Book contents
- Medicine and Practical Ethics in Galen
- Medicine and Practical Ethics in Galen
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Moral Themes and Types of Moralism in Galen
- Part II Case Studies
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Cited
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2023
Book contents
- Medicine and Practical Ethics in Galen
- Medicine and Practical Ethics in Galen
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Conventions and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Moral Themes and Types of Moralism in Galen
- Part II Case Studies
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Cited
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Medicine and Practical Ethics in Galen , pp. 246 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Adamson, P. 2016, ‘Ethik als Medizin in der arabischen Tradition’, in Nassery, I. and Schmidt, J. (eds.), Moralische Vortrefflichkeit in der pluralen Gesellschaft. Tugendethik aus philosophischer, christlicher und muslimischer Perspektive Moralische Vortrefflichkeit in der pluralen Gesellschaft, Paderborn, 65–90.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1976, ‘Polupragmosune and “Minding One’s Own Business”: A Study in Greek Social and Political Values’, Classical Philology 71.4, 301–327.Google Scholar
Ahonen, M. 2017, ‘Galen on Sexual Desire and Sexual Regulation’, Apeiron 50.4, 449–481.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. C. A. 2008, ‘The Passions in Galen and the Novels of Chariton and Xenophon’, in Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, London-New York, 175–197.Google Scholar
Alexopoulos, L. 2015, ‘Medicine, Rhetoric and Philanthropy in Gregory of Nyssa’s Second Sermon “On the Love of the Poor”’, Theologia 86.3, 59–85.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Millán, C. 1999, ‘Greco-Roman Case Histories and their Influence on Islamic Clinical Accounts’, Social History of Medicine 12, 19–43.Google Scholar
Amato, E. (ed.) and Julien, Y. (trans.), 2005, Favorinos d’Arles, Oeuvres I. Introduction générale – Témoignages – Discours aux Corinthiens – Sur la Fortune, Paris.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1993, The Second Sophistic: Α Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire, London.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. 2008, ‘Imagination and Meditation in Seneca: The Example of Praemediatio’, in Fitch, J. G. (ed.), Seneca. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, Oxford, 102–113.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 2014, ‘Galen’s De Indolentia and the Creation of a Personal Philosophy’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), Galen’s De Indolentia. Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter, Tübingen, 127–142.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2015, ‘Medical Acculturation?: Early Greek Texts and the Question of Near Eastern Influence’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, Berlin, 19–46.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2005, ‘Un personaggio in cerca di lettore. Galens Groer Puls und die Erfindung des Lesers’, in Fögen, Th. (ed.), Antike Fachtexte /Ancient Technical Texts, Berlin-New York, 21–39.Google Scholar
Auberger, J. 1993, ‘Parole et silence dans les Préceptes de mariage de Plutarque’, Les Études Classiques 61, 297–308.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. et al. (trans.), 1927–2004, Plutarch Moralia, 16 vols, Cambridge, MA-London.Google Scholar
Bannert, H. 2015, ‘Medical Education’, in Bloomer, M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Education, Chichester, 413–429.Google Scholar
Barbara, S. 2014, ‘“Memorial” Strategies of Court Physicians in the Imperial Period’, in Maire, B. (ed.), ‘Greek’ and ‘Roman’ in Latin Medical Texts: Studies in Cultural Change and Exchange in Ancient Medicine, Leiden, 25–42.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (ed.), 1991, Galeni De Optimo Docendi Genere, Exhortatio ad Medicinam (Protrepticus), Berlin [CMG 1.1].Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. 1978, ‘Solone Saffo Euripide in un passo di Galeno’, Prometheus 4, 207–218.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1991, ‘Galen on Logic and Therapy’, in Kudlien, K. and Durling, R. (eds.), Galen’s Method of Healing, Leiden, 50–102.Google Scholar
Barraud, G. 1938, ‘Galen et l’éducation physique’, Bulletin de la Société française d’ histoire de la médecine 32, 164–169.Google Scholar
Barton, T. 1994, Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Physiognomics, and Medicine under the Roman Empire, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Bazou, A. (ed.), 2011, Γαληνοῦ Ὅτι ταῖς τοῦ σώματος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις ἕπονται, Athens.Google Scholar
Becchi, F. 2012, ‘La psicopatologia di Galeno: Il Περὶ ἀλυπίας’, in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi sul De Indolentia di Galeno, Roma, 23–31.Google Scholar
Becker, L. C. 2004, ‘Stoic Emotion’, in Strange, S. K. and Zupko, J. (eds.), Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations, Cambridge, 250–276.Google Scholar
Bendz, G. (ed.) and Pape, I. (trans.), 1990, Caelii Aureliani Celerum Passionum libri III, Tardarum Passionum Libri V, Berlin.Google Scholar
Benedict, R. 1946, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, Th., 1967, Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London.Google Scholar
Bergsträsser, G. (ed.), 1925, Hunain ibn Ishāq. Über die syrischen und arabischen Galen-Übersetzungen. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 17.2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bertini Malgarini, A. (ed.), 1992, Galeno. De Optima Corporis nostri Constitutione e De Bono Habitu; traduzione dal greco e commento, Rome.Google Scholar
Bertsch, S. 2015, ‘Senecan Selves’, in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1997, Hadrian: The Restless Emperor (Roman Imperial Biographies), London-New York.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1972, ‘A Nickname for Commodus and the Date of Fronto’s Death’, Chiron 2, 463–473.Google Scholar
Boissevain, U. P. (ed.), 1895–1901; repr. 1955, Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt, 3 vols, Berlin.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2021, ‘Is the Theriac to Piso attributed to Galen authentic?’, in Petit, C., Swain, S., Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), Pseudo-Galenica: The Formation of the Galenic Corpus from Antiquity to the Renaissance, London, 13–30.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2019, ‘Galien de Pergame ou le médecin qui voulait se faire philosophe’, in Crignon, C., Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Médecins et philosophes: Une histoire, Paris, 109–128.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2017, ‘Galen’, Oxford Bibliographies; DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195389661-0258.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2015a, ‘Mystère autour d’une petite balle: à quel jeu jouaient Galien et Marc Aurèle?’, Galenos 9, 37–56.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2015b, ‘De l’art de la citation: Galien lecteur des auteurs antiques’, in Ángel y Espinós, J., Floristán Imízcoz, J. M., García Romero, F., López Salvá, M. (eds.), Ὑγίεια καὶ γέλως. Hmenaje a Ignacio Rodríguez Alfageme, Zaragoza, 97–115.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2014, ‘Les âges de la vie chez Galien: Sens des mots brephos, pais, neos, meirakion et neaniskos’, in Rousseau, N. and Boehm, I. (eds.), L’expressivité du lexique médical en Grèce et à Rome. Hommages à Françoise Skoda, Paris, 269–284.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2013, ‘What is a Mental Illness, and How can It be Treated? Galen’s Reply as a Doctor and as a Philosopher’, in Harris, W.V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden, 129–145.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2010a, ‘Galien de Pergame et la pratique épistolaire’, Laurence, P. and Guillaumont, F. (eds.), Les écritures de la douleur dans l’épistolaire de l’Antiquité à nos jours, Tours, 113–132.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., Jouanna, J. and Pietrobelli, A. (eds.), 2010b, Galien, Ne pas se chagriner, Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2009, ‘Galen’s Bios and Methodos: From Ways of Life to Path of Knowledge’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 175–189.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2008a, ‘The Library of a Greek Scholar in the Roman Empire: New Testimony from Galen’s Recently Discovered Peri Alupias’, in Gilliers, L. (ed.), Asklepios: Studies on Ancient Medicine, Bloemfontein, 7–18.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2008b, ‘Galien de Pergame témoin de son temps: l’acculturation de la médecine grecque à la société romaine du IIe s. de n. è.’, Semitica and Classica 1, 71–80.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (ed.), 2007, Galien, Œuvres, Tome I. Introduction générale; Sur l’ordre de ses propres livres; Sur ses propres livres; Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe, Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, P. (eds.), 2005, ‘Galien ressuscité: édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des Études Grecques 118, 168–213.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2004, ‘Oral et écrit chez Galien’, in Jouanna, J. and Leclant, J. (eds.), La médecine grecque antique, Paris, 199–218.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2003, ‘Aux marges de la médecine rationnelle: médecins et charlatans à Rome au temps de Galien (IIe s. de notre ère)’, Revue des Études Grecques 116, 109–131.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2002, ‘Un médecin œnophile: Galien et le vin de Falerne’, in Jouanna, J. and Villard, L. (eds.), Vin et santé en Grèce ancienne, Actes du Colloque International (Rouen Paris, 28–30 septembre 1998), Paris, 155–163.Google Scholar
