Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:09:30.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Serpent in the Garden: Liberal Theology in the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Elizabeth Fox-Genovese
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Eugene D. Genovese
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

We have failed to lay the stress of the argument on the right and duty of society to care for all its members, placing all in the positions for which God fitted them, partly because our minds have to some degree been infected by the virus of Red Republican theory which has made the social system at the North rotten to the core.

—W. A. Cave

The southern churches, for all their vaunted orthodoxy, could not wholly resist the rising tide of theological liberalism, as capitalism inexorably transformed the world into one grand marketplace of ideas as well as commodities. No society could insulate itself from marketplace sentiments and ideas, which themselves metamorphosed into commodities. Supposedly, heresies, cults, and isms flourished only in the free states, but they were making troublesome inroads into the slave states. Vigilance emerged as the South's order of the day.

Long-standing theological and ecclesiastical differences within the national Presbyterian Church flared into acrimony in the 1830s, and the split in 1837 between the orthodox Calvinist Old School and the more variegated New School exposed the strength but also the greater weakness of theological liberalism in the South. Beneath ecclesiastical and political issues lay theological ones: faithfulness to the Orthodox Westminster Confession and to the formulaic five points of Calvinism or “TULIP” (total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints). The New School arose in the Northeast primarily among men who professed to defend Calvinism against the Unitarians but who made more and more concessions to advocates of free will (Arminians). They repudiated predestination or interpreted it so flexibly as to make Arminians gloat over their surrender.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Mind of the Master Class
History and Faith in the Southern Slaveholders' Worldview
, pp. 587 - 612
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×