisa. “Citizenship and Religious Toleration in France.” In Toleration in Enlightenment Europe, eds. Grell, Ole Peter and Porter, Roy. Cambridge University Press, 2000, 157–74.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Civil Government, ed. Shapiro, Ian. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Loirette, Gabriel. “Montesquieu et le problème de France: Du bon Gouvernement.” In Actes du Congrès Montesquieu. Bordeaux: Impriméries Delmas, 1956, 219–39.Google Scholar

López-Córdova, J. Ernesto, and Meissner, Christopher M.. “The Impact of International Trade on Democracy: A Long-Run Perspective.” World Politics 60, no. 4 (2008): 539–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenthal, David. “Book 1 of Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws.” American Political Science Review 53 (1959): 488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenthal, David. “Montesquieu.” In History of Political Philosophy, eds. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph. University of Chicago Press, 1987, 513–58.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David. “Montesquieu and the Classics.” In Ancients and Moderns: Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss, ed. Cropsey, Joseph. New York: Basic Books, 1964, 258–87.Google Scholar

Le Roy, Loys. Les Politiques d’Aristote: Esqvelles est monstree la science de gouuerner le genre humain en toutes especes d’estats publics. 1568.Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald. Principles of Constitutional Design. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Sara. “Problems with Principles: Montesquieu’s Theory of Natural Justice.” History of Political Thought 24, no. 1 (2003): 109–30.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy, trans. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Tarcov, Nathan. University of Chicago Press, [1517] 1995.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince, 2nd edn., trans. Mansfield, Harvey C.. University of Chicago Press, [1532] 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markovits, Francine. Montesquieu: Le droit et l’histoire. Paris: Vrin, 2008.Google Scholar

Markovits, Francine. “Montesquieu: l’esprit d’un peuple, une histoire expérimentale.” In Lectures de l’Esprit des lois, eds. Hoquet, Thierry and Spector, Céline. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004, 65–9988Google Scholar

Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Mentor, 1999.Google Scholar

Maletz, Donald. “Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no.1 (2005): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manent, Pierre. The City of Man, trans. LePain, Marc A.. Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “Montesquieu et la politique moderne.” In Lectures de l’Esprit des lois, eds. Hoquet, Thierry and Spector, Céline. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004, 171–232.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Harvey C. Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of the Executive Power. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Martin, Cristophe. “Une apologétique ‘moderne’ des Anciens: la querelle dans les Pensées.” Revue Montesquieu 7 (2003–2004): 67–83.Google Scholar

Martin, Kingsley. French Liberal Thought in the 18th Century. London: E. Benn., 1929.Google Scholar

Martino, Pierre. “De quelques résidus métaphysiques dans l’Esprit des lois.” Revue d'histoire de la philosophie et d’histoire générale de la civilisation 43 (1946): 235–43.Google Scholar

Mathiez, Albert. “La place de Montesquieu dans l’histoire des doctrines politiques du XVIIIe siècle.” Annales Historiques de la Révolution Française 7 (1930): 97–112.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. “Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolution.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, eds. Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S.. Cambridge University Press, 1997, 142–73.Google Scholar

McCrea, Adriana. “Sixteenth- through Eighteenth-Century Philosophy of Law.” In Vol. 2 of The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia, ed. Gray, Christopher, 799–803. New York: Garland Publishing, 1999.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

McNeil, David M. Guillaume Budé and Humanism in the Reign of Francis I. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1975.Google Scholar