Boudon, V. 2001, ‘Galien et les arts figurés: un médecin amateur d’art’, in La littérature et les arts figurés de l’Antiquité à nos jours, Actes du XIVe Congrès International de l’Association Guillaume Budé (Limoges, 25–28 août 1998), Paris, 209–217.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2000, ‘Eudème de Pergame’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. III, Paris, 282–285.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 1994, ‘Loisir et création littéraire chez Galien’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2, 154–168.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. and Delattre, D. (eds.), 2003, Galien. Systématisation de la médecine. Texte grec et traduction annotée, précédés d’études introductives, Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, P. 2016, ‘Miraculous Fish Therapy for Leprosy (‘Elephant Disease’) and Other Skin Diseases in Byzantium’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 40.1, 170–175.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste; Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA [originally published in 1979 as La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement].Google Scholar
Brain, P. 1986, Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of His Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 2003, ‘Stoic Moral Psychology’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge, 257–294.Google Scholar
Brigham, N. L. et al. 1997, ‘The Roles of Invidious Comparisons and Deservingness in Sympathy and Schadenfreude’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19.3, 363–380.Google Scholar
Brock, A. J. (transl.), 1916, Galen. On the Natural Faculties. Loeb Classical Library 71, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2015, Galenos, Die Verbrannte Bibliothek, Peri Alypias, Über die Unverdrossenheit, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1994, ‘The Bubble of the Second Sophistic’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39.1, 25–52.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. C. 1902, ‘Epideictic Literature’, Studies in Classical Philology [Chicago] 3, 89–261.Google Scholar
Burguière, P., Gourevitch, D. and Malinas, Y. (eds.), 1988–2000, Soranos d’Éphèse, Maladies des femmes. Vols 4, Paris.Google Scholar
Burke, K. 1966, Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature and Method, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 1993, Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Caner, G. C. 1954, ‘Use of Suggestion in Psychotherapy’, The New England Journal of Medicine 251, 733–735.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. 1984, ‘The Meaning of Prohairesis in Aristotele’s Ethics’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114, 147–157.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. M. 2004, ‘Numbers, Prognosis, and Healing: Galen on Medical Theory’, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 90.2, 45–60.Google Scholar
Coughlin, S. 2018, ‘Athenaeus of Attalia on the Psychological Causes of Bodily Health’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 109–142.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1996, Writing, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Crusius, O. 1884, ‘Ein Lehrgedicht des Plutarch (Echtheit von Galen’s Protrepticus, Versspuren, Galen und Plutarch, Plutarch und Phaedrus)’, Rheinisches Museum 39, 581–606.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. 2014, ‘Genre and Galen’s Philosophical Discourses’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R., Wilberding, J. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen, London, 39–59.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. 2009, Rhetorical Strategies and Generic Conventions in the Galenic Corpus, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
Damiani, V. 2018, ‘Protreptic and Medicine: Galen’, in Alieva, O., Kotzé, A. and van der Meeren, S. (eds.), When Wisdom call: Philosophical Protreptic in Antiquity, Brepols, 299–317.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C. and Ruelle, C. É. (eds.), 1879, Œuvres de Rufus d’Éphèse, Paris (repr. Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
De Boer, W. (ed.). 1937, Galeni De Propriorum Animi cuiuslibet Affectuum Dignotione et Curatione; De Animi cuiuslibet Peccatorum Dignotione et Curatione; De Atra Bile, Leipzig-Berlin [CMG 4,1,1].Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (ed.), 1996, Galeni De Elementis ex Hippocratis Sententia, Berlin [CMG 1,2].Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. 1991, ‘Galen’s Response to Skepticism’, Illinois Classical Studies 16, 283–306.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. 1988, ‘The Third Part of the Soul’, in Manuli, P., Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche di Galeno, Napoli, 43–63.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (ed.), 1978–1984, Galeni De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, Berlin [CMG 4,1,2, vols. 3].Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. 1966, ‘Galen and the Greek Poets’, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 7.3, 259–266.Google Scholar
Debru, A. and Garofalo, I. (eds. and transl.), 2005, Galien. Les os pour les débutants: L’anatomie des muscles, Paris.Google Scholar
Debru, A. 1995, ‘Les démonstrations médicales à Rome au temps de Galien’, in van der Eijk, Ph. et al. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context, Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA, Vol. I, 69–81.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. 1970, Medicus gratiosus: Untersuchungen zu einem griechischen Arztbild / Mit dem Anhang Testamentum Hippocratis und Rhazes’ De indulgentia medici, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (ed.), 1965, Die griechische Empirikerschule. Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre, Um Zusätze vermehrter anastatischer Neudruck der Ausgabe von 1930, Berlin-Zürich.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. 2000, ‘Galeno come intellettuale’, in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi su Galeno: Scienza, Filosofia, Retorica e Filologia, Firenze, 13–29.Google Scholar
Destré, P. and Trivigno, F. (eds.), 2019, Laughter, Humor and Comedy in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Devinant, J. 2020, Les Troubles psychiques selon Galien: Étude d’un système de pensée, Paris.Google Scholar
Devinant, J. 2018, ‘Mental Disorders and Psychological Suffering in Galen’s Cases’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 198–221.Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. 1937, ‘The Epicurean Doctrine of Gratitude’, American Journal of Philology 58.3, 320–328.Google Scholar
Dickerman, S. O. 1911, ‘Some Stock Illustrations of Animal Intelligence in Greek Psychology’, Transaction and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 42, 123–130.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (ed.), 1915, Galeni In Hippocratis Prorrheticum I Commentaria III, Leipzig-Berlin [CMG 9.2].Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1993, Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism; Translated with an Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1983, ‘Metriopatheia and Apatheia: Some Reflections on Controversy in later Greek Ethics’, in Anton, J. P., Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, Albany, NY, 508–517.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. 2008, ‘Psychology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 184–209.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. 1988, ‘Tipologia degli errori e loro correzione secondo Galeno’, in Manuli, P., Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche di Galeno, Napoli, 65–116.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2014, ‘Ancient ἐκδόσεις: Further Lexical Observations on Some Galen’s Texts’, Lexicon Philosophicum, International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
Drabkin, I. E. 1944, ‘On Medical Education in Greece and Rome’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 15, 333–351.Google Scholar
Duff, T. 2011, ‘Plutarch’s Lives and the Critical Reader’, in Roskam, G. and van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, Leuven, 59–82.Google Scholar
Ecca, G. (ed.), 2016, Die hippokratische Schrift Praecepta. Kritische Edition, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Mit Anhang: ein Scholion zu Praec. 1, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. 1967, Ancient Medicine. Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein (edited by Temkin, Owsei and Lilian Temkin, C., translated from the German by C. Lilian Temkin), Baltimore, MD-London.Google Scholar
Edlow, R. B. 1977, Galen on Language and Ambiguity: An English Translation of Galen’s ‘De Captionibus (On Fallacies)’ with Introduction, Text and Commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1997, ‘Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters’, Greece and Rome 44.1, 23–38.Google Scholar
