Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:39:14.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Non-biomedical applications of materiomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

By
Carson Meredith ,
Sangil Han ,
Ismael Gomez ,
Johannes Leisen  and
Haskell Beckham
Edited by
Jan de Boer  and
Clemens A. van Blitterswijk
Jan de Boer
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Clemens A. van Blitterswijk
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Scope

Materiomics approaches may be applied broadly in the design and characterization of a wide range of materials, going beyond the biomedical focus. This chapter presents essential concepts relevant to the implementation of materiomics to physical and chemical properties not usually associated with biomedical materials. Recent progress in this area is reviewed briefly with several examples given in high-throughput measurement of organic and inorganic materials properties. The applications that are covered range from speciality coatings to membranes for fuel cells and metal–organic framework materials for carbon capture. Properties treated here include mechanical, spectroscopic and transport characteristics.

Tutorial on basic principles

Materials complexity

While previous chapters have focused on the application of materiomics concepts to biomedical materials, this chapter will emphasize how and why materiomics is being employed in materials research and development beyond the biomaterials field. The central challenge inherent to materials research and development is that most products consist of multiple components whose final properties are usually a sensitive function of composition and processing conditions. The complex interactions make it difficult, if not impossible, to design products a priori without significant experimentation. Academicians are often interested in characterizing fundamental phenomena, such as phase transitions or magnetization, and discovering how these phenomena can be used to develop novel materials functionalities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Materiomics
High-Throughput Screening of Biomaterial Properties
 , pp. 177 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beers, KL, Douglas, JF, Amis, EJ et al. Combinatorial measurements of crystallization growth rate and morphology in thin films of isotactic polystyrene. Langmuir. 2003;19:3935–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briceno, G, Chang, H, Sun, XD et al. A class of cobalt oxide magnetoresistance materials discovered with combinatorial synthesis. Science. 1995;270:273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocchini, S, James, K, Tangpasuthadol, V et al. A combinatorial approach to polymer design. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:4553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, TA, Walt, DR, White, J et al. Generating sensor diversity through combinatorial polymer synthesis. Analyt Chem. 1997;69:3413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanak, JJ. The ‘multiple-sample concept’ in materials research: synthesis, compositional analysis and testing of entire multicomponent systems. J Mater Sci. 1970;5:964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, K, Stefansky, T, Davy, G et al. Rapid method for determining ternary-alloy phase diagrams. J Appl Phys. 1965;36:3808–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J, Lehmann, CW, Schmidt, HW et al. Combinatorial material libraries on the microgram scale with an example of hydrothermal synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:3369.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Karim, A, Amis, et al. High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules. 2000;33:5760–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Smith, AP, Karim, A et al. Combinatorial materials science: thin-film dewetting. Macromolecules. 2000;33(26):9747–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, X-D, Sun, X, Briceno, G et al. A combinatorial approach to materials discovery. Science. 1995;268:1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AP, Douglas, J, Meredith, JC, Karim, A, Amis, EJ. Combinatorial study of surface pattern formation in thin block copolymer films. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:15503–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Yoo, Y, Gao, C et al. Identification of a blue photoluminescent composite material from a combinatorial library. Science. 1998;279:1712–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, RD, Lyon, RE, Takemori, MT, Eidelman, N. High throughput techniques for fire resistant materials development. In: Wilkie, CA, Morgan, AB, eds. Fire Retardency of Polymeric Materials. CRC Press; 2010. p. 421–51.
Lewis, GJ, Sachtler, JWA, Lowa, JJ et al. High throughput screening of the ternary LiNH2–MgH2–LiBH4 phase diagram. J Alloys Compounds. 2007;446–447:355–9.Google Scholar
Guerin, S, Hayden, BE, Lee, CE, Mormiche, C, Russell, AE. High throughput synthesis and screening of ternary metal alloys for electrocatalysis. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:14355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, ADW, Mar, RE, Dahn, JR. Combinatorial study of tin-transition metal alloys as negative electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc. 2006;153:A1998–A2005.Google Scholar
Potyrailo, RA, Chisholm, BJ, Olson, DR, Brennan, MJ, Molaison, CA. Development of combinatorial chemistry methods for coatings: high-throughput screening of abrasion resistance of coatings libraries. Analyt Chem. 2002;74:5105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerns, M, Holeňa, M. Combinatorial Development of Solid Catalytic Materials. Imperial College Press; 2009.
