Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:25:16.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Stretching and folding diagnostics in solutions three-dimensional Euler and Navier–Stokes equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

By
J.D. Gibbon  and
D.D. Holm
Edited by
James C. Robinson ,
José L. Rodrigo  and
Witold Sadowski
J.D. Gibbon
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
D.D. Holm
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
James C. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
José L. Rodrigo
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Witold Sadowski
Affiliation:
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Poland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Mathematical Aspects of Fluid Mechanics , pp. 201 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashurst, W. & Meiron, D. (1987) Numerical study of vortex reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1632–1635.Google Scholar
Bardos, C. & Benachour, S. (1977) Domaine d'analyticité des solutions de l'équation d'Euler dans un ouvert de ℝn. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. IV Ser. 4, 647–687.Google Scholar
Bardos, C. & Titi, E.S. (2007) Euler equations of incompressible ideal fluids. Russ. Math. Surv. 62:3, 409–451.Google Scholar
Beale, J.T., Kato, T. & Majda, A.J. (1984) Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3D Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 94, 61–66.Google Scholar
Bell, J.B. & Marcus, D.L. (1992) Vorticity intensification and transition to turbulence in the three-dimensional Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 147, 371–394.Google Scholar
Boratav, O.N. & Pelz, R.B. (1994) Direct numerical simulation of transition to turbulence from a high-symmetry initial condition. Phys. Fluids 6, 2757–2784.Google Scholar
Boratav, O.N. & Pelz, R.B. (1995) On the local topology evolution of a highsymmetry flow. Phys. Fluids 7, 1712–1731.Google Scholar
Brachet, M.E., Meiron, D.I., Orszag, S.A., Nickel, B.G., Morf, R.H., & Frisch, U. (1983) Small-scale structure of the Taylor–Green vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 411–452.Google Scholar
Brachet, M.E., Meneguzzi, V., Vincent, A., Politano, H., & Sulem, P.-L. (1992) Numerical evidence of smooth self-similar dynamics and the possibility of subsequent collapse for ideal flows. Phys. Fluids 4A, 2845–2854.Google Scholar
Brenier, Y. (1999) Minimal geodesics on groups of volume-preserving maps and generalized solutions of the Euler equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52, 411–452.Google Scholar
Brenier, Y., De Lellis, C., & Székelyhidi, L. (2011) Weak-strong uniqueness for measure-valued solutions. Comm. Math. Phys. 305, 351–361.Google Scholar
Bustamante, M.D. & Kerr, R.M. (2008) 3D Euler about a 2D Symmetry Plane. In Proceedings of “Euler Equations 250 years on” (Aussois, June 2007), special issue of PhysicaD 237, 1912–1920.Google Scholar
Cabana, M., Fortuné, V., & Jordan, P. (2008) Identifying the radiating core of Lighthill's source term. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 22, 87–106.Google Scholar
Chae, D. (2003) Remarks on the blow-up of the Euler equations and the related equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 245, 539–550.Google Scholar
Chae, D. (2004) Local Existence and Blow-up Criterion for the Euler Equations in the Besov Spaces. Asymptotic Analysis 38, 339–358.Google Scholar
Chae, D. (2005) Remarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations. Nonlinearity 18, 1021–1029.Google Scholar
Chae, D. (2007) On the finite time singularities of the 3D incompressible Euler equations. Comm. Pure App. Math. 60, 597–617.Google Scholar
Chorin, A.J. (1982) The evolution of a turbulent vortex. Comm. Math. Phys. 83, 517–535.Google Scholar
Cichowlas, C. & Brachet, M.-E. (2005) Evolution of complex singularities in Kida–Pelz and Taylor–Green inviscid flows. Fluid Dyn. Res. 36, 239–248.Google Scholar
Constantin, P. (2008) Singular, weak and absent: Solutions of the Euler equations. In Proceedings of “Euler Equations 250 years on” (Aussois, June 2007), special issue of PhysicaD 237, 1926–1931.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Majda, A.J., & Tabak, E. (1994) Formation of strong fronts in the 2D thermal active scalar. Nonlinearity 7, 1495–1533.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Fefferman, C., & Majda, A.J. (1996) Geometric constraints on potentially singular solutions for the 3D Euler equationComm. Partial Diff. Equns. 21, 559–571.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Nie, Q., & Schorghofer, N. (1998) Nonsingular Surface Quasi-Geostrophic flows. Phys. Lett.A 24, 168–172.Google Scholar