Ehlert, J. (ed.), 1959, Galeni De Purgantium Medicamentorum Facultate. Überlieferung und Edition, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Elliott, C. J. 2005, Galen, Rome and the Second Sophistic, Unpublished PhD Thesis, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Englert, L. 1929, Untersuchungen zu Galens Schrift Thrasybulos. Studien der Geschichhte der Medizin 18, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. 2008, ‘Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic’, Classical Philology 103.4, 395–413.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1973, Les trois ‘‘protreptiques’’ de Platon; Euthydème, Phédon, Epinomis, Paris.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. T. 2014, ‘Galen’s De Indolentia in the Context of Greco-Roman Medicine, Moral Philosophy, and Physiognomy’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), Galen’s De indolentia. Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 88, Tübingen, 203–220.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. T. 2008, ‘The Passions and Moral Progress: An Introduction’, in Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, London-New York, 1–25.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. 1965, ‘Plato und Aristoteles im Protreptikos des Jamblichos’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47, 53–79.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2008, ‘Commentary’, in Hankinson, J. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 323–354.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 2011, ‘Theophrastus and Strato on Animal Intelligence’, in Desclos, M.-L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, NJ-London, 399–412.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2000, Essential Works of Michel Foucault. Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth; ed. Rabinow, P., London.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1990a, The Use of Pleasure (translated from the French by R. Hurley). Vol. 2, The History of Sexuality, New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1990b, The History of Sexuality (translated from the French by R. Hurley). Vol. 3, The Care of the Self, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1988, Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, ed. Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., Hutton, P. H., London-Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1985, Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia (Six Lectures given by Michel Foucault at Berkeley, Oct–Nov. 1983). Ed. by Joseph Pearson in 1985, (Reedited in 1999 for www.foucault.info available at https://foucault.info/parrhesia/, last accessed 3 February 2020).Google Scholar
Frank, A. W. 1995, The Wounded Storyteller. Body, Illness, and Ethics, Chicago, IL-London.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1990, ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology, Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought 1. Cambridge, 225–250.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1988, ‘The Empiricist Attitude towards Reason and Theory’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), Method, Medicine and Metaphysics, Apeiron Suppl. Vol. 22, 79–97.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987, ‘The Ancient Empiricists’, in Frede, M. (ed.), Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 243–260.Google Scholar
French, R. 2003, Medicine Before Science: The Business of Medicine from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fuentes González, P. P. 1998, Les Diatribes de Télès: Introduction, Texte Revu, Traduction et Commentaire des Fragments, Paris.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. and Wilkie, J. S. 1984, Galen On Respiration and the Arteries: An Edition with English Translation and Commentary of De Usu Respirationis, An in Arteriis Natura Sanguis contineatur, De Usu Pulsuum, and De Causis Respirationis, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. 1928, ‘Der aristotelische Protreptikos und die entwicklungsheschichte Betrachtung der aristotelischen Ethik’, Hermes 63, 138–165.Google Scholar
García Ballester, L. 1995, ‘Elementos para la construcción de las historias clínicas en Galeno’, Dynamis 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
García Ballester, L. 1988, ‘Soul and Body, Disease of the Soul and Disease of the Body in Galen’s Medical Thought’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche di Galeno, Napoli, 117–152.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I. and Lami, A., 2012, Galeno L’Anima e il Dolore. De Indolentia-De Propriis Placitis. Testo greco a fronte, Milan.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I. (ed.), 1997, Anonymi Medici. De Morbis Acutis et Chroniis, Leiden-New York-Köln.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I. (ed.), 1986, Galenus: Anatomicarum Administrationum Libri qui supersunt novem: earundem interpretatio Arabica Hunaino Isaaci filio ascripta. Vol. I: Books 1–4, Naples.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. A. 2014, ‘Encomium and Thesis in Galen’s De Parvae Pilae Exercitio’, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 54, 462–473.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2019, ‘Galen’s Περὶ Ἀλυπίας as Philosophical Therapy: How Coherent is It?’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 135–154.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2013, ‘Philosophical Therapy as Preventive Psychological Medicine’, in Harris, W. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden, 339–360.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2007, ‘Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers?’, Phronesis 52, 88–120.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2003, ‘The School in the Roman Imperial Period’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge, 33–58.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1998, ‘Did Galen Understand Platonic and Stoic Thought on the Emotions?’, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht, 113–148.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 2020, ‘Aretaeus and the Ekphrasis of Agony’, Classical Antiquity 39.2, 153–187.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 2009, ‘Shock and Awe: The Performance Dimension of Galen’s Anatomy Demonstrations’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 85–114.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.), 2001, Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic, and the Development of the Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gorgemanns, H. 2001, ‘Protreptik’, in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.), Der Neue Pauly Encyclopädie der Antike; Band 10, Stuttgart, 468–471.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, D. 2016, ‘Two Historical Case Histories of Acute Alcoholism in the Roman Empire’, in Laes, C., Goodey, C., and Rose, M. L. (eds.), Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies a Capite Ad Calcem, Leiden, 73–87.Google Scholar
Green, R. M. 1955, Asclepiades, His Life and Writings; A Translation of Cocchi’s Life of Asclepiades and Gumpert’s Fragments of Asclepiades, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1986, ‘The Spiritual Guide’, in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), Classical Mediterranean Spirituality, London, 436–459.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1969, Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hajal, F. 1983, ‘Galen’s Ethical Psychotherapy: Its Influence on a Medieval Near Eastern Physician’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 38, 320–333.Google Scholar
Halkin, A. S. 1944, ‘Classical and Arabic Material in Ibn Aḳnīn’s Hygiene of the Soul’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 14, 25–147.Google Scholar
Halkin, F. (ed.), 1973, Légendes grecques de «martyres romaines». Subsidia hagiographica 55, Brussels.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2019a, ‘Galen’s Philosophy of Mind’, in Sisko, J. E. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity, Abingdon-New York, 258–278.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2019b, ‘Galen and the Sceptics (and the Epicureans) on the Unavoidability of Distress’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 155–179.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2008, ‘The Man and His Work’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 1–33.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2006, ‘Body and Soul in Galen’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to Body and Soul, Berlin, 232–258.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2005, ‘Prédiction, prophétie, pronostic: la gnoséologie de l’avenir dans la divination et la médecine antique’, in Kany-Turpin, R. (ed.), Signes et prédiction dans l’antiquité, Saint-Étienne, 147–162.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995, ‘The Growth of Medical Empiricism’, in Bates, D. (ed.), Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, Cambridge, 60–83.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1993, ‘Actions and Passions: Affection, Emotion and Moral Self-Management in Galen’s Philosophical Psychology’, in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, 184–222.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1988, ‘Galien: la médecine et la philosophie antisceptique’, Revue de philosophie ancienne 2, 227–267.Google Scholar
Hanson, A. E. 1998, ‘Galen: Author and Critic’, in Most, G. W. (ed.), Editing texts: Texte edieren, Göttingen, 22–53.Google Scholar
Harkins, P. W. 1963, Galen on the Passions and Errors of the Soul, translated by P. W. Harkins, with an introduction and interpretation by W. Riese, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Harré, R. and Moghaddam, F. M., 2003, The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts, Westport, CT, 1–11.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2013, ‘Thinking about Mental Disorders in Classical Antiquity’, in Harris, W. V. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden, 1–23.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 2001, Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hartlich, P. 1889, ‘De exhortationum a Graecis Romanisque scriptarum historia et indole’, Leipziger StudIen zur Classischen Philolologie 11, 207–336.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. 2011, ‘Galenus Christianus? The Doctrine of Demonstration in Stromata VIII and the Question of its Source’, Vigiliae Christianae 65.4, 343–375.Google Scholar