Keep, A, Ellis, S, Ball, S. Combinatorial and high-throughput discovery and optimization of catalysts and materials. Platinum Metals Rev. 2007;51:204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyler, M, Stoewe, K, Maier, WF. New hydrogen-producing photocatalysts – a combinatorial search. Appl Catal B Envir. 2007;76(1–2):146–57.Google Scholar
Potyrailo, R, Rajan, K, Stoewe, K et al. Combinatorial and high-throughput screening of materials libraries: review of state of the art. ACS Combinat Sci. 2011;13(6):579–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jandeleit, B, Schaefer, DJ, Powers, TS, Turner, HW, Weinberg, WH. Combinatorial materials science and catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:2494–532.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC. A current perspective on high-throughput polymer science. J Mater Sci. 2003;38(22):4427–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawse, JN, ed. Experimental Design for Combinatorial and High-throughput Materials Development. Wiley-Interscience; 2003.
Potyrailo, RA. Sensors in combinatorial polymer research. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2004; 25(1):78–94.Google Scholar
Hagemeyer, A, Strasser, P, Volpe, AF, eds. High-throughput Screening in Chemical Catalysis. Wiley-VCH; 2004.
Amis, EJ. Reaching beyond discovery. Nat Mater. 2004;3(2):83–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, MAR, Hoogenboom, R, Schubert, US. Combinatorial methods, automated synthesis and high-throughput screening in polymer research: The evolution continues. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2004;25(1):21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, MAR, Schubert, US. Combinatorial polymer research and high-throughput experimentation: powerful tools for the discovery and evaluation of new materials. J Mater Chem. 2004;14(22):3289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HQ, Hoogenboom, R, Meier, MAR, Schubert, US. Combinatorial and high-throughput approaches in polymer science. Measure Sci Technol. 2005;16(1):203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, MAR, Schubert, US. Selected successful approaches in combinatorial materials research. Soft Matter. 2006;2(5):371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, DC, Chisholm, BJ, Stafslien, SJ. Mini-review: Combinatorial approaches for the design of novel coating systems. Biofouling. 2007; 23(3):179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, N, Schubert, US. Software solutions for combinatorial and high-throughput materials and polymer research. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2004;25(1):48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muster, TH, Trinchi, A, Markley, TA et al. A review of high-throughput and combinatorial electrochemistry. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56(27):9679–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, K, Stefansky, T, Davy, G, Zackay, VF, Parker, ER. Rapid method for determining ternary-alloy phase diagrams. J Appl Phys. 1965;36:3808–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanak, JJ. The ‘multiple-sample concept’ in materials research: synthesis, compositional analysis and testing of entire multicomponent systems. J Mater Sci. 1970;5:964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, SPA, Read, JL, Pirrung, MC et al. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science. 1991;251:767–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, X-D, Sun, X, Briceno, G et al. A combinatorial approach to materials discovery. Science. 1995;268:1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordkovich, VZ, Jin, Z, Yamadab, Y et al. Fabrication and characterization of thin-film phosphor combinatorial libraries. Solid State Sci. 2002;4:779–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Großhans, I, Karl, H, Stritzker, B. Advanced apparatus for combinatorial synthesis of buried II / VI nanocrystals by ion implantation. Mater Sci Eng. 2003;B101:212–15.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, I, van Dover, RB, Koinuma, H. Combinatorial synthesis and evaluation of functional inorganic materials using thin-film techniques. MRS Bull. 2002;27:301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasolka, MJ, Stafford, CM, Beers, KL. Gradient and microfluidic library approaches to polymer interfaces. In: Meier, MAR, Webster, DC, eds. Polymer Libraries 2010. Springer; 2010. p. 63–105.
van den Berg, AMJ, Smith, PJ, Perelaer, J et al. Inkjet printing of polyurethane colloidal suspensions. Soft Matter. 2007;3(2):238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, KW, Jeon, MK, Oh, KS et al. Combinatorial approach for ferroelectric material libraries prepared by liquid source misted chemical deposition method. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(4):1134–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genzer, J, Bhat, RR. Surface-bound soft matter gradients. Langmuir. 2008;24:2294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Karim, A, Amis, EJ. High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules. 2000;33:5760–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Karim, A, Amis, EJ. Combinatorial and high-throughput methods in polymer science. MRS Bull. 2002;27(4):330–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Smith, AP, Karim, A, Amis, EJ. Combinatorial materials science: thin-film dewetting. Macromolecules. 2000; 33(26):9747–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, I, Basak, P, Meredith, JC. Polymer thickness and composition gradients. In: Genzer, J, ed. Soft Matter Gradient Surfaces: Methods and Applications. Wiley; 2012.