Meernik, James. “United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy.” Journal of Peace Research 33, no. 4 (1996): 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mentzer, Raymond A. Jr. Blood and Belief: Family Survival and Confessional Identity among the Provincial Huguenot Nobility. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, The Subjection of Women and Utilitarianism. New York: Modern Library: 2002.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Miller, David. Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Paul B. Elusive Origins: The Enlightenment in the Modern Caribbean Historical Imagination. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Miller, Paul D. Armed State Building: Confronting State Failure, 1898–2012. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu. 4 vols. London: T. Evans, 1777.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline, ed. Lowenthal, David. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. De l’esprit des loix. 2 vols. Geneva: Barrillot et fils, 1748.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. “Discourse on the Motives That Ought to Encourage Us to the Sciences.” The New Atlantis, trans. Schaub, Diana J., no. 20 (2008): 35–63.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. My Thoughts, ed. Clark, Henry C.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2012.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. Oeuvres Complètes de Montesquieu, eds. Ehrard, Jean and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, et al. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1998–.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. Oeuvres Complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Masson, André. 3 vols. Paris: Les Éditions Nagel, 1950–55.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. Persian Letters, ed. Kahn, Andrew. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de. The Spirit of the Laws, eds. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia C., and Stone, Harold S.. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Free Trade, Free Speech, and Free Love: Monarchy from the Liberal Prospect in Mid-Eighteenth Century France.” In Monarchisms in the Age of Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Common Good, eds. Blom, Hans, Laursen, John Christian, and Simonutti, Luisa. University of Toronto Press, 2007, 101–18.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Monarchy’s Paradox: Honor in the Face of Sovereign Power.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 41–68.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Montesquieu on Empire and Enlightenment.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, ed. Muthu, Sankar. Cambridge University Press, 2014, 112–54.Google Scholar

Mousnier, Roland E. The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1879: The Organs of State and Society, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew R. “Tolerance, Toleration, and the Liberal Tradition.” Polity 29 (1997): 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Stephen. The Gift of Immortality: Myths of Power and Human Poetics. London: Associated University Presses, 1997.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. Enlightenment against Empire. Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordland, Rod. “Afghan Equality and Law, but with Strings Attached.” New York Times, September 24, 2010. Accessed April 30, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2010/09/25/world/asia/25kite.html.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. Morality and Politics in Modern Europe, ed. Letwin, Shirley Robin. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. On Human Conduct. Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, ed. Fuller, Timothy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991, 5–42.Google Scholar

Obama, Barack. “Remarks at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, December 14, 2011.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Barack Obama, 2011, Book 2, Presidential Documents – July 1 to December 31, 2011. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, 2015.Google Scholar

Oresme, Nicole. Politiques d’Aristote. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, [1374] 1970.Google Scholar

Orwin, Clifford. “‘For Which Human Nature Can Never Be Too Grateful’: Montesquieu as the Heir of Christianity.” In Recovering Reason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, ed. Burns, Timothy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010, 269–82.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution. 2 vols. Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Pangle, Thomas L. Aristotle’s Teaching in the Politics. University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pangle, Thomas L. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws. University of Chicago Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pangle, Thomas L. The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws. University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasquier, Étienne. L’interprétation des Institutes de Justinian. Paris, 1847.Google Scholar

Pasquier, Étienne. Les Lettres. 2 vols. Paris, 1619.Google Scholar

Pasquier, Étienne. Les Oeuvres d’Estienne Pasquier. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1723.Google Scholar

Peceny, Mark. Democracy at the Point of Bayonets. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Peterson, Michael D. “Fasting: Eastern Christian.” In Encyclopedia of Monasticism. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2000, 468–70.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Plamenatz, John. Man and Society: Machiavelli through Rousseau. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar

Plato, . Divini Platonis Opera Omnia quæ Extant, trans. Ficino, Marcilio. Lyon: Apud Franciscum le Preux, 1590.Google Scholar

Plato, . The Laws of Plato, ed. Pangle, Thomas L.. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Pliny the Younger. Complete Letters, trans. Walsh, P. G.. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century, A Reissue with a Retrospect. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Barbarism and Religion. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Commerce, Virtue and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Editor’s Introduction.” In James Harrington: The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge University Press, 1992, vii–xxiii.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “The Origins of Study of the Past: A Comparative Approach.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 4 (1962): 209–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Man: Moral Essays and Satires. London: Cassell & Company, 1906.Google Scholar

Poujol, Jacques. “Jean Ferrault on the King’s Privileges.” Studies in the Renaissance 5 (1958): 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prélot, Marcel. “Montesquieu et les formes de gouvernement.” In La pensée politique et constitutionnelle de Montesquieu: bicentenaire de L’Esprit des lois, 1748–1948, 2nd edn., eds. Mirkene-Guetzévitch, Boris and Puget, Henri. Paris: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1988, 119–32.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Helvétius, . “Letters of Helvétius, Addressed to President Montesquieu and M. Saurin, on Perusing the Manuscript of The Spirit of Laws.” In de Tracy, Antoine Louis Claude Destutt, A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of Laws, To Which Are Annexed, ‘Observations on the Thirty-First Book,’ by the Late M. Condorcet, and Two Letters of Helvétius, On the Merits of the Same Work, trans. Jefferson, Thomas. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811, 283–92.Google Scholar