Córdoba, D. (1998) Nonexistence of simple hyperbolic blow-up for the quasigeostrophic equation. Ann. Math. 148, 1135–1152.Google Scholar
Córdoba, D. & Fefferman, C. (2001) Growth of solutions for QG and 2D Euler equations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 665–670.Google Scholar
Córdoba, D., Fefferman, C., & Rodrigo, J. (2004) Almost sharp fronts for the surface quasi-geostrophic equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(9), 2687–2691.Google Scholar
Deng, J., Hou, T.Y., & Yu, X. (2005) Geometric Properties and Non-blowup of 3D Incompressible Euler Flow. Commun. Partial Diff. Equns. 30, 225–243.Google Scholar
Deng, J., Hou, T.Y., & Yu, X. (2006) Improved geometric condition for nonblowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equation. Commun. Partial Diff. Equns. 31, 293–306.Google Scholar
De Lellis, C. & Székelyhidi, L. (2009) The Euler equations as a differential inclusion. Ann. of Math. 170, 1417–1436.Google Scholar
De Lellis, C. & Székelyhidi, L. (2010) On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 195, 225–260.Google Scholar
Ertel, H. (1942) Ein Neuer Hydrodynamischer Wirbelsatz. Met. Z. 59, 271–281.Google Scholar
Gibbon, J.D. (2008) The three dimensional Euler equations: how much do we know? In Proceedings of “Euler Equations 250 years on” (Aussois, June 2007), special issue of PhysicaD 237, 1894–1904.Google Scholar
Gibbon, J.D. & Holm, D.D. (2010) The dynamics of the gradient of potential vorticity. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 172001–8.Google Scholar
Grafke, T., Homann, H., Dreher, J., & Grauer, R. (2008) Numerical simulations of possible finite time singularities in the incompressible Euler equations: comparison of numerical methods. In Proceedings of “Euler Equations 250 years on” (Aussois, June 2007), special issue of PhysicaD 237, 1932–1936.Google Scholar
Grauer, R. & Sideris, T. (1991) Numerical computation of 3D incompressible ideal fluids with swirl. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3511–3514.Google Scholar
Grauer, R., Marliani, C., & Germaschewski, K. (1998) Adaptive mesh refinement for singular solutions of the incompressible Euler equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4177–4180.Google Scholar
Gulak, Y. & Pelz, R.B. (2005) High-symmetry Kida flow: Time series analysis and resummation. Fluid Dyn. Res. 36, 211–220.Google Scholar
Hamman, C.W., Klewick, J.C., & Kirby, R.M. (2008) On the Lamb vector divergence in Navier–Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 610, 261–284.
Haynes, P. & McIntyre, M.E. (1987) On the evolution of vorticity and potential vorticity in the presence of diabatic heating and frictional or other forces. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 828–841.Google Scholar
Herring, J.K., Kerr, R.M., & Rotunno, R. (1994) Ertel's PV in stratified turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 35–47.Google Scholar
Holm, D.D. & Kupershmidt, B. (1983) Poisson brackets and Clebsch representations for magnetohydrodynamics, multi-fluid plasmas, and elasticity. PhysicaD 6, 347–363.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B.J., McIntyre, M.E., & Robertson, A.W. (1985) On the use & significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 111, 877–946.Google Scholar
Hou, T.Y. & Li, R. (2006) Dynamic depletion of vortex stretching and nonblowup of the 3-D incompressible Euler equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. 16, 639–664.Google Scholar
Hou, T.Y. & Li, R. (2008) Blowup or No Blowup? The Interplay between Theory and Numerics. In Proceedings of “Euler Equations 250 years on” (Aussois, June 2007), special issue of PhysicaD 237, 1937–1944.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.M. (1993) Evidence for a singularity of the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations. Phys. FluidsA 5, 1725–1746.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.M. (2005a) Velocity and scaling of collapsing Euler vortices. Phys. FluidsA 17, 075103.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.M. (2005b) Vortex collapse. Fluid Dyn. Res. 36, 249–260.Google Scholar