Gallant, ND, Lavery, KA, Amis, EJ, Becker, ML. Universal gradient substrates for ‘click’ biofunctionalization. Adv Mater. 2007;19(7):965-+.Google Scholar
Gershon, AL, Kota, AK, Bruck, HA. Characterization of quasi-static mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites using a new combinatorial approach. J Compos Mater. 2009;43(22):2587–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, M, Parkinson, BA. Combinatorial approaches for the identification and optimization of oxide semiconductors for efficient solar photoelectrolysis. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(1):197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinar, J, Shinar, R, Zhou, Z. Combinatorial fabrication and screening of organic light-emitting device arrays. Appl Surface Sci. 2007;254:749–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayaraman, S, Hillier, AC. Electrochemical synthesis and reactivity screening of a ternary composition gradient for combinatorial discovery of fuel cell catalysts. Measure Sci Technol. 2005;16(1):5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapata, P, Mountz, D, Meredith, JC. High-throughput characterization of novel pvdf/acrylic polyelectrolyte semi-interpenetrated network proton exchange membranes. Macromolecules. 2012;43:7625–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sormana, JL, Chattopadhyay, S, Meredith, JC. High-throughput mechanical characterization of free-standing polymer films. Rev Sci Instrum. 2005;76(6):062214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sormana, J-L, Meredith, JC. High-throughput dynamic impact characterization of polymer films. Mater Res Innov. 2003;7(5):295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sormana, J-L, Meredith, JC. High-throughput screening of mechanical properties on temperature gradient polyurethaneurea libraries. Macromol Rapid Comm. 2003;24:118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajduk, D. Combinatorial polymer characterization. Abstr PAP ACS. 2001;222:338-POLY Part 2.Google Scholar
Tweedie, CA, Anderson, DG, Langer, R, Van Vliet, KJ. Combinatorial material mechanics: High-throughput polymer synthesis and nanomechanical screening. Adv Mater. 2005;17(21):2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potyrailo, RA, Wroczynski, RJ, Lemmon, JP, Flanagan, WP, Siclovan, OP. Fluorescence spectroscopy and multivariate spectral descriptor analysis for high-throughput multiparameter optimization of polymerization conditions of combinatorial 96-microreactor arrays. J Comb Chem. 2003;5(1):8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, C, Lilge, D, Kristen, MO. Automated raman spectroscopy as a tool for the high-throughput characterization of molecular structure and mechanical properties of polyethylenes. Macromol Rapid Comm. 2003;24:109–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidelman, N, Simon, CG. Characterization of combinatorial polymer blend composition gradients by FTIR microspectroscopy. J Res of Nat Inst Standards Technol. 2004;109(2):219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potyrailo, RA, Wroczynski, RJ, Lemmon, JP, Flanagan, WP, Siclovan, OP. Fluorescence spectroscopy and multivariate spectral descriptor analysis for high-throughput multiparameter optimization of polymerization conditions of combinatorial 96-microreactor arrays. J Combinat Chem. 2003;5(1):8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, ED, Marcus, M, Aeppli, G et al. Synchrotron X-ray microbeam diagnostics of combinatorial synthesis. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;73(13):1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisen, J, Gomez, I, Roper, J, Meredith, JC, Beckham, H. Spatially resolved solid-state 1H NMR for evaluation of gradient-composition polymeric materials. ACS Combinat Sci. 2012;14:415–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, S, Huang, Y, Watanabe, T et al. High-throughput screening of MOFs for CO2 separation. ACS Combinat Sci. 2012;14:263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollmann, P, Leistner, M, Stoeck, U et al. High-throughput screening: speeding up porous materials discovery. Chem Commun. 2011;47:5151–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, S, Suh, C, Nowers, J et al. Informatics for combinatorial materials science. JOM J Min Metals Mater Soc. 2008;60(3):56–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kholodovych, V, Smith, J, Knight, D et al. Accurate predictions of cellular response using QSPR: a feasibility test of rational design of polymeric biomaterials. Polymer. 2004;45:7367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, N. Polymer Informatics. In: Meier, MAR, Webster, DC, eds. Polymer Libraries 2010. Springer; 2010. p. 107–49.
Moloshok, TD, Klevecz, RR, Grant, JD et al. Application of Bayesian decomposition for analysing microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(4):566–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Fasolka, M, Karim, A, Amis, E. An informatics infrastructure for combinatorial and high-throughput materials research built on open source code. Measure Sci Technol. 2005;1:261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, C, Sieg, SC, Heying, MJ et al. Visualization of high-dimensional combinatorial catalysis data. J Combinat Chem. 2009;11:385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, I, Lippmaa, M, Matsumoto, Y. Combinatorial experimentation and materials informatics. MRS Bull. 2006;31:999–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubinyi, H. QSAR and 3D QSAR in drug design. Part 1: Methodology. Drug Discovery Today. 1997;2(11):457–67.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×