Heeg, J. (ed.), 1915, Galeni in Hippocratis Prognosticum Commentaria III, Leipzig-Berlin [CMG 9,2].Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1923, Galeni De Alimentorum Facultatibus, De Bonis Malisque Sucis, Leipzig-Berlin [CMG 4.2].Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1901, Galenus: De Optima Corporis Constitutione. Idem de Bono Habitu. Programm des Kgl. humanistichen Gymnasiums, Hof.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. et al. (eds.), 1893, Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora. Vol. 3: Περὶ αἱρέσεων τοῖς εἰσαγομένοις, Θρασύβουλος, Περὶ φυσικῶν δυνάμεων, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1884–1893, Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora, recensuerunt I. Marquardt, I. Mueller, G. Helmreich. Vol. I, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Higgins, N. 2015, ‘Shame on You: The Virtuous Use of Shame in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics’, Expositions 9.2, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hine, H. 2017, ‘Philosophical Authority in the Younger Seneca’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge, 58–82.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2014, ‘Galen on the Chances of Life’, in Wohl, V. (ed.), Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought, Cambridge, 230–250.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2013, ‘Disturbing Connections: Sympathetic Affections, Mental Disorder, and the Elusive Soul in Galen’, in Harris, W. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden, 147–176.Google Scholar
Holzhey, H. 1989, ‘Popularphilosophie’, in Historisches Woerterbuch der Philosophie, Band 7, Basel, 1093–1100.Google Scholar
Horstmanshoff, M. 1999, ‘Les émotions chez Caelius Aurelianus’, in Mudry, Ph. (ed.), Le traité des Maladies aiguës et des Maladies chroniques de Cælius Aurelianus. Nouvelles approches, Nantes, 259–290.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. 2004, ‘Platons’ “Protreptikos”: Gesprächsgeschehen und Gesprächsgegenstand in Platons “Euthedemos’, Rheinisches Museum 147.3–4, 247–275.Google Scholar
Ieraci Bio, A. M. 1997, ‘Sulla concezione del medico pepaideuménos in Galeno e nel tardoantico’, in López-Férez, J. A. (ed.), Galeno: Obra, Pensamiento e Influencia, Madrid, 133–151.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 1995, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Medicine as a Stochastic Art’, in van der Eijk, Ph., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-Cultural Context. Vol. 2 (Clio Medica 28), Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA, 473–485.Google Scholar
Ilberg, J. 1897, ‘Über die Schriftstellerei des Klaudios Galenos’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 52, 591–623.Google Scholar
Iskandar, A. Z. (ed.), 1988, Galeni De Optimo Medico Cognoscendo Libelli Versio Arabica, Berlin [CMG Suppl. Or. IV].Google Scholar
Jażdżewska, K. 2018, ‘Laughter in Plato’s and Xenophon’s Symposia’, in Danzig, G., Johnson, D., Morrison, D. (eds.), Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies, Leiden-Boston, MA, 187–207.Google Scholar
Jażdżewska, K. 2016, ‘Laughter in Plutarch’s Convivium Septem Sapientium’, Classical Philology 111.1, 74–88.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. 2010, Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire, New York-Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. and Horsley, G. H. R. (eds. and transl.), 2011, Galen: Method of Medicine. Volume I: Books 1–4, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. (ed. and transl.), 2018, Galen. Hygiene. Volume I: Books 1–4, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 2009, ‘Books and Libraries in a Newly-Discovered Treatise of Galen’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 22, 390–398.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. D. 1986, ‘Ancient Philosophic Protreptic and the Problem of Persuasive Genres’, Rhetorica 4, 309–333.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2012, ‘Politics and Medicine. The Problem of Change in Regimen in Acute diseases and Thucydides (Book 6)’, in van der Eijk, Ph. (ed.), Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers by Jacques Jouanna, Leiden, 21–38.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2009, ‘Does Galen have a Medical Programme for Intellectuals and the Faculties of the Intellect?’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 190–205.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2003, ‘La notion de nature chez Galien’, in Jouanna, J. (ed.), Galien et la philosophie, coll. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique XLIX, Vandœuvres-Geneva, 229–268.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1997, ‘La lecture de l’éthique hippocratique par Galien’, in Flashar, H. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Médecine et morale dans l’Antiquité, coll. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique XLIII, Vandœuvres-Geneva, 211–253.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1996, ‘Le vin et la médecine dans la Grèce ancienne’, Revue des Études Grecques 109.2, 54–64.Google Scholar
Julião, R. 2018, ‘Galen on Memory, Forgetting and Memory Loss’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 222–244.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. H. 2017, ‘Galen on Reason and Appetite: A Study of the De Moribus’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 50.3, 367–392.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. H. 2014, ‘Galen on the Therapy of Distress and the Limits of Emotional Therapy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47, 275–296.Google Scholar
Keil, W. (ed.), 1959, Galeni Puero Epileptico Consilium. Ausgabe und Kommentar, Göttingen.Google Scholar
King, D. 2013, ‘Galen and Grief: The Construction of Grief in Galen’s Clinical Work’, in Chaniotis, A. and Ducrey, P. (eds.), Unveiling Emotions, II. Emotions in Greece and Rome: Texts, Images, Material Culture, Stuttgart, 251–272.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. 2006, ‘Plato and the Ship of State’, in Santas, G. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, Malden, MA, 189–213.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1981, ‘Galen und die Zweite Sophistik’, in Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen: Problems and Prospects, London, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1965, ‘Aus Galens Praxis am römischen Kaiserhof”, in Welskopf, E.C. (ed.), Neue Beiträge zur Geschichte der Alten Welt 2: Römisches Reich, Berlin, 57–61.Google Scholar
König, J. 2017, ‘Introduction: Self-Assertion and Its Alternatives in Ancient Scientific and Technical Writing’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge, 1–26.Google Scholar
König, J. 2011, ‘Self-Promotion and Self-Effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, Oxford, 179–203.Google Scholar
König, J. 2009, ‘Conventions of Prefatory Self-Presentation in Galen’s On the Order of my Own Books’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 35–58.Google Scholar
König, J. 2008, ‘Sympotic Dialogue in the First to Fifth Centuries CE’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, New York-Cambridge, 85–113.Google Scholar
König, J. 2007, ‘Fragmentation and Coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Organizing Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge, 43–68.Google Scholar
Konrad, G. 1959, Protreptik und Paränese bei Platon; Untersuchungen zur Form des Platonischen Dialogs, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2006, ‘The Active Reader in Classical Antiquity’, Argos: Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Estudios Clásicos 30, 5–16.Google Scholar
Kotrc, F. 1970, Galen’s On Phlebotomy Against the Erasistrateans in Rome, Dissertation: Washington State University, Seattle.Google Scholar
Kotzia, P. and Sotiroudis, P., 2016, Γαληνός Για την αποφυγή της λύπης, Η πραγματεία Περὶ ἀλυπίας, Εισαγωγή: Σ. Ξενοφώντος, Μετάφραση-σχόλια: Π. Κοτζιά-Π. Σωτηρούδης, Eπίμετρο: Ι. Πολέμης, Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Kotzia, P. 2014, ‘Galen, De Indolentia: Commonplaces, Traditions, and Contexts’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), Galen’s De Indolentia. Essays on a newly Discovered Letter, Tübingen, 91–125.Google Scholar
Kotzia, P. 2012, ‘Galen, Περὶ ἀλυπίας: Title, Genre, and two Cruces’, in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi sul De Indolentia di Galeno, Roma, 69–91.Google Scholar
Kotzia-Panteli, P. 1995, ‘Ὁ Γαληνός γιά τήν ἰατρική ὁρολογία καί τή γλώσσα’, Ἐπιστημονική Ἐπετηρίδα τῆς Φιλοσοφικῆς Σχολῆς, Περίοδος Β΄, Τεῦχος Τμήματος Φιλολογίας, τόμ. 5, Θεσσαλονίκη, 59–112.Google Scholar
Kovačič, F. 2001, Der Begriff der Physis bei Galen vor dem Hintergrund seiner Vorgänger, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. 1939, ‘Kitāb al-akhlāq li-Jālīnūs’, Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts of the Egyptian University 5.1, 1–51.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1988, ‘Der ärtztliche Beruf in Staat und Gesellschaft der Antike’, Jahrbuch des Instituts für Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung 7, 41–73.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1970a, ‘Medical Education in Classical Antiquity’, in O’Malley, C. D. (ed.), The History of Medical Education, Berkeley, CA, 3–37.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1970b, ‘Medical Ethics and Popular Ethics in Greece and Rome’, Clio Medica 5, 91–121.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2014, The Subject of Virtue. An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom, New York.Google Scholar