Radasanu, Andrea. “Montesquieu on Moderation, Monarchy and Reform.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 2 (2010): 283–307.Google Scholar

Radasanu, Andrea. “Polishing Barbarous Mores: Montesquieu on Liberalism and Civic Education.” In Civic Education and the Future, eds. Busch, Elizabeth Kaufer and White, Jonathan W.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013, 49–65.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul A. “Forms of Government: Structure, Principle, Object, and Aim.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, eds. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, 69–108.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul A. “Introduction.” In Machiavelli’s Liberal Republican Legacy, ed. Rahe, Paul A.. Cambridge University Press, 2006, xix–xxx.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul A. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundations of the Modern Republic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul A. Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul A. Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Randall, Michael. The Gargantuan Polity: On the Individual and the Community in the French Renaissance. University of Toronto Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasmussen, Dennis. The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism, 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Régaldo, Marc. Montesquieu et la Religion. Bordeaux: Académie Montesquieu, 1998.Google Scholar

Rice, Condoleezza. “Remarks by National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice at the 28th Annual Convention of the National Association of Black Journalists, August 7, 2003.” Accessed March 27, 2017. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/08/20030807–1.html.Google Scholar

Richelieu, Cardinal. The Political Testament, trans. Hill, Henry Bertram. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Richter, Melvin. “Comparative Political Analysis in Montesquieu and Tocqueville.” Comparative Politics 1 (1969): 129–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin. “An Introduction to Montesquieu’s ‘An Essay on the Causes That May Affect Men’s Minds and Characters.’” Political Theory 4, no. 2 (1976): 132–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Robin, Corey. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roelker, Nancy Lyman. One King, One Faith: The Parlement of Paris and the Religious Reformations of the Sixteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. Rational Legitimacy: A Theory of Political Support. Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenblatt, Helena. Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Michael L. “Does Taxation Lead to Representation?” British Journal of Political Science 34, no. 2 (2004): 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Mankind.” In The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses, ed. Dunn, Susan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002, 69–148.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile, or On Education, trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Russo, Elena. “Virtuous Economies: Modernity and Noble Expenditure from Montesquieu to Caillois.” In Postmodernism and the Enlightenment: New Perspectives in Eighteenth-Century French Intellectual History, ed. Gordon, Daniel. London: Routledge, 2001, 67–116.Google Scholar

Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory, 3rd edn. New York: Holt, Rineart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar

Salkever, Stephen. “Aristotle’s Social Science.” In Aristotle’s Politics: Critical Essays, eds. Kraut, Richard and Skultety, Steven, 27–64. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar

Sales, Francis de. Introduction to the Devout Life. New York: Vintage Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Samuel, Ana. “The Design of Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws: The Triumph of Freedom over Determinism.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 2 (2009): 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saugera, Éric. Bordeaux port négrier: XVIIe–XIXe siècles, 2nd edn. Paris: Karthala, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaub, Diana J. Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana J. “Montesquieu’s Popular Science,” The New Atlantis, no. 20 (2008): 37–46.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana J. “Of Believers and Barbarians: Montesquieu’s Enlightened Toleration.” In Skepticism and the Origins of Toleration, ed. Levine, Alan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999, 225–48.Google Scholar

Schiffman, Zachary S. The Birth of the Past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffman, Zachary S. “Humanism and the Problem of Relativism.” In Humanism in Crisis: The Decline of the French Renaissance, ed. Desan, Philippe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2016, 69–83.Google Scholar

