Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:02:08.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Vector network analysis for nonlinear systems

from Part IV - Nonlinear measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Yves Rolain
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Gerd Vandersteen
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Maarten Schoukens
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Valeria Teppati
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal University (ETH), Zürich
Andrea Ferrero
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Torino
Mohamed Sayed
Affiliation:
Microwave and Millimeter Wave Solutions, Santa Rosa
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The measurement of the nonlinear behavior of microwave systems and components has evolved a lot over the last years. Starting from instrument prototypes, vector network analyzers for nonlinear systems (NVNA) have now entered the product lines of all the major instrumentation vendors. The major challenge for the scientific community is to embed these devices in the mainstream design and characterization of nonlinear devices and circuits.

As the NVNA is still young, most currently active professionals did not experience NVNA technology during their education or their career. Therefore, it is extremely important to clearly define what can be expected from an NVNA. There is a need for an explanation of what an NVNA is and is not. Explaining the limitations of the NVNA technology is also extremely important, as this can avoid false expectations and deceptions.

This text has the ambition to take a small step in this direction. This is why much effort is spent in the first sections of this chapter in drawing the big picture around the NVNA. Our hope is that this might help practitioners to position the NVNA and to obtain some intuition about the actual measurements the NVNA makes.

The remainder of the text explains the ideas behind the different instruments that have NVNA capability. The setups are very different, but the measurements they make are very similar. The key idea is that to characterize a nonlinear device under test, one needs to measure the complete spectrum (amplitude and phase) of all the port quantities (waves or voltages and currents) that are present at all the ports of the device.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] S. F., Adam, “Microwave Theory and Applications.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
[2] D., Rytting, “Network analyzers from small signal to large signal measurements,” PROC. 67th ARFTG Conference, 2006, pp. 11–49, 16–16, June 2006.Google Scholar
[3] Y., Rolain, W., Van Moer, G., Vandersteen and J., Schoukens, “Why are nonlinear microwave systems measurements so involved?IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 726–729, June 2004.Google Scholar
[4] P., Wambacq, “Symbolic analysis of large and weakly nonlinear analog integrated circuits,” Ph.D. dissertation, K.U. Leuven, Belgium, Jan. 1996.Google Scholar
[5] M., Schetzen, “The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems.” New York: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
[6] S. A., Maas, “Nonlinear Microwave Circuits”. New York: Wiley, 1988.Google Scholar
[7] W., Van Moer and Y., Rolain, “Measuring the sensitivity of microwave components to bias variations,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 787–791, June 2004.Google Scholar
[8] A., Alghanim, J., Benedikt and P. J., Tasker, “Investigation of electrical base-band memory effects in high-power 20W LDMOS transistors using IF passive load pull,” 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, vols 1–5, Syria, 2008.Google Scholar
[9] E. Oran, Brigham, “The Fast Fourier Transform.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
[10] J., Schoukens and R., Pintelon, “Identification of Linear Systems.” London, U.K.: Pergamon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
[11] M., Sipila, K., Lehtinen and V., Porra, “High-frequency periodic time domain waveform measurement system,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1397–1405, Oct. 1988.Google Scholar
[12] G., Kompa and F., van Raay, “Error-corrected large-signal wave-form measurement system combining network analyser and sampling oscilloscope capabilities,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 358–365, Apr. 1990.Google Scholar
[13] A., Ferrero and U., Pisani, “Two-port network analyzer calibration using an unknown ‘thru’”, IEEE Microwave Guided Waves Lett., vol. MGWL-2, pp. 505–507, Dec. 1992.Google Scholar
[14] J., Verspecht, “Broadband sampling oscilloscope characterization with the nose-to-nose calibration procedure: A theoretical analysis,” in Proc. 1994 IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Technology Conf., Hamamatsu, Japan, May 1994, pp. 526–529.Google Scholar
[15] J., Verspecht and K., Rush, “Individual characterization of broadband sampling oscilloscopes with the nose-to-nose calibration procedure,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 354–374, Apr. 1994Google Scholar
[16] G., Vandersteen and R., Pintelon, “Maximum likelihood estimator for jitter noise models for HF sampling scopes,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1282–1284, Dec. 2000.Google Scholar
[17] P. D., Hale, C. M., Wang, D. F., Williams, K. A., Remley and J.D., Wepman, “Compensation of random and systematic timing errors in sampling oscilloscopes,” IEEE Transactions on Instrum. Meas., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2146–2154, Dec. 2006.Google Scholar
[18] W., Van Moer, Y., Rolain and A., Geens, “Measurement based nonlinear modeling of spectral regrowth,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1711–1716, Dec. 2001.Google Scholar
[19] W., Van Moer, Y., Rolain and J., Schoukens, “An automatic harmonic selection scheme for measurements and calibration with the nonlinear vectorial network analyser,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 337–341, Apr. 2002.Google Scholar
[20] W., Van Moer and Y., Rolain, “Proving the usefulness of a 3-port nonlinear vectorial network analyser through mixer measurements,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1834–1837, Dec. 2003.Google Scholar
[21] K. M., Youngseo, P., Roblin, Myoung Sukkeun, J. Strahler, F. De Groote, and J. P., Teyssier, “Multi-harmonic broadband measurements using a large signal network analyzer,” PROC. 75th ARFTG, pp. 1–6, 28–28, May 2010.Google Scholar
[22] M. El, Yaagoubi, G., Neveux, D., Barataud, T., Reveyrand, J.-M., Nebus, F., Verbeyst, F., Gizard, and J., Puech, “Time domain calibrated measurements of wideband multisines using a large signal network analyzer,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1180–1192, May 2008.Google Scholar
[23] U., Lott, “Measurement of magnitude and phase of harmonics generated in nonlinear microwave two-ports,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1506–1511, Oct. 1989.Google Scholar
[24] P., Blockley, D., Gunyan and J. B., Scott, “Mixer-based, vector-corrected, vector signal/network analyzer offering 300 kHz-20 GHz bandwidth and traceable phase response,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, pp. 4 pp., 12–17 June 2005.Google Scholar
[25] “Microwave Components 0.001-40 GHz,” Herotek, Datasheets [Online]. Available: www.herotek.com.
[26] M., Thorsell and K., Andersson, “Fast multiharmonic active load–pull system with waveform measurement capabilities,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 149–157, Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
[27] H., Jie, K. G., Gard, N. B., Carvalho and M. B., Steer, “Dynamic time-frequency waveforms for VSA characterization of PA long-term memory effects,” ARFTG Conference, 2007 69th, pp. 1–5, 8–8, June 2007.Google Scholar
[28] T., Van den Broeck and J., Verspecht, “Calibrated vectorial nonlinear network analyzer,” in Proc. IEEE MTT-S, San-Diego, CA, 1994, pp. 1069–1072.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×