Laín Entralgo, P. 1970, The Therapy of the Word in Classical Antiquity (Edited and translated by Rather, L. J. and Sharp, John M.), New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, J. C. (ed. and transl.), 2016, Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq on His Galen Translations, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
Langholf, V. 1990, Medical Theories in Hippocrates: Early Texts and the ‘Epidemics’, Berlin-New York.Google Scholar
Lee, P. M. J. 2020, Moral Transformation in Greco-Roman Philosophy of Mind: Mapping the Moral Milieu of the Apostle Paul and His Diaspora Jewish Contemporaries, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lee, P. M. J. 2014, ‘Ancient Mentors and Moral Progress According to Galen and Paul’, in Eklund, R. A. and Phelan, J. E. Jr (eds.), Doing Theology for the Church: Essays in Honor of Klyne Snodgrass, Eugene, OR, 55–70.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. 2017, ‘The Authority of Galen’s Witnesses’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge, 260–282.Google Scholar
Leigh, R. 2016, On Theriac to Piso, Attributed to Galen: A Critical Edition with Translation and Commentary, Leiden-Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Letts, M. 2016, ‘Questioning the Patient, Questioning Hippocrates: Rufus of Ephesus and the Pursuit of Knowledge’, in Petridou, G. and Thumiger, C. (eds.), Homo Patiens—Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World, Leiden, 81–103.Google Scholar
Levey, M. 1967, ‘Medical Ethics of Medieval Islam with Special Reference to Al-Ruhāwī’s “Practical Ethics of the Physician”’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 57.3, 1–100.Google Scholar
Levy, C. 2011, ‘Médecine et philosophie. À propos de l’édition du De indolentia de Galien dans le C.U.F’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1, 198–210.Google Scholar
Linden, D. E. J. 1999, Medicine and Morality in the Ancient World: An Analysis of Galen’s Medical and Philosophical Writings, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2009, ‘Galen’s un-Hippocratic Case-Histories’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 115–131.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2008, ‘Galen and His Contemporaries’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 34–48.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1988, ‘Scholarship, Authority and Argument in Galen’s Quod Animi Mores’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche di Galeno, Naples, 12–42.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1979, Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. 1977, ‘A Structural Pattern in Greek Dietetics and the Early History of Greek Medicine’, Medical History 21, 235–260.Google Scholar
López Férez, J. A. 2010, ‘Some Remarks by Galen about the Teaching and Studying of Medicine’, in Horstmanshoff, M. (ed.), Hippocrates and Medical Education, Leiden-Boston, MA, 361–382.Google Scholar
Luchner, K. 2004, Philiatroi: Studien zum Thema der Krankheit in der griechischen Literatur der Kaiserzeit, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. (ed.), 1969, Galeni De Partibus Artis Medicativae, De Causis Contentivis, De Diaeta in Morbis Acutis secundum Hippocratem Libelli Versio Arabica, Berlin [CMG Suppl. Or. II].Google Scholar
Manetti, D. and Roselli, A., 1994, ‘Galeno commentatore di Ippocrate’, ANRW II 37.2, 1529–1635.Google Scholar
Manuli, P. 1988, ‘La passione nel De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis’, in Manuli, P., Vegetti, M. (eds.), Le Opere Psicologiche di Galeno, Naples, 185–214.Google Scholar
Maróth, M. 1993, ‘Galen als Seelenheiler’, in Kollesch, J. und Nickel, D. (eds.), Galen und das Hellenistische Erbe, Stuttgart, 145–155.Google Scholar
Marquardt, I. (ed.), 1884, Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora, recensuerunt Marquardt, I., Mueller, I., Helmreich, G., vol. I. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. 2016, ‘Galen’s Anxious Patients: Lypē as Anxiety Disorder’, in Petridou, G. and Thumiger, C. (eds.), Homo Patiens: Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World, Leiden, 203–223.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. 1999, ‘Physicians and the Roman Imperial Aristocracy: The Patronage of Therapeutics’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 73.1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Mattock, J. 1972, ‘A Translation of the Arabic Epitome of Galen’s Book Peri êthôn’, in Stern, S. M., Hourani, A. and Brown, V. (eds.), Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented by His Friends and Pupils to Richard Walzer on His Seventieth Birthday, Oxford, 235–260.Google Scholar
Mazzini, I. 2014, ‘References to Medical Authors in Non-medical Latin Literature’, in Maire, B. (ed.), ‘Greek’ and ‘Roman’ in Latin Medical Texts: Studies in Cultural Change and Exchange in Ancient Medicine, Leiden-Boston, MA, 77–91.Google Scholar
Menghi, M. 1984, ‘Introduzione’, in Menghi, M. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Galeno: Le passioni e gli errori dell’ anima. Opere morali, Venice, 7–20.Google Scholar
Mewaldt, J. (ed.), 1914, Galeni in Hippocratis de Natura Hominis Commentaria III, Leipzig-Berlin [CMG 8,1].Google Scholar
Meyerhof, M. 1929, ‘Autobiographische Bruchstücke Galens aus arabischen Quellen’, Sudhoffs Archiv 22, 72–86.Google Scholar
Michael, R., Garry, M. and Kirsch, I., 2012, ‘Suggestion, Cognition, and Behavior’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 21.3, 151–156.Google Scholar
Migne, J.-P. (ed.), 1883, Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina. Vol. XXIII, Paris.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Ph. 1993, ‘Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 31, 111–128.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2007, ‘The Doctor and the Pastry Chef: Pleasure and Persuasion in Plato’s Gorgias’, Ancient Philosophy 27.2, 229–249.Google Scholar
Müller, I. (ed.), 1891, Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora, recensuerunt I. Marquardt, I. Mueller, G. Helmreich. Vol. 2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Neuville, S. and Johnson, T. M., 1988, Exhortation to Philosophy: Including the Letters of Iamblichus and Proclus’ Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles/Iamblichus; translated from the Greek by Thomas Moore Johnson, Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Newman, R. J. 1989, ‘Cotidie Meditare: Theory and Practice of the Meditatio in Imperial Stoicism’, ANRW II.36.3, 1473–1517.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. 2005, Animals, Right and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics, New York-London.Google Scholar
Nicholls, M. 2011, ‘Galen and Libraries in the Peri Alupias’, Journal of Roman Studies 101, 123–142.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. 1976, ‘Ein Ballspiel im Urteil des Arztes. Bemerkungen zu Galens Schrift “Über die Übung mit dem kleinen Ball”’, Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 13.2, 77–81.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. 2011, ‘Plutarch’s “Minor” Ethics: Some Remarks on De garrulitate, De curiositate, and De vitioso pudore’, in Roskam, G. and van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, Leuven, 205–222.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2001, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge-New York.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1994, The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1993, ‘Poetry and the Passions: Two Stoic Views’, in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, Cambridge, 97–149.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986, ‘Therapeutic Arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge, 31–74.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2021, ‘Galen and the Sophists’, Aion Sezione di Filologia e Letteratura Classica 43, 114–127.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2016, Review of Robert Leigh, On Theriac to Piso, Attributed to Galen. A Critical Edition with Translation and Commentary, Studies in Ancient Medicine 47 (Leiden-Boston, MA, Brill, 2015), Medical History 60.4, 581–582.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2012, ‘Galen and Roman Medicine: Or can a Greek become a Latin?’, European Review 20.4, 534–542.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (ed.), 2011, Galen: On Problematical Movements. Edited with Introduction and Commentary by Vivian Nutton, with an Edition of the Arabic Version by Gerrit Bos, Cambridge-New York.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2009a, ‘Galen’s Library’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge, 19–34.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2009b, ‘Galen’s Authorial Voice: A Preliminary Enquiry’, in Taub, L. and Doody, A. (eds.), Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, Trier, 53–62.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2008, ‘The Fortunes of Galen’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 355–390.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1992, ‘Healers in the Medical Market Place: Towards a Social History of Graeco-Roman Medicine’, in Wear, A. (ed.), Medicine in Society: Historical Essays, Cambridge, 15–58.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1991a, ‘Style and Context in the Method of Healing’, in Kudlien, F. E. and Durling, R. J. (eds.), Galen’s ‘Method of Healing’, Leiden-New York, 1–25.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1991b, ‘From Medical Certainty to Medical Amulets: Three Aspects of Ancient Therapeutics’, Bynum, W. F., Nutton, V. (eds.), Essays in the History of Therapeutics, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 13–22.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1990, ‘The Patient’s Choice: A New Treatise by Galen’, Classical Quarterly 40.1, 236–257.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1988, ‘Galen and Medical Autobiography’, in Nuttton, V. (ed.), From Democedes to Harvey, London, 50–62.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1985, ‘Murders and Miracles: Lay Attitudes towards Medicine in Classical Antiquity’, in Porter, R. S. (ed.), Patients and Practitioners: Lay Perceptions of Medicine in Pre-Industrial Society, Cambridge, 23–53.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1984, ‘Galen in the Eyes of His Contemporaries’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 58.3, 315–324.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1977, ‘Archiatroi and the Medical Profession in Antiquity’, Papers of the British School at Rome 45, 191–226.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1972, ‘Galen and Medical Autobiography’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 198 (n.s. 18), 50–62. Repr. in V. Nutton, 1988, From Democedes to Harvey: Studies in the History of Medicine, London, ch. 1.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1971, ‘L. Gellius Maximus, Physician and Procurator’, Classical Quarterly 21.1 262–272.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. and Maas, P. L., 1939, ‘An Ancient Poem on the Duties of a Physician’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 7.1, 315–322.Google Scholar