Kida, S. (1985) Three-Dimensional periodic flows with high-symmetry. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 2132–2136.Google Scholar
Kozono, H. & Taniuchi, Y. (2000) Limiting case of the Sobolev inequality in BMO, with applications to the Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 214, 191–200.Google Scholar
Kurgansky, M.V. & Pisnichenko, I.A. (2000) Modified Ertel's Potential Vorticity as a Climate Variable. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 822–835.Google Scholar
Kurgansky, M.V. & Tatarskaya, M.S. (1987) The potential vorticity concept in meteorology: A review. Izvestiya - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 23, 587–606.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, E. & Zakharov, V.E. (1997) Hamiltonian formalism for nonlinear waves. Phys. Uspekhi 40, 1087–1116.Google Scholar
Lipnikov, K., Shashkov, M., & Yotov, I. (2009) Local flux mimetic finite difference methods, Numer. Math. 112, 115–152.Google Scholar
Majda, A.J. & Bertozzi, A.L. (2001) Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Marmanis, H. (1998) Analogy between the Navier–Stokes equations and Maxwell's equations: Application to turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10, 1428–1437.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H.K. (1978) Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Morf, R.H., Orszag, S.A., & Frisch, U. (1980) Spontaneous singularity in threedimensional, inviscid incompressible flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 572–575.Google Scholar
Ohkitani, K. (1993) Eigenvalues problems in three-dimensional Euler flows. Phys. FluidsA 5, 2570–2572.Google Scholar
Ohkitani, K. (2008) A geometrical study of 3D incompressible Euler flows with Clebsch potentials – a long-lived Euler flow and its power-law energy spectrum. PhysicaD 237, 2020–2027.Google Scholar
Ohkitani, K. & Yamada, M. (1997) Inviscid and inviscid-limit behaviour of a surface quasi-geostrophic flow. Phys. Fluids 9, 876–882.Google Scholar
Orlandi, P. & Carnevale, G. (2007) Nonlinear amplification of vorticity in inviscid interaction of orthogonal Lamb dipoles. Phys. Fluids 19, 057106.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. (1988) Analogues of potential vorticity in electrically conducting fluids. Geo. Astro. Fluid Dyn. 40, 133–145.Google Scholar
Pauls, W., Matsumoto, T., Frisch, U., & Bec, J. (2006) Nature of complex singularities for the two-dimensional Euler equation. PhysicaD 219, 40–59.Google Scholar
Pelz, R.B. (1997) Locally self-similar, finite-time collapse in a high-symmetry vortex filament model. Phys. Rev.E 55, 1617–1626.Google Scholar
Pelz, R.B. (2001) Symmetry and the hydrodynamic blow-up problem. J. Fluid Mech. 444, 299–320.
Pelz, R.B. & Gulak, Y. (1997) Evidence for a real-time singularity in hydrodynamics from time series analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4998–5001.Google Scholar
Pelz, R.B. & Ohkitani, K. (2005) Linearly strained flows with and without boundaries – the regularizing effect of the pressure term. Fluid Dyn. Res. 36, 193–210.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Kerr, R.M. (1987) Numerical simulation of interacting vortex tubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1636–1639.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Siggia, E. (1990) Collapsing solutions to the 3D Euler equations. Phys. FluidsA 2, 220–241.Google Scholar
Rodrigo, J.L. (2005) On the evolution of sharp fronts for the quasi-geostrophic equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58, no. 6, 821–866.Google Scholar
Rousseaux, G., Seifer, S., Steinberg, V., & Wiebel, A. (2007) On the Lamb vector and the hydrodynamic charge. Exps. Fluids 42, 291–299.Google Scholar
Shnirelman, A. (1997) On the non-uniqueness of weak solution of the Euler equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 50, 1260–1286.Google Scholar
Siggia, E.D. (1984) Collapse and amplification of a vortex filament. Phys. Fluids 28, 794–805.Google Scholar
Sposito, G. (1997) On steady flows with Lamb surfaces. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 35, 197–209.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C., & Toupin, R A. (1960) Classical Field Theories. In Flugge, S. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Physics III/1. Springer, Berlin.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×