Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Binder, Sarah A.
and
Smith, Steven S.
1998.
Political Goals and Procedural Choice in the Senate.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 2,
p.
398.
Bensel, Richard
2000.
Of Rules and Speakers.
Social Science History,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
349.
Zelizer, Julian E.
2000.
Introduction to Roundtable.
Social Science History,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
307.
Zelizer, Julian E.
2000.
Clio's Lost Tribe: Public Policy History Since 1978.
Journal of Policy History,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
369.
Schickler, Eric
2000.
Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 2,
p.
269.
Weaver, R. Kent
2000.
The Politics of Constitutional Reform in North America.
p.
47.
Hurwitz, Mark S.
Moiles, Roger J.
and
Rohde, David W.
2001.
Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 4,
p.
911.
KREHBIEL, KEITH
and
MEIROWITZ, ADAM
2002.
Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
MARSHALL, BRYAN W.
2002.
Explaining the Role of Restrictive Rules in the Postreform House.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Price, Kevin S.
2002.
The Partisan Legacies of Preemptive Leadership: Assessing the Eisenhower Cohorts in the U.S. House.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
609.
Polsby, Nelson W.
and
Schickler, Eric
2002.
LANDMARKS IN THESTUDY OFCONGRESS SINCE1945.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
333.
Binder, Sarah A.
Lawrence, Eric D.
and
Smith, Steven S.
2002.
Tracking the Filibuster, 1917 to 1996.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
406.
GREEN, MATTHEW N.
2002.
Institutional Change, Party Discipline, and the House Democratic Caucus, 1911–19.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
601.
Marshall, Bryan W.
2003.
Controlling the Agenda with Special Rules: A House‐Senate Comparison of Legislation in the Postreform Congress.
Politics & Policy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 4,
p.
672.
Roberts, Jason M.
and
Smith, Steven S.
2003.
Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 2,
p.
305.
ANDERSON, WILLIAM D.
BOX‐STEFFENSMEIER, JANET M.
and
SINCLAIR‐CHAPMAN, VALERIA
2003.
The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
357.
Martorano, Nancy
2004.
Cohesion or Reciprocity? Majority Party Strength and Minority Party Procedural Rights in the Legislative Process.
State Politics & Policy Quarterly,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
55.
LEE, FRANCES E.
2004.
Bicameralism and Geographic Politics: Allocating Funds in the House and Senate.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
185.
Rose, Melody
2004.
The Upper Chamber Takes the High Road: Social Regulatory Policy and the U.S. Senate, 1953-2000.
Congress & the Presidency,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
161.
Jupille, Joseph
2004.
Procedural Politics.