Schiffman, Zachary S. “Estienne Pasquier and the Problem of Historical Relativism.” The Sixteenth Century Journal 18, no. 4 (1987): 505–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, Malcolm. Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Stuart B. All Can Be Saved: Religious Tolerance and Salvation in the Iberian Atlantic World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. Law, the State, and the International Community. New York: Columbia University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Scoville, Warren. The Persecution of Huguenots and French Economic Development 1680–1720. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger. The Uses of Pessimism: And the Danger of False Hope. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Seyssel, Claude de. The Monarchy of France, ed. Kelley, Donald R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: [1519] 1981.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. “Bayle and Montesquieu.” In Pierre Bayle, le philosophe de Rotterdam, ed. Dibon, P.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1959, 142–9.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. “La genèse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France 52 (1952): 425–38.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. “Montesquieu’s Correspondence: Additions and Corrections.” French Studies 12 (1958): 324–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Sherman, Charles P. Roman Law in the Modern World. Boston Book Company, 1917.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, 21–38.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Montesquieu. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge: Belknap, 1984.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. “Virtue in a Bad Climate: Good Men and Good Citizens in Montesquieu’s L’Esprit des lois.” In Enlightenment Studies in Honour of Lester G. Crocker, eds. Bingham, Alfred J. and Topazio, Virgil W.. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1979, 315–28.Google Scholar

Siculus, Diodorus. The Library of History, trans. Oldfather, Charles H.. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 1933–1967.Google Scholar

Sidney, Algernon. Discourses Concerning Government. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, [1704] 1996.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2009): 325–70.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven B. Reading Leo Strauss: Politics, Philosophy, Judaism. University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sowerby, Scott. “Tolerance and Toleration in Early Modern England.” In A Lively Experiment, eds. Beneke, Chris and Grenda, Christopher S.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015, 58–68.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Le fait religieux dans L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu, L’État et la Religion, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Sofia, BG: Éditions Iztok-Zapad, 2007, 40–78.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Le Projet de paix perpétuelle: de Saint-Pierre à Rousseau.” In Principes du droit de la guerre, Ecrits sur le Projet de Paix Perpétuelle de l’abbé de Saint-Pierre, eds. Bachofen, B. and Spector, Céline. Paris: Vrin, 2008, 229–94.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu et l’émergence de l’économie politique. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2006.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu: Liberté, droit et histoire. Paris: Éditions Michalon, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu. Pouvoirs, richesses et société. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France , 2004.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Quelle justice? Quelle rationalité? La mesure du droit dans L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu en 2005, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2005, 219–42.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Spirit, General Spirit,” trans. Philip Stewart. In Dictionnaire Montesquieu, ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. Accessed March 27, 2017. http://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/en/article/1376474276/en/.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Spector, Céline. Le vocabulaire de Montesquieu. Paris: Ellipses, 2001.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Was Montesquieu Liberal? The Spirit of the Laws in the History of Liberalism.” In French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day, eds. Geenens, Raf and Rosenblatt, Helena. Cambridge University Press, 2012, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spitz, Jean-Fabien. La liberté politique: Essai de généalogie conceptuelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France , 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spragens, Thomas A. Civil Liberalism: Reflections on Our Democratic Ideals. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, W. J. Politics and Religion in Seventeenth-Century France. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Stanley, Sharon A. French Enlightenment and the Emergence of Modern Cynicism. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Stein, Peter. Roman Law in European History. New York: Cambridge University Press, [1926] 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Iain. “Montesquieu in England: his ‘Notes on England,’ with Commentary and Translation.” Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 6 (2002). Accessed March 27, 2017. ouclf.iuscomp.org.Google Scholar

Storing, Herbert, ed. The Complete Anti-Federalist. University of Chicago Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, Leo. The City and Man. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. University of Chicago Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, Leo. Seminar on Aristotle, Politics, spring 1960, ed. Joseph Cropsey. Accessed March 27, 2017. https://leostrausscenter.uchicago.edu/course/aristotle-politics-spring-quarter-1960.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. Seminar on Montesquieu II, spring 1966, ed. Thomas L. Pangle. Accessed April 30, 2018. https://leostrausscenter.uchicago.edu/course/montesquieu-ii-spring-quarter-1966.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. University of Chicago Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Stroumsa, Guy G. A New Science: The Discovery of Religion in the Age of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Vickie B. Montesquieu and the Despotic Ideas of Europe: An Interpretation of The Spirit of the Laws. University of Chicago Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tacitus. Agricola. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Tacitus. The Annals and The Histories, ed. Hadas, Moses. New York: Modern Library, 2003.Google Scholar