Olivieri, A. (ed.), 1935–1950, Aetii Amideni Libri Medicinales V–VIII, 2 vols. Berlin [CMG VIII 2].Google Scholar
Olivieri, A. 1910, ‘Osservazioni sopra un’ opera morale di Galeno’, Atti deal Reale Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Atti N.S. 1, vol. 2, 95–109.Google Scholar
O’Neil, E. N. 1997, ‘Plutarch on Friendship’, in Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.), Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, Atlanta, GA, 105–122.Google Scholar
Otte, Ch. (ed.), 2001, Galen, De Plenitudine: Kritische Edition, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Pearcy, L. T. 1983, ‘Galen and Stoic Rhetoric’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 24.3, 259–272.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2011, ‘What is Popular about Plutarch’s “Popular Philosophy”?’, in Roskam, G. and van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, Leuven, 41–58.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1995, ‘The Moralism of Plutarch’s Lives’ in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, Oxford, 205–220.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. 1995, The Suffering Self: Pain and Narrative Representation in the Early Christian Era, London-New York.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. W. 1977, ‘Observations on the Chronology of the Galenic Corpus’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51.3, 484–495.Google Scholar
Petit, C. 2019, ‘Death, Posterity and the Vulnerable Self: Galen’s Περὶ Ἀλυπίας in the Context of His Late Writings’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 41–62.Google Scholar
Petit, C. 2018, Galien de Pergame ou la rhétorique de la providence: Médecine, littérature et pouvoir à Rome, Leiden-Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. 2020, ‘Cerceau et petite balle: les bienfaits des jeux pour la santé’, in Dasen, V. and Vespa, M. (eds.), Bons ou mauvais jeux? Pratiques ludiques et sociabilité, Pallas 114, 149–169.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. 2019, ‘Galen’s early Reception (Second–Third centuries)’, in Bouras-Vallianatos, P. and Zipser, B. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen, Leiden-Boston, MA, 11–37.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. 2018, ‘Le commentaire comme exercice spirituel chez Galien’, in Delattre, C., Valette, E., Cottier, J.-F., Kefallonitis, S., Ribreau, M. and Soler, J. (eds.), Pragmatique du commentaire. Mondes anciens, mondes lointains, Turnhout, 81–110.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. 2010, ‘Variation autour du Thessalonicensis Vlatadon 14: un manuscrit copié au xénon du Kral, peu avant la chute de Constantinople’, Revue des études Byzantines 68, 95–126.Google Scholar
Pigeaud, J. 1981, La maladie de l’âme. Étude sur la relation de l’âme et du corps dans la tradition médico-philosophique antique, Paris.Google Scholar
Pleket, H. W. 1995, ‘The Social Status of Physicians in the Graeco-Roman World’, in van der Eijk, Ph. et al. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-cultural Context, Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA. Vol. I, 27–34.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M., Hubert, C., et al. (eds.), 1929–1978, Plutarchi Moralia. 7 vols, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Polemis, I. and Xenophontos, S. (eds.), 2023, Galen, On Avoiding Distress, On My Own Opinions. Critical Edition by I. Polemis and S. Xenophontos; Translation by S. Xenophontos, Berlin. (freely accessible online: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111320816/html).Google Scholar
Polito, R. 2016, ‘Competence Conflicts between Philosophy and Medicine: Caelius Aurelianus and the Stoics on Mental Diseases’, Classical Quarterly 66, 358–369.Google Scholar
Potter, P. (ed. and trans.), 1995, Hippocrates. Places in Man. Glands. Fleshes. Prorrhetic 1-2. Physician. Use of Liquids. Ulcers. Haemorrhoids and Fistulas. Loeb Classical Library 482, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rabbow, P. 1914, Antike Schriften uber Seelenheilung und Seelenleitung: Die Therapie des Zorns, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Raeder, J. (ed.), 1928–1933, Oribasii Collectionum Medicarum Reliquiae. Vols. 1–4, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. 2004, Becoming Sinners: Christianity and Moral Torment in a Papua New Guinea Society, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. S. 1955, Sources for the History of Greek Athletics in English Translation, with Introductions, Notes, Bibliography, and Indices, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Moreno, I. 2020, ‘La estética musical en Galeno de Pérgamo’, Fortunatae 31.1, 201–224.Google Scholar
Romano, E. 2000, ‘La dietetica di Galeno. Un incontro fra medicina e politica’, in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi su Galeno: Scienza, Filosofia, Retorica e Filologia, Firenze, 31–44.Google Scholar
Roselli, A. 2010, ‘Libri e bibliotheche a Roma al tempo di Galeno: la testimonianza del De Indolentia’, Galenos 4, 127–148.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 2014, ‘Philology and the Rhetoric of Catastrophe in Galen’s De Indolentia’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, W. T. (eds.), Galen’s De Indolentia: Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter, Heidelberg, 159–174.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 2013, ‘Galen on Poetic Testimony’, in Asper, M. (ed.), Writing Science: Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece, Berlin, 177–189.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 2010, ‘Galen, Satire and the Compulsion to Instruct’, in Horstmanshoff, M. (ed.), Hippocrates and Medical Education: Selected Papers Read at the XIIth International Hippocrates Colloquium Universiteit Leiden 24–26 August 2005, Leiden-Boston, MA, 325–342.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 2009, ‘Socratism in Galen’s Psychological Works’, in Brockmann, C., Brunschön, W. and Overwien, O. (eds.), Antike Medizin im Schnittpunkt von Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften. Internationale Fachtagung aus Anlass des 100-jährigen Bestehens des Akadamienvorhabens, Berlin, 155–171.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. and van der Stockt, L. (eds.), 2011, ‘Efficiency and Effectiveness of Plutarch’s Broadcasting Ethics’, in Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, Leuven, 7–16.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), 2014, ‘Introduction (with illustration of Vlatadon 14)’, in Galen’s De Indolentia. Essays on a newly Discovered Letter, Tübingen, 3–18.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. K. 2014, ‘The Apocolocyntosis of Commodus or the Anti-imperial Tendenz of Galen’s De Indolentia’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), Galen’s De indolentia. Essays on a newly Discovered Letter, Tübingen, 175–200.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W., 2012, ‘Galen’s On the Avoidance of Grief: The Question of a Library at Antium’, Classical Philology 107.2, 131–145.Google Scholar
Rousseau, N. 2020, ‘Des Thériaques (Θηριακά) à «la thériaque» (θηριακή): formation et histoire du terme’, in Boudon-Millot, V. and Micheau, F. (eds.), La Thériaque: Histoire d’un Remède Millénaire, Paris, 39–75.Google Scholar
Salas, L. A. 2020, Cutting Words: Polemical Dimensions of Galen’s Anatomical Experiments, Leiden-Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Samama, E. 2003, Les médecins dans le monde grec: sources épigraphiques sur la naissance d’un corps medical, Genève.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. 1997, ‘Philosophical Prose’, in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C- A.D. 400, Leiden-New York-Köln, 195–264.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. 1992, ‘Prose Usages of akouein “to read”’, Classical Quarterly 42, 129–141.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (ed.), 2002, Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il ‘de captionibus in dictione’, Venice.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. 2012, ‘Galen and the Tripartite Soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, Ch. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self, Cambridge-New York, 331–349.Google Scholar
Schlange-Schöningen, H. 2015, ‘Herrschaftskritik bei Galen’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, Berlin, 655–673.Google Scholar
