No attempt to deal with the facts of meiosis would be complete without some consideration of the evolution of the various modes and mechanisms to which the greater part of this monograph has been devoted.

The data summarized in Chapter 6 indicate that all the component parts of the meiotic mechanism are under genetic control and show heritable variation in the form of mutations. Since selection will operate on any set of entities with the properties of heredity, variation and a capacity for multiplication,it has commonly been assumed, as the quote which introduces this chapter also initially assumes, that changes in the character of meiosis stemming from mutation will necessarily reflect adjustments relating to selection for enhanced fitness. Inherent in this assumption is the belief that different meiotic systems have different consequences which allow them to respond to differentselection pressures.

It is certainly possible to demonstrate a response to artificial selection for a number of aspects of meiotic behaviour. Shaw (1971b), for example, was able to alter the mean cell chiasma frequency of male meiocytes by selecting grasshoppers with high and low mean cell chiasma frequencies and using these as parents in experimental crosses.