Tarcov, Nathan. Locke’s Education for Liberty. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Taylor, Mark C. Confidence Games: Money and Markets in a World without Redemption. University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Taylor, Robert S. “Democratic Transitions and the Progress of Absolutism in Kant’s Political Thought.” The Journal of Politics 68, no. 3 (2006): 556–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terjanian, Anoush Fraser. Commerce and Its Discontents in Eighteenth-Century French Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Tholozan, Olivier. Henri de Boulainvilliers: L’anti-absolutisme aristocratique légitimé par l’histoire. Marseille: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2015.Google Scholar

Tillet, Édouard. “Collectio juris, Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, t. 11 et 12.” Revue Montesquieu 8 (2005–2006): 215–22.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J. P.. New York: HarperCollins, 1988.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. The Tocqueville Reader, eds. Zunz, Oliver and Kahan, Alan S.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. “Droit naturel et formes de gouvernement dans L’Esprit des lois.” Esprit 75 (1983): 35–48.Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Tomaselli, Sylvana. “Intolerance, the Virtue of Princes and Radicals.” In Toleration in Enlightenment Europe, eds. Grell, Ole Peter and Porter, Roy. Cambridge University Press, 2000, 86–101.Google Scholar

Tomaselli, Sylvana. “The Spirit of Nations.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, eds. Goldie, Mark and Wolker, Robert, 9–39. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Tomasi, John. Free Market Fairness. Princeton University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasi, John. Liberalism beyond Justice. Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Utt, Walter C., and Strayer, Brian E.. The Bellicose Dove: Claude Brousson and Protestant Resistance to Louis XIV. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Valerius Maximus. Memorable Deeds, trans. Walker, Henry John. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2004.Google Scholar

Van Ruymbek, Bertrand. New Babylon to Eden: The Huguenots and the Migration to Colonial South Carolina. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, ed. Dictionnaire Montesquieu. Accessed March 27, 2017. http://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voltaire. Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire. Paris: Garnier, 1880.Google Scholar

Voltaire. Philosophical Letters, ed. Leigh, John. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2007.Google Scholar

Vyerberg, Henry. Historical Pessimism in the French Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waddicor, Mark H. Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, David. The Growth of the Liberal Soul. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Warburton, William. The Divine Legation of Moses. London, 1846.Google Scholar

Warburton, William. A Selection from the Unpublished Papers of the Right Reverend William Warburton, ed. Kilvert, Francis. London: John Bowyer Nichols & Son, 1841.Google Scholar

Ward, Lee. “Montesquieu on Federalism and Anglo-Gothic Constitutionalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37, no. 4 (2007): 551–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Lee. Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Warren, James. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Watson, John Selby. The Life of William Warburton. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, & Green, 1863.Google Scholar

Werlin, Herbert H. “Political Change and Political Culture.” American Political Science Review 84, no. 1 (1990): 249–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Thomas G. “The Political Theory of the Declaration of Independence.” In The American Founding and the Social Compact, eds. West, Thomas G. and Pestritto, Ronald J.. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2003, 95–146.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Laurence. “The International Politics of Democratization from Portugal (1974) to Iraq (2003).” In The International Politics of Democratization: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Teixeira, Nuno Severiano. London: Routledge, 2008, 8–25.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Laurence. “On ‘Cultivating’ Democracy: Enlivening the Imagery for Democracy Promotion.” In The Conceptual Politics of Democracy Promotion, eds. Hobson, Christopher and Kurki, Milja. London: Routledge, 2012, 19–37.Google Scholar

Wiley, James. “Sheldon Wolin on Theory and the Political.” Polity 38, no. 2 (2006): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, David. Condorcet and Modernity. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, David Lay. “Political Ontology and Institutional Design in Montesquieu and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (2010): 525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Justice in Love. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Wright, Johnson Kent. “A Rhetoric of Aristocratic Reaction? Nobility in De l’Esprit des Lois.” In The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century: Reassessments and New Approaches, ed. Smith, Jay M.. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006, 227–51.Google Scholar

Young, B. W. Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England: Theological Debate from Locke to Burke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, David. “Montesquieu’s View of Despotism and His Own Use of Travel Literature.” Review of Politics 40 (1978): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zanin, Sergey. “Rousseau, Montesquieu et la ‘religion civile.’” In Montesquieu, L’État et la Religion, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Sofia, BG: Èditions Iztok-Zapad, 2007, 186–212.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Michael. “Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Classical Liberalism: On Montesquieu’s Critique of Hobbes.” In Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy, eds. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge University Press, 2001, 227–51.Google Scholar