Schlange-Schöningen, H. 2003, Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen. Biographie und Sozialgeschichte, Berlin-New York.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2007, Modern Literary Theory and Ancient Texts: An Introduction, Malden, MA-Oxford.Google Scholar
Schneeweiss, G. 2005, Protreptikos: Hinführung zur Philosophie: Aristoteles; rekonstruiert, übersetzt und kommentiert von Gerhart Schneeweiss, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2003, ‘Stoic Ethics’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge, 233–256.Google Scholar
Schröder, H. O. (ed.), 1934, Galeni In Platonis Timaeum Commentarii Fragmenta, Leipzig-Berlin [Suppl. I].Google Scholar
Sellars, J. 2009, The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy, Bristol.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2000, ‘Science, Philosophy and Human Life in the Ancient World’, in Wolff, J. and Stone, M. (eds.), The Proper Ambition of Science, London-New York, 7–27.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1973, Galen, On Psychology, Psychopathology, and Function and Diseases of the Nervous System. An Analysis of His Doctrines, Observations and Experiments, Basel-New York.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1968, Galen’s System of the Physiology and Medicine. An Analysis of His Doctrines and Observations on Bloodflow, Respiration, Humors and Internal Diseases, Basel-New York.Google Scholar
Simon, M. 1964, ‘Der τέχνη-Begriff bei Aristoteles’, in Neue Beiträge zur Geschichte der Alten Welt, in Hans-Joachim Diesner, Verbindung mit et al. Vol. I, Berlin, 285–292.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2021, ‘Is Greco-Roman Medicine Holistic? Galen and the Ancient Medical-Philosophical Debates’, in Thumiger, Ch. (ed.), Holism in Ancient Medicine and Its Reception, Leiden-Boston, MA, 154–183.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. and van der Eijk, Ph., (ed. and transl.), 2019, Galen: Works on Human Nature. Volume 1: Mixtures (De Temperamentis), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2019a, ‘New Light and Old Texts: Galen on His Own Books’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 91–131.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2019b, ‘A New Distress: Galen’s Ethics in Περὶ Ἀλυπίας and Beyond’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 180–198.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2018, ‘Galen’s Pathological Soul: Diagnosis and Therapy in Ethical and Medical Texts and Contexts’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 381–420.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2017, ‘The Essence of Rage: Galen on Emotional Disturbances and their Physical Correlates’, in Seaford, R. et al. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, Oxford, 161–196.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2014a, ‘Galen and the Philosophers: Philosophical Engagement, Shadowy Contemporaries, Aristotelian Transformations’, in Adamson, P. et al. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen, London, 7–38.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. 2014b, ‘The Fight for Health: Tradition, Competition, Subdivision and Philosophy in Galen’s Hygienic Writings’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22.5, 974–995.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (ed.), 2013, Galen: Psychological Writings: Avoiding Distress, Character Traits, The Diagnosis and Treatment of the Affections and Errors Peculiar to Each Person’s Soul, The Capacities of the Soul depend on the Mixtures of the Body, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. 1995, ‘Protreptic in Ancient Theories of Philosophical Literature’, in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld, Amsterdam, 173–192.Google Scholar
Slotty, F. 1928, ‘Die Stellung des Griechischen und anderer idg. Sprachen zu dem soziativen und affektischen Gebrauch des Plurals der ersten Person’, Indogermanische Forschungen 45, 348–363.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. et al. 1996, ‘Envy and Schadenfreude’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22.2, 158–168.Google Scholar
Snyder, H. G. 2013, ‘The Classroom in the Text: Exegetical Practises in Justin and Galen’, in Porter, S. E. and Pitts, A. W. (eds.), Christian Origins and Greco-Roman Culture: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, Leiden-Boston, MA, 663–685.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2000, Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stirewalt, M. L. 1991, ‘The Form and Function of the Greek Letter-Essay’, in Donfried, K. P. (ed.), The Romans Debate, Edinburgh, 147–171.Google Scholar
Strohmeier, G. 2003, ‘Die Ethik Galens und ihre Rezeption in der Welt des Islams’, in Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Galien et la philosophie, Genf, 307–329.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2008, ‘Social Stress and Political Pressure: On Melancholy in Context’, in Pormann, P. E. (ed.), On Melancholy/Rufus of Ephesus, Tübingen, 113–138.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2006, ‘Beyond the Limits of Greek Biography: Galen from Alexandria to the Arabs’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography, Swansea, 395–427.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996, Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World, A.D. 50–250, Oxford.Google Scholar
Szarmach, M. 1990–1992, ‘Der Protreptik von Galenos als rhetorische Werk’, Acta antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 33, 117–121.Google Scholar
Temkin, O. 1973, Galenism. Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy, Ithaca, NY-London.Google Scholar
Temkin, O. 1934, ‘Galen’s Advice for an Epileptic Boy’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 2, 179–189.Google Scholar
Thom, J. C. 2012, ‘Popular Philosophy in the Hellenistic-Roman World’, Early Christianity 3, 279–295.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N., 2018, ‘Introduction’, in C. Thumiger and P. N. Singer (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 1–32.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. 2019, ‘Therapy of the Word and Other Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Ancient Greek Medicine’, Transcultural Psychiatry 57.6, 741–752.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. 2018, ‘Stomachikon, Hydrophobia and Other Eating Disturbances: Volition and Taste in Late-Antique Medical Discussions’, in Thumiger, C. and Singer, P. N. (eds.), Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina, Leiden, 245–268.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C. 2017, A History of the Mind and Mental Health in Classical Greek Medical Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2020, ‘Galen’s Self-Understanding and the Platonic Phaedrus’, in Delcomminette, S., d’Hoine, P. and Gavray, M.-A. (eds.), The Reception of Plato’s “Phaedrus” from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Berlin-Boston, MA, 25–39.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2019, ‘Wisdom and Emotion: Galen’s Philosophical Position in Avoiding Distress’, in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context A Tale of Resilience, Leiden-Boston, MA, 199–215.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2015, ‘Galen on Medicine as a Science and as an Art’, Istoriya meditsiny (History of Medicine) 2.2, 168–176.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2008, ‘Methodology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge, 49–65.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003a, Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003b, ‘Galen’s Psychology’, in Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Galien et la Philosophie: huit exposés suivis de discussions, Geneva, 131–169.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. 2012, “‘And to End on a Poetic Note”: Galen’s Authorial Strategies in the Pharmacological Books’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 43.2, 307–315.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 2017, ‘Philosophical Authority in the Imperial Period’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge, 27–57.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 2014, ‘The Role of Philosophers and Philosophy in the Imperial Period’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch, Chichester, 43–57.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 1997, ‘On the Tablet of Cebes’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After, London, 159–180.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2009, ‘Epicurean Therapeutic Strategies’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge, 249–265.Google Scholar
Tucci, P. 2008, ‘Galen’s Storeroom, Rome’s Libraries, and the Fire of AD 192’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 21, 133–149.Google Scholar
Usener, H. and Radermacher, L. (eds.), 1997, Dionysii Halicarnesei quae exstant. Vol. VI: Opusculorum volumen secundem, Stuttgart-Leipzig.Google Scholar
Vagelpohl, U. (ed.), 2014, Galeni In Hippocratis Epidemiarum Librum I Commentariorum I–III Versionem Arabicam, Berlin [CMG Suppl. Or. 1].Google Scholar
Vamvouri-Ruffy, M. 2012, Les Vertus thérapeutiques du banquet: Médecine et idéologie dans les Propos de table de Plutarque, Paris.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 2020, ‘Galen on Soul, Mixture and Pneuma’, in Inwood, B. and Warren, J. (eds.), Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge-New York, 62–88.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 2015, ‘Galen on the Assessment of Bodily Mixtures’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, Berlin, 675–698.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 2014a, ‘Galen and Early Christians on the Role of the Divine in the Causation and Treatment of Health and Disease’, Early Christianity 5, 337–370.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 2014b, ‘Galen on the Nature of Human Beings’, in Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J. (eds.), Philosophical Themes in Galen, London, 89–134.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 2013, ‘Cure and (In)curability of Mental Disorders in Ancient Medical and Philosophical Thought’, in Harris, W. (ed.), Mental Disorders in the Classical World, Leiden-Boston, MA, 307–338.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 1997a, ‘Galen’s Use of the Concept of “Qualified Experience” in His Dietetic and Pharmacological Works’, in Debru, A. (ed.), Galen on Pharmacology: Philosophy, History and Medicine, Leiden-New York-Köln, 35–58.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph. 1997b, ‘Towards a Rhetoric of Ancient Scientific Discourse’, in Bakker, E. J. (ed.), Grammar as Interpretation: Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, Leiden-New York-Köln, 77–129.Google Scholar
van der Stockt, L. 2011, ‘Semper duo, numquam tres? Plutarch’s Popularphilosophie on Friendship and Virtue in On Having Many Friends’, in Roskam, G. and van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, Leuven, 19–39.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. 2014, ‘Practical Ethics’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch, Chichester, 135–148.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. 2010, Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
van Nijf, O. 2008, ‘Athletics and Paideia: Festival and Physical Education in the World of the Second Sophistic’, in Borg, B. (ed.), Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic, Berlin-New York, 203–224.Google Scholar
van Nijf, O. 2001, ‘Local Heroes: Athletics, Festivals and Elite Self-Fashioning in the Roman East’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and Development of Empire, Cambridge, 306–334.Google Scholar
van Nuffelen, P. 2014, ‘Galen, Divination and the Status of Medicine’, Classical Quarterly 64.1, 337–352.Google Scholar
van Nuffelen, P. 2007, ‘Words of Truth: Mystical Silence as a Philosophical and Rhetorical Tool in Plutarch’, Hermathena 182, 9–34.Google Scholar
van Nuffelen, P. and Van Hoof, L., 2013, ‘Posidonius and the Golden Age: A Note on Seneca, Epistulae morales 90’, Latomus 72, 186–195.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1984, ‘La terapia dell’anima. Patologia e disciplina del soggetto in Galeno’, in Menghi, M. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), Galeno: Le passioni e gli errori dell’ anima. Opere morali, Venice, 131–155.Google Scholar
von Arnim, J. (ed.), 1893–1896, Dionis Prusaensis quem vacant Chrysostomum quae extant Omnia. Vols 2, Berlin.Google Scholar
von der Mühll, P. 1939, ‘Isokrates und der Protreptikos des Aristoteles’, Philologus 94, 259–265.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 2011, ‘The Physiology and Therapy of Anger: Galen on Medicine, the Soul, and Nature’, in Opwis, F. and Reisman, D. (eds.), Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion, Leiden, 63–87.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 2003, ‘Galen’s Daimon: Reflections on “Irrational” and “Rational”’, in Palmieri, N. (ed.), Rationnel et irrationnel dans la médecine ancienne et médiévale: aspects historiques, scientifiques et culturels, Saint-Étienne, 15–43.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 2000, ‘Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen’, in Wright, J. P. and Potter, P. (eds.), Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment, Oxford, 79–116.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1997a, ‘Character and Competence: Personal and Professional Conduct in Greek Medicine’, in Flashar, H. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Médecine et morale dans l’Antiquité, Vandoeuvres, 157–195.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1997b, ‘Galen and the Second Sophistic’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After, London, 33–54.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1995, ‘Anatomy as Rhetoric: Galen on Dissection and Persuasion’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50, 47–66.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1994, ‘Author and Authority. Celsus and the Construction of a Scientific Self’, in Vázquez Buján, M. E. (ed.), Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media, Santiago de Compostela, 103–117.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (ed.), 1989, Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria: Editions, Translations and Essays, Cambridge-New York.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. 1930, ‘Exhortation to the Study of the Arts especially Medicine’, Medical Life 37, 507–529.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. 1949, ‘New Light on Galen’s Moral Philosophy (From a recently discovered Arabic source)’, Classical Quarterly 43.1/2, 82–96.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (ed.), 1944, Galen on Medical Experience: Arabic Text with an English Translation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Walzer, R, and Frede, M., 1985, Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. On the Sects for Beginners, An Outline of Empiricism, On Medical Experience, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. and Pfaff, F. (eds.), 1956, Galeni in Hippocratis Sextum Librum Epidemiarum Commentaria I-VI, Berlin [CMG 10,2,2].Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. (ed.), 1951, Galeni Adversus Lucum et Adversus Iulianum libelli, Berlin [CMG 10,3].Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. 1938, ‘Galenos von Pergamon: Allgemeine Ertüchtigung durch Ballspiel. Eine sporthygienische Schrift aus dem zweiten Jahrhundert n. Chr.’, Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 31, 254–297.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. (ed.), 1935, ‘Galens Protreptikosfragment’, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Medizin 4, 88–121.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. 1933, ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Galens Protreptikosfragment’, Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 26.3, 205–252.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1977, The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. 2, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (ed.), 1976, The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. 1, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
White, L. M. 2014, ‘The Pathology and Cure of Grief (λύπη): Galen’s De Indolentia in Context’, in Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W. (eds.), Galen’s De Indolentia: Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter, Heidelberg, 221–249.Google Scholar
White, H. 1980, ‘The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality’, Critical Inquiry 7.1, 5–27.Google Scholar
White, R. G., McGeachan, C., Miller, G., and Xenophontos, S., 2020, ‘“Other Psychotherapies” – Healing Interactions across Time, Geography and Culture’, Transcultural Psychiatry 57.6, 727–740.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001, Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (ed.), 2021, Galien, Œuvres. Tome V: Sur les facultés des aliments, Paris.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2016, ‘Treatment of the Man: Galen’s Preventive Medicine in the De Sanitate Tuenda’, in Petridou, G. and Thumiger, C. (eds.), Homo Patiens—Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World, Leiden, 413–431.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2007, ‘Galen and Athenaeus in the Hellenistic Library’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Organizing Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge, 69–87.Google Scholar
Wood, A. M., Joseph, S. and Linley, S. P. A., 2007, ‘Gratitude: The Parent of All Virtues’, The Psychologist 20, 18–21.Google Scholar
Wray, D. 2015, ‘Seneca’s Shame’, in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge, 199–211.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. 2016a, Ethical Education in Plutarch: Moralising Agents and Contexts, Berlin.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. 2016b, ‘Casting Light on the Connection between Pseudo-Plutarch’s On the Education of Children and Galen’s Exhortation to the Study of Medicine’, Latomus 75, 71–77.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. 2014, ‘Psychotherapy and Moralising Rhetoric in Galen’s Newly Discovered Avoiding Distress (Peri Alypias)’, Medical History 58.4, 585–603.Google Scholar
/Xenophontos, S. 2013, ‘Imagery and Education in Plutarch’, Classical Philology 108.2, 126–138.Google Scholar
/Xenophontos, S. 2012, ‘Plutarch’s Compositional Technique in the An Seni Respublica Gerenda Sit: Clusters vs. Patterns’, American Journal of Philology 113.2, 61–91.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, S. 2010, ‘The Complementarity of Plutarch’s Πῶς δεῖ τὸν νέον ποιημάτων ἀκούειν and Περὶ τοῦ ἀκούειν. Two educational ‘sessions’ (re)visited’, Rosetta 8.5, 164–185.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. 1951, ‘Plutarchos von Chaironeia’, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 41, 636–962.Google Scholar
Zigon, J. 2007, ‘Moral Breakdown and the Ethical Demand: A Theoretical Framework for an Anthropology of Moralities’, Anthropological Theory 7.2, 131–150.Google Scholar
Zonta, M. 1995, Un interprete ebreo della filosofia di Galeno: gli scritti filosofici di Galeno nell’opera di Shem Tob ibn Falaquera, Torino.Google Scholar
Zurcher, L. A. 1982, ‘The Staging of Emotion: A Dramaturgical Analysis’, Symbolic Interaction 5.1, 1